Sex Differences in Plaque Composition and Morphology Among Symptomatic Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Carotid Artery Stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Incidence of ischemic stroke differs between men and women, with substantially higher rates in men. The underlying mechanism of this difference remains poorly understood but may be because of differences in carotid atherosclerosis. Using an in-depth imaging-based approach, we investigated differences between carotid plaque composition and morphology in male and female patients with stroke, taking into account differences in total plaque burden. Additionally, we investigated all possible within-artery combinations of plaque characteristics to explore differences between various plaque phenotypes. METHODS: We included 156 men and 68 women from the PARISK (Plaque At Risk) study, a prospective cohort study of patients with recent ischemic cerebrovascular symptoms and <70% ipsilateral carotid stenosis. Plaque characteristics (intraplaque hemorrhage [IPH], lipid-rich necrotic core [LRNC], calcifications, thin-or-ruptured fibrous cap, ulcerations, total plaque volume) were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector-row computed tomography angiography. We used multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses to assess sex differences in plaque characteristics. RESULTS: We found significant difference in total plaque volume between men and women (ß=22.9 mm3 [95% CI, 15.4-30.5]; mean volume in men 1399±425 mm3, in women 1011±242 mm3). Additionally, men were more likely to have IPH (odds ratio [OR]=2.8 [95% CI, 1.3-6.3]; IPH proportion in men 49%, in women 16%) and LRNC (OR=2.4 [95% CI, 1.2-4.7]; LRNC proportion in men 73%, in women 41%) even after adjustment for total plaque volume. We found no sex-specific differences in plaque volume-corrected volumes of IPH, LRNC, and calcifications. In terms of coexistence of plaque characteristics, we found that men had more often a plaque with coexistence of calcifications, LRNC, and IPH (OR=2.7 [95% CI, 1.2-7.0]), with coexistence of thin-or-ruptured fibrous cap/ulcerations, LRNC, and IPH (OR=2.4 [95% CI, 1.1-5.9]), and with coexistence of all plaque characteristics (OR=3.0 [95% CI, 1.2-8.6]). CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with mild-to-moderate carotid stenosis, men are more likely to have a high-risk carotid plaque with IPH and LRNC than women, regardless of total plaque burden. Men also have more often a plaque with multiple vulnerable plaque components, which could comprise an even higher stroke risk. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01208025.

The Association Between Time-Varying Wall Shear Stress and the Development of Plaque Ulcerations in Carotid Arteries From the Plaque at Risk Study.

Background and Purpose: Shear stress (WSS) is involved in the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic disease and might affect plaque ulceration. In this case-control study, we compared carotid plaques that developed a new ulcer during follow-up and plaques that remained silent for their exposure to time-dependent oscillatory shear stress parameters at baseline. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients who underwent CTA and MRI of their carotid arteries at baseline and 2 years follow-up were included. These 18 patients consisted of six patients who demonstrated a new ulcer and 12 control patients selected from a larger cohort with similar MRI-based plaque characteristics as the ulcer group. (Oscillatory) WSS parameters [time average WSS, oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT)] were calculated using computational fluid dynamics applying the MRI-based geometry of the carotid arteries and compared among plaques (wall thickness>2 mm) with and without ulceration (Mann-Whitney U test) and ulcer-site vs. non-ulcer-site within the plaque (Wilcoxon signed rank test). More detailed analysis on ulcer cases was performed and the predictive value of oscillatory WSS parameters was calculated using linear and logistic mixed-effect regression models. Results: The ulcer group demonstrated no difference in maximum WSS [9.9 (6.6-18.5) vs. 13.6 (9.7-17.7) Pa, p = 0.349], a lower maximum OSI [0.04 (0.01-0.10) vs. 0.12 (0.06-0.20) p = 0.019] and lower maximum RRT [1.25 (0.78-2.03) Pa-1 vs. 2.93 (2.03-5.28) Pa-1, p = 0.011] compared to controls. The location of the ulcer (ulcer-site) within the plaque was not always at the maximal WSS, but demonstrated higher average WSS, lower average RRT and OSI at the ulcer-site compared to the non-ulcer-sites. High WSS (WSS>4.3 Pa) and low RRT (RRT < 0.25 Pa) were associated with ulceration with an odds ratio of 3.6 [CI 2.1-6.3] and 2.6 [CI 1.54-4.44] respectively, which remained significant after adjustment for wall thickness. Conclusion: In this explorative study, ulcers were not exclusively located at plaque regions exposed to the highest WSS, OSI, or RRT, but high WSS and low RRT regions had a significantly higher odds to present ulceration within the plaque even after adjustment for wall thickness.

Dolichoarteriopathies of the extracranial internal carotid artery: The Plaque At RISK study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dolichoarteriopathies of the extracranial part of the internal carotid artery (ICA) are associated with cerebrovascular events, yet information on their prevalence and risk factors remains limited. The aim of the present study therefore was to study the prevalence and risk factors of dolichoarteriopathies in a sample of patients with cerebrovascular symptoms from the Plaque At RISK (PARISK) study. METHODS: In a random sample of 100 patients from the PARISK study, multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) was performed as part of clinical workup. On MDCTA, we evaluated the extracranial trajectory of the ICA by measuring the length (in millimeters), the tortuosity index (TI; defined as the ICA length divided by the shortest possible distance from bifurcation to skull base), and dolichoarteriopathy type (tortuosity, coiling or kinking). Next, we investigated the association between cardiovascular risk factors and these measurements using linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) length of the ICA was 93 (± 14) mm, with a median (interquartile range) TI of 1.2 (1.1-1.3). The overall prevalence of dolichoarteriopathies was 69%, with tortuosity being the most common (72%), followed by coiling (20%), and kinking (8%). We found that age and obesity were associated with a higher TI: difference per 10-year increase in age: 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.08) and 0.16 (95% CI 0.07-0.25) for obesity. Obesity and hypercholesterolemia were associated with a more severe type of dolichoarteriopathy (odds ratio [OR] 2.07 [95% CI 1.04-4.12] and OR 2.17 [95% CI 1.02-4.63], respectively). CONCLUSION: Dolichoarteriopathies in the extracranial ICA are common in patients with cerebrovascular symptoms, and age, obesity and hypercholesterolemia may play an important role in the pathophysiology of these abnormalities.

Association between Intraplaque Hemorrhage and Vascular Remodeling in Carotid Arteries: The Plaque at RISK (PARISK) Study.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular remodeling is a compensatory enlargement of the vessel wall in response to atherosclerotic plaque growth. We aimed to investigate the association between intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), vascular remodeling, and luminal dimensions in recently symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid artery stenosis in which the differences in plaque size were taken into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed vessel dimensions on MRI of the symptomatic carotid artery in 164 patients from the Plaque At RISK study. This study included patients with recent ischemic neurological event and ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis <70%. The cross section with the largest wall area (WA) in the internal carotid artery (ICA) was selected for analysis. On this cross section, the following parameters were determined: WA, total vessel area (TVA), and lumen area (LA). Vascular remodeling was quantified as the remodeling ratio (RR) and was calculated as TVA at this position divided by the TVA in an unaffected distal portion of the ipsilateral ICA. Adjustment for WA was performed to correct for plaque size. RESULTS: Plaques with IPH had a larger WA (0.56 vs. 0.46 cm2; p < 0.001), a smaller LA (0.17 vs. 0.22 cm2; p = 0.03), and a higher RR (2.0 vs. 1.9; p = 0.03) than plaques without IPH. After adjustment for WA, plaques containing IPH had a smaller LA (B = -0.052, p = 0.01) than plaques without IPH, but the RR was not different. CONCLUSION: After correcting for plaque size, plaques containing IPH had a smaller LA than plaques without IPH. However, RR was not different.