Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anim Reprod ; 19(3): e20220053, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36313599

RESUMO

The growth, sexual maturity and fertility-related parameters related of young Nellore bulls with divergent residual feed intake (RFI) raised on pasture were evaluated. After classification of 48 young males as low and high RFI (more and less efficient, respectively), the animals were evaluated for growth and reproductive parameters at 28-day intervals from 14.3 to 24.6 months of age. The semen was cryopreserved in the last sampling and fresh and post-thaw semen samples were evaluated. Low RFI bulls exhibited higher initial and final body weight (P < 0.05), but feed intake, body condition score and growth measures evaluated by carcass ultrasound were unaffected by RFI (P > 0.05). The scrotal circumference, sperm concentration, defects, and quality of fresh semen, and ultrasonographic testicular characteristics were unaffected by RFI (P > 0.05). However, velocity parameters such as average path and curvilinear velocities determined by computer-assisted sperm analysis of thawed semen submitted to the rapid thermoresistance test were improved (P < 0.05) in low RFI bulls, but this improvement in quality did not enhance in vitro sperm fertilizing ability. Our results demonstrated significant differences in metabolism and growth performance between bulls of divergent RFI. In addition, there was slight improvement in the semen quality of bulls with low RFI bulls, but this did not enhance in vitro fertilizing ability. Selection of beef bulls for RFI can be performed, which will result in economic benefits by improving the growth performance of the animals without affecting reproductive parameters.

2.
Anim Reprod Sci ; 195: 102-111, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29885853

RESUMO

Semen cryopreservation comprises different steps, among them are the cooling and freezing rates which significantly influence the quality of thawed sperm. Different systems with variable freezing rates are used for freezing bull semen in the field, with a consequence of variable success rates. The objective of this study was to compare different systems for freezing bull semen in the field. Five cooling methods of semen and two methods for the subsequent freezing phase (5 × 2 factorial scheme) were used. Two to four ejaculates were collected from 12 bulls with an electroejaculator. The ejaculates were diluted in BotuBov® to a concentration of 50 × 106 spermatozoa/mL in 0.5-mL straws. After dilution, the straws were cooled to 5 °C in five cooling systems: TK 4000® at a cooling rate of -0.25 °C/min (R1); TK 4000® at a rate of -0.5 °C/min (R2); Minitube® refrigerator at a rate of -2.8 °C/min (R3); Botutainer® at a rate of -0.65 °C (R4), and domestic refrigerator at a rate of -2.0 °C/min (R5). After stabilization at 5 °C for 4 h, these straws were then submitted to two freezing systems: TK 4000® at a freezing rate of -15 °C/min (C1) and Styrofoam box with liquid nitrogen at a rate of -19 °C/min (C2). Sperm kinetics were evaluated by computer-assisted sperm analysis at four time points: in fresh semen, after cooling, post-thawing, and after the rapid thermal resistance test (TRT). In addition, plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial potential and intracellular H2O2 were analyzed after thawing by flow cytometry. The R1, R2 and R4 cooling systems were the most efficient in preserving sperm viability, membrane integrity and intracellular H2O2. Samples frozen in the C1 system exhibited better post-thaw and post-TRT kinetics than C2 samples. In conclusion, slower cooling curves in conjunction with a constant freezing rate obtained with the programmable unit were more efficient for freezing bull semen in the field.


Assuntos
Bovinos/fisiologia , Criopreservação/veterinária , Congelamento , Preservação do Sêmen/veterinária , Sêmen/fisiologia , Animais , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. (Online) ; 54(3): 264-276, 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-879464

RESUMO

The aim of this work was to submit sperm cells to different laboratory challenges and to compare in vitro results with in vivo semen fertility. Four different batches from the same Brangus bull were used in a timed-AI program of 332 Brangus cows. Each batch (B) was submitted to the following procedure: semen sample was thawed at 36°C for 30 seconds (control). Sperm motility parameters, plasma membrane integrity, sperm morphology, and concentration were assessed. Then, an aliquot of thawed sample was incubated in a water bath at 45°C for 40 min (thermal challenge group; TCG) and another aliquot was centrifuged at 500 xg (Percoll gradient 45%/90%) for 15 min (centrifugation challenge group; CCG). Centrifuged semen was also submitted to another thermal challenge, being incubated (water bath) at 45°C for 40 min (centrifugation + thermal challenge group; CTCG). At the end of each challenge (CCG, TCG, and CTCG), the same laboratory tests used for control group were repeated. The following conception rates (CR) were observed for each batch: B1 = 48.9% (44/90); B2 = 44.2% (23/52); B3 = 55.5% (40/72); B4 = 43.2% (51/118); (p < 0.10). In the lab, B3 presented higher (p ≤ 0.05) progressive motility (PM) than B4 after thawing (control group) and after all sperm challenges (TCG, CCG, and CTCG). However, despite B3 and B4 having demonstrated a similar percentage of plasma membrane integrity (PMI) to the control group (B3 = 66.7 ± 1.3 and B4 = 65.2 ± 3.3), B3 demonstrated higher (P ≤ 0.05) percentage of PMI (37.2 ± 2.5) than B4 (26.7 ± 3.3) after passing through the most stressing in vitro challenge (CTCG). The semen batch presenting the highest resistance to in vitro challenges was the one that presented a trend for higher in vivo fertility, suggesting that submitting semen samples to laboratory challenges may be an interesting alternative for selecting batches with greater field fertility.(AU)


O objetivo deste estudo foi estressar células espermáticas em diferentes desafios laboratoriais e comparar os resultados in vitro com a fertilidade in vivo do sêmen. Quatro partidas de um mesmo touro Brangus foram utilizadas em um programa de IATF de 332 vacas Brangus. Cada partida foi submetida ao seguinte procedimento: a amostra de sêmen foi descongelada a 36°C por 30 segundos (grupo controle). Foram avaliados parâmetros de motilidade espermática (CASA), integridade da membrana plasmática (PMI), morfologia e concentração espermática. Em seguida, uma alíquota da amostra descongelada foi incubada em banho-maria a 45°C durante 40 minutos (grupo de desafio térmico, TCG) e outra alíquota foi centrifugada a 500 xg (gradiente de Percoll 45%/90%) durante 15 min (grupo desafio de centrifugação, CCG). Uma aliquota do sêmen centrifugado foi ainda submetida ao desafio térmico, sendo incubado a 45°C durante 40 min (grupo de desafio térmico + centrifugação, CTCG). No final de cada desafio (CCG, TCG e CTCG), os mesmos testes laboratoriais utilizados para o grupo de controle foram realizados. A seguinte taxa de concepção (CR) foi observada para cada partida (B): B1 = 48,9% (44/90), B2 = 44,2% (23/52), B3 = 55,5% (40/72) e B4 = 43,2% (51/118); (P < 0,10). No laboratório, B3 apresentou maior (P ≤ 0,05) motilidade progressiva (PM) do que B4 logo após o descongelamento (grupo controle) e após todos os desafios laboratoriais (TCG, CCG e CTCG). Porém, apesar de B3 e B4 demonstrarem similar porcentagem de PMI no grupo controle (B3 = 66,7 ± 1,3 e B4 = 65,2 ± 3,3), B3 apresentou maior (P ≤ 0,05) PMI (37,2 ± 2,5%) do que B4 (26,7 ± 3,3%) após passar pelo maior desafio laboratorial (CTCG). A partida seminal que in vitro apresentou maior resistência aos desafios laboratoriais foi a mesma que apresentou tendência para maior fertilidade in vivo. Assim, sugere-se que submeter amostras seminais a desafios laboratoriais pode ser uma alternativa interessante para selecionar partidas com maior fertilidade a campo.(AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Bovinos , Fertilização in vitro/veterinária , Inseminação Artificial/veterinária , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/veterinária , Preservação do Sêmen/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA