Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Urol Oncol ; 41(8): 354.e11-354.e18, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37391283

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: While Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 and 5 lesions usually justify prostate biopsy (PBx), the management of a PI-RADS 3 lesion can be discussed. The aim of our study was to determine the optimal prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) threshold and predictive factors of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using our prospectively maintained database, we conducted a monocentric retrospective study, including all patients with a clinical suspicious of prostate cancer (PCa), all of them had a PI-RADS 3 lesion on the mpMRI prior to PBx. Patients under active surveillance or displaying suspicious digital rectal examination were excluded. Clinically significant (csPCa) was defined as PCa with any ISUP grade group ≥ 2 (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4). RESULTS: We included 158 patients. The detection rate of csPCa was 22.2%. In case of PSAD ≤ 0.15 ng/ml/cm3, PBx would be omitted in 71.5% (113/158) of men at the cost of missing 15.0% (17/113) of csPCa. With a threshold of 0.15 ng/ml/cm3, the sensitivity and the specificity were 0.51 and 0.78 respectively. The positive predictive value was 0.40 and the negative predictive value was 0.85. According to multivariate analysis, age (OR = 1.10, CI95% 1.03-1.19, P = 0.007), and PSAD ≥ 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 (OR = 3.59, CI95% 1.41-9.47, P = 0.008) were independent predictive factors of csPCa. Previous negative PBx was negatively associated with csPCa (OR = 0.24, CI 95% 0.07-0.66, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our result suggests that the optimal PSAD threshold was 0.15 ng/ml/cm3. However, in this case omitting PBx in 71.5% of cases would be at the cost of missing 15.0% of csPCa. PSAD should not be used alone, other predictive factors as age and PBx history should also be considered in the discussion with the patient, to avoid PBx while missing few csPCa.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos
2.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 20(3): e244-e252, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35216924

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A greater selection of candidates for active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) may decrease the rate of delayed treatment. We aimed to study: 1) the impact of MRI and PSA density (PSAd) at baseline on the final status, and 2) the impact of bio-clinical features during the follow-up on pursuing AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric study between June 2013 and July 2020, included 99 patients in AS (median follow-up: 19 months [18-92]). All MRI were reviewed by a single radiologist. Lost to follow-up were 17 patients and 6 patients chose treatment by themselves. Treatment was proposed in case of upgrading (≥ GG2) or increasing PCa volume. RESULTS: Impact of MRI and PSAd at baseline:  Combining PSAd ≤ 0.15 and PIRADS ≤ 3, the probability to remain in AS was 72%. This rate reached 83% when PSAd ≤ 0.10 was associated to normal MRI.  During follow-up:  One hundred fifty-seven prostatic biopsies (PBx) were performed and 38 (24%) found PCa upgrading. The association between negative MRI and PSAd ≤ 0.10, during follow-up, had an excellent NPV to predict treatment (95%). This combination concerned 25% (37/151) of surveillance biopsies that could have been avoided at the cost of delaying upgrading in 3% (1/37). In multivariate analysis, only PIRADS ≥ 4 before PBx was associated to a risk of treatment during follow-up (OR, 10.4 [95% CI, 4.2-25.8]; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Using PSAd and MRI at baseline to select patients showed excellent performances to predict the maintenance in AS. During follow-up, MRI PIRADS ≥ 4 was associated to an increased risk of treatment.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Conduta Expectante
3.
Am J Transplant ; 20(6): 1729-1738, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32012441

RESUMO

The medical device M101 is an extracellular hemoglobin featuring high oxygen-carrying capabilities. Preclinical studies demonstrated its safety as an additive to organ preservation solutions and its beneficial effect on ischemia/reperfusion injuries. OXYgen carrier for Organ Preservation (OXYOP) is a multicenter open-label study evaluating for the first time the safety of M101 added (1 g/L) to the preservation solution of one of two kidneys from the same donor. All adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by an independent data and safety monitoring board. Among the 58 donors, 38% were extended criteria donors. Grafts were preserved in cold storage (64%) or machine perfusion (36%) with a mean cold ischemia time (CIT) of 740 minutes. At 3 months, 490 AEs (41 serious) were reported, including two graft losses and two acute rejections (3.4%). No immunological, allergic, or prothrombotic effects were reported. Preimplantation and 3-month biopsies did not show thrombosis or altered microcirculation. Secondary efficacy end points showed less delayed graft function (DGF) and better renal function in the M101 group than in the contralateral kidneys. In the subgroup of grafts preserved in cold storage, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis showed beneficial effects on DGF independent of CIT (P = .048). This study confirms that M101 is safe and shows promising efficacy data.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Soluções para Preservação de Órgãos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Rim , Preservação de Órgãos , Oxigênio , Perfusão , Doadores de Tecidos
4.
Scand J Urol ; 52(3): 174-179, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29463177

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Compared with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies (SBx), targeted biopsies (TBx) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/TRUS fusion could increase the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa-s) and reduce non-significant PCa (PCa-ns). This study aimed to compare the performance of the two approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-center study was conducted on all consecutive patients with PCa suspicion who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). All patients underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion TBx (two to four cores/target) using UroStation™ (Koelis, Grenoble, France) and SBx (10-12 cores) during the same session. PCa-s was defined as a maximal positive core length ≥4 mm or Gleason score ≥7. RESULTS: The study included 191 patients (at least one suspicious lesion: PI-RADS ≥3). PCa was detected in 55.5% (106/191) of the cases. The overall PCa detection rate and the PCa-s detection rate were not significantly higher in TBx alone versus SBx (44.5% vs 46.1%, p = .7, and 38.2% vs 33.5%, p = .2, respectively). Combined TBx and SBx diagnosed significantly more PCa-s than SBx alone (45% vs 33.5%, p = .02). PCa-s was detected only by TBx in 12% of cases (23/191) and only by SBx in 7.3% (14/191). Gleason score was upgraded by TBx in 16.8% (32/191) and by SBx in 13.6% (26/191) of patients (p = .4). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TBx and SBx achieved the best results for the detection and prognosis of PCa-s. The use of SBx alone would have missed the detection of PCa-s in 12% of patients.


Assuntos
Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/métodos , Endossonografia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Reações Falso-Negativas , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal , Gradação de Tumores , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Prog Urol ; 15(1): 75-7, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15822398

RESUMO

Renal infarction is a rare disease which must be considered in any case of low back pain. The most frequent causes are related to emboligenic heart disease, renal artery fibrodysplasia or trauma. The authors report the second published case of idiopathic renal infarction. The diagnosis is usually suggested by contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan, but is confirmed and refined by selective renal arteriography or CT angiography. Treatment may be medical or surgical depending on the severity of the lesions and the patient's general state. The therapeutic indications are discussed in the light of a review of the literature.


Assuntos
Infarto/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA