Normothermic Machine Perfusion Is Associated With Improvement in Mortality and Graft Failure in Donation After Cardiac Death Liver Transplant Recipients in the United States.

Background: Use of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) may help to expand the liver transplantation (LT) donor pool by potentially increasing the utilization of donation after circulatory death (DCD) organs. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of NMP on LT from DCD organs. Methods: Data among DCD adult LT recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing between January 2016 and December 2022 were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between 2 groups: NMP versus non-MP using propensity score matching. Results: During the study period, 4217 DCD LT recipients (NMP: 257 and non-MP: 3960) were identified. compared with non-MP, DCD LT recipients in NMP group were older (median recipient age: 61 versus 59 y, P = 0.013), had lower model for the end-stage liver disease score, longer wait time (126 versus 107 d, P = 0.028), and received organs from older donors (median age: 42 versus 38 y, P < 0.01) with longer preservation time (9.9 versus 5.3 h, P < 0.001). Two-year overall survival (NMP 94.4% versus non-MP 89.7%, P = 0.040) and 2-y graft survival (NMP 91.3% versus non-MP 84.6%, P = 0.017) were better in the NMP group. After propensity score matching, 2-y overall survival (NMP 94.2% versus non-MP 88.0%, P = 0.023) and graft survival (NMP 91.3% versus non-MP 81.6%, P = 0.004) were better in the NMP group. On multivariable cox regression analysis, NMP was an independent factor of protection against mortality (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.91; P = 0.029) and against graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.61; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Use of NMP for LT from DCD donors was associated with improved posttransplant patient and graft survival.

Potential Association of Blood Transfusion in Deceased Donors With Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Donor blood transfusion may potentially affect transplant outcomes through an inflammatory response, recipient sensitization, or transmission of infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of donor blood transfusion with outcomes of liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2022, donor blood transfusion information was available for 113,017 adult recipients of LT in the United Network for Organ Sharing database and was classified into 4 levels of transfusion: no-transfusion (N = 68,130), transfusion of 1-5 units (N = 33,629), 6-10 units (N = 8067), and >10 units (N = 5329). Recipient survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox-hazard model. RESULTS: Among this cohort, 40.8% of donors (N = 46,261) received blood transfusion during the index hospitalization. Compared to no-blood transfusion donors, blood transfusion donors were younger (median age 37 versus 46 y P < 0.001) and were more brain death donors (94.5% versus 92.1%, P < 0.001). An increased risk of rejection at 6-mo (transfusion 10.3% versus no-transfusion 9.9%, P = 0.055) and 1 y (transfusion 12.5% versus no-transfusion 11.9%, P = 0.0036) post-LT was noted in this cohort. Multivariable Cox-hazard model showed blood transfusion was associated with increased 1-y mortality (transfusion 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P = 0.007) and graft failure (transfusion 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.13, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Donor blood transfusion was associated with an increased risk of rejection at 6 mo and 1 y among LT recipients and worse post-transplant graft and overall survival. Additional information regarding donor blood transfusion, along with other known factors, may be considered when deciding the optimization of overall immune suppression in LT recipients to decrease the risk of delayed rejection.

Stethoscope barriers narrative review; It's time for a strategy unfriendly to multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs).

The current standard of stethoscope hygiene doesn't eliminate the transmission of harmful pathogens, including multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). In the era of the increasing prevalence of MDRO infections, the use of new systems providing touch free barriers may improve patient safety versus traditional stethoscope cleaning practices with chemical agents. Our purpose was to provide a narrative literature review regarding barriers as an improvement over the current standard of care for stethoscope hygiene. Searching PubMed, articles were identified if they were in English and published after 1990, using the search term "stethoscope barrier", or if they were from a previously published stethoscope hygiene article using "author's name + stethoscope". Included articles evaluated or discussed stethoscope barriers. Of 28 manuscripts identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria. Barriers were considered superior to alternatives if they were single use, disposable, applied in a touch free fashion, were impervious to pathogens, provided an aseptic patient contact, and were acoustically invisible. Use of a practitioner's personal stethoscope with a disposable diaphragm barrier should be recommended as a new standard of care as this represents an improvement in patient safety and patient experience when compared to the disposable stethoscope or isopropyl alcohol stethoscope diaphragm cleaning.

The Effect of New Acuity Circle Policy on Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in the United States.

Background: New deceased donor liver allocation policy using an acuity circle (AC)-based model was implemented on February 4th, 2020. The effect of AC policy on simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of AC policy on SLKT waitlist mortality, transplant probability, and post-transplant outcomes. Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, 4908 adult SLKT candidates during two study periods, pre-AC (Aug-2017 to Feb-2020, N = 2770) and post-AC (Feb-2020 to Dec-2021, N = 2138) were analyzed. Outcomes included 90-day waitlist mortality, transplant probability, and post-transplant patient and graft survival. Results: Compared to pre-AC period, SLKT recipients during post-AC period had higher median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (24 vs 23, P < 0.001), and less percentage of MELD exception (4.6% vs 7.7%, P = 0.001). The 90-day waitlist mortality was same, but the probability of SLKT increased in post-AC period (P < 0.001). Post-AC period also saw increased utilization of donation after cardiac death organs (11% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001) and decreased rates of transplantation among Black candidates (7.9% vs 13%). After risk adjustment, post-AC period was not associated with any significant difference in 90-day waitlist mortality (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.80; 95% CI 0.56-1.16, P = 0.24), and a higher 90-day probability of SLKT (sHR 1.68; 95% CI 1.41-1.99, P < 0.001). During post-transplant period, one-year patient survival, liver and kidney graft survival were comparable between two study periods. Conclusions: The AC liver allocation policy was associated with increased transplant probability of adult SLKT candidates without decreasing waitlist mortality, post-transplant patient survival, or liver and kidney graft survival.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Heart Transplant Recipients and Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies: Experience, Lessons Learnt, and Future Challenges.

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), including heart transplant (HT) recipients, infected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at higher risk of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, or death when compared with general population. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have reduced COVID-19-related mortality rates from ~30% in the early pandemic to <3% in 2022 among HT recipients. We performed a retrospective chart review including adult HT recipients at Westchester Medical Center from January 1, 2020 to December 10, 2022, who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19, and those who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab for preexposure prophylaxis. Additionally, a comprehensive review of the literature involving SOTRs who received mAbs for COVID-19 was conducted. In this largest single-center study in this population, 42 adult HT recipients received casirivimab/imdevimab (36%), sotrovimab (31%), or bebtelovimab (29%) for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Among these recipients, no infusion-associated adverse effects, progression of disease, COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, or death were noted. Preexposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab was given to 63 HT recipients in a dedicated infusion center (40%), inpatient setting (33%), or at time of annual heart biopsy (27%). No immediate adverse events were noted. There were 11 breakthrough infections, all mild. Overall, the data suggests that HT recipients receiving mAbs have reduced rates of hospitalization, need for intensive care unit care, or death. Use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs in SOTRs is resource intensive and requires a programmatic team approach for optimal administration and to minimize any risk of disparities in their use.

The effects of acuity circle policy on racial disparity in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A new deceased donor liver allocation policy using an acuity circle-based model was implemented with the goal of providing equitable access to liver transplantation. We assessed the effect of the acuity circle policy on racial disparities in liver transplantation by analyzing waitlist mortality, transplant probability, and post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 23,717 adult liver transplantation candidates listed during the pre-acuity circle period and 21,051 during the post-acuity circle period (N = 44,768) in the United Network for Organ Sharing database from February 2020 to December 2021. RESULTS: Acuity circle-policy implementation was not associated with any significant difference in 90-day waitlist mortality but increased the 90-day probability of all candidates. Implementation did not decrease 90-day waitlist mortality but increased the 90-day transplant probability for all patients. One-year patient and liver graft survival were comparable between the study periods for all recipients, but Black recipients had higher rates of 1-year post-liver transplantation mortality and liver graft failure in both periods. CONCLUSION: Although the implementation of the acuity circle policy is associated with an increase in transplant probability in White, Black, and Hispanic liver transplantation candidates, it did not change their waitlist mortality, nor did it lead to any improvement in the preexistent worse post-transplant outcomes in Black liver transplantation recipients.

Utilization of hepatitis C virus infected donors in heart transplant recipients with elevated MELD-XI score.

BACKGROUND: The advent of direct-acting antivirals has helped to increase the safe utilization of organs from hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) donors. However, the outcomes of heart transplantation (HT) using an HCV+ donor are unclear in recipients with underlying liver disease represented by an elevated model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI). METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was queried from Jan 2016 to Dec 2021. Post-transplant outcomes stratified by recipient MELD-XI score (low <10.37, medium, 10.38-13.39, and high >13.4) was compared between patients with HT from HCV+ (N = 792) and patients with HT from HCV-negative donors (N = 15,266). RESULTS: The median MELD-XI score was comparable (HCV+, 12.1, vs. HCV-negative, 11.8, p = .37). In the HCV+ group, donors were older (33 vs. 31 years, p < .001). Ischemic time of donor hearts (3.48 vs. 3.28 h, p < .001) and travel distance (250 vs. 157 miles, p < .001) were longer in HCV+ group. In the Kaplan Meier analysis with a median follow-up of 750 days, survival was comparable between the two groups (2-year survival, MELD-XI Low: HCV+, 92.4 ± 3.6% vs. HCV-negative, 91.1 ±.8%, p = .83, Medium: HCV+ 89.2 ± 4.3% vs. HCV-negative, 88.2 ± 1.0%, p = .68, and High: HCV+, 84.9 ± 4.5% vs. HCV-negative, 84.6 ± 1.1%, p = .75) In multivariate Cox hazard models, HCV donors were not associated with mortality in each MELD-XI subgroup (Low: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.02, p = .94; Medium: aHR, .95, p = .81; and High: aHR, .93, p = .68). CONCLUSION: Utilization of HCV+ hearts was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in recipients with an elevated MELD- XI score.

Groin wound management after decannulation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in heart transplantation: Role of sartorius muscle flap.

BACKGROUND: The management of complex groin wounds following VA-ECMO after heart transplant (HT) is uncertain due to limited experience. Sartorius muscle flaps (SMF) have been used in vascular surgery for groin wound complications. However, their use in HT recipients with perioperative VA-ECMO is unclear. This study aims to describe characteristics and outcomes of HT patients with groin complications after arterial decannulation for femoral VA-ECMO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed HT patients who underwent peri-transplant femoral VA-ECMO at our institution from April 2011 to February 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence of cannulation-related wound complications. RESULTS: Among the 34 patients requiring VA-ECMO peri-transplant, 17 (50%) experienced complications at the cannulation site. Baseline characteristics including duration of VA-ECMO support were comparable in both groups. Patients with complications presented mostly with open wounds (41.1%) after a median duration of 22 days post-transplant. Concurrent groin infections were observed in 52.3% of patients, all caused by gram-negative bacteria. Wound complications were managed with 12 (70.6%) undergoing SMF treatment and 5 (31.2%) receiving conventional therapy. Four SMF recipients had preemptive procedures for wound dehiscence, while eight underwent SMF for groin infections. Among the SMF group, 11 patients had favorable outcomes without recurrent complications, except for one patient who developed a groin infection with pseudoaneurysm formation. Conventional therapy with vacuum assisted closure (VAC) and antibiotics were utilized in four patients without infection and one patient with infection. Three patients required additional surgeries with favorable healing of the wound. CONCLUSION: Complications related to femoral VA-ECMO are common in HT patients, with infection being the most frequent complication. SMFs can be a useful tool to prevent progression of infection and improve local healing.

Outcomes of Bebtelovimab Therapy in Patients With Solid Organ Transplantation With Mild and Moderate COVID-19.

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at greater risk of poorer outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as compared to the general population. Because of significant drug-drug interactions between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and immunosuppressive agents as well as logistical challenges of outpatient administration of remdesivir, anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) had been the mainstay of outpatient treatment of COVID-19 among SOTRs, with bamlanivimab, casirivimab-imdevimab, and sotrovimab having been previously granted emergency use authorization by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The challenge with the ongoing use of these monoclonal antibodies is the loss of efficacy against emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2. Bebtelovimab, which retained efficacy against early subvariants of Omicron, was granted emergency use authorization by the Food and Drug Administration when Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 became the predominant variants in the United States. However, the study based on which bebtelovimab was authorized by the FDA did not include SOTRs. The only available safety and efficacy data on these patients are from retrospective studies. In our retrospective analysis of 62 SOTRs who received bebtelovimab infusion between May 11, 2022, and October 11, 2022, 28 had a kidney transplant, 18 had a liver transplant, 10 had a heart transplant, and six had multi-organ transplants (liver/kidney: 4, heart/kidney: 2). None of the patients reported infusion-associated adverse reaction. Only one (1.6%) patient developed progression of COVID-19, requiring subsequent treatment with remdesivir, steroids, and oxygen supplementation. The rate of need for intensive care and death from COVID-19 during the 30-day follow-up period was 0%.

Inferior outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma during early-COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was a significant impact on routine medical care in the United States, including in fields of transplantation and oncology. AIM: To analyze the impact and outcomes of early COVID-19 pandemic on liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States. METHODS: WHO declared COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. We retrospectively analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database regarding adult LT with confirmed HCC on explant in 2019 and 2020. We defined pre-COVID period from March 11 to September 11, 2019, and early-COVID period as from March 11 to September 11, 2020. RESULTS: Overall, 23.5% fewer LT for HCC were performed during the COVID period (518 vs 675, P < 0.05). This decrease was most pronounced in the months of March-April 2020 with a rebound in numbers seen from May-July 2020. Among LT recipients for HCC, concurrent diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis significantly increased (23 vs 16%) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) significantly decreased (18 vs 22%) during the COVID period. Recipient age, gender, BMI, and MELD score were statistically similar between two groups, while waiting list time decreased during the COVID period (279 days vs 300 days, P = 0.041). Among pathological characteristics of HCC, vascular invasion was more prominent during COVID period (P < 0.01), while other features were the same. While the donor age and other characteristics remained same, the distance between donor and recipient hospitals was significantly increased (P < 0.01) and donor risk index was significantly higher (1.68 vs 1.59, P < 0.01) during COVID period. Among outcomes, 90-day overall and graft survival were the same, but 180-day overall and graft were significantly inferior during COVID period (94.7 vs 97.0%, P = 0.048). On multivariable Cox-hazard regression analysis, COVID period emerged as a significant risk factor of post-transplant mortality (Hazard ratio 1.85; 95%CI: 1.28-2.68, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: During COVID period, there was a significant decrease in LTs performed for HCC. While early postoperative outcomes of LT for HCC were same, the overall and graft survival of LTs for HCC after 180 days were significantly inferior.

Outcomes of Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation Under the New Heart Allocation Policy: A United Organ Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the new heart allocation policy, which prioritizes acutely ill patients on temporary mechanical circulatory support and provides broader sharing of donor organs, on patient and graft survival in combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) is unknown. METHODS: In the United Network for Organ Sharing data, patients were divided in groups before and after the policy change (OLD, January 1, 2015 to October 17, 2018, N=533; and NEW, October 18, 2018 to December 31, 2020, N=370). Propensity score matching was performed utilizing recipient characteristics (283 pairs). The median follow-up was 1099 days. RESULTS: The annual volume of HKT increased approximately 2-fold during this period (N=117 in 2015 and N=237 in 2020), predominantly among patients not on hemodialysis at time of transplantation. Ischemic times for heart (OLD, 2.94 versus NEW, 3.37 hours; P<0.001) and kidney grafts (14.1 versus 16.0 hours; P<0.001) were longer under the new policy, as was the travel distance (47 versus 183 miles; P<0.001). In the matched cohort, 1-year overall survival (OLD, 91.1% versus NEW, 84.8%; P<0.001), and freedom from heart and kidney graft failure rate were worse under the new policy. Patients not on hemodialysis at time of HKT demonstrated worse survival and a higher risk of kidney graft failure under the new policy compared with the old policy. In multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis, the new policy was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.81; P=0.007), and graft failure among HKT recipients (heart, hazard ratio, 1.81; P=0.007; and kidney, hazard ratio, 1.83; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The new heart allocation policy was associated with worse overall survival and decreased freedom from heart and kidney graft failure in HKT recipients.