Novel findings on anti-plaque effects of stannous fluoride.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antiplaque effects for 0.454% bioavailable gluconate chelated stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrices versus controls by clinical model, plaque index, tooth surface and tooth type in a pooled analysis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate plaque effects of SnF2 dentifrices from the same formulation family over the past 30 years. Forty-four 4-day and longer-term (≥ 2 weeks) RCTs conducted in six countries with 3,336 subjects using Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index, Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index, Digital Plaque Imaging Analysis, and Silness and Löe Plaque Index were included. RESULTS: In 13 and 11 longer-term studies assessing SnF2 dentifrice versus a negative or positive control, respectively, standardized differences in average plaque score of -1.15 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.69) and -0.74 (95% CI: -1.20, -0.28) were observed (P ≤ 0.011), favoring SnF2. Reductions represented a 19% and 16% benefit versus the negative and positive control, respectively. In 18 and five 4-day studies assessing SnF2 dentifrice versus a negative (NaF/SMFP) or positive (triclosan/chlorhexidine) control, respectively, differences in average 4-day plaque score of -0.27 (95% CI: -0.31, -0.23) and -0.15 (95% CI: -0.25, -0.06) were observed (P≤ 0.001) favoring SnF2. Reductions represented a 14% and 11% benefit versus the negative and positive control, respectively. Significant antiplaque benefits for SnF2 dentifrice were seen regardless of clinical model, plaque index, tooth surface or type, including brushed and unbrushed surfaces (P≤ 0.049). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Bioavailable gluconate chelated SnF2 dentifrices showed consistent plaque inhibition versus negative and positive controls across all conditions evaluated. Importantly, the effect on unbrushed surfaces illustrated the significant plaque inhibition benefit of SnF2 beyond mechanical plaque removal.

Bioavailable gluconate chelated stannous fluoride toothpaste meta-analyses: Effects on dentine hypersensitivity and enamel erosion.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of bioavailable gluconate-chelated stannous fluoride (SnF2) toothpaste with control toothpastes for treatment of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) and enamel erosion. DATA AND SOURCES: A Procter & Gamble Oral Care archive of clinical studies was reviewed from 2000 to 2020. Eligible studies were Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) investigating bioavailable gluconate-chelated SnF2 toothpaste efficacy compared to controls in adult participants measured following tactile (Yeaple force) and/or evaporative stimuli (Schiff score) in-vivo, duration <2 months (DH); or by erosive toothwear (profilometry) from in-situ samples, duration 10-15 days. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and resolved disagreements by discussion. A meta-analysis was undertaken and Risk of Bias (RoB) assessed using the Cochrane collaboration RoB tool for randomized parallel-group and cross-over trials. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (1287 participants) assessed DH relief and Six RCTs (184 participants) enamel erosion protection. For DH SnF2 toothpastes provided a 57 % (evaporative air) and 142 % (tactile) benefit versus negative controls (sodium fluoride/monofluorophosphate, 8 studies; p < 0.001). Compared to positive controls (potassium nitrate or arginine, 6 studies), a 22 % advantage (p = 0.036) was seen for evaporative air. In erosion studies, SnF2 toothpastes provided an 83 % benefit versus control toothpastes (arginine or sodium fluoride; p < 0.001) with a change (95 %CI) in average surface profilometry level (µm) of -2.02(-2.85, -1.20). CONCLUSIONS: The use of these bioavailable SnF2 toothpastes, as part of a daily oral hygiene regimen, will provide patients with enamel erosion protection, combined with alleviation of DH pain when present, improving quality of life.

The effects of bioavailable gluconate chelated stannous fluoride dentifrice on gingival bleeding: Meta-analysis of eighteen randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To estimate gingivitis effects of a bioavailable gluconate chelated 0.454% stannous fluoride (SnF2 ) family of dentifrices in adult subjects versus positive (triclosan) and negative (NaF or MFP) controls when used ≤3 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis evaluated bioavailable gluconate chelated SnF2 dentifrices versus a negative or positive control for gingival bleeding. RESULTS: In 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2,890 subjects assessing SnF2 paste versus a negative or positive control, the average number of bleeding sites was reduced by 51% and 31%, respectively. The average change (95% CI) in number of bleeding sites was -16.3 (-27.8, -4.9) versus the negative control and -3.6 (-5.4, -1.8) versus the positive control. Subjects with localized or generalized gingivitis had 3.7 times better odds (95% CI [2.8, 5.0]) of shifting to generally healthy using SnF2 versus a negative control and 2.8 times better odds (95% CI [2.1, 3.9]) of shifting to generally healthy using SnF2 versus a positive control. The individual study risk of bias was deemed to be low in all categories of bias. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates significant gingivitis benefits of bioavailable SnF2 dentifrices when used ≤3 months versus positive (triclosan) and negative (NaF or MFP) controls.

Trained vs untrained evaluator assessment of body condition score as a predictor of percent body fat in adult cats.

Body condition scoring (BCS) provides a readily available technique that can be used by both veterinary professionals and owners to assess the body condition of cats, and diagnose overweight or underweight conditions. The objective of this study was to evaluate a five-point BCS system with half-point delineations using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Four evaluators (a veterinarian, veterinary technician, trained scorer and untrained scorer) assessed 133 neutered adult cats. For all scorers, BCS score was more strongly correlated with percent body fat than with body weight. Percent body fat increased by approximately 7% within each step increase in BCS. The veterinarian had the strongest correlation coefficient between BCS and percent fat (r = 0.80). Mean body fat in cats classified as being in ideal body condition was 12 and 19%, for 3.0 and 3.5 BCS, respectively. Within BCS category, male cats were significantly heavier in body weight than females within the same assigned BCS category. However, DXA-measured percent body fat did not differ significantly between male and female cats within BCS category, as assigned by the veterinarian (P >0.13). Conversely, when assessed by others, mean percent body fat within BCS category was lower in males than females for cats classified as being overweight (BCS >4.0). The results of this study show that using a BCS system that has been validated within a range of normal weight to moderately overweight cats can help to differentiate between lean cats and cats that may not be excessively overweight, but that still carry a higher proportion of body fat.