Remote assessment of myotonic dystrophy type 1: A feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Remote study visits (RSVs) are emerging as important tools for clinical research. We tested the feasibility of using RSVs to evaluate patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), including remote quantitative assessment of muscle function, and we assessed correlations of remote assessments with patient-reported function. METHODS: Twenty three subjects with DM1 were consented remotely. Toolkits containing a tablet computer, grip dynamometer, and spirometer were shipped to participants. The tablets were loaded with software for video-conferencing and questionnaires about functional impairment, patient experience with technology, and willingness to participate in future remote studies. Grip strength, forced vital capacity, peak cough flow, timed-up-and-go (TUG), and grip myotonia (hand opening time) were determined during RSVs. We assessed correlations of remote assessments with patient-reported outcomes of muscle function and with CTG repeat size. RESULTS: All 23 subjects completed RSVs. 95% of participants were able to complete all components of the remote study. All toolkit components were returned upon completion. Grip strength and TUG demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with self-reported inventories of upper and lower extremity impairment, respectively (ρ = 0.7 and ρ = -0.52). A total of 91% of subjects expressed interest in participating in future RSVs. DISCUSSION: Results of this study support the feasibility of using portable devices and video-conferencing for remote collection of patient-reported outcomes and quantitative assessment of muscle function in DM1.

Brief assessment of cognitive function in myotonic dystrophy: Multicenter longitudinal study using computer-assisted evaluation.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is known to affect cognitive function, but the best methods to assess central nervous system involvement in multicenter studies have not been determined. In this study our primary aim was to evaluate the potential of computerized cognitive tests to assess cognition in DM1. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, observational study of 113 adults with DM1 at six sites. Psychomotor speed, attention, working memory, and executive functioning were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months using computerized cognitive tests. Results were compared with assessments of muscle function and patient reported outcomes (PROs), including the Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index (MDHI) and the 5-dimension EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. RESULTS: Based on intraclass correlation coefficients, computerized cognitive tests had moderate to good reliability for psychomotor speed (0.76), attention (0.82), working memory speed (0.79), working memory accuracy (0.65), and executive functioning (0.87). Performance at baseline was lowest for working memory accuracy (P < .0001). Executive function performance improved from baseline to 3 months (P < .0001), without further changes over 1 year. There was a moderate correlation between poorer executive function and larger CTG repeat size (r = -0.433). There were some weak associations between PROs and cognitive performance. DISCUSSION: Computerized tests of cognition are feasible in multicenter studies of DM1. Poor performance was exhibited in working memory, which may be a useful variable in clinical trials. Learning effects may have contributed to the improvement in executive functioning. The relationship between PROs and cognitive impairment in DM1 requires further study.

Mexiletine in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess mexiletine's long-term safety and effect on 6-minute walk distance in a well-defined cohort of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of mexiletine (150 mg 3 times daily) to evaluate its efficacy and safety in a homogenous cohort of adult ambulatory patients with DM1. The primary outcome was change in 6-minute walk distance at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in hand grip myotonia, strength, swallowing, forced vital capacity, lean muscle mass, Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index scores, and 24-hour Holter and ECG results at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Forty-two participants were randomized and 40 completed the 6-month follow-up (n = 20 in both groups). No significant effects of mexiletine were observed on 6-minute walk distance, but hand grip myotonia was improved with mexiletine treatment. There were no differences between the mexiletine and placebo groups with respect to the frequency or type of adverse events. Changes in PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were similar in mexiletine- and placebo-treated participants. CONCLUSIONS: There was no benefit of mexiletine on 6-minute walk distance at 6 months. Although mexiletine had a sustained positive effect on objectively measured hand grip myotonia, this was not seen in measures reflecting participants' perceptions of their myotonia. No effects of mexiletine on cardiac conduction measures were seen over the 6-month follow-up period. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for ambulatory patients with DM1, mexiletine does not significantly change 6-minute walk distance at 6 months.

Myotonic dystrophy patient preferences in patient-reported outcome measures.

INTRODUCTION: When preparing for clinical trials in myotonic dystrophy type-1 (DM1), it is important that researchers develop and identify patient-reported outcome measures with good measurement properties. METHODS: Fifty-two DM1 patients enrolled in 2 clinical studies completed the Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index (MDHI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (version 2; SF-36v2), Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life questionnaire (INQoL), and a questionnaire comparing the relevance, usability, overall preference, and perceived responsiveness of each measure. The associations between instrument scores and physical function, genetic test results, and employment status were examined. RESULTS: The MDHI was preferred over the INQoL in 13 of 13 areas and was preferred over the SF-36v2 in 9 of 13 areas. The MDHI was the only score that was associated with participant employment status, CTG repeat length, and the 3 measurements of clinical function. DISCUSSION: The MDHI correlates well with physical function and is viewed favorably by participants in DM1 clinical studies. Muscle Nerve, 2018.

Myotonic dystrophy health index: Correlations with clinical tests and patient function.

INTRODUCTION: The Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index (MDHI) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Here, we examine the associations between the MDHI and other measures of disease burden in a cohort of individuals with myotonic dystrophy type-1 (DM1). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 70 patients with DM1. We examined the associations between MDHI total and subscale scores and scores from other clinical tests. Participants completed assessments of strength, myotonia, motor and respiratory function, ambulation, and body composition. Participants also provided blood samples, underwent physician evaluations, and completed other patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: MDHI total and subscale scores were strongly associated with muscle strength, myotonia, motor function, and other clinical measures. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported health status, as measured by the MDHI, is associated with alternative measures of clinical health. These results support the use of the MDHI as a valid tool to measure disease burden in DM1 patients.

Patient-Reported Impact of Symptoms in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 (PRISM-2).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and relative importance of the most life-affecting symptoms in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) and to identify the factors that have the strongest association with these symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult patients with DM2 from a National Registry of DM2 Patients to assess the prevalence and relative importance of 310 symptoms and 21 symptomatic themes. Participant responses were compared by age categories, sex, educational attainment, employment status, and duration of symptoms. RESULTS: The symptomatic themes with the highest prevalence in DM2 were the inability to do activities (94.4%), limitations with mobility or walking (89.2%), hip, thigh, or knee weakness (89.2%), fatigue (89.2%), and myotonia (82.6%). Participants identified the inability to do activities and fatigue as the symptomatic themes that have the greatest overall effect on their lives. Unemployment, a longer duration of symptoms, and less education were associated with a higher average prevalence of all symptomatic themes (p < 0.01). Unemployment, a longer duration of symptoms, sex, and increased age were associated with a higher average effect of all symptomatic themes among patients with DM2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The lives of patients with DM2 are affected by a variety of symptoms. These symptoms have different levels of significance and prevalence in this population and vary across DM2 subgroups in different demographic categories.

Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index: initial evaluation of a disease-specific outcome measure.

INTRODUCTION: In preparation for clinical trials we examine the validity, reliability, and patient understanding of the Myotonic Dystrophy Health Index (MDHI). METHODS: Initially we partnered with 278 myotonic dystrophy type-1 (DM1) patients and identified the most relevant questions for the MDHI. Next, we used factor analysis, patient interviews, and test-retest reliability assessments to refine and evaluate the instrument. Lastly, we determined the capability of the MDHI to differentiate between known groups of DM1 participants. RESULTS: Questions in the final MDHI represent 17 areas of DM1 health. The internal consistency was acceptable in all subscales. The MDHI had a high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95) and differentiated between DM1 patient groups with different disease severities. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evaluation of the MDHI provides evidence that it is valid and reliable as an outcome measure for assessing patient-reported health. These results suggest that important aspects of DM1 health may be measured effectively using the MDHI.