Guideline-directed medical therapy prescribing patterns and in-hospital outcomes among heart failure patients during COVID-19.

Study objective: The association of prior to admission guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use in patients hospitalized with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF, ejection fraction ≤40 %) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with in-hospital outcomes has not been well studied. Design/setting/participants/interventions/outcome measures: Using the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Registry, we identified HFrEF patients presenting with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and compared rates of GDMT prescription between those presenting prior to and during the pandemic. In a subgroup of patients with a concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis, we evaluated the association of prior to admission GDMT use with in-hospital mortality and severe COVID-19. Results: 23,899 patients were admitted with HFrEF during the pandemic (2/16/20-3/24/21) and 26,459 patients were admitted in the year prior (2/16/19-2/15/20). In this overall cohort, prior to admission ACEI/ARB/ARNI (45.6 % vs 48.1 %, p < 0.0001) and BB (56.9 % vs 62.4 %, p < 0.0001) use was lower among admitted HFrEF patients during the pandemic when compared to the year prior. Rates of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, MRA, and triple therapy (ACE/ARB/ARNI + BB + MRA) prescription at discharge were higher during the pandemic compared to the year prior. Among a subgroup of those with HFrEF and COVID-19 (n = 333), prior to admission GDMT use was not associated with in-hospital mortality or severe COVID-19. Conclusion: We found no association between prior to admission GDMT use and in-hospital mortality or severe COVID-19 among HFrEF patients admitted with ADHF and COVID-19. GDMT prescription at discharge for HFrEF patients overall has remained either similar or improved during the pandemic.

Bias Perpetuates Bias: ChatGPT Learns Gender Inequities in Academic Surgery Promotions.

OBJECTIVE: Gender inequities persist in academic surgery with implicit bias impacting hiring and promotion at all levels. We hypothesized that creating letters of recommendation for both female and male candidates for academic promotion in surgery using an AI platform, ChatGPT, would elucidate the entrained gender biases already present in the promotion process. DESIGN: Using ChatGPT, we generated 6 letters of recommendation for "a phenomenal surgeon applying for job promotion to associate professor position", specifying "female" or "male" before surgeon in the prompt. We compared 3 "female" letters to 3 "male" letters for differences in length, language, and tone. RESULTS: The letters written for females averaged 298 words compared to 314 for males. Female letters more frequently referred to "compassion", "empathy", and "inclusivity"; whereas male letters referred to "respect", "reputation", and "skill". CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the gender bias present in promotion letters generated by ChatGPT, reiterating existing literature regarding real letters of recommendation in academic surgery. Our study suggests that surgeons should use AI tools, such as ChatGPT, with caution when writing LORs for academic surgery faculty promotion.

Patient Perspectives on AI for Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to health and health care is rapidly increasing. Several studies have assessed the attitudes of health professionals, but far fewer studies have explored the perspectives of patients or the general public. Studies investigating patient perspectives have focused on somatic issues, including those related to radiology, perinatal health, and general applications. Patient feedback has been elicited in the development of specific mental health care solutions, but broader perspectives toward AI for mental health care have been underexplored. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand public perceptions regarding potential benefits of AI, concerns about AI, comfort with AI accomplishing various tasks, and values related to AI, all pertaining to mental health care. METHODS: We conducted a 1-time cross-sectional survey with a nationally representative sample of 500 US-based adults. Participants provided structured responses on their perceived benefits, concerns, comfort, and values regarding AI for mental health care. They could also add free-text responses to elaborate on their concerns and values. RESULTS: A plurality of participants (245/497, 49.3%) believed AI may be beneficial for mental health care, but this perspective differed based on sociodemographic variables (all P<.05). Specifically, Black participants (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, 95% CI 1.03-3.05) and those with lower health literacy (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.29-3.78) perceived AI to be more beneficial, and women (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-0.99) perceived AI to be less beneficial. Participants endorsed concerns about accuracy, possible unintended consequences such as misdiagnosis, the confidentiality of their information, and the loss of connection with their health professional when AI is used for mental health care. A majority of participants (80.4%, 402/500) valued being able to understand individual factors driving their risk, confidentiality, and autonomy as it pertained to the use of AI for their mental health. When asked who was responsible for the misdiagnosis of mental health conditions using AI, 81.6% (408/500) of participants found the health professional to be responsible. Qualitative results revealed similar concerns related to the accuracy of AI and how its use may impact the confidentiality of patients' information. CONCLUSIONS: Future work involving the use of AI for mental health care should investigate strategies for conveying the level of AI's accuracy, factors that drive patients' mental health risks, and how data are used confidentially so that patients can determine with their health professionals when AI may be beneficial. It will also be important in a mental health care context to ensure the patient-health professional relationship is preserved when AI is used.

Impact of Holistic Application Scoring on Interview Offers.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a holistic screening tool for surgical residency application processing to capture the diverse skills and attributes of the applicant, based on characteristics most commonly associated with success in our residency program. DESIGN: We developed an application-scoring rubric with 4 domains based on ACGME Holistic reviewing criteria: academic potential, experiences, personal attributes, and clinical competency. We scored academic potential based on a composite of Step 2 score, MSPE tier rank, surgery clerkship grade, college honors, publications, and presentations. An additional score accounted for personal adversity overcome or "distance travelled". This included previous homelessness, first-generation college student or immigrant status, noted socioeconomic hardship, disability overcome, or other stated personal experience of discrimination including underrepresented in medicine status. We sorted the list of top 200 candidates by adversity score, Step 2 score, academic potential score, and total overall score to compare the groups in terms of interview offers. SETTING: We are an academic surgical residency program housed within a private medical college in the Northeast region. PARTICIPANTS: All categorical applicants to our program were managed with our holistic screening approach. RESULTS: There were 29 students with the highest adversity score (AS) of 4 and 26 (90%) were selected to interview based on holistic overall score and reviewer comments. Fourteen students had an AS of 3, and 12 (86%) were selected to interview. Twenty-five students had an AS of 2, and 23 (92%) were selected to interview. If Step 2 score alone had been used to determine which applicants should be interviewed, only 11 students (38%) with an AS of 4 would have been interviewed. If the academic potential alone was used for screening, only 10 (35%) of students with an AS of 4 would have been interviewed. Taking all students with any adversity score into account (n = 70), when screened with only Step 2 scores, just 31(44%) would have been interviewed. When ranked by academic potential score, 35 (50%) would have been interviewed. When applying our holistic overall score alone, 56 (80%) would have been interviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a holistic application review and ranking students not only by standardized exam scores, but also considering other history of academic achievement, personal attributes, experiences in leadership or service, and clinical competency can allow for mitigation of implicit bias. Allowance for an adversity score can help programs recognize students who have significantly longer "distance traveled" to make it through medical education and who have the potential to be fantastic residents.

Economic burden of recurrent hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and can become recurrent in half of cases. However, the incremental economic burden associated with recurrent hyperkalemia is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate all-cause health care resource utilization (HRU) and medical costs in patients with stage 3/4 CKD with recurrent hyperkalemia vs normokalaemia and vs nonrecurrent hyperkalemia. METHODS: Data were from Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data (January 1, 2016, to August 1, 2022). This retrospective observational cohort study compared patients with stage 3/4 CKD with recurrent hyperkalemia (≥2 hyperkalemia events within 1 year [hyperkalemia event: hyperkalemia diagnosis or potassium [K+]>5 mmol/l]; index was the first hyperkalemia event) with an exact- and propensity score-matched cohort of patients with normokalemia (K+ ≥3.5 to ≤5 mmol/l; random K+ as index) and separately with a matched cohort of patients with nonrecurrent hyperkalemia (1 hyperkalemia event within 1 year; index was hyperkalemia event). Patient characteristics, medication use, HRU, and medical costs were compared between cohorts using standardized mean differences during the 12-month baseline period. All-cause HRU and medical costs during the 12-month follow-up were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and McNemar tests for categorical variables. Substudies of recurrent hyperkalemia vs normokalemia were conducted for patients with Medicare coverage and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) use. RESULTS: The recurrent hyperkalemia vs normokalemia sample comprised 4,549 matched pairs (Medicare substudy: 3,151; RAASi substudy: 3,535) and the recurrent hyperkalemia vs nonrecurrent hyperkalemia sample comprised 1,599 matched pairs. Baseline characteristics, HRU, and medical costs of the cohorts were similar after matching. During follow-up, patients with recurrent hyperkalemia had a mean of 11.2 more health care encounters (0.5 more inpatient admissions, 0.3 more emergency department visits, and 7.2 more outpatient visits) than patients with normokalemia. Patients with recurrent hyperkalemia also had double the total annual medical costs vs normokalemia ($34,163 vs $15,175; P < 0.001), mainly driven by inpatient costs ($21,250 vs $7,392), which accounted for 62.2% and 48.7% of total costs, respectively. Results were similar in the RAASi and Medicare substudies. Recurrent hyperkalemia was associated with a mean 4.3 more all-cause health care encounters and $14,057 higher medical costs (both P < 0.001) than nonrecurrent hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent hyperkalemia in patients with stage 3/4 CKD was associated with higher all-cause HRU and medical costs compared with normokalemia (including in patients with Medicare coverage and RAASi use) and nonrecurrent hyperkalemia. Research is needed to understand if long-term treatment strategies aimed at preventing hyperkalemia recurrence may alleviate this economic burden.

Hyperkalemia and risk of chronic kidney disease progression: A propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a known complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, it is not known whether hyperkalemia directly contributes to CKD progression and the risk of death. Clarifying the extent to which hyperkalemia is associated with CKD progression and mortality can inform clinical practice and guide future research. The objective of this study was to quantify the risks of CKD progression and mortality associated with hyperkalemia in patients with stages 3b/4 CKD. METHODS: This was a real-world, exact and propensity score-matched, observational cohort study using data (January 2016-December 2021) from Optum's deidentified Market Clarity Data, a large US integrated insurance claims/electronic medical record database. The study included matched adult patients with stages 3b/4 CKD with and without hyperkalemia, not regularly treated with an intestinal potassium (K+) binder. Measured outcomes were CKD progression and all-cause mortality. CKD progression was defined as diagnosis of CKD stage 4 (if stage 3b at index), CKD stage 5 or kidney failure, or receipt of dialysis or kidney transplantation. RESULTS: After matching, there were 6,619 patients in each of the hyperkalemia and non-hyperkalemia cohorts, with a mean (standard deviation) follow-up time of 2.12 (1.42) years. Use of any renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) during baseline was common (75.9%) and most patients had CKD stage 3b (71.2%). Patients with hyperkalemia had a 1.60-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50, 1.71) higher risk of CKD progression and a 1.09-fold (1.02, 1.16) higher risk of all-cause mortality relative to patients without hyperkalemia. Relative risks of CKD progression associated with hyperkalemia were similar within the subset of patients receiving RAASi and across CKD stages, and when alternative definitions of CKD progression were used. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD stages 3b/4 and hyperkalemia experienced significantly higher risks of CKD progression and all-cause mortality than propensity score-matched patients without hyperkalemia.

Patient and clinician preferences for biologic treatments for severe uncontrolled asthma: a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the preferences of patients with asthma and asthma-treating clinicians for attributes of biologic treatments, to compare patients' and clinicians' preferences, and to better understand the reasons for their preferences. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe asthma and clinicians who treat asthma in the US completed a cross-sectional, online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) that consisted of seven attributes spanning treatment efficacy, risk and convenience. Marginal utilities were estimated using a mixed logit model, and relative attribute importance scores calculated. Clinicians were also asked about the value of biomarker agnostic biologic treatments. The survey was followed by qualitative interviews targeting a sub-sample of survey participants, in which the rationale behind their survey responses was discussed. RESULTS: In the DCE, both patients and clinicians placed the most importance on exacerbation and hospitalization rate reduction, and risk of injection site reaction. Patients valued location of administration more than clinicians. Rationale for individual-level preferences varied, with patients and clinicians reporting their preference depended on event frequency and anticipated quality of life impacts. Clinicians mentioned compliance and financial impacts, while patients mentioned personal experience, particularly around site reactions. Most patients and clinicians would value a biomarker agnostic asthma treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma treatment preferences are largely driven by treatment efficacy and minimizing the risk of site reactions, although preferences differ between patients and clinicians across other attributes, highlighting the need for shared decision-making and individualized care.

Hyperkalemia Recurrence Following Medical Nutrition Therapy in Patients with Stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease: The REVOLUTIONIZE I Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: The REVOLUTIONIZE I study aimed to characterize the relationships between medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and hyperkalemia recurrence in patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hyperkalemia who received MNT in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This observational cohort study used de-identified electronic health record data from patients aged ≥ 18 years with stage 3-4 CKD who received MNT between January 2019 and October 2022 and had hyperkalemia (serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L) within 30 days before MNT. Patients were followed for 6 months or until the first censoring event (death, prescription of outpatient potassium binder, or study end). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the number of hyperkalemia recurrences per patient, time to each recurrence, and hyperkalemia-related healthcare resource utilization. Exploratory outcomes included all-cause healthcare resource utilization and mortality. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 2048 patients; 1503 (73.4%) patients remained uncensored after 6 months. During the 6-month follow-up period, 56.0% of patients had ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence and 37.4% had ≥ 1 recurrence within the first month. Patients with ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence during follow-up had a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 2.6 ± 2.2 recurrences. The mean ± SD time to first hyperkalemia recurrence was 45 ± 46 days; the time between recurrences decreased with subsequent episodes. Hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits were recorded for 13.7% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were consistent across patient subgroups, including those with comorbid heart failure and patients receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy at baseline. CONCLUSION: Most patients with stage 3-4 CKD had hyperkalemia recurrence, and MNT alone was inadequate to prevent recurrence. These patients may require additional long-term treatment, such as novel potassium binders, to maintain normokalemia and prevent hyperkalemia recurrence following MNT. Infographic available for this article. INFOGRAPHIC.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically receive dietary counseling from a registered dietician, referred to as medical nutrition therapy, to help reduce their risk of complications of CKD while addressing their specific nutritional needs. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of elevated blood potassium levels (hyperkalemia), which has potentially life-threatening consequences. Although medical nutrition therapy may help patients with hyperkalemia to manage their dietary potassium intake, its effects in preventing recurrence are unclear. Our aim was to determine whether medical nutrition therapy can help prevent hyperkalemia recurrence after an initial event in patients with non-dialysis-dependent (stage 3­4) CKD in real-world clinical practice. We used data from de-identified electronic health records to study hyperkalemia recurrence over 6 months in patients with stage 3­4 CKD who received medical nutrition therapy within 30 days after experiencing hyperkalemia. Over half of the patients (56.0%) had at least one hyperkalemia recurrence within an average of 45 days during the 6 months after medical nutrition therapy; these patients had an average of 2.6 distinct recurrences in 6 months. In patients with two or more hyperkalemia recurrences, the time between these became shorter than 30 days. Our real-world study results show that hyperkalemia is a chronic, recurring condition in patients with stage 3­4 CKD, and that medical nutrition therapy is not enough to prevent its recurrence. This suggests that these patients may need additional long-term treatment for hyperkalemia, such as novel potassium binder therapy, to prevent hyperkalemia recurrence.

Visualizing machine learning-based predictions of postpartum depression risk for lay audiences.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if different formats for conveying machine learning (ML)-derived postpartum depression risks impact patient classification of recommended actions (primary outcome) and intention to seek care, perceived risk, trust, and preferences (secondary outcomes). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited English-speaking females of childbearing age (18-45 years) using an online survey platform. We created 2 exposure variables (presentation format and risk severity), each with 4 levels, manipulated within-subject. Presentation formats consisted of text only, numeric only, gradient number line, and segmented number line. For each format viewed, participants answered questions regarding each outcome. RESULTS: Five hundred four participants (mean age 31 years) completed the survey. For the risk classification question, performance was high (93%) with no significant differences between presentation formats. There were main effects of risk level (all P < .001) such that participants perceived higher risk, were more likely to agree to treatment, and more trusting in their obstetrics team as the risk level increased, but we found inconsistencies in which presentation format corresponded to the highest perceived risk, trust, or behavioral intention. The gradient number line was the most preferred format (43%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: All formats resulted high accuracy related to the classification outcome (primary), but there were nuanced differences in risk perceptions, behavioral intentions, and trust. Investigators should choose health data visualizations based on the primary goal they want lay audiences to accomplish with the ML risk score.

Medical Costs in Patients with Hyperkalemia on Long-Term Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Therapy: The RECOGNIZE II Study.

Purpose: Hyperkalemia, defined as abnormally high serum potassium levels of ≥5.1 mmol/L, is associated with increased medical costs. This real-world study evaluated the impact of long-term sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) therapy on medical costs in patients with hyperkalemia. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, comparative study used claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus. Patients aged ≥18 years with hyperkalemia who had outpatient SZC fills (>3-month supply over 6 months) between July 2019 and December 2021 and continuous insurance coverage 6 months before and 6 months after the first SZC fill were included. These patients (SZC cohort) were 1:1 exact- and propensity score-matched on baseline variables with patients with hyperkalemia who did not receive SZC (non-SZC cohort). The primary endpoint was hyperkalemia-related medical costs to payers over 6 months. Results: Each cohort included 661 matched patients. Mean per-patient hyperkalemia-related medical costs were reduced by 49.5% ($3728.47) for the SZC versus non-SZC cohort ($3798.04 vs $7526.51; P<0.001), whereas mean all-cause medical costs were reduced by 21.0% ($5492.20; $20,722.23 vs $26,214.43; P<0.01). A 39.8% ($3621.03) increase in all-cause pharmacy costs ($12,727.20 vs $9106.17; P<0.01) was offset by the medical cost savings. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that long-term (>3 months) outpatient treatment with SZC was associated with medical cost savings compared with no SZC therapy.

Impact of Age and Variant Time Period on Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of age and COVID-19 variant time period on morbidity and mortality among those hospitalized with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: Patients from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines COVID-19 cardiovascular disease registry (January 20, 2020-February 14, 2022) were divided into groups based on whether they presented during periods of wild type/alpha, delta, or omicron predominance. They were further subdivided by age (young: 18-40 years; older: more than 40 years), and characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results: The cohort consisted of 45,421 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (wild type/alpha period: 41,426, delta period: 3349, and omicron period: 646). Among young patients (18-40 years), presentation during delta was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3) when compared with presentation during wild type/alpha. Among older patients (more than 40 years), presentation during delta was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), MACE (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6) when compared with wild type/alpha. Among older patients (more than 40 years), presentation during omicron associated with decreased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9) when compared with wild type/alpha. Conclusion: Among hospitalized adults with COVID-19, presentation during a time of delta predominance was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19, MACE, and in-hospital mortality compared with presentation during wild type/alpha. Among older patients (aged more than 40 years), presentation during omicron was associated with decreased odds of severe COVID-19 and in-hospital mortality compared with wild type/alpha.

Impact of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Plus Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Therapy on Short-Term Medical Costs in Hyperkalemia: OPTIMIZE II Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving cardiorenal-protective renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) are at increased risk of developing hyperkalemia, which is associated with increased medical costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adding sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) therapy on 3-month medical costs in patients who experienced hyperkalemia while receiving RAASi therapy. METHODS: The retrospective OPTIMIZE II study used medical and pharmacy claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who received SZC (≥ 60 day supply over 3 months' follow-up) and continued RAASi between July 2019 and December 2021 (Continue RAASi + SZC cohort) were 1:1 exact and propensity score matched with patients who discontinued RAASi after hyperkalemia diagnosis and did not receive SZC (Discontinue RAASi + no SZC cohort). The primary outcome was hyperkalemia-related medical costs to payers over 3 months; all-cause medical and pharmacy costs were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the Continue RAASi + SZC (n = 467) versus Discontinue RAASi + no SZC (n = 467) cohort, there were significant reductions in mean per-patient hyperkalemia-related medical costs (reduction of $2216.07; p = 0.01) and all-cause medical costs (reduction of $6102.43; p < 0.001); mean hyperkalemia-related inpatient medical costs and all-cause inpatient and emergency department medical costs were significantly reduced. The reduction in all-cause medical cost in the Continue RAASi + SZC cohort offset an increase in the mean per-patient all-cause pharmacy cost (increase of $3117.71; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RAASi therapy has well-established cardiorenal benefits. In OPTIMIZE II, management of RAASi-induced hyperkalemia with SZC was associated with lower hyperkalemia-related and all-cause medical costs than RAASi discontinuation without SZC, demonstrating medical cost savings with maintaining RAASi therapy with SZC.

Short-term costs in patients with chronic kidney disease treated with dapagliflozin: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This real-world study evaluated the impact of dapagliflozin on short-term medical costs in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus. Patients aged ≥18 years with a filled dapagliflozin prescription after stage 3 CKD diagnosis between September 2020 and December 2021 were 1:1 propensity score matched with patients with stage 3 CKD who did not receive dapagliflozin. The primary endpoint was cardiorenal medical costs to payers over 6 months; all-cause medical and pharmacy costs were also analyzed. Within the overall population, there was a new-user subgroup of patients with no sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 use during baseline. RESULTS: The new-user subgroup included 503 matched patients per cohort. Mean per-patient cardiorenal medical costs were reduced by 49.0% in the dapagliflozin versus non-dapagliflozin cohort ($3172.15 vs $6219.50; P < 0.001). Mean all-cause medical costs were reduced ($8043.58 vs $12,194.87; P < 0.001) and mean all-cause pharmacy costs were increased ($9056.98 vs $7453.23; P = 0.22). Results were similar for the overall population. CONCLUSION: This study showed dapagliflozin was associated with reduced cardiorenal medical costs over 6 months compared with no dapagliflozin treatment in patients with stage 3 CKD, demonstrating real-world medical cost savings.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a condition in which the kidneys become progressively less effective at filtering blood. Patients with CKD also have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, and stroke. Dapagliflozin is a drug that can be prescribed for adults with CKD to reduce the risk of CKD worsening, hospitalization for heart failure, and death from cardiovascular disease. Because the cost of medications could affect whether they are prescribed to patients who could benefit from them, our goal was to study the impact of dapagliflozin treatment on short-term costs for patients in the United States with CKD. We used health insurance claims data to compare medical costs (sum of costs for treatment during hospital admissions and outpatient and emergency department visits) and pharmacy costs over 6 months between patients with stage 3 CKD treated with dapagliflozin with those for a matching group of patients who were not treated with dapagliflozin. The dapagliflozin group had a lower average medical cost for cardiorenal causes (related to CKD, including hospitalization for heart failure) paid by health insurance than the non-dapagliflozin group; the average cardiorenal medical cost patients paid themselves (out-of-pocket) was also lower for the dapagliflozin group. The average medical cost for all causes paid by insurance was also lower for the dapagliflozin group; this reduction was larger than the increase in the average all-cause pharmacy cost in the dapagliflozin group. Our study showed that treatment with dapagliflozin can lead to medical cost savings for patients with CKD.

Management Practices for Standard-Risk and High-Risk Patients With Bronchiolitis.

OBJECTIVE: Management guidelines for bronchiolitis advocate for supportive care and exclude those with high-risk conditions. We aim to describe and compare the management of standard-risk and high-risk patients with bronchiolitis. METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients <2 years of age admitted to the general pediatric ward with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision discharge diagnosis code of bronchiolitis or viral syndrome with evidence of lower respiratory tract involvement. Patients were defined as either standard- or high-risk on the basis of previously published criteria. The frequencies of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were compared. RESULTS: We included 265 patients in this study (122 standard-risk [46.0%], 143 high-risk [54.0%]). Increased bronchodilator use was observed in the standard-risk group (any albuterol dosing, standard-risk 65.6%, high-risk 44.1%, P = .003). Increased steroid use was observed in the standard-risk group (any steroid dosing, standard-risk 19.7%, high-risk 14.7%, P = .018). Multiple logistic regression revealed >3 doses of albuterol, hypertonic saline, and chest physiotherapy use to be associated with rapid response team activation (odds ratio [OR] >3 doses albuterol: 8.36 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99-35.10], P = .048; OR >3 doses hypertonic saline: 13.94 [95% CI: 4.32-44.92], P = .001); OR percussion and postural drainage: 5.06 [95% CI: 1.88-13.63], P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: A varied approach to the management of bronchiolitis in both standard-risk and high-risk children occurred institutionally. Bronchodilators and steroids continue to be used frequently despite practice recommendations and regardless of risk status. More research is needed on management strategies in patients at high-risk for severe disease.

Women's perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in mental healthcare.

This study aimed to evaluate women's attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies used in mental health care. We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of U.S. adults reporting female sex at birth focused on bioethical considerations for AI-based technologies in mental healthcare, stratifying by previous pregnancy. Survey respondents (n = 258) were open to AI-based technologies in mental healthcare but concerned about medical harm and inappropriate data sharing. They held clinicians, developers, healthcare systems, and the government responsible for harm. Most reported it was "very important" for them to understand AI output. More previously pregnant respondents reported being told AI played a small role in mental healthcare was "very important" versus those not previously pregnant (P = .03). We conclude that protections against harm, transparency around data use, preservation of the patient-clinician relationship, and patient comprehension of AI predictions may facilitate trust in AI-based technologies for mental healthcare among women.

Who needs what (features) when? Personalizing engagement with data-driven self-management to improve health equity.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the feasibility of promoting engagement with data-driven self-management of health among individuals from minoritized medically underserved communities by tailoring the design of self-management interventions to individuals' type of motivation and regulation in accordance with the Self-Determination Theory. METHODS: Fifty-three individuals with type 2 diabetes from an impoverished minority community were randomly assigned to four different versions of an mHealth app for data-driven self-management with the focus on nutrition, Platano; each version was tailored to a specific type of motivation and regulation within the SDT self-determination continuum. These versions included financial rewards (external regulation), feedback from expert registered dietitians (RDF, introjected regulation), self-assessment of attainment of one's nutritional goals (SA, identified regulation), and personalized meal-time nutrition decision support with post-meal blood glucose forecasts (FORC, integrated regulation). We used qualitative interviews to examine interaction between participants' experiences with the app and their motivation type (internal-external). RESULTS: As hypothesized, we found a clear interaction between the type of motivation and Platano features that users responded to and benefited from. For example, those with more internal motivation reported more positive experience with SA and FORC than those with more external motivation. However, we also found that Platano features that aimed to specifically address the needs of individuals with external regulation did not create the desired experience. We attribute this to a mismatch in emphasis on informational versus emotional support, particularly evident in RDF. In addition, we found that for participants recruited from an economically disadvantaged community, internal factors, such as motivation and regulation, interacted with external factors, most notably with limited health literacy and limited access to resources. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests feasibility of using SDT to tailor design of mHealth interventions for promoting data-driven self-management to individuals' motivation and regulation. However, further research is needed to better align design solutions with different levels of self-determination continuum, to incorporate stronger emphasis on emotional support for individuals with external regulation, and to address unique needs and challenges of underserved communities, with particular attention to limited health literacy and access to resources.

Real-World Modifications of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with Hyperkalemia Initiating Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Therapy: The OPTIMIZE I Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia (HK) may result in disruptions of guidelines-concordant renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), a standard of care in persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Such disruptions-dose reduction or discontinuation-diminish the benefits of RAASi, placing patients at risk of serious events and renal dysfunction. This real-world study evaluated RAASi modifications among patients who initiated sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) for HK. METHODS: Adults (≥ 18 years) initiating outpatient SZC (index date) while on RAASi were identified from a large US claims database (January 2018-June 2020). RAASi optimization (maintain same or up-titration of RAASi dosage), non-optimization (down-titration of RAASi dosage or discontinuation), and persistence were descriptively summarized following index. Predictors of RAASi optimization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models. Analyses were conducted by subgroups, including patients without end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), with CKD, and with CKD + diabetes. RESULTS: A total of 589 patients initiated SZC during RAASi therapy (mean age 61.0 years, 65.2% male), and 82.7% patients (n = 487) kept RAASi after index (mean follow-up = 8.1 months). Most patients (77.4%) optimized RAASi therapy after initiating SZC; 69.6% maintained the same dosage while 7.8% had up-titrations. A similar rate of RAASi optimization was observed among subgroups without ESKD (78.4%), with CKD (78.9%), and with CKD + diabetes (78.1%). At 1-year post-index, 73.9% of all patients who optimized RAASi were still on therapy, while only 17.9% of patients who did not optimize therapy were still on a RAASi. Among all patients, predictors of RAASi optimization included fewer prior hospitalizations (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% CI [0.63-1.00]; p < 0.05) and fewer prior emergency department (ED) visits (0.78 [0.63-0.96]; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Consistent with clinical trial findings, nearly 80% of patients who initiated SZC for HK optimized their RAASi therapy. Patients may require long-term SZC therapy to encourage continuation of RAASi therapy especially after inpatient and ED visits.

Commentary on Cochrane review: "Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults with unipolar major depressive disorder".

BACKGROUND: Cochrane recently published a review of esketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators in depression. AIM: To address the limitations of the review, analyses of esketamine data were conducted to provide additional perspective to the reviewers' interpretation of their findings. METHODS: Response rate, remission rate, and change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score were determined using data from all esketamine phase 2/3 registration studies of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and, separately, all esketamine phase 2/3 registration studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and active suicidal ideation with intent. Outcomes were assessed at all timepoints (i.e., 24 h, 72 h (MDD with active suicidal intent only), and 1, 2, and 4 weeks). Enrollment criteria of the TRD studies were different than those of the studies of MDD and active suicidal ideation with intent, resulting in differences in patients' clinical characteristics and depression severity between the cohorts. Thus, we did not compare results between these cohorts (as was done in the Cochrane review). RESULTS/OUTCOMES: In the combined TRD studies, a statistically significant between-group difference favored esketamine plus antidepressant over antidepressant plus placebo at 24 h (based on response, remission, and change in MADRS score), 1 week (change in MADRS score), 2 weeks (response and change in MADRS score), and 4 weeks (response, remission, and change in MADRS score). In the combined studies of MDD and active suicidal ideation with intent, the between-group difference was statistically different, favoring esketamine plus standard-of-care over placebo plus standard-of-care, at 24 h (response, remission, and change in MADRS score), 72 h and 1 week (change in MADRS score), 2 weeks (response), and 4 weeks (response, remission, and change in MADRS score). For both study types, the between-group difference in outcomes was not statistically significant at the other timepoints. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Esketamine improves response, remission, and depressive symptoms as early as 24 h post-first dose among patients with TRD and among patients with MDD and active suicidal ideation with intent.