Effect of Serelys Homme on the Incidence and Severity of Vasomotor Symptoms and Quality-of-Life Impairments in Patients Receiving Hormone Therapy and Radiation for Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of the ESCULAPE Phase 2 Prospective Study.

Purpose: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may cause vasomotor symptoms (VMS) including hot flushes and sweats, which affect quality of life (QoL). Serelys Homme is a nonhormonal and a natural origin product that could affect VMS in men undergoing ADT. We evaluated effectiveness and tolerance of Serelys Homme administration on VMS and QoL of patients undergoing combined ADT and radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Between April 2017 and July 2019, 103 patients were screened, and 53 patients refused to participate in the study. Serelys Homme therapy consisted of a daily administration of 2 tablets for 6 months. Patients were evaluated with 4 questionnaires including the adapted Modified Rankin Scale (adapted-MRS), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ 5D3L), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), and Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) at day 0, day 90 (D90), and day 180 (D180). Statistical evaluation was performed using the Wilcoxon rank sign test. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 50 patients, 4 withdrew after inclusion. All patients (n = 46) received either postoperative or definitive radiation therapy combined with a short (n = 15) or long course (n = 31) of ADT. Serelys Homme administration significantly decreased the rate of patients who had ≥7 VMS and 3 to 6 VMS per day. The number of patients presenting with moderate or severe VMS was decreased at D90 (P = .005) and at D180 (P = .005). In addition, VMS duration was reduced at D90 (P = .002) and D180 (P < .001). Finally, at D90 and D180, 11.1% and 16.0% of patients, respectively, with initial severe or moderate VMS had a complete response without further symptoms. Among QoL parameters, fatigue decreased significantly. Effectiveness evaluated by doctors was rated as moderate or good to excellent VMS control in 20% and 60% of the patients, respectively. No side effects were recorded in the whole population. Conclusions: This study demonstrated effectiveness and excellent tolerance of Serelys Homme. We observed a significant reduction of the frequency, duration, and intensity of hot flushes and sweats induced by ADT. Serelys Homme increased QoL scores. These encouraging results open the prospect to further studies and Serelys Homme use in patients undergoing ADT for prostate cancer.

Interaction between Radiation Therapy and Targeted Therapies in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Literature Review, Levels of Evidence for Safety and Recommendations for Optimal Treatment Sequence.

Purpose: Over the past twenty years, anti-HER2 targeted therapies have proven to be a revolution in the management of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers. Anti-HER2 therapies administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy have been specifically studied. Unfortunately, the safety of anti-HER2 therapies in combination with radiation remains largely unknown. Thus, we propose a literature review of the risks and safety of combining radiotherapy with anti-HER2 therapies. We will focus on the benefit/risk rationale and try to understand the risk of toxicity in early-stage and advanced breast cancer. Methods: Research was carried out on the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrial.gov, Medline, and Web of Science for the terms "radiotherapy", "radiation therapy", "radiosurgery", "local ablative therapy", and "stereotactic", combined with "trastuzumab", "pertuzumab", "trastuzumab emtansine", "TDM-1", "T-Dxd", "trastuzumab deruxtecan", "tucatinib", "lapatinib", "immune checkpoint inhibitors", "atezolizumab", "pembrolizumab", "nivolumab", "E75 vaccine", "interferon", "anti-IL-2", "anti-IL 12", and "ADC". Results: Association of radiation and monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab (with limited data) seems to be safe, with no excess risk of toxicity. Preliminary data with radiation and of antibody-drug conjugate of trastuzumab combined cytotoxic (trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan), given the underlying mechanism of action, suggest that one must be particularly cautious with the association. The safety of the combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib, tucatinib) and radiation remains under-studied. The available evidence suggests that checkpoint inhibitors can be safely administrated with radiation. Conclusions: HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies and checkpoint inhibitors can be combined with radiation, apparently with no excess toxicities. Caution is required when associating radiation with TKI and antibody drugs, considering the limited evidence.

Effect of lethal total body irradiation on bone marrow chimerism, acute graft-versus-host disease, and tumor engraftment in mouse models: impact of different radiation techniques using low- and high-energy X-rays.

PURPOSE: Effects of X­ray energy levels used for myeloablative lethal total body irradiation (TBI) delivery prior to bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in preclinical mouse models were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In mouse models, single-fraction myeloablative TBI at a lethal dose was delivered using two different X­ray devices, either low (160 kV cabinet irradiator) or high energy (6 MV linear accelerator), before semi-allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) to ensure bone marrow (BM) chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and tumor engraftment. Recipient mice were clinically followed for 80 days after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Flow cytometry was performed to assess donor chimerism and tumor engraftment in recipient mice. RESULTS: Both X­ray irradiation techniques delivered a 10 Gy single fraction of TBI, presented a lethal effect, and could allow near-complete early donor chimerism on day 13. However, low-energy irradiation increased T cells' alloreactivity compared to high-energy irradiation, leading to clinical consequences for GVHD and tumor engraftment outcomes. The alloreactive effect differences might be attributed to the distinction in inflammatory status of irradiated recipients at donor cell infusion (D0). Delaying donor cell administration (D1 after lethal TBI) attenuated T cells' alloreactivity and clinical outcomes in GVHD mouse models. CONCLUSION: Different X­ray irradiation modalities condition T cell alloreactivity in experimental semi-allogeneic BMT. Low-energy X­ray irradiator induces a post-TBI inflammatory burst and exacerbates alloreactive reactions. This technical and biological information should be considered in interpreting GVHD/ graft-versus-leukemia effect results in mice experimental models of BMT.

Genomic Prostate Score: A New Tool to Assess Prognosis and Optimize Radiation Therapy Volumes and ADT in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Genomic classifiers such as the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) could help to personalize treatment for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (I-PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the GPS to change therapeutic decision making in I-PCa. Only patients in the intermediate NCCN risk group with Gleason score 3 + 4 were considered. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the GPS on risk stratification: NCCN clinical and genomic risk versus NCCN clinical risk stratification alone. We also analyzed the predictive role of the GPS for locally advanced disease (≥pT3+) and the potential change in treatment strategy. Thirty patients were tested for their GPS between November 2018 and March 2020, with the median age being 70 (45-79). Twenty-three patients had a clinical T1 stage. Eighteen patients were classified as favorable intermediate risk (FIR) based on the NCCN criteria. The median GPS score was 39 (17-70). Among the 23 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy, Gleason score 3 + 4 was found in 18 patients. There was a significant correlation between the GPS and the percentage of a Gleason grade 4 or higher pattern in the surgical sample: correlation coefficient r = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8; p = 0.005. In this study, the GPS combined with NCCN clinical risk factors resulted in significant changes in risk group.

Outcomes and Side Effects of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Upper Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The benefit of neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy for locally advanced upper rectal tumors remains controversial. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with stage II or-III upper rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision in our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2004 to October 2019, all patients with stage II or III upper rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision were identified from our database. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and local recurrence were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late treatment-related toxicities were recorded according to the CTCAE-5 version. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 106 patients. Respectively, 36% and 61% of patients had stage II and stage III upper rectal cancer. The median follow-up period was 4.4 ± 3.4 years. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival were respectively 78% [95% confidence interval (CI)=69.2-88] and 76.8% (95%CI=68.4-86.2). The rate of local recurrence at 5 years was 3.78% (95%CI=0-7.98). Forty-two percent of patients presented early toxicities and 27.4% of patients experienced early surgical complications. Late toxicities and surgical complications occurred in 24.5% and 9.4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision of stage II-III upper rectal cancer is effective and safe.

Curative intent Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) for treatment of lung oligometastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): a multi-institutional retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess outcomes of SABR for metachronous isolated lung oligometastases from HNSCC. METHODS: For patients who developed isolated, 1 or 2 lungs lesions (<5cm) consistent with metastases from HNSCC, the indication of SABR was validated in a multidisciplinary tumor board. All patients were monitored by CT or PET CT after SABR (Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation) for HNSCC. RESULTS: Between November 2007 and February 2018, 52 patients were treated with SABR for metachronous lung metastases. The median time from the treatment of the primary HNSCC to the development of lung metastases was 18 months (3-93). The cohort's median age was 65.5 years old (50-83). The vast majority (94.2%) received 60 Gy in three fractions. Forty-one patients (78.5%) presented a solitary lung metastasis, while 11 patients (21.5%) had two lung metastases. With a median follow-up of 45.3 months, crude local and metastatic control rates were 74 and 38%, respectively. 1 year and 2 year Overall Survival (OS) were 85.8 and 65.9%, respectively. The median OS was 46.8 months. About one-fourth of patients were retreated by SABR for distant pulmonary recurrence. The treatment was well tolerated with only one patient who reported ≥ grade 3 toxicity (1.9%). CONCLUSION: In selected metastatic HNSCC patients, early detection and treatment of lung metastases with SABR is effective and safe. Prospective studies are required to validate this potential shift. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Patients with oligometastases and controlled primary HNSCC seem to benefit from metastasis directed therapies.

Radiation Therapy Delivery Challenges in Older Patients During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: The management of older patients in radiation therapy (RT) departments has been challenging in the context of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. We report our experience of RT adapted schedules or strategy changes in older patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients aged ≥75 years were recruited during weekly chart rounds. All were potentially eligible for a specific intervention to reduce the frequency of patients' visits to the hospital. The effect of deferring radiation and hypofractionation of RT schedules was assessed in terms of the number of courses initially planned and replanned during the lockdown. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified during the official lockdown in France (March 17 to May 11). Median age was 78 years (75-95 years). Most patients were male (n = 12, 60%) being treated in the postoperative setting (n = 17, 85%). RT was delayed in 11 cases (55%) with hormonal therapy prescribed in 10 cases (50%). Altered RT fractionation was proposed for 5 cases (25%); combinations of altered fractionation and deferral of radiation were applied in 3 cases (15%). The number of radiation courses initially planned and replanned according to the pandemic context: 563 and 197, respectively (-62%; P < .001). None presented recurrence when RT was initiated, and no patient developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of the COVID-19 outbreak, individual risk-based radiation therapy seems to be safe. Systematic screening of patients for COVID-19 before starting radiation therapy is mandatory. In our department the oncogeriatrics expertise availability for daily practice was of great use during the pandemic. Other prospective studies are needed to validate such strategies in case of resurgence of similar outbreaks.

Radiation Therapy Department Reorganization during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak: Keys to Securing Staff and Patients During the First Weeks of the Crisis and Impact on Radiation Therapy Practice from a Single Institution Experience.

PURPOSE: During the first weeks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in France, it was necessary to clearly define organizational priorities in the radiation therapy (RT) departments. In this report, we focus on the urgent measures taken to reduce risk for both our staff and patients by reducing the number of patients receiving treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the fractionation schemes for all patients in our department, including those receiving treatment and those soon to start treatment. Our goals were to (1) decrease the number of patients coming daily to the hospital for RT, (2) adapt our human resources to continue patients' care in the department, and (3) help to cover understaffed COVID-19 sectors of the hospital. RESULTS: We identified 50 patients who were receiving treatment (n = 6), were going to start radiation after CT scan simulation (n = 41), or for whom the CT scan was pending (n = 3). The majority were women (64%) treated for breast cancer (54%). RT was delayed for 22 (44%) patients. The majority were offered hormone therapy as "waiting therapy." Hypofractionation was considered in 21 (42%) patients mainly with breast cancer (18 of 21, 86%). The number of courses initially planned and replanned as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak during the period of March 15 to May 31, 2020, were 1383 and 683, respectively, which represented a reduction of 50% (including delayed sessions) that allowed our reorganization process. CONCLUSIONS: To conserve resources during the pandemic, we successfully reduced the number of patients receiving treatment in a proactive fashion and adapted our organization to minimize the risk of COVID-19 contamination. Departments across the world may benefit from this same approach.

A review of the international early recommendations for departments organization and cancer management priorities during the global COVID-19 pandemic: applicability in low- and middle-income countries.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a new virus that has never been identified in humans before. COVID-19 caused at the time of writing of this article, 2.5 million cases of infections in 193 countries with 165,000 deaths, including two-third in Europe. In this context, Oncology Departments of the affected countries had to adapt quickly their health system care and establish new organizations and priorities. Thus, numerous recommendations and therapeutic options have been reported to optimize therapy delivery to patients with chronic disease and cancer. Obviously, while these cancer care recommendations are immediately applicable in Europe, they may not be applicable in certain emerging and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this review, we aimed to summarize these international guidelines in accordance with cancer types, making a synthesis for daily practice to protect patients, staff and tailor anti-cancer therapy delivery taking into account patients/tumour criteria and tools availability. Thus, we will discuss their applicability in the LMICs with different organizations, limited means and different constraints.