Evidence for the use of demeclocycline in the treatment of hyponatraemia secondary to SIADH: a systematic review.

AIMS: Hyponatraemia (HN) is the most common electrolyte balance disorder in clinical practice. Since the 1970s, demeclocycline has been used in some countries to treat chronic HN secondary to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). The precise mechanism of action of demeclocycline is unclear, but has been linked to the induction of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Furthermore, the safety profile of demeclocycline is variable with an inconsistent time to onset, and a potential for complications. There has been no systematic evaluation of the use of demeclocycline for the treatment of HN secondary to SIADH to date. A systematic literature review was performed to obtain an insight into the clinical safety and efficacy of demeclocycline for this condition. METHODS: Embase(™) , MEDLINE(®) , MEDLINE(®) In-Process, and The Cochrane Library were searched on two occasions using MeSH terms combined with free-text terms. References were screened by two independent reviewers. Relevant publications were then extracted by two independent reviewers, with a third reviewer collating and finalising extractions. RESULTS: The searches returned a total of 705 hits. 632 abstracts were screened after the removal of duplicates. Following screening, 35 full-length publications were reviewed. Of these, 17 were excluded, resulting in 18 studies deemed relevant for data extraction. Two were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 16 were non-RCTs, and 10 were case reports. DISCUSSION: Although most reports suggest that demeclocycline can address serum sodium levels in specific patients with HN, efficacy is variable, and may depend upon the underlying aetiology. Demeclocycline dose adjustments can be complex, and as its use in clinical practice is not well defined, it can differ between healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of clinical and economic evidence supporting the use of demeclocycline for HN secondary to SIADH. Patients receiving demeclocycline for HN secondary to SIADH must be closely monitored.

Efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin: a dose-finding study.

AIMS: Ipragliflozin is a novel, selective inhibitor of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2 inhibitor) in clinical development for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of ipragliflozin. METHODS: In a 12-week, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy (≥1500 mg/day) were randomized to one of four ipragliflozin treatment groups (12.5, 50, 150 or 300 mg once daily) or placebo. Primary efficacy outcome was mean change from baseline in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared to placebo at week 12. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs and laboratory safety measurements were assessed. RESULTS: Ipragliflozin dose dependently decreased HbA1c from baseline to week 12 compared to placebo (-0.22, -0.34, -0.40 and -0.48% for ipragliflozin 12.5, 50, 150 and 300 mg, respectively). Decreases in body weight and blood pressure were observed for all ipragliflozin groups. AEs occurred in 39.7-51.4% of the ipragliflozin groups and 39.4% of placebo patients. Urinary tract infections (1.4-6.9 vs. 6.1%), genital infections (0-4.3 vs. 1.5%) and hypoglycaemia (0-5.9 vs. 3.0%) were similar in the ipragliflozin and placebo groups, respectively, without dose dependency. There were no clinically relevant effects on other safety measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Ipragliflozin treatment improved glycaemic control when added to metformin therapy and may be associated with weight loss and reductions in blood pressure compared to placebo. No safety or tolerability concerns were identified at any of the tested doses supporting the further development of ipragliflozin at ≥50 mg doses in T2DM patients.