The Role of FLIR ONE Thermography in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Series.

ABSTRACT: Complex regional pain syndrome remains a debated syndrome characterized by symptoms and signs, including pain, sensory disturbances, thermal asymmetry, edema, and motor impairments. Thermography is a tool that assesses skin surface temperature distribution. Current literature focuses on the role of thermography for diagnostic purposes; however, its role in monitoring the response to treatment in complex regional pain syndrome is unclear. We present a case series of four patients with complex regional pain syndrome where a FLIR ONE thermal imaging camera (FLIR Systems, Inc, Wilsonville, OR) was used to assist in the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome, capture the effects of diagnostic nerve blocks to evaluate a peripheral nerve contribution to complex regional pain syndrome, as well as monitor and assess treatment efficacy with prednisone and surgery. Four patients were screened by clinical assessment to meet the Budapest Criteria. The thermal images revealed improvement in the temperature distribution after therapeutic intervention. We also noted temporary but immediate changes on thermal imaging with diagnostic nerve blocks. Our cases suggest that the FLIR ONE thermal imaging camera has the potential to be an accessible monitoring tool to assist in diagnosis and assess treatment efficacy in complex regional pain syndrome over time.

Improving the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis using a multidisciplinary pathway.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Improvement opportunities exist in the accuracy and timeliness of the diagnosis of childhood appendicitis. The purpose of our study was to conduct a post-implementation audit of a diagnostic pathway for children with suspected appendicitis presenting to our pediatric emergency department. METHODS: We adopted a diagnostic pathway that utilized a validated risk of appendicitis stratification tool (Alvarado Score) with protocolized use of abdominal ultrasound for moderate risk patients. We conducted a 10% convenience sample audit of pathway patients treated over the subsequent 18-month period. Outcome measures included false negative and positive rates, sensitivity, specificity, and overall pathway accuracy. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four pathway patients, of which 22 (16.4%) had appendicitis confirmed pathologically, were evaluated. The risk group distribution of patients was: low risk (29%), moderate risk (60%), and high risk (11%). The negative appendectomy rate was 4.4% (reduced from 14% pre-pathway), and the false negative (missed appendicitis) rate was 3.0%. No patients received CT scans. Pathway sensitivity was 81.8%% (95% CI 59.7% to 94.8%), specificity-92.9%% (95% CI 86.4%-96.9%), and overall accuracy-91.0% (95% CI 84.9%-95.3%). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a diagnostic pathway achieved a high level of accuracy and reduced our institutional negative appendectomy rate by 67%. The audit identified additional pathway improvement opportunities. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Effectiveness of Emergency Department Treatment of Pediatric Headache and Relation to Rebound Headache.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between the degree of headache relief obtained in the pediatric emergency department (PED) with abortive treatment and unscheduled return visits to the PED for a recurrent or persistent headache within 72 hours. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study with 369 patients, all younger than 18 years, who presented to the PED with a primary complaint of either a headache or migraine. Patient and visit details were collected from the medical chart, along with presenting and discharge pain score. Percent pain reduction at discharge was determined through the following calculation: (Presenting Pain Score - Discharge Pain Score)/Presenting Pain Score. Associations were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: No significant association was found between the percent pain reduction and return to the PED (P = 0.49). Mean presenting pain score at the index visit was statistically higher for those who ended up returning to the PED versus those who did not (8.1 vs 7.4; P = 0.02). A trend toward increase in return visits was seen among patients who had a headache duration greater than 3 days (odds ratio, 1.99) and patients who experienced less than 50% pain reduction in the PED (odds ratio, 1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Complete resolution in the PED may not be necessary, given the lack of association between the degree of pain relief and revisit rates. Perhaps, the goal should be to achieve at least 50% pain reduction before discharge.