RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore a novel position of mammography named axilla view in axillary lymph node (ALN) evaluation in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled and scheduled for mammography before surgery. Investigated imaging patterns included mediolateral oblique (2D-MLO) and axilla view (2D-axilla) of mammography, and axilla view of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-axilla). The correlation of ALN numbers between imaging and pathology was analyzed. Diagnostic performance was analyzed via AUC. RESULTS: 75 patients were included. A larger and clearer axillary region was displayed in axilla view. The total number of ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO view (4.6 vs. 2.5, P < .001; 5.6 vs. 4.6, P = .034). Correlations between number of positive ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view and pathologically confirmed metastatic ALNs were stronger than 2D-MLO view (Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.7084,0.7044 and 0.4744). The proportion of cases with ≥5 positive ALNs detected under 3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO (38.2% vs. 14.7%, P = .028). The overweight and obese group showed a higher AUC value than the underweight and lean group in ALN evaluation, although not significantly (2D-MLO: 0.7643 vs. 0.6458, P = .2656; 2D-axilla: 0.8083 vs. 0.6586, P = .1522; 3D-axilla: 0.8045 vs. 0.6615, P = .1874). This difference was more pronounced in axilla view. CONCLUSION: Axilla view exhibited advantages over conventional MLO view in the extent of axilla displayed by mammography in breast cancer. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.