Assessment of non-inferiority in terms of six-month morbidity and mortality of a hospital-at-home care pathway for patients with acute heart failure: FIL-EAS-ic study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of hospitalization and is associated with high mortality rates, long hospital stays and high economic costs worldwide. Novel care pathways are increasingly considered to address these burdens. In France, a mixed conventional hospitalization and hospital-at-home (HaH) care pathway (named FIL-EAS-ic) has been designed to reduce hospital length of stay without impairing HF outcomes. This protocol describes the study design evaluating the non-inferiority of the FIL-EAS-ic pathway compared to conventional hospitalization in terms of six-month all-cause mortality and/or unscheduled HF-related hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized, prospective, multicenter trial (NCT04878263) will be conducted involving two groups of patients in a 1:2 ratio: i) a control group following the conventional hospitalization pathway, and ii) the experimental group following the FIL-EAS-ic pathway. We aim to include 454 patients from the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer and the Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne in France from June 2021 to June 2023. The non-inferiority of the FIL-EAS-ic pathway compared to conventional hospitalization, in terms of six-month all-cause mortality and/or unscheduled HF-related hospitalization will be tested by the Farrington-Manning method. Impact on treatment adherence, HF rehospitalizations and cumulative time spent in the hospital will also be compared between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial will provide evidence on a novel HF care pathway in France as well as its potential to improve follow-up care, quality of life and patient satisfaction as well as its potential to reduce costs.

Predictors of Tri-council Funding Among Nutrition Researchers in Canada.

Purpose: Barriers in research for women and dietitians have been documented. We sought to describe tri-council funding awarded within the nutrition discipline according to institution type, academic rank, gender, dietitian status, and primary research methods used.Methods: Using an online search methodology, faculty members with research appointments were identified from nutrition departments offering accredited dietetic programs and/or at Canada's collective of research-intensive universities known as U15. All data regarding faculty members, their institutions, and funding were collected through publicly available websites and Scopus. Tri-council funding associated with the nominated principal investigator, from a 5-year period, 2013-2014 to 2017-2018, was extracted. Binary logistic regression was used to test for predictors of receiving any tri-council operating funds within the 5-year period.Results: Faculty members (n = 237) from 21 institutions were identified for inclusion. Those from U15 institutions, at the full professor rank, nondietitians, men, and those who engaged in primarily quantitative research methods (vs. qualitative or mixed-methods) were significantly more likely to hold any tri-council funding during the eligible period. Dietitians (n = 76) were significantly less likely to hold tri-council funding, independent of institution, rank, gender, and primary research methods utilized.Conclusions: The apparent under-funding of academic dietitians from federal tri-council sources requires exploration.

Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Manitoba grocery sector: a qualitative analysis of media, organizational communications, and key informant interviews.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted all aspects of the food system, including the retail grocery sector. We sought to (objective 1) document and (objective 2) analyze the policies implemented in the grocery sector during the first wave of the pandemic in Manitoba, Canada. METHODS: Our qualitative policy analysis draws from organizational communications (websites and social media) (n = 79), news media articles (n = 95), and key informant interviews with individuals (n = 8) working within the grocery sector in urban and rural, Manitoba. Media and communications were extracted between March 9-May 8, 2020 and interviews were conducted in July-August, 2020. RESULTS: Newly implemented policies due to the pandemic fell under four inter-related themes: Employee health and wellbeing, Safety measures, Operational measures, and Community support. Employee health and wellbeing included sub-themes of financial and social support, health recommendations and protocols, and new employee guidelines. Safety measures encompassed numerous policies pertaining to sanitation, personal protection, transmission prevention, physical distancing, and limiting access. Overall, new policies were discussed as effective in making grocery shopping as safe as possible given the situation. Compliance and enforcement, employee teamwork, and support for employees were key themes related to perceptions of policy success in a challenging and inequitable context. Nevertheless, government support and communication was needed as well to ensure safety within the grocery sector. CONCLUSIONS: The grocery sector reacted to the pandemic with the swift implementation of policies to address food supply issues, prevent transmission of the virus, support their employees as essential workers, and better serve high-risk populations.