Does reduced lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide predict the presence of pulmonary hypertension?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether reduced lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) predicts the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in heterogeneous group of patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary function and transthoracic echocardiographic testing within a 6-month period were retrospectively identified by chart review. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) was measured using Doppler echocardiography. PH was defined as a RVSP >30 mm Hg. Patients were divided into 2 major groups: those whose RVSP was < or =30 mm Hg and those whose RVSP was >30 mm Hg. PH was classified as mild (RVSP = 31-40 mm Hg), moderate (RSVP = 41-60 mm Hg) and severe (RVSP >60 mm Hg). RESULTS: A total of 398 patients were entered into the study: 264 (66.3%) with PH and 134 (33.7%) without PH. Patients with PH were older, had a lower mean percentage of predicted values for forced vital capacity (%FVC), for DLCO (%DLCO) and for DLCO corrected for alveolar volume (%DLCO/VA) than those without PH. Multivariate analysis identified age and %FVC as independent predictors of PH [odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 1.038 (1.020-1.056) and 0.972 (0.955-0.988), respectively]. There was a weak, but significant negative correlation between RVSP and %DLCO (r = -0.205, P = 0.001), but there was no correlation between RVSP and %DLCO/VA. Neither %DLCO nor %DLCO/VA was found to be independent predictors of PH. CONCLUSION: In a heterogeneous group of patients, %DLCO and %DLCO/VA do not independently predict the presence of PH.

Outcomes in patients with abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging and normal coronary angiogram.

A subset of subjects undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging has perfusion abnormalities that are subsequently labeled false positive based on coronary angiography. We evaluated the long-term prevalence of cardiovascular events in these patients. We retrospectively identified 48 patients who had reversible perfusion abnormalities with myocardial perfusion imaging and normal coronary angiography. Patients with known coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, valvular disease, and cardiomyopathy were excluded. Patient follow-up, conducted for at least 3 (mean interval, 7.4) years from the index myocardial perfusion imaging, was accomplished by a review of medical records and telephone interviews. Study endpoints were cardiovascular events defined as sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting, and cerebrovascular or peripheral revascularization. Thirty-one percent (15 of 48) of the patients had cardiovascular events. Six of the 48 patients had coronary events. These patients had abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging and normal coronary angiogram. The time between myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary event was 0.5 to 8.67 years. There was a strong correlation between the regions of original perfusion abnormality and the ultimate coronary ischemia or revascularization. Abnormal findings on myocardial perfusion imaging may predict a higher prevalence of coronary and peripheral vascular events than suggested by a normal coronary angiogram.