Health state preference assessment in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient preferences for health states associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Seven health states describing varying stages of disease severity in DPN were developed: mild neuropathy, painful neuropathy, severe neuropathy, minor ulcer, severe ulcer, minor amputation and major amputation. Using a computer interview, both rating scale (RS) and standard gamble (SG) preference scores were elicited from 52 patients with diabetes mellitus. SETTING: A US university medical centre and a Veterans Affairs clinic. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus between the ages of 18 and 80 years. Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with DPN. RESULTS: Preference scores decreased in accordance with greater symptomatic and functional impairment. Median RS scores ranged from 0.89 to 0.23 for the seven health states. Median SG scores ranged from 0.96 to 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: Patient preferences for health states decrease as a function of increasing disease severity in DPN. The result is robust across the RS and SG methods of preference measurement. These results may be useful in informing policy analyses for resource allocation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Effect of telephone follow-up on the physical well-being dimension of quality of life in patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of telephone follow-up on the physical well-being dimension of health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Public teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty patients with cancer who were discharged to home from the hospital. INTERVENTION: Patients received a telephone follow-up call 48-72 hours after discharge. Information was solicited regarding drug-related (and other) problems. Problems were addressed, and advice and support were given. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed no differences in the physical well-being dimension of health-related quality of life between patients who received telephone follow-up and a control group who did not. Sixty-eight percent of the follow-up group and 40% of the control group (p = 0.007) reported having had at least one contact with a health professional. CONCLUSION: One possible explanation for the lack of effect of the intervention is that high-risk patients in the control group received a similar intervention from other health care professionals. We suggest that telephone follow-up be coordinated among health professionals.