Coronavirus Receptor Expression Profiles in Human Mast Cells, Basophils, and Eosinophils.

A major problem in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients is the massive tissue inflammation in certain target organs, including the lungs. Mast cells (MC), basophils (BA), and eosinophils (EO) are key effector cells in inflammatory processes. These cells have recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. We explored coronavirus receptor (CoV-R) expression profiles in primary human MC, BA, and EO, and in related cell lines (HMC-1, ROSA, MCPV-1, KU812, and EOL-1). As determined using flow cytometry, primary MC, BA, and EO, and their corresponding cell lines, displayed the CoV-R CD13 and CD147. Primary skin MC and BA, as well as EOL-1 cells, also displayed CD26, whereas primary EO and the MC and BA cell lines failed to express CD26. As assessed using qPCR, most cell lines expressed transcripts for CD13, CD147, and ABL2, whereas ACE2 mRNA was not detectable, and CD26 mRNA was only identified in EOL-1 cells. We also screened for drug effects on CoV-R expression. However, dexamethasone, vitamin D, and hydroxychloroquine did not exert substantial effects on the expression of CD13, CD26, or CD147 in the cells. Together, MC, BA, and EO express distinct CoV-R profiles. Whether these receptors mediate virus-cell interactions and thereby virus-induced inflammation remains unknown at present.

Antineoplastic efficacy profiles of avapritinib and nintedanib in KIT D816V+ systemic mastocytosis: a preclinical study.

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a hematopoietic neoplasm with a complex pathology and a variable clinical course. Clinical symptoms result from organ infiltration by mast cells (MC) and the effects of pro-inflammatory mediators released during MC activation. In SM, growth and survival of MC are triggered by various oncogenic mutant-forms of the tyrosine kinase KIT. The most prevalent variant, D816V, confers resistance against various KIT-targeting drugs, including imatinib. We examined the effects of two novel promising KIT D816V-targeting drugs, avapritinib and nintedanib, on growth, survival, and activation of neoplastic MC and compared their activity profiles with that of midostaurin. Avapritinib was found to suppress growth of HMC-1.1 cells (KIT V560G) and HMC-1.2 cells (KIT V560G + KIT D816V) with comparable IC50 values (0.1-0.25 µM). In addition, avapritinib was found to inhibit the proliferation of ROSAKIT WT cells, (IC50: 0.1-0.25 µM), ROSAKIT D816V cells (IC50: 1-5 µM), and ROSAKIT K509I cells (IC50: 0.1-0.25 µM). Nintedanib exerted even stronger growth-inhibitory effects in these cells (IC50 in HMC-1.1: 0.001-0.01 µM; HMC-1.2: 0.25-0.5 µM; ROSAKIT WT: 0.01-0.1 µM; ROSAKIT D816V: 0.5-1 µM; ROSAKIT K509I: 0.01-0.1 µM). Avapritinib and nintedanib also suppressed the growth of primary neoplastic cells in most patients with SM examined (avapritinib IC50: 0.5-5 µM; nintedanib IC50: 0.1-5 µM). Growth-inhibitory effects of avapritinib and nintedanib were accompanied by signs of apoptosis and decreased surface expression of the transferrin receptor CD71 in neoplastic MC. Finally, we were able to show that avapritinib counteracts IgE-dependent histamine secretion in basophils and MC in patients with SM. These effects of avapritinib may explain the rapid clinical improvement seen during treatment with this KIT inhibitor in patients with SM. In conclusion, avapritinib and nintedanib are new potent inhibitors of growth and survival of neoplastic MC expressing various KIT mutant forms, including D816V, V560G, and K509I, which favors the clinical development and application of these new drugs in advanced SM. Avapritinib is of particular interest as it also blocks mediator secretion in neoplastic MC.

Drug-induced mast cell eradication: A novel approach to treat mast cell activation disorders?

Mast cell (MC) activation is a key event in allergic reactions, other inflammatory states, and MC activation syndromes. MC-stabilizing agents, mediator-targeting drugs, and drugs interfering with mediator effects are often prescribed for these patients. However, the clinical efficacy of these drugs varies depending on the numbers of involved MCs and the underlying pathology. One straightforward approach would be to eradicate the primary target cell. To date however, no MC-eradicating treatment approach has been developed for patients with MC activation disorders. Nevertheless, recent data suggest that long-term treatment with agents effectively inhibiting KIT function results in the virtual eradication of tissue MCs and a sustained decrease in serum tryptase levels. In many of these patients, MC depletion is associated with a substantial improvement in mediator-induced symptoms. In patients with an underlying KIT D816V-positive mastocytosis, such MC eradication requires an effective inhibitor of KIT D816V, such as avapritinib. However, the use of KIT inhibitors must be balanced against their potential side effects. Here we discuss MC-eradicating strategies in various disease models, the feasibility of this approach, available clinical data, and future prospects for the use of KIT-targeting drugs in MC activation disorders.

Identification of CD203c as a New Basophil-Specific Flow-Marker in Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Basophilia is a crucial prognostic variable in Ph-chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The ectoenzyme CD203c is an activation-linked surface antigen that is expressed specifically on basophil-committed progenitor cells and mature basophils. We examined the expression of CD203c on progenitors and/or basophils in 21 healthy donors and 44 patients with CML. As expected, the numbers of CD203c+ blood leukocytes were significantly higher in CML patients compared to controls (percentage of CD203c+ cells among viable cells in CML at diagnosis: 4.19 ± 3.68% vs. controls: 0.53 ± 0.23%, p < 0.05). Moreover, CML basophils expressed higher levels of CD203c compared to normal basophils (median staining-index in CML at diagnosis: 29.41 ± 19.14 versus controls: 20.44 ± 13.45). We also found that the numbers and percentage of circulating CD203c+ cells at diagnosis correlate with the disease-related risk-profile. Incubation of CML basophils with an anti-IgE-antibody resulted in further upregulation of CD203c. After successful treatment with imatinib and/or other BCR::ABL1 inhibitors leading to major or complete molecular responses, the numbers of CD203c+ basophils decreased substantially in our CML patients compared to pre-treatment values. Together, CD203c is overexpressed on CML basophils, is further upregulated by IgE receptor cross-linking, and may serve as a biomarker to quantify basophilia in patients with CML at diagnosis and during therapy.

Efficacy and Synergy of Small Molecule Inhibitors Targeting FLT3-ITD+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Constitutive activation of FLT3 by ITD mutations is one of the most common genetic aberrations in AML, present in ~1/3 of cases. Patients harboring FLT3-ITD display worse clinical outcomes. The integration and advancement of FLT3 TKI in AML treatment provided significant therapeutic improvement. However, due to the emergence of resistance mechanisms, FLT3-ITD+ AML remains a clinical challenge. We performed an unbiased drug screen to identify 18 compounds as particularly efficacious against FLT3-ITD+ AML. Among these, we characterized two investigational compounds, WS6 and ispinesib, and two approved drugs, ponatinib and cabozantinib, in depth. We found that WS6, although not yet investigated in oncology, shows a similar mechanism and potency as ponatinib and cabozantinib. Interestingly, ispinesib and cabozantinib prevent activation of AXL, a key driver and mechanism of drug resistance in FLT3-ITD+ AML patients. We further investigated synergies between the selected compounds and found that combination treatment with ispinesib and cabozantinib or ponatinib shows high synergy in FLT3-ITD+ AML cell lines and patient samples. Together, we suggest WS6, ispinesib, ponatinib and cabozantinib as novel options for targeting FLT3-ITD+ AML. Whether combinatorial tyrosine kinase and kinesin spindle blockade is effective in eradicating neoplastic (stem) cells in FLT3-ITD+ AML remains to be determined in clinical trials.

Asciminib and ponatinib exert synergistic anti-neoplastic effects on CML cells expressing BCR-ABL1 T315I-compound mutations.

Ponatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) directed against BCR-ABL1 which is successfully used in patients with BCR-ABL1 T315I+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, BCR-ABL1 compound mutations may develop during therapy in these patients and may lead to drug resistance. Asciminib is a novel drug capable of targeting most BCR-ABL1 mutant-forms, including BCR-ABL1T315I, but remains ineffective against most BCR-ABL1T315I+ compound mutation-bearing sub-clones. We demonstrate that asciminib synergizes with ponatinib in inducing growth-arrest and apoptosis in patient-derived CML cell lines and murine Ba/F3 cells harboring BCR-ABL1 T315I or T315I-including compound mutations. Asciminib and ponatinib also produced cooperative effects on CRKL phosphorylation in BCR-ABL1-transformed cells. The growth-inhibitory effects of the drug combination 'asciminib+ponatinib' was further enhanced by hydroxyurea (HU), a drug which has lately been described to suppresses the proliferation of BCR-ABL1 T315I+ CML cells. Cooperative drug effects were also observed in patient-derived CML cells. Most importantly, we were able to show that the combinations 'asciminib+ponatinib' and 'asciminib+ponatinib+HU' produce synergistic apoptosis-inducing effects in CD34+/CD38- CML stem cells obtained from patients with chronic phase CML or BCR-ABL1 T315I+ CML blast phase. Together, asciminib, ponatinib and HU synergize in producing anti-leukemic effects in multi-resistant CML cells, including cells harboring T315I+ BCR-ABL1 compound mutations and CML stem cells. The clinical efficacy of this TKI combination needs to be evaluated within the frame of upcoming clinical trials.

Eosinophils and eosinophil-associated disorders: immunological, clinical, and molecular complexity.

Eosinophils and their mediators play a crucial role in various reactive states such as bacterial and viral infections, chronic inflammatory disorders, and certain hematologic malignancies. Depending on the underlying pathology, molecular defect(s), and the cytokine- and mediator-cascades involved, peripheral blood and tissue hypereosinophilia (HE) may develop and may lead to organ dysfunction or even organ damage which usually leads to the diagnosis of a HE syndrome (HES). In some of these patients, the etiology and impact of HE remain unclear. These patients are diagnosed with idiopathic HE. In other patients, HES is diagnosed but the etiology remains unknown - these patients are classified as idiopathic HES. For patients with HES, early therapeutic application of agents reducing eosinophil counts is usually effective in avoiding irreversible organ damage. Therefore, it is important to systematically explore various diagnostic markers and to correctly identify the disease elicitors and etiology. Depending on the presence and type of underlying disease, HES are classified into primary (clonal) HES, reactive HES, and idiopathic HES. In most of these patients, effective therapies can be administered. The current article provides an overview of the pathogenesis of eosinophil-associated disorders, with special emphasis on the molecular, immunological, and clinical complexity of HE and HES. In addition, diagnostic criteria and the classification of eosinophil disorders are reviewed in light of new developments in the field.