Comparison of Four Tests for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection.

BACKGROUND: Due to lower operational costs, health maintenance organizations (HMOs) may prioritize Helicobacter pylori stool antigen testing (HpStAg) for the non-invasive diagnosis of H. pylori infection over 13C-urea breath tests (13C-UBTs). The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of the diagnostic tests for H. pylori. METHODS: We performed histology, rapid urease test (RUT), 13C-UBT and HpStAg on consecutive patients referred for gastroscopy. Monoclonal stool antigen test was performed using the LIAISON Meridian chemiluminescent immunoassay. Histology was examined with hematoxylin and eosin, and additional stains were performed at the pathologist's discretion. For the assessment of 13C-UBT, we compared concordant histology and RUT. HpStAg was compared to the concordant results of two of the three remaining tests. RESULTS: 103 patients were included (36 males (35.0%), age 50.1 ± 18.4 years). The indication for gastroscopy was dyspepsia in 63 (61.2%). Agreement between RUT and histology was 95.9%. For 13C-UBT and HpStAg, respectively, H. pylori positivity was 30% (30/100) and 27.16% (22/81); sensitivity was 97% and 70%; specificity was 100% and 94.4%; accuracy was 98% and 86%; positive predictive value (PPV) was 100% and 86.4%; negative predictive value (NPV) was 93% and 86%. No demographic, clinical, or endoscopic predictors of HpStAg accuracy were identified using logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: 13C-UBT performs better than HpStAg at our institution. When interpreting results, clinicians should consider test limitations.

[ADVANCES ON ESOPHAGEAL MEASUREMENTS: HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY, TIMED BARIUM SWALLOW, ENDOFLIP AND PH MONITORING].

INTRODUCTION: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms are very common in the general adult population. Dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation and non-cardiac chest pain are the most common signs. The clinical approach in managing these symptoms starts with upper GI endoscopy in order to exclude inflammatory, neoplastic and fibrotic disorders that involve the esophagus. Upper GI endoscopy is mandatory especially when alarm signs exist. In patients with no structural abnormalities, physiological testing might aid to better understand the origin of the symptoms and to improve management.

The Effects of Gluten-free Diet on Body Mass Indexes in Adults with Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Gluten-free diet (GFD) includes a higher intake of sugars and fats. Previous studies have investigated its effect on body mass index (BMI) in celiac disease (CD) patients but had contradictive conclusions. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of GFD on BMI in CD patients. STUDY: Systematically, we conducted literature research using Medline, Scopus, and Embase, and we identified 1565 potential studies/abstracts. Only studies of patients with CD under a GFD with recorded BMI before and after dietary intervention were included. Subgroup analyses based on study design and BMI categories were performed. We calculated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) for the number of patients in each BMI group according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions after GFD using fixed and random effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: The analysis included 10 studies and 38 sub-studies/data sets, which encompassed 2450 patients from 5 countries. We found nonsignificant odds for changing the BMI group (pooled OR 0.972, 95% CI: 0.858-1.101, P=0.65) after GFD. However, looking specifically at BMI subgroups, we found higher odds for BMI category change after GFD in underweight patients (OR 0.588, 95% CI: 0.479-0.723, P <0.001), and overweight patients,25

Disparity in Helicobacter pylori Positivity among Israeli Adults with Uninvestigated Dyspepsia in an Urban Setting with Mixed Ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prevalence varies according to both geographical region and ethnicity. The interplay between these two factors has been poorly studied. OBJECTIVES: To determine the positivity rate of H. pylori infection among Jewish and Arab patients who live in a mixed urban center in Israel. METHODS: Between November 2009 and September 2014, dyspeptic patients referred to a gastroenterology clinic in Lod, Israel, were enrolled in a prospective study. For each patient, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and a noninvasive or endoscopy-based test for H. pylori was performed. RESULTS: A total of 429 consecutive patients (322 Jewish and 107 Arabs), mean age 45 years (range 15-91 years) were included; 130 males. Overall positivity for H. pylori was 42.4% (182/429). The positivity rate of H. pylori was 38.8% for Jews (125/322) and 53.2% for Arabs (57/107) in Lod (P < 0.01). When immigrants were excluded, the difference in H. pylori positivity did not reach statistical significance (45.0% [77/171] vs. 53.2% [57/107], P = 0.217, in Jews and Arabs, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori infection was more common in Arabs that Jews in the mixed city of Lod, Israel. This finding may suggest that non-environmental factors were responsible for the observed difference in H. pylori positivity.

Comparing a New Flow Immune-Chromatography Fast Assay with a Random Access Semi-Automatic Chemiluminescent Immunoassay to Measure Fecal Calprotectin.

OBJECTIVE: The biomarker fecal calprotectin is an efficacious tool for evaluating the level of disease activity in Crohn's and Ulcerative colitis, as well as for discriminating between inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. The aim of this investigation was to appraise the analytical proficiency of a novel flow immune-chromatography assay through comparison with the established gold standard system in our laboratory. METHODS: A cohort comprising of 125 stool samples, submitted for the purpose of routine calprotectin levels analysis, underwent assessment using two distinct approaches: the Liaison XL system and the SmarTest assay, while adhering to identical cut-off criteria. The present study assessed the performance of the SmarTest assay by calculating its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy measures. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the SmarTest assay were found to be 97.75%, 80.56%, and 92.80%, respectively, upon comparison with the gold standard. Moreover, the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis ascertained that the linear correlation pertaining to the calprotectin levels, as identified between both assays, was statistically significant (R=0.8158, P values <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Upon comparison with the Liaison XL system, it was found that the SmarTest assay demonstrated satisfactory results in both qualitative and quantitative aspects. This novel and expedient diagnostic assay is commended for evaluating fecal calprotectin in situations where access to laboratory services may be insufficient or nonexistent, rendering it an ideal option for point-of-care or at-home testing purposes.

Face-to-face interviews versus Internet surveys: Comparison of two data collection methods in the Rome foundation global epidemiology study: Implications for population-based research.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study (RFGES) assessed the prevalence, burden, and associated factors of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI) in 33 countries around the world. Achieving worldwide sampling necessitated use of two different surveying methods: In-person household interviews (9 countries) and Internet surveys (26 countries). Two countries, China and Turkey, were surveyed with both methods. This paper examines the differences in the survey results with the two methods, as well as likely reasons for those differences. METHODS: The two RFGES survey methods are described in detail, and differences in DGBI findings summarized for household versus Internet surveys globally, and in more detail for China and Turkey. Logistic regression analysis was used to elucidate factors contributing to these differences. RESULTS: Overall, DGBI were only half as prevalent when assessed with household vs Internet surveys. Similar patterns of methodology-related DGBI differences were seen within both China and Turkey, but prevalence differences between the survey methods were dramatically larger in Turkey. No clear reasons for outcome differences by survey method were identified, although greater relative reduction in bowel and anorectal versus upper gastrointestinal disorders when household versus Internet surveying was used suggests an inhibiting influence of social sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings strongly indicate that besides affecting data quality, manpower needs and data collection time and costs, the choice of survey method is a substantial determinant of symptom reporting and DGBI prevalence outcomes. This has important implications for future DGBI research and epidemiological research more broadly.

Ethnic Differences in Clinical Presentations and Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Findings in Patients with Achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic differences in achalasia presentations have scarcely been described. The association between achalasia and immunologic HLA haplotypes suggests that there may be a genetic predisposition. We aimed to evaluate differences in demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and manometric findings between two distinct ethnic groups with achalasia-Israeli Arabs (IA) and Israeli Jews (IJ). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at two medical centers. High-resolution manometry (HRM) reports were reviewed for newly-diagnosed achalasia patients. Demographic data, clinical presentations, endoscopy reports, and HRM metrics including the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were all reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, 94 achalasia patients were included (53.2% male; mean age 54.5 ± 18.0). 43 patients were IA (45.7%). Body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Compared to IJ, the IA patients had more esophageal dysphagia (100% vs. 88.2%; P = 0.022), chest pain (46.5% vs. 25.5%; P = 0.033), and a tortuous esophagus on endoscopy (23.3% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.005). IA patients were also diagnosed at a younger age than IJ patients (50.9 ± 17.5 vs. 57.5 ± 18.0; p = 0.039). Furthermore, IRP values were higher among IA patients than IJ patients (32.2 ± 13.8 vs. 23.3 ± 8.4; p < 0.001). A regression model analysis found that ethnicity significantly predicted IRP (ß = - 10, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Ethnicity appears to affect achalasia clinical presentation and HRM findings. IA achalasia patients are diagnosed at a younger age, present with more severe esophageal symptoms, and have a higher IRP compared to IJ patients. Additional studies of diverse, multiethnic populations, especially with genetic evaluations, are required to further assess the role of ethnicity in achalasia.

Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) Distinguishes between Reflux-Predominant and Dysphagia-Predominant Phenotypes of Esophageal "Absent Contractility".

Background: Patients with absent contractility (AC) often suffer from either reflux or dysphagia. It remains unclear what factors determine which phenotype patients present with. We sought to evaluate if high-resolution manometry metrics, especially integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), could explain this. Methods: Cases of AC from three medical centers were reviewed for demographic, clinical, and manometric data. Cases with an IRP between 10−15 mmHg or subsequent diagnosis of achalasia were excluded. Results: 69 subjects were included (mean age 56.1; 71% female). A total of 41 (59.4%) were reflux-predominant. The reflux-predominant group was younger (51.1 vs. 63.5, p = 0.002) and had lower median LES basal pressures (7.5 vs. 12.5 mmHg, p = 0.014) and IRP values (1.5 vs. 5.6 mmHg, p < 0.001) compared to the dysphagia group. When divided into tertiles, the trend in symptoms between LES basal pressure tertiles was not significant. However, the trend for IRP was significant (p < 0.001). For example, in the lowest IRP tertile, 91.3% of subjects were reflux-predominant compared to only 26.1% in the highest tertile, while the dysphagia-predominant group increased from 8.7% to 73.9%. In a regression model controlling for age and using IRP tertile 1 as the reference, having an IRP in tertile 2 increased the likelihood of having dysphagia-predominant disease by 7, while being in tertile 3 increased the likelihood by 22. Conclusions: IRP helps distinguish between the reflux-predominant and dysphagia-predominant phenotypes of AC. This may have therapeutic clinical consequences as procedures such as fundoplication to tighten the LES may benefit patients with reflux and a low IRP, while procedures like peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to disrupt the LES may benefit patients with dysphagia and a relatively high IRP.

Lasting Effects of Helicobacter pylori Infection on the Microbial Communities of Patients with and without Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.

Gastrointestinal (GI) microbial populations are important in maintaining normal functioning of the GI by preventing disorders. Dysbiotic microbiota may increase the likelihood of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), a syndrome associated with significant morbidity. We aimed to inves- tigate the microbiota populations of patients with SIBO. Patients with symptoms of SIBO were consecutively enrolled; they underwent a SIBO hydrogen breath test and stool was collected for microbiome analysis by sequencing of the 16S rRNA. Of the 55 patients recruited, 42 (76.4%) were positive for SIBO. When visualizing the bacterial ß-di- versity, a sub-cluster of patients was identified. Further examination of these patients' records re- vealed previous treatment for Helicobacter pylori (HP). Microbiome analysis of these patients demonstrated a significant decrease in ß-diversity (p-value<0.001) compared to patients without previous HP therapy. Furthermore, ß-diversity was significantly different in this subgroup, and sev- eral bacterial taxa were differentially expressed, including one from the genus Methanobrevibacter, which was reduced in patients that previously underwent HP treatment. Our findings suggest that while symptoms associated with SIBO may cause dysbiosis, there was no differentiation in fecal microbiome composition based on SIBO diagnosis. Furthermore, our results support previous observations regarding antibiotic-altered microbiota with effects extending two and three years post-treatment.

A Novel Fecal Elastase Assay for the Detection of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Fecal pancreatic elastase 1 (FPE1) is an established screening test for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), a condition that is underdiagnosed and if not treated may cause significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare a new FPE1 machine based CLIA kit to an ELISA assay which is considered the de facto gold standard in our laboratory for FPE1 measurement. METHODS: Levels of FPE1 from the 227 stool samples were analyzed by the ScheBo ELISA kit and the CLIA Liaison XL system simultaneously with the same cutoff values for both assays. Performance of the Liaison XL system was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: The comparison between the Liaison XL system performance and the ScheBo ELISA kit as reference revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 86.8%, 94.3%, and 92.1%, respectively, using a cutoff of 100 µg FPE1/g stool. When the cutoff is 200 µg FPE1/g stool the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 86.6%, 97.1%, and 90.7%, respectively. Furthermore, linear correlation of FPE1 levels between the two assays were found to be significant by Pearson's correlation coefficient test (R = 0.85, p-values < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Liaison XL system showed good laboratory performance with our pre-determined cutoff values when compared to our previous assay. An important advantage of this system is its semi-automated mechanism that enables large scale analysis of FPE1. In addition to that, the Liaison XL system is ideal for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of FPE1 allowing for its application to the clinical setting.