Treating patients with cancer amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: experience of a regional hospital in the Piedmont region in northern Italy.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is posing an unprecedented dilemma to oncologists worldwide, forcing them to decide whether to continue or suspend treatments in order to protect their most vulnerable patients from infection. After the first report from China, the outbreak spread rapidly worldwide. To, date no clear indications on how to treat patients with cancer with COVID-19 infection are available. METHODS: We report data on 21 patients with cancer referred to a single medical oncology unit of a general hospital from mid-March to April 23, 2020. RESULTS: Nine patients were on active cancer therapy during the infection and all stopped medical treatments. Overall 8 patients developed pneumonia and 6 patients died of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The management of patients with cancer during the pandemic should be carefully balanced and discussed among oncologists and other key professionals involved in the treatment of this vulnerable group of patients, in order to balance the risk of treatment and the risk of infection.

Variation in gynecological oncology follow-up practice: attributable to cancer centers or to patient characteristics? A Piedmont Regional Oncology Network Study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend minimalist follow-up, there is wide variability in gynecological oncology practice. The aims of this study were to describe between-center differences in the follow-up of endometrial, ovarian, and uterine cervical cancer; to identify the determinants of test prescription; to estimate the related costs; and to assess the weight of center habits and patient characteristics as sources of unexplained variability. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of patients treated between August 2004 and July 2005 for gynecological malignancies and followed up for the detection of recurrent disease were retrospectively collected from 29 centers of the Piedmont Oncology Network. Multivariate multilevel analyses were performed to study the determinants of test prescription and costs. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on 351 patients (median follow-up: 578 days). The unexplained variability in computed tomography prescriptions (26%), ultrasound prescriptions (17%), and total cost of follow-up (15%) can be attributed to center habits, independenty of the clinical characteristics of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Much of the unexplained variability in the follow-up for gynecological malignancies is attributable to different habits of centers belonging to a cancer network. These results prompted us to design a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare minimalist versus intensive follow-up programs in endometrial cancer.

Survival prediction and frequency of anticancer treatment in cancer patients hospitalized due to acute conditions. Role of clinical parameters and PaP score.

PURPOSE: Survival prediction is useful in selecting patients for palliative care or active anticancer therapy. The palliative and prognostic (PaP) score was shown to predict 1-month survival in terminally ill patients. Its application to patients with less advanced disease is a subject of debate. We assessed the value of the PaP score and of other clinical parameters in predicting survival in patients admitted in an oncological ward due to acute conditions. We also evaluated the frequency of active anticancer treatment in the last weeks of life. METHODS: All the 208 patients, consecutively admitted in a department of medical oncology and radiotherapy in a 9-month period, were included. Patients and disease features together with the PaP score were assessed and included in a multivariable model for survival prediction. RESULTS: Overall, median survival was 19 weeks and 12-week survival was 59.6%. The PaP score accurately predicted 4-week survival. Among the 39 patients who died within 4 weeks, 36% were on active treatment. The reason of admission, disease control, treatment, and PaP score were independently related to 12-week survival in the multivariate analysis; however patients with a 12-week survival lower than 30% were a minority. CONCLUSIONS: Although the PaP score accurately predicts life expectancy, its use in the setting of acute conditions seems not straightforward, due to the overall good prognosis of these patients. Active treatment in the last period of life is common. The potential reversibility of acute conditions makes prognostic measures inadequate for the purpose of treatment choices.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in a concomitant alternating chemoradiotherapy program for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer: a pharmacology-guided schedule.

PURPOSE: Administration of gemcitabine together with cisplatin at cytotoxic doses in a chemoradiotherapy regimen is hampered by a high degree of local toxicity. Using the pharmacologic properties of the drug we designed a modified schedule aimed at reducing toxicity while preserving activity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx, bulky T4, and/or N2 to N3 were eligible. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 12 and cisplatin at a dose of 20 mg/m2 on Days 2 to 5, every 21 days for 3 courses. Radiotherapy, delivered with standard fractionation, was given on Days 8 to 12 and 15 to 19 and was repeated 3 times up to a total dose of > or = 60 Gy. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were selected. Grade 3 to 4 stomatitis was recorded in 25 patients (89%). Thirteen patients (46%) experienced Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8 patients (29%) and in 2 was complicated by infection and death. The overall complete response rate was 79%. At a median follow up of 71 months, 11 patients had a locoregional relapse (3-year locoregional control, 64%); 6 patients had distant metastases, among whom only 2 were without locoregional recurrence. The 3-year progression-free survival is 39% and 3-year overall survival has been 43%. CONCLUSION: The schedule modification did not attenuate local toxicity. Moreover, infections and especially pneumonia, were a major problem. The high activity of gemcitabine when combined with radiotherapy would most likely be better exploited in the context of modified radiation schemes.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy in the management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II trial.

Aim of the present study was to test, activity and toxicity of a rapidly alternating chemoradiation (paclitaxel based) in 31 patients with unresectable, locally advanced or recurrent after surgery, head and neck cancer. Three-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 61.4 and 73.7%, respectively. Main side effects remain a major problem.

Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer patients unfit for or pretreated with chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin-Paclitaxel is one of the most active regimens in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the administration of weekly Paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy, or as first-line chemotherapy in unfit patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received Carboplatin at the dose of 6 x area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) on day 1 and Paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 28. Thirty-two had received a prior platinum-based treatment, while 16 were chemotherapy-naive, unfit patients. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (33%); grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 7 (15%); grade 1-3 peripheral sensory neuropathy in 35 (73%). Nineteen patients (39.6%; 95% C.I.: 25.8% - 53.4%) achieved an objective response without any difference between the first-line and second-line group. One-year survival was 39.5% (95% CI: 25.4% - 53.6%). CONCLUSION: The impressive activity of this regimen makes it suitable for further investigation in the second-line setting. Toxicity seen in the unfit population mandates some modification of the regimen.

Prospective evaluation of major vascular events in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: Cancer and cisplatin-based chemotherapy both are well recognized risk factors for coagulation disorders and thrombosis. However, vascular events (VEs) seldom are considered adverse effects of treatment and may not even be taken into account in reports of chemotherapy trials. METHODS: VEs were recorded prospectively in a population of patients with nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who were treated consecutively with cisplatin and gemcitabine using a diagnostic flow chart based on a thorough clinical examination, hematologic and coagulative parameters, and imaging assessments when appropriate. RESULTS: From January, 2000 to January 2003, 108 patients with Stage III-IV NSCLC underwent chemotherapy and were evaluated. Overall, 22 VEs occurred in 19 patients (17.6%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.3-24.8%), including 10 arterial VEs (2 myocardial infarctions, 7 lower limb arterial thrombosis, and 1 ischemic stroke) and 12 venous VEs (3 catheter-related upper limb VEs, 6 venous thrombosis of the lower limb, and 3 pulmonary embolisms). The cumulative proportion of VEs at 1 year after the start of chemotherapy was 22.0% (95% CI, 12.7-31.3%). Four patients died due to the VE (overall mortality, 3.7%), and 3 patients needed surgical revascularization. In the other patients, conservative medical treatment was effective. Baseline patient-related and disease-related characteristics of the patients with VEs did not differ significantly from the characteristics of patients without VE; liver and brain metastases were more frequent in patients with VE, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Response rates were similar in the two groups. A double VE was detected in three patients who were given further chemotherapy after resolution of the first event. CONCLUSIONS: VEs were a common finding in chemotherapy-treated NSCLC patients. Chemotherapy itself seem to be a powerful risk factor for VE. Strategies to predict the occurrence of VEs should be developed to spare this life-threatening toxicity.

A phase II study of epirubicin, vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced breast cancer.

Our objective was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination of cisplatin, epirubicin and vinorelbine (CEV) in advanced breast cancer patients. Patients with advanced breast cancer, locally advanced or metastatic, received epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 8. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 35 patients were treated. Thirty-one patients were evaluated for response. One hundred and fifty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered overall. The objective response rate (ORR) was 84%, including complete response in 13% of patients. All stage III patients achieved a downstaging, with a pathological complete response in two out of 10 patients. Patients with stage IV disease obtained objective response in 67% of cases. Toxicity was mild to moderate. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 17% of patients. We conclude that CEV combination represents an effective treatment for patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer, allowing an important ORR. Moreover this regimen appears to be well tolerated.

Topotecan and ifosfamide as salvage treatment in advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate activity and toxicity of the combination of topotecan and ifosfamide as salvage treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer refractory to or relapsing after platinum compound-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients entered the trial. Inclusion criteria were: previous platinum compound-based chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel, age /=50% reduction of baseline CA-125 was recorded. Significant higher response rate was observed in platinum-sensitive population (11/15 patients) compared to resistant disease (8/24 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy with topotecan and ifosfamide (IT) in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients is feasible with moderate toxicity. The potential of the regimen for synergistic drug interactions deserves further evaluations.