IDegLira fixed-ratio combination in the real world: a retrospective observational single-center Italian experience.

OBJECTIVE: An improvement of type 2 diabetes treatment is represented by the recent availability of a fixed-ratio combination of slow insulin degludec and GLP-1 RA liraglutide (IDegLira), which shows encouraging clinical trial results. This work represents a real-world evidence study to evaluate if the obtained clinical results are also confirmed in the clinical practice, in an Italian type 2 diabetes patients' population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted in the Diabetology Service of the Umbria local sanitary agency (USL Umbria 1) in Perugia. The study investigated all diabetic patients >18 years, who underwent anti-diabetic treatment with basal insulin with or without the concomitant consumption of one or more oral anti-diabetic agent (BOT group) or GLP-1 RA or rapid-acting insulin bolus (BB group), with unsatisfactory glycemic control for either hypoglycemic episodes or weight gain. The observation period was February 2018 to April 2019. RESULTS: IDegLira results to be effective in reducing HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose, especially among GLP-1 RA and BOT subgroup. In BOT group, a statistical difference was noted from the first month of treatment, also for post-prandial glycemia. Obtained results were achieved at a moderate dose of IDegLira reported during the study, which also represents a significant reduction of the amount of basal insulin in BB patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obtained results suggest that in a real-world setting, the switch to IDegLira treatment is a valid option for patients with unsatisfactory glycemic control, or who experienced side effects such as weight gain and hypoglycemia of other insulin therapies.

Contribution of MHC class I chain-related A (MICA) gene polymorphism to genetic susceptibility for systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of the MHC class I chain-related A (MICA) gene polymorphism to the genetic risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: HLA-DRB1-DQA1-DQB1 genotyping, MICA exon 5 microsatellite genotyping and HLA-B8 genotyping were performed in 48 Italian SLE patients and in 158 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Of HLA class II haplotypes, only DRB1*03-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201 (DR3-DQ2) was significantly more frequent among SLE patients than among healthy control subjects [odds ratio (OR) = 6.5, corrected P < 0.0026]. HLA-B8 was detected in 31% SLE patients and 13% healthy control subjects (OR = 3.0, P = 0.005). The allele-wise comparison between patients and controls showed that both MICA5 (OR = 2.5, corrected P < 0.0005) and MICA5.1 (OR = 2.4, corrected P < 0.0005) were positively and MICA9 (OR = 0.2, corrected P < 0.0005) was negatively associated with the disease. The MICA5/5.1 genotype was positively associated with SLE (OR = 28.9, corrected P < 0.0015) also in subjects negative for DR3-DQ2 (OR > 22.6, corrected P < 0.011). The simultaneous presence of DR3-DQ2 and MICA5.1 was detected in 15/48 (31%) SLE and in 10/158 (6%) healthy control subjects (OR = 6.7, corrected P < 0.011). The simultaneous combination of DR3-DQ2 and MICA5 was found in 10/48 (21%) SLE patients and in only 1/158 healthy control subjects (OR = 41.3, corrected P < 0.011). Logistic regression analysis showed the independent positive associations of MICA5 and MICA5.1 and negative association of MICA9 with the disease, and revealed that the interaction of the three major markers (DR3-DQ2, MICA5 and MICA5.1) was associated with increasing genetic risk, which was highest (OR > 30.3) in DR3-DQ2-positive subjects carrying the MICA5-5.1 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides the first demonstration of the independent association of the MICA gene polymorphism with genetic risk of SLE.

Lack of association of human chemokine receptor gene polymorphisms CCR2-64I and CCR5-Delta32 with autoimmune Addison's disease.

The attraction of leukocytes to tissues is essential for inflammation and the initiation of the autoimmune reaction. The process is controlled by chemokines, which are chemotactic cytokines. We investigated whether human chemokine receptor gene polymorphisms, namely CCR5-Delta32 and CCR2-64I, are associated with susceptibility to autoimmune Addison's disease. Genotyping was performed in 56 patients and 127 healthy controls by a new method using pyrosequencing for CCR2-64I and by polymerase chain reaction and detecting gel for CCR5-Delta32. None of the CCR2 or CCR5 alleles was found to be associated, either positively or negatively, with disease risk. Our results indicate that the CCR2-64I and CCR5-Delta32 gene polymorphisms do not play a major role in conferring genetic risk for, and/or protection against, autoimmune Addison's disease.

Contribution of postprandial versus interprandial blood glucose to HbA1c in type 1 diabetes on physiologic intensive therapy with lispro insulin at mealtime.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitate the contribution of postprandial blood glucose, which improves with the short-acting insulin analog lispro [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] in type 1 diabetes, to the overall 24-h blood glucose concentration and the long-term HbA1c concentration under conditions of different postabsorptive blood glucose. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 24 type 1 diabetic patients on long-term intensive therapy with premeal human regular insulin (Hum-R) and bedtime NPH were randomly assigned to a continuation of Hum-R (group 1, n = 8), lispro (group 2, n = 8), or lispro + NPH (in variable proportions) administered at mealtime (group 3, n = 8) for 3 months, NPH administered at bedtime was continued in all three groups. Data from home blood glucose monitoring were collected, and a 24-h plasma glucose and insulin profile was obtained during a 2-day hospital visit to calculate areas under the postprandial glucose curve (3.5 h after breakfast, 3.5 h after lunch, and 3.0 h after dinner for a total of 10.0 h) and the postabsorptive blood glucose curve (the remaining 14.0 h out of 24.0 h) (AUC). Eight nondiabetic subjects were also studied. RESULTS: The substitution of Hum-R with lispro (group 2) resulted in lower postprandial blood glucose, but greater postabsorptive blood glucose (P < 0.05 vs. group 1). The postprandial blood glucose AUC was lower (161 +/- 19 vs. 167 +/- 20 mg.100 ml-1.h-1), but the postabsorptive blood glucose AUC was greater (155 +/- 22 vs. 142 +/- 19 mg.100 ml-1.h-1) (P < 0.05). Therefore, the 24-h blood glucose AUC was no different (NS). Consequently, HbA1c was no different (NS). This occurred because in group 2, mealtime lispro resulted in normal prandial plasma insulin, but also resulted in lower interprandial concentration (P < 0.05 vs. group 1). When NPH was added to lispro (30% at breakfast, 40% at lunch, 10% at dinner) in group 3, postabsorptive plasma insulin was similar to group 1 (NS), in group 3, the postprandial blood glucose AUC (153 +/- 17 mg.100 ml-1.h-1) was lower and the postabsorptive blood glucose AUC was no different, as compared with group 1 (NS). Therefore, the 24-h blood glucose AUC was lower (147 +/- 17 vs. 155 +/- 21 and 158 +/- 20 mg.100 ml-1.h-1), and HbA1c was lower (6.41 +/- 0.12 vs. 6.84 +/- 0.2 and 6.96 +/- 0.2% (groups 3, 1, and 2 respectively, P < 0.05). Frequency of hypoglycemia was greater in group 2 (P < 0.05), but not in group 3 (NS) vs. group 1.

Long-term intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes with the short-acting insulin analog lispro in variable combination with NPH insulin at mealtime.

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the short-acting insulin analog lispro can be successfully implemented in long-term intensive insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes, and if so, what its effects are on glycemic control and frequency and awareness of hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We randomized 56 type 1 diabetic patients to treatment with either lispro (n = 28) or human regular insulin (Hum-R; n = 28) as mealtime insulin for 1 year (open design, parallel groups). Lispro was injected at mealtime and Hum-R was given 10-40 min before meals (bedtime NPH was continued on both occasions). With lispro, NPH was added at breakfast (approximately 70/30), lunch (approximately 60/40), and supper (approximately 80/20) (mixing percentage of lispro/NPH) to optimize premeal and bedtime blood glucose. RESULTS: Total daily insulin units were no different in the two treatment groups, but with lispro approximately 30% less short-acting insulin at meals and approximately 30% more NPH was needed versus Hum-R (P < 0.05). The bedtime NPH dosage was no different. With lispro + NPH, the mean daily blood glucose was lower than with Hum-R (8.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; P < 0.05), HbA1c was lower (6.34 +/- 0.10 vs. 6.71 +/- 0.11%, mean value over 1 year; P < 0.002), and hypoglycemia (blood glucose < or = 3.8 mmol/l) was less frequent (7.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 11.5 +/- 0.7 episodes/patient-month) and tended to occur more within 90 min after meals than in the postabsorptive state (P < 0.05 vs. Hum-R). After 1 year, plasma adrenaline and symptom responses to experimental, stepped hypoglycemia improved with lispro and were closer to the responses of 12 nondiabetic control subjects versus Hum-R both in terms of thresholds and magnitude (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that mealtime injection of lispro + NPH improves the 24-h blood glucose and the percentage HbA1c as compared with Hum-R. The improvement can be maintained long term. Intensive therapy with lispro + NPH results in less frequent hypoglycemia and better awareness and counterregulation of hypoglycemia.

Use of the short-acting insulin analogue lispro in intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: importance of appropriate replacement of basal insulin and time-interval injection-meal.

To establish whether lispro may be a suitable short-acting insulin preparation for meals in intensive treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients already in chronic good glycaemic control with conventional insulins, 69 patients on intensive therapy (4 daily s.c. insulin injections, soluble at each meal, NPH at bedtime, HbA1c <7.5%) were studied with an open, cross-over design for two periods of 3 months each (lispro or soluble). The % HbA1c and frequency of hypoglycaemia were assessed under four different conditions (Groups I-IV). Lispro was always injected at mealtime, soluble 10-40 min prior to meals (with the exception of Group IV). Bedtime NPH was continued with both treatments. When lispro replaced soluble with no increase in number of daily NPH injections (Group I, n = 15), HbA1c was no different (p = NS), but frequency of hypoglycaemia was greater (p < 0.05). When NPH was given 3-4 times daily, lispro (Group II, n = 18), but not soluble (Group III, n = 12) decreased HbA1c by 0.35 +/- 0.25% with no increase in hypoglycaemia. When soluble was injected at mealtimes, HbA1c increased by 0.18 +/- 0.15% and hypoglycaemia was more frequent than when soluble was injected 10-40 min prior to meals (Group IV, n = 24) (p < 0.05). It is concluded that in intensive management of Type 1 DM, lispro is superior to soluble in terms of reduction of % HbA1c and frequency of hypoglycaemia, especially for those patients who do not use a time interval between insulin injection and meal. However, these goals cannot be achieved without optimization of basal insulin.

Long-term intensive therapy of IDDM patients with clinically overt autonomic neuropathy: effects on hypoglycemia awareness and counterregulation.

To test the hypothesis that hypoglycemia unawareness and impaired counterregulation are reversible after meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN), 21 patients (8 without DAN [DAN-]; 13 with DAN [DAN+]; of the latter, 7 had orthostatic hypotension [DAN+PH+] and 6 did not [DAN+PH-]) and 15 nondiabetic subjects were studied during stepped hypoglycemia (plateau plasma glucose decrements from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/l) before and 6 months after prevention of hypoglycemia (intensive therapy). After 6 months, frequency of mild hypoglycemia decreased from approximately 20 to approximately 2 episodes/patient-month while HbA1c increased from 6.2 +/- 0.3 to 6.9 +/- 0.2% (P < 0.05). Responses of adrenaline improved more in DAN- patients (from 1.17 +/- 0.12 to 2.4 +/- 0.22 nmol/l) than in DAN+PH- (from 0.75 +/- 0.25 to 1.56 +/- 0.23 nmol/l) and DAN+PH+ patients (from 0.80 +/- 0.24 to 1.15 +/- 0.27 nmol/l, P < 0.05) but remained lower than in nondiabetic subjects (4.9 +/- 0.37 nmol/l, P < 0.05), whereas glycemic thresholds normalized only in DAN-, not DAN+. Autonomic symptoms of hypoglycemia improved but remained lower in DAN- (6.2 +/- 0.6) than in nondiabetic subjects (8.1 +/- 1.1) and lower in DAN+PH+ (4 +/- 0.8) than in DAN+PH- subjects (5.1 +/- 0.8, P < 0.05), whereas neuroglycopenic symptoms normalized (NS). Cognitive function deteriorated less before than after prevention of hypoglycemia (P < 0.05). Thus, intensive therapy with emphasis on preventing hypoglycemia reverses hypoglycemia unawareness in DAN+ patients despite marginal improvement of adrenaline responses, results in low frequency of hypoglycemia despite impaired counterregulation, and maintains HbA1c in the range of intensive therapy. We conclude that DAN, long IDDM duration per se, and antecedent recent hypoglycemia contribute to different extents to impaired adrenaline responses and hypoglycemia unawareness.

Evidence of increased systemic glucose production and gluconeogenesis in an early stage of NIDDM.

To assess the mechanisms of fasting hyperglycemia in NIDDM patients with mild elevation of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) compared with NIDDM patients with overt hyperglycemia, we studied 29 patients with NIDDM, who were divided in two groups according to their fasting plasma glucose (<7.8 and > or =7.8 mmol/l for groups A and B, respectively), and 16 control subjects who were matched with NIDDM patients for age, sex, and body mass index. All subjects were infused with [3-3H]glucose between 10:00 P.M. and 10:00 A.M. during overnight fasting to determine glucose fluxes. In 27 subjects (17 diabetic and 10 control), [U-14C]alanine was simultaneously infused between 4:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. to measure gluconeogenesis (GNG) from alanine. Arterialized-venous plasma samples were collected every 30 min for measurement of glucose fluxes, GNG, and glucoregulatory hormones. In group A, plasma glucose, rate of systemic glucose production (SGP), and GNG were greater than in control subjects (7.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, 10.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 9.5 +/- 0.3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), and 0.58 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.37 +/- 0.02 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively, for group A and control subjects; mean value 8:00 A.M.-10:00 A.M., all P < 0.05). Both increased SGP and GNG correlated with plasma glucose in all subjects (r = 0.77 and r = 0.75, respectively, P < 0.005). Plasma counterregulatory hormones did not differ in NIDDM patients compared to control subjects. The present studies demonstrate that SGP and GNG are increased in NIDDM patients without overt fasting hyperglycemia. Thus these metabolic abnormalities primarily contribute to early development of overnight and fasting hyperglycemia in NIDDM.

Contribution of autonomic neuropathy to reduced plasma adrenaline responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM: evidence for a nonselective defect.

To determine the contribution of clinically overt diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) to reduced plasma adrenaline responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM and to establish its selectivity for hypoglycemia, we studied 17 IDDM patients (7 without DAN [DAN-] and 10 with DAN [DAN+]), of whom 5 had and 5 did not have postural hypotension (DAN+PH+ and DAN+PH-, respectively), and 8 nondiabetic subjects on 2 different occasions, i.e., clamped hypoglycemia (steps from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/l plasma glucose) and 30-min steady-state exercise at 55% V(O[2max]). Recent antecedent hypoglycemia was meticulously prevented before the studies to exclude hypoglycemia as a cause of reduced responses of adrenaline to hypoglycemia. In DAN- patients, maximal responses of adrenaline to hypoglycemia were reduced (2.44 +/- 0.58 nmol/l vs. 4.9 +/- 0.54 nmol/l in nondiabetic patients) (P < 0.05). In DAN+, adrenaline responses initiated at a lower plasma glucose and were lower than in DAN- (DAN+PH-, 1.06 +/- 0.38 nmol/l; DAN+PH+, 0.84 +/- 0.27 nmol/l; P < 0.001, but NS between PH- and PH+). In response to exercise, adrenaline increased less in DAN- (0.89 +/- 0.11 nmol/l) patients than in nondiabetic subjects (1.19 +/- 0.14 nmol/l; NS) and only to 0.36 +/- 0.07 nmol/l in DAN+PH- and 0.23 +/- 0.09 nmol/l in DAN+PH+ (P < 0.001 vs. DAN- and nondiabetic subjects). These results were confirmed when nondiabetic and DAN- subjects repeated the exercise at 60 watts (35 and 41% of V(O[2max]), respectively), i.e., at the same absolute workload of DAN+ patients. Thus, DAN (both PH+ and PH-) contributes to reduced responses of adrenaline to hypoglycemia independently of recent antecedent hypoglycemia. The adrenaline defect in DAN is not selective for hypoglycemia.

Late post-prandial hypoglycaemia as the sole presenting feature of secreting pancreatic beta-cell adenoma in a subtotally gastrectomized patient.

In this paper we describe for the first time late post-prandial hypoglycaemia as the sole presenting feature of an insulinoma in a patient who had previously undergone subtotal gastrectomy. The symptoms of hypoglycaemia always occurred 1-3 h after meals, not in the fasting state. Because of the history of gastrectomy and because post-prandial hypoglycaemia was reproduced by an oral glucose tolerance test, the diagnosis of reactive hypoglycaemia was made. Eighteen months later a fasting test was performed: venous plasma glucose decreased from 3.8 mmol/l to 2.7 mmol/l between 14 and 20 h of fast while plasma immunoreactive insulin did not decrease and plateaued at 185 pmol/l. Plasma C-peptide (0.9 nmol/l) and proinsulin (70 pmol/l, split 64, 65) were also elevated. All islet hormones increased in response to i.v. glucose and were suppressed after diazoxide. Although pre-operative procedures were negative in localizing an insulinoma, the patient underwent an operation and an insulinoma was detected at the body level of the pancreas. Thus, insulinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of reactive hypoglycaemia in gastrectomized patients. Response of islet hormones to glucose and their suppression by diazoxide are evidence of a secreting insulinoma even in the absence of preoperative localization of the pancreatic adenoma.

Effects of the short-acting insulin analog [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] on postprandial blood glucose control in IDDM.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the effects of the short-acting insulin analog Lispro versus human regular insulin (Hum-R) on postprandial metabolic control in IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Four studies were performed in 10 C-peptide-negative IDDM patients. Lispro or Hum-R (0.15 U/kg) or Lispro + NPH (0.07 U/kg) or Hum-R + NPH were injected subcutaneously 30 min (Hum-R) or 5 min (Lispro) before lunch. Preprandial plasma glucose (PG) was maintained on all four occasions at approximately 7.3 mmol/l by intravenous insulin. RESULTS: After subcutaneous Lispro injection, plasma free insulin (FIRI) was greater between 0 and 2 h (233 +/- 22 pmol/l) than after Hum-R (197 +/- 25 pmol/l) but lower between 2.25 and 7 h (81 +/- 10 vs. 104 +/- 13 pmol/l, P < 0.05). After Lispro, PG was lower versus Hum-R for 3 h (7.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 8.3 +/- 0.9 mmol/l) but subsequently increased more than after Hum-R (3.25-7h, 11.3 +/- 1 vs. 9.6 +/- 1.2 mmol/l), resulting in a 7-h postprandial PG greater than Hum-R (9.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l) (all P < 0.05). Addition of NPH to Lispro increased the 2.5-to 7-h FIRI to 110 +/- 11 pmol/l and decreased the 3.25- to 7-h PG to 7.7 +/- 0.8 pmol/l, resulting in 0- to 7-h PG (7.3 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) lower than after Hum-R + NPH (7.9 +/- 0.5 pmol/l) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At meals, in order for Lispro to improve postprandial blood glucose not only at 2-h, but also over a 7-h period in C-peptide-negative IDDM, basal insulin must be optimally replaced.

Improved postprandial metabolic control after subcutaneous injection of a short-acting insulin analog in IDDM of short duration with residual pancreatic beta-cell function.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postprandial metabolic control after subcutaneous injection of a short-acting insulin analog [Lys(B289),Pro(B29)] (Lispro) or human regular insulin (Humulin R U-100 [Hum-R]) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) of short duration with residual beta-cell function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six IDDM patients (age 25 +/- 2 years, diabetes duration 14 +/- 2 months, HbA1c 6.4 +/- 0.5%) with residual pancreatic beta-cell function (fasting plasma C-peptide 0.19 +/- 0.02 nmol/l) were studied on three different occasions. Postbreakfast plasma glucose was maintained at approximately 7.1 mmol/l by means of intravenous insulin until either 1200 when 0.1 U/kg Hum-R was injected or until 1225 when 0.1 U/kg of either Hum-R or Lispro was injected subcutaneously. Lunch (mixed meal, 692 Kcal) was served at 1230 (0 min). Six nondiabetic control subjects were also studied. RESULTS: After Lispro administration, the 120-min plasma glucose decreased more (6.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) than after injection of Hum-R at -30 min (7.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) or -5 min (9.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l). By the end of the study, plasma glucose was still lower after Lispro was injected (6.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) than after Hum-R was injected at -30 min (7.6 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) or -5 min (7.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) (P < 0.05). Two IDDM patients required glucose to prevent hypoglycemia after being injected with Lispro, but four required glucose after being injected with Hum-R at -5 min (Lispro approximately 27 mmol glucose infused between 90 and 240 min; Hum-R approximately 80 mmol between 240 and 390 min). After Lispro, plasma insulin peaked earlier (at 30 min, 342 +/- 29 pmol/l) than after Hum-R injection at -30 min (at 90 min, 198 +/- 28 pmol/l) and was superimposable on that of nondiabetic subjects. In Hum-R injected at -5 min, plasma insulin peaked later (at 120 min) and subsequently remained greater than in the two other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of a time interval between injection and meal, Lispro controls postprandial plasma glucose concentration better than Hum-R given 30 min before meals and, to an even greater extent, better than Hum-R given 5 min before meals. In addition, Lispro minimizes the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia, thus closely mimicking the postprandial glucose homeostasis of nondiabetic subjects. IDDM patients with residual pancreatic beta-cell function are the ideal candidates for prandial use of Lispro because they can maintain near-normoglycemia longer after subcutaneous analog injection because of residual endogenous insulin secretion.