Content validity of SarQoL, a quality of life questionnaire specific to sarcopenia.

BACKGROUND: The Sarcopenia & Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure designed for assessing health-related quality of life in individuals with sarcopenia. Despite its wide acceptance in the scientific literature, its content validity has only been partially demonstrated so far. AIMS: To enhance the evidence supporting the content validity of the SarQoL questionnaire. METHODS: Following COSMIN methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 Belgian older adults who met the EWGSOP2 criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia and 11 experts in sarcopenia, with clinical or research background. Comprehensiveness, relevance and comprehensibility of SarQoL content were assessed through individual transcripts and were qualitatively analyzed thematically according to the seven dimensions of SarQoL. RESULTS: The majority of the concepts elicited during the semi-structured interviews fitted within existing SarQoL dimensions. Importantly, the different domains of SarQoL were consensually considered as relevant by patients and experts. Some new emergent concepts were identified by the participants. While many of them could be considered as enrichments of existing dimensions or sub-concepts, other new concepts (i.e. self-fulfilment, acceptance of the reduced condition, adaptation/use of strategies, depression) may highlight two potential dimensions not covered by SarQoL, i.e. patient empowerment and depression. Cognitive interviews also highlighted that SarQoL items and instructions were clear and comprehensible. CONCLUSIONS: SarQoL, in its current form, demonstrates good evidence of content validity for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sarcopenia. We do not recommend adding new items or dimensions to SarQoL. Instead, for researchers or clinicians who aim to specifically address self-empowerment or depression of sarcopenic populations, we suggest completing the assessment of quality of life by concurrently using additional validated scales of patient empowerment or depression.

Intrinsic capacity and risk of death: Focus on the impact of using different diagnostic criteria for the nutritional domain.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the ability of intrinsic capacity (IC) to predict death in community-dwelling older people using different diagnostic criteria to define the nutritional domain. METHODS: Participants from the Belgian SarcoPhAge cohort were followed from 2013 to the present. Four IC domains were assessed at baseline (data on the sensorial domain were not collected), and considered unsatisfactory below some specific thresholds. The nutritional domain was considered unsatisfactory if baseline malnutrition was present, defined by: 1) MNA-SF ≤11 points; 2) seven versions of the GLIM criteria, varying by the technique used to identify a reduced muscle mass; or 3) the combination of MNA-SF ≤11 points + GLIM criteria. The association between baseline unsatisfactory IC and 9-year mortality was calculated using the odds ratio (OR) adjusted for cofounders. RESULTS: Among the 534 participants (73.5 ± 6.2 years old; 60.3 % women at baseline), 157 (29.4 %) were dead after 9.3 ± 0.3 years of follow-up. Patients with baseline unsatisfactory IC in the locomotor domain (adjusted OR = 2.31 [95%CI 1.38-3.86]) or psychological domain (adjusted OR = 1.78 [1.12-2.83]) were at higher mortality risk. Regarding malnutrition, unsatisfactory IC in the nutrition domain was strongly associated with a higher mortality risk, whatever the criteria used to identify a reduced muscle mass. The highest association with mortality was found in participants with a baseline unsatisfactory nutritional domain defined by the combination of MNA-SF + GLIM criteria (adjusted OR = 3.27 [95%CI 1.72-6.23]). CONCLUSIONS: Presenting any unsatisfactory IC at baseline was associated with a higher 9-year mortality risk in community-dwelling older people. The sequential incorporation of MNA-SF and GLIM criteria as the IC nutritional domain would be helpful to guide public health actions towards healthy ageing.

[Physical activity in nursing homes: contributions of the SENIOR cohort]. / L'activité physique en maison de repos : contributions de la cohorte SENIOR.

The SENIOR ("Sample of Elderly Nursing homes Individuals: an Observational Research") study is a prospective follow-up of a cohort of more than 600 people living in nursing homes in Belgium. One of the objectives of this study is to investigate ways of managing frailty in order to prevent the occurrence of adverse health events. Thanks to the numerous demographic, clinical and anamnestic data collected annually, this study has shown the importance of promoting qualitative physical activity in nursing homes in order to improve the quality of life of residents. Specifically, our research showed the positive effect of physical activity programmes on weekly energy expenditure and improvement of functional abilities, motivation to engage in physical activity and quality of life. Furthermore, the possibilities to improve the motivational context of group physical activity sessions and the feasibility of innovative physical activity programmes, based on the development of a giant play mat or the organisation of competitions in nursing homes, were highlighted.

L'étude SENIOR («Sample of Elderly Nursing homes Individuals : an Observational Research¼) est un suivi prospectif d'une cohorte de plus de 600 personnes résidant en maison de repos, en Belgique. Un des objectifs de celle-ci est l'étude des pistes de prise en charge de la fragilité afin de prévenir la survenue d'événements indésirables de santé. Grâce aux nombreuses données démographiques, cliniques et anamnestiques récoltées annuellement, cette étude a permis de montrer l'importance de promouvoir l'activité physique qualitative en maison de repos afin d'améliorer la qualité de vie des résidents. Plus précisément, nos recherches ont montré l'effet positif des programmes d'activité physique sur les dépenses énergétiques hebdomadaires et l'amélioration des capacités fonctionnelles, de la motivation à pratiquer l'activité physique et de la qualité de vie. Par ailleurs, les possibilités d'améliorer le contexte motivationnel des séances d'activité physique de groupe et la faisabilité de programmes d'activité physique innovants basés sur l'élaboration d'un tapis de jeu géant ou l'organisation de compétitions en maisons de retraite, ont été mises en évidence.