RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) deptics an acute form of lung infjury with often severe respiratory impairment that requires invasive mechanical ventilation. Since ARDS can be caused by several distinct etiologies, correct characterization is desired and frequently challenging. Surgical lung biopsy was previously reported to be of additive value. We describe our institutional experience using transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) for further characterization of severe and unexplained ARDS cases. CASE PRESENTATION: We retrospectively collected data of TBCB in patients with unexplained ARDS, whether with or without ECMO-support. Between 2019 and 2020 TBCB was performed in eight patients. Decision for the intervention was decided in multidisciplinary discussion. Five patients were treated with ECMO. The median duration of invasive ventilation before TBCB was 24 days. TBCB was performed in one segment, that was prophylactically occluded by Watanabe spigot or swab after the procedure. Histology results and their contribution to further therapeutic decisions were analyzed. Histology revealed five diffuses alveolar damage, one acute fibrinoid organizing pneumonia, one cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and one lung cancer. All results contributed to the decision of further management. While no pneumothorax or severe endobronchial bleeding occurred, two delayed hematothoraces needed surgical treatment. No patients died due to TBCB. CONCLUSION: TBCB is feasible in ARDS even during ECMO treatment. Histologic results can play a significant role in therapeutic and ethic discussion to guide the patients' care. Side effects should be considered and monitored.
Assuntos
Biópsia , Pulmão , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Humanos , Pulmão/patologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Biópsia/métodosRESUMO
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EH) is a rare vascular malignant sarcoma. To date, there are only two published case reports of EH mimicking nerve sheath tumors of a peripheral nerve. A 41-year-old woman presented with a painful node on the inside of the upper arm and motor deficits of the ulnar nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up and neurosonography revealed a slowly progressive, contrast-enhancing tumor in the area of the neurovascular bundle. A schwannoma of the ulnar nerve was suspected. At surgery, the tumor was adherent to the brachial artery, but not to nerves. Pathology revealed an EH. EH may mimic a nerve sheath tumor and should be taken into consideration, especially because of its potential for metastasis and fatal progression.
Assuntos
Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide , Neoplasias de Bainha Neural , Neurilemoma , Sarcoma , Adulto , Braço/patologia , Criança , Feminino , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/cirurgia , Humanos , Neurilemoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neurilemoma/patologia , Neurilemoma/cirurgia , Nervo Ulnar/diagnóstico por imagem , Nervo Ulnar/patologiaRESUMO
Advancements in personalized medicine have increased the demand for quantity and preservation of tissue architecture of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples. These demands may be addressed by the SonoTip TopGain® needle, which has a 3-point crown-cut design that contrasts with the standard single bevel design of the ViziShot 2®. The objective was to compare the SonoTip TopGain® and ViziShot 2® needles by considering biopsy sample characteristics, diagnostic accuracy, and patient safety. The primary endpoint of the study was the number of high-power fields (HPFs) in the center of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell block per sample. The lymph node with the highest probability for malignant infiltration based on size and sonographic appearance was chosen as the target lymph node for 20 patients. The same lymph node in each patient was sampled using both the ViziShot 2® and SonoTip TopGain® needles. The samples were measured, sliced, and analyzed by a pathologist. Sixteen patients were biopsied with both needles. Four patients could not be biopsied with the SonoTip TopGain® needle since it could not penetrate cartilage or be repositioned to bypass cartilage. HPFs and sample dimensions were significantly greater in the patients where sampling with the SonoTip TopGain® needle was possible (p = 0.007 and p = 0.005, respectively). Diagnostic accuracy and safety profiles were comparable. Significantly more material can be sampled using the SonoTip TopGain® needle when cartilage penetration can be avoided. This improves the yield for molecular workup in the era of personalized medicine.