Predictors of first ischemic lower limb ulcer in dialysis patients: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lower limb ischemia affects the quality of life, physical activity and life expectancy of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with ischemic foot ulcers considering clinical, laboratory and therapeutic domains. METHODS: This observational cohort study was based on data from the Nephrology and Dialysis Department database of Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco (Italy). All of the incident patients who started dialysis between 1 January 1999 and 29 February 2012 were enrolled, excluding temporary guests, patients with acute renal failure and patients with previous limb ischemia or amputation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the predictors in each domain, which were matched in the final model. A time-dependent approach was used to take into account the evolution of some of the prognostic covariates. RESULTS: Of the 526 incident dialysis patients, 120 developed a lower limb ischemic lesion after a median of 13 months. The incidence of new ulcers was constant during the study period (6 per 100 person-years), but higher in the diabetics with a relative rate of 4.5. The variables significantly related to an increased risk of lower limb ulcers were age, male gender, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, treatment with proton pump inhibitors, iron, anticoagulants and calcium-based binders, and blood levels of phosphorus, triglycerides and C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: The incidence of lower limb ulcers was highest during the early dialysis follow-up and was associated with, in addition to diabetes, modifiable laboratory and therapeutic predictors such as anticoagulants, proton pump inhibitors, calcium-containing binders, calcimimetics and iron.

Mini-peritoneal equilibration test: A simple and fast method to assess free water and small solute transport across the peritoneal membrane.

BACKGROUND: Loss of ultrafiltration (UF) of peritoneal membrane is one of the most important causes of peritoneal dialysis failure. UF is determined by osmotic forces acting mainly across small pores (UFSP) and ultrasmall pores or free water transport. At present, only semiquantitative estimates or complicated computer simulations are available to assess free water transport. The aim of this study was to assess free water transport during a 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test lasting 1 hour. In this condition, sodium transport is mainly due to convection, allowing the estimate of ultrafiltration of small pores and then of free water transport (total UF - UFSP). METHODS: In 52 peritoneal dialysis patients we performed a 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test (4 hours) and a 3.86% mini-peritoneal equilibration test (1 hour) and compared UF and small solute transports obtained with the two methods. RESULTS: During the 3.86% mini-peritoneal equilibration test, UFSP and free water transport were 279 +/- 142 mL and 215 +/- 86 mL, respectively; free water transport well correlated to total UF during the 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test (r= 0.67). The groups of peritoneal transporters, categorized according to glucose dialysate ratio (D/D(0)) and to creatinine/plasma ratio (D/P(Creat)), were in good agreement for the two peritoneal equilibration tests (weighted kappa 0.62 and 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 3.86% mini-peritoneal equilibration test is a simple and fast method to assess free water transport. It also gives information about total UF and small solute transports and it is in good agreement with the 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test.

Ionic dialysance allows an adequate estimate of urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: An adequate estimation of urea distribution volume (V) in hemodialysis patients is useful to monitor protein nutrition. Direct dialysis quantification (DDQ) is the gold standard for determining V, but it is impractical for routine use because it requires equilibrated postdialysis plasma water urea concentration. The single pool variable volume urea kinetic model (SPVV-UKM), recommended as a standard by Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI), does not need a delayed postdialysis blood sample but it requires a correct estimate of dialyser urea clearance. METHODS: Ionic dialysance (ID) may accurately estimate dialyzer urea clearance corrected for total recirculation. Using ID as input to SPVV-UKM, correct V values are expected when end-dialysis plasma water urea concentrations are determined in the end-of-session blood sample taken with the blood pump speed reduced to 50 mL/min for two minutes (U(pwt2')). The aim of this study was to determine whether the V values determined by means of SPVV-UKM, ID, and U(pwt2') (V(ID)) are similar to those determined by the "gold standard" DDQ method (V(DDQ)). Eighty-two anuric hemodialysis patients were studied. RESULTS: V(DDQ) was 26.3 +/- 5.2 L; V(ID) was 26.5 +/- 4.8 L. The (V(ID)-V(DDQ)) difference was 0.2 +/- 1.6 L, which is not statistically significant (P= 0.242). Anthropometric volume (V(A)) calculated using Watson equations was 33.6 +/- 6.0 L. The (V(A)-V(DDQ)) difference was 7.3 +/- 3.3 L, which is statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anthropometric-based V values overestimate urea distribution volume calculated by DDQ and SPVV-UKM. ID allows adequate V values to be determined, and circumvents the problem of delayed postdialysis blood samples.