Comparison of Depth-Related Visuomotor Task Performance in Uniocular Individuals and in Binocular Controls With and Without Temporary Monocular Occlusion.

Purpose: Do one-eyed (uniocular) humans use monocular depth cues differently from those with intact binocularity to perform depth-related visuomotor tasks that emulate complex activities of daily living? If so, does performance depend on the participant's age, duration of uniocularity and head movements? Methods: Forty-five uniocular cases (age range 6-37 years; 2.4 months-31.0 years of uniocularity) and 46 age-similar binocular controls performed a task that required them to pass a hoop around an electrified wire convoluted in depth multiple times, while avoiding contact as indicated by auditory feedback. The task was performed with and without head restraint, in random order. The error rate and speed were calculated from the frequency of contact between the hoop and wire and the total task duration (adjusting for error time), respectively, all determined from video recordings of the task. Head movements were analyzed from the videos using face-tracking software. Results: Error rate decreased with age (P < 0.001) until the late teen years while speed revealed no such trend. Across all ages, the error rate increased and speed decreased in the absence of binocularity (P < 0.001). There was no additional error reduction with duration of uniocularity (P = 0.16). Head movements provided no advantage to task performance, despite generating parallax disparities comparable to binocular viewing. Conclusions: Performance in a dynamic, depth-related visuomotor task is reduced in the absence of binocular viewing, independent of age-related performance level. This study finds no evidence for a prolonged experience with monocular depth cues being advantageous for such tasks over transient loss of binocularity.

Computational analysis of retinal image quality with different contact lens designs in keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To determine 1) the relative differences in optical quality of keratoconic eyes fitted with four routinely used CL designs and 2) the Zernike coefficients in the residual wavefront aberration map that may be responsible for differences in the optical quality of keratoconic eyes fitted with these CLs. METHODS: Wavefront aberrations over a 3-mm pupil diameter were measured without and with Kerasoft IC®, Rose K2®, conventional spherical Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP), and Scleral CLs in 15 mild to moderate keratoconic eyes (20 - 28 years) and under unaided viewing in 10 age-similar non-contact lens wearing controls. The resultant through-focus curves constructed for the logarithm of Neural Sharpness (logNS) Image Quality (IQ) metric were quantified in terms of peak value, best focus, and depth of focus. Sensitivity analyses determined the impact of the residual Zernike coefficients of keratoconic eyes fitted with CLs on the IQ of controls at emmetropic refraction. RESULTS: The peak IQ and depth of focus were similar with Rose K2®, conventional RGP, and Scleral CLs (p > 0.05, for all) but significantly better than Kerasoft IC® CLs (p < 0.01 for all). Best focus was similar across all four CLs (p > 0.2 for all). However, the IQ parameters of all the lenses remained significantly poorer than the controls (p < 0.01, for all). The IQ of the controls dropped to keratoconic levels with induced residual lower-order Zernike terms and 3rd-order coma across all lenses in the sensitivity analysis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IQ of keratoconic eyes remain suboptimal with routinely dispensed CL designs, largely due to residual lower-order aberrations and coma, all relative to the controls. The performance drop appears greater for the Kerasoft IC® CL relative to the other CL designs. These results may provide the optical basis for psychophysical spatial visual performance reported earlier across these four CL designs for keratoconus.

Impact of Degraded Optics on Monocular and Binocular Vision: Lessons from Recent Advances in Highly-Aberrated Eyes.

PURPOSE: Optical imperfections of the eye, characterized by higher-order wavefront aberrations, are exaggerated in corneal disease (e.g., keratoconus) and iatrogeny (e.g., keratorefractive surgery for myopia correction, keratoplasty for optical clarity restoration). This article reviews the recent advances on this topic for a comprehensive understanding of how optical degradations in disease models impact retinal image quality and monocular and binocular visual performance. METHODS: Published literature over the last decade on retinal image quality and/or monocular and binocular visual functions with corneal irregularity was reviewed based on their relevance to the current topic, study population and strength of study design. The literature was summarized into four themes: 1) wavefront errors and retinal image quality of highly aberrated eyes, 2) monocular and binocular vision loss consequent to degraded optics and visual strategies to optimize performance, 3) impact of optical correction modalities on visual performance and 4) implications for clinical management of patients. RESULTS: Across the 46 articles reviewed, the results clearly indicated that an increase in higher-order aberrations across these conditions had a significant negative impact on the patient's retinal image quality, and monocular and binocular visual functions. Interocular differences in retinal image quality deteriorated visual performance more than an overall worsening of image quality bilaterally. Minimizing optical degradation using rigid contact lenses and adaptive optics technology significantly improves retinal image quality and monocular and binocular vision, but performance remains sub-optimal relative to age-similar healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Corneal disease and iatrogeny are useful models to understand the impact of optical degradation on retinal image quality and visual performance. Clinical management will greatly benefit from equalizing retinal image quality of both eyes of these patients. Future studies that deepen our understanding of the structure-function relation in these conditions are desirable for advancing vision science in this area and for developing novel clinical management strategies.

Differences in Image Quality after Three Laser Keratorefractive Procedures for Myopia.

SIGNIFICANCE: Psychophysical estimates of spatial and depth vision have been shown to be better after bilateral ReLEx small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive surgery for myopia, relative to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). The present study provides the optical basis for these findings using computational image quality analysis. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare longitudinal changes in higher-order wavefront aberrations and image quality before and after bilateral PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE refractive procedures for correcting myopia. METHODS: Wavefront aberrations and image quality of both the eyes of 106 subjects (n = 40 for FS-LASIK and SMILE and n = 26 for PRK) were determined pre-operatively and at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month post-operative intervals using computational through-focus analysis for a 6-mm pupil diameter. Image quality was quantified in terms of its peak value and its interocular difference, residual defocus that was needed to achieve peak image quality (best focus), and the depth of focus. RESULTS: The increase in root mean squared deviations of higher-order aberrations post-operatively was lesser after SMILE (1-month visit median [25th to 75th interquartile range], 0.34 µm (0.28 to 0.39 µm]) than after PRK (0.80 µm [0.74 to 0.87 µm]) and FS-LASIK (0.74 µm [0.59 to 0.83 µm]; P ≤ .001), all relative to pre-operative values (0.20 µm [0.15 to 0.30 µm]). The peak image quality dropped and its interocular difference increased, best focus shifted myopically by 0.5 to 0.75 D, and depth of focus widened significantly after PRK and FS-LASIK surgeries, all relative to pre-operative values (P < .001). All these changes were negligible but statistically significant in a minority of instances after SMILE surgery (P ≥ .01). CONCLUSIONS: Although all three refractive surgeries correct myopia, the image quality and its similarity between eyes are better and closer to pre-operative values after SMILE, compared with FS-LASIK and PRK. These results can be explained from the underlying increase in higher-order wavefront aberrations experienced by the eye post-operatively.