Common Injuries in Female Competitive Softball Players.

The popularity of softball is rising among female athletes with more than two million players between the ages of 12 and 18 competing per year. As participation rates increase, the frequency of injuries related to softball is on the rise. Softball injuries can differ from baseball injuries, and only a small amount of current literature focuses exclusively on softball injuries. Orthopaedic surgeons need to be prepared to evaluate, diagnose, and treat common injuries sustained while playing softball. The purpose of this study is to investigate the mechanisms of injury that are commonly encountered by female athletes in competitive fast-pitch softball and review current safety initiatives that have been implemented to aide in injury prevention.

Techniques for Managing the Subscapularis and Addressing Failures of the Tendon in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is an accepted treatment for a variety of degenerative conditions of the glenohumeral joint. The manner in which the subscapularis tendon is handled during the approach in aTSA is not universally agreed on. Failure of the repair after aTSA has been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes in some cases. There is no consensus on how to treat failures, as all techniques described in the literature demonstrate shortcomings. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the methods of handling the tendon in aTSA and to review options for treating failure following surgery. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e264-e272.].

Patient- and Procedure-Specific Variables Associated With Removal or Revision of Radial Head Arthroplasty.

Introduction The purpose of this retrospective review was to identify risk factors associated with removal or revision following radial head arthroplasty. Methods Patients undergoing primary radial head arthroplasty between 2009 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were identified. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to analyze the characteristics of patients requiring implant removal or revision and multivariable analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios. Results There were 312 patients included in the final cohort with a median follow-up of 3.8 years. Thirty-five patients (11.2%) underwent prosthesis removal or revision. There was an increased percentage of implants removed or revised in patients under age 40, with surgery performed for chronic indications compared to acute trauma, and with the use of press-fit stems compared to polished. Discussion It appears younger patient age, chronic surgical indications, and certain aspects of prosthesis design may influence rates of removal or revision.

The association between critical shoulder angle and revision following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a matched case-control study.

HYPOTHESIS: The concept of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) was introduced in 2013, with studies showing that larger CSA is associated with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and smaller CSA with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We hypothesized outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) would differ depending on CSA. METHODS: We conducted a matched case-control study using Kaiser Permanente's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry to identify patients who underwent primary elective anatomic TSA for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis from 2009-2018. Seventy-eight adult patients who underwent revision following the primary TSA due to glenoid component failure or rotator cuff tear comprised the case group. A control group of nonrevised patients were identified from the same source population. Two controls were matched to each case by age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgeon who performed the index TSA, and post-TSA follow-up time. The relationship between revision and CSA as measured on radiographs were analyzed as a 1:2 matched-pairs case-control study with use of multiple conditional multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Revised cases had a higher likelihood of a CSA ≥35° (odds ratio [OR] = 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-4.59). A higher likelihood of CSA ≥35° was observed for those revised for glenoid loosening (OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.20-17.50) and revised for rotator cuff tear (OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.18-4.92) compared with nonrevised controls. Every 5° increase in CSA had higher odds of overall revision (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.18-2.21), glenoid loosening (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.27-4.92), and rotator cuff tear (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.07-2.14). CONCLUSION: In a matched case-control study of primary anatomic TSA, individuals who were revised for aseptic glenoid loosening and superior cuff failure had a higher CSA compared with nonrevised individuals. These data suggest that surgeons may consider using reverse arthroplasty in cases of primary shoulder arthritis with a CSA of 35° or greater.

The effect of a statewide COVID-19 shelter-in-place order on shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture volume and length of stay.

BACKGROUND: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted elective shoulder arthroplasty throughput, traumatic shoulder arthroplasty procedures are less apt to be postponed. We sought to evaluate shoulder arthroplasty utilization for fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic and California's associated shelter-in-place order compared to historical controls. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study with historical controls, identifying patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture in California using our integrated electronic health record. The time period of interest was following the implementation of the statewide shelter-in-place order: March 19, 2020-May 31, 2020. This was compared to three historical periods: January 1, 2020-March 18, 2020, March 18, 2019-May 31, 2019, and January 1, 2019-March 18, 2019. Procedure volume, patient characteristics, in-hospital length of stay, and 30-day events (emergency department visit, readmission, infection, pneumonia, and death) were reported. Changes over time were analyzed using linear regression adjusted for usual seasonal and yearly changes and age, sex, comorbidities, and postadmission factors. RESULTS: Surgical volume dropped from an average of 4.4, 5.2, and 2.6 surgeries per week in the historical time periods, respectively, to 2.4 surgeries per week after shelter-in-place. While no more than 30% of all shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed during any given week were for fracture during the historical time periods, arthroplasties performed for fracture was the overwhelming primary indication immediately after the shelter-in-place order. More patients were discharged the day of surgery (+33.2%, P = .019) after the shelter-in-place order, but we did not observe a change in any of the corresponding 30-day events. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of shoulder arthroplasty for fracture dropped during the time of COVID-19. The reduction in volume could be due to less shoulder trauma due to shelter-in-place or a change in the indications for arthroplasty given the perceived higher risks associated with intubation and surgical care. We noted more patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for fracture were safely discharged on the day of surgery, suggesting this may be a safe practice that can be adopted moving forward. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Case-control Comparative Study.

Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Descriptive Analysis of 170 Patients From a United States Integrated Health Care System.

PURPOSE: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) can be used, with varying degrees of success, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and distal humerus fractures and their sequelae in elderly patients. Some of the largest studies of TEA have included data from more than 20 years ago and may not reflect the current practice of TEA. We sought to describe a modern cohort of patients who underwent TEA in a United States integrated health care system. METHODS: All patients aged 18 years and older who underwent primary unilateral TEA from January 1, 2009, through March 31, 2018, were identified to conduct a descriptive study. The patients' characteristics and demographics, including age, body mass index, sex, diabetes status, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and surgical indication, were recorded. The crude cumulative revision probability as well as the 90-day postoperative incidence rate of emergency department visit, readmission, and mortality was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients met our inclusion criteria. The annual procedure volume nearly doubled, from 11 procedures in 2009 to 21 procedures in 2017. The most common indication for TEA was fracture (40.6%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (36.5%). At 4-year follow up, the crude cumulative revision probability was 9.8% (95% confidence interval, 5.6%-16.9%). Of the 170 patients who underwent TEA, 43 (25.3%) experienced a 90-day emergency department visit, 24 (14.1%) experienced a 90-day readmission, and 2 (1.2%) died within 90 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of patients who underwent TEA using modern implants showed a notable increase in the volume of TEA over the study period, with more TEAs performed for trauma. The incidence of readmission and emergency department visits following TEA were high in this study. Further studies are needed to better define the current practice of TEA in the community at large. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Early revision in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a cross-registry comparison.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated anatomic total shoulders undergoing early revision (less than two years) in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) and the Kaiser Permanente Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (KPSAR). METHODS: A cross-sectional comparison of both registries was performed between the years of 2009 and 2012. Only patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis were included. Aggregate-level data of patients undergoing early revisions done within two years of index arthroplasty were evaluated, and descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS: During the study period, 4614 patients were identified in the AOANJRR compared to 2036 in the KPSAR. Rotator cuff pathology, component loosening, and prosthetic instability were among the most common reasons for revision in both registries. A higher rate of revision in the AOANJRR was found to be secondary to the failure of one specific prosthesis, which has since been discontinued. DISCUSSION: Comparing reasons for early revision in total shoulder arthroplasty revealed several similarities between the AOANJRR and KPSAR. Differences were also noted, and this study served to highlight the importance prosthesis selection can play in determining outcomes. Cooperation among registries may allow for earlier identification of risk factors for failure in shoulder arthroplasty.

Characteristics of Rotator Cuff Repairs Revised to Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Successful repair of a torn rotator cuff may prevent progression to rotator cuff arthropathy. However, previous studies have shown a substantial rate of failure after rotator cuff repair and characteristics of surgically repaired rotator cuffs that go on to shoulder arthroplasty have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the patient characteristics and rate at which patients who underwent rotator cuff repair progressed to shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair in a large, closed healthcare system in 2008. The EMR was queried for rotator cuff repair CPT with ICD-9 codes for rotator cuff. The resultant dataset was then cross-referenced with a separate internal shoulder arthroplasty registry to determine which patients went onto shoulder arthroplasty. Demographic variables, descriptors of tear pathology and repair characteristics were collected and compared between patients who subsequently underwent shoulder arthroplasty and those that did not. RESULTS: A total of 882 rotator cuff repair patients were included within this study. Of the initial 882 cuff repairs, there were 12 patients (1.4%) that went on to have arthroplasty. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty after rotator cuff repair were significantly older at time of surgery and had greater comorbidity burdens. Patients who ended up with shoulder arthroplasty had the procedure an average of 4.77 ± 3.28 (SD) years after rotator cuff repair, with 11 of 12 patients having a diagnosis of rotator cuff arthropathy at the time of shoulder replacement. CONCLUSION: In a closed system, tracking rotator cuff repairs over 9.1 years revealed a small number that went on to subsequent shoulder arthroplasty. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were significantly older and had greater comorbidity burdens than those who did not. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty usually either had shoulder arthroplasty within 1 year or after 5 years. Enhanced understanding of which patients may progress to arthroplasty may provide a better initial choice of operative intervention in those patients.

Arthroscopic Repair of a Displaced Tuberosity Fragment After Proximal Humerus Locking Plate Fixation: A Case Report.

CASE: Locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures is known to have high complication rates. Even a technically well-performed surgery can be subject to loss of reduction, which can lead to an adverse functional outcome for the patient. In this case report, we describe a patient who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humerus fracture complicated by delayed loss of reduction of a greater tuberosity fragment that was revised using arthroscopic techniques. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of displaced greater tuberosity fragments after failed locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures can lead to good functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

The association between glenoid component design and revision risk in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a proven treatment for glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis, with superior results compared with hemiarthroplasty. However, glenoid component loosening remains a problem and is one of the most common causes of failure in TSA. Multiple component designs have been developed in an attempt to reduce loosening rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk of revision after anatomic TSA according to the glenoid component design. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study including patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary elective TSA for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2017. Patients with missing implant information, who received stemless humeral implants, or who received augmented glenoid implants, were excluded. Glenoid component designs used were categorized into 4 mutually exclusive treatment groups: polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth, polyethylene-metal hybrid, polyethylene all-cemented pegged, and polyethylene cemented keeled. Multivariable competing risk regression was used to evaluate the risk of glenoid loosening as a cause-specific revision by the glenoid component design. RESULTS: Of the 5566 TSA included in the final cohort, 39.2% of glenoid implants were polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth, 31.1% were polyethylene-metal hybrid, 26.0% were polyethylene all-cemented pegged, and 3.6% were polyethylene cemented keeled. At 6-year final follow-up, 4.1% of TSA were revised for any cause, and 1.4% for glenoid loosening. Compared with the polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth design, no difference in glenoid loosening revision risk was observed for the polyethylene-metal hybrid design (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-3.20). However, both the polyethylene all-cemented pegged (HR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.08-5.66) and polyethylene cemented keeled (HR = 3.84, 95% CI = 1.13-13.00) designs had higher risks for revision due to glenoid loosening. CONCLUSIONS: We observed glenoid component designs to be associated with differential risks in revision due to glenoid loosening with polyethylene all-cemented pegged glenoids and polyethylene cemented keeled glenoids having higher risks when compared with polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth glenoids. Surgeons may want to consider the glenoid component design when performing anatomic TSA.

Risk Factors for Re-Revision Surgery in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Revision shoulder arthroplasty is an expensive undertaking with notable morbidity to the patient and less predictable outcomes. Therefore, it is important to avoid even further surgery in these patients. We sought to report the annual revision burden from a large integrated healthcare system and identify patient and operative factors that may predispose patients to revision failure, necessitating further surgery. METHODS: Annual revision burden as a proportion of the overall shoulder arthroplasties performed from 2005 to 2017 was obtained. Patients who underwent aseptic revision between 2005 and 2017 comprised the study sample. Patient characteristics evaluated for re-revision risk included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, and diabetes status, whereas surgical characteristics included surgeon cumulative revision volume, revision procedure type, and top reason for revision by primary procedure type. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between the specified factors and re-revision risk. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2017, revisions represented 5.3% to 7.8% of all shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed. Factors associated with re-revision surgery risk by procedure type included increasing BMI and hemiarthroplasty revision procedure compared with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) revision procedure for hemiarthroplasty primaries; diabetes, revision because of instability, and lower cumulative surgeon revision procedure volume for RTSA primaries; and TSA revision procedure compared with RTSA revision procedure for TSA primaries. CONCLUSION: The annual revision shoulder arthroplasty volume increased over the study period. Patient factors, including BMI and diabetes were associated with higher re-revision risks for hemiarthroplasty and RTSA primaries, respectively. RTSA revised for instability had a higher risk of re-revision compared with other indications. TSA and hemiarthroplasty requiring aseptic revision may be best treated with RTSA as opposed to another TSA or hemiarthroplasty. Further studies are needed to verify these findings and identify how the mechanism of failure may affect the procedure selection in the revision setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty in shoulder arthroplasty patients: does the order of the lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty matter?

BACKGROUND: As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) utilization increases, arthroplasties of multiple joints in a patient are more common. An understanding of the success of shoulder arthroplasty patients also requiring a lower-extremity (hip or knee) TJA is lacking. We evaluated the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in the revision risk following shoulder arthroplasty in patients who also undergo a lower-extremity TJA compared with those who do not? (2) Does the revision risk differ depending on the sequence of the procedures? METHODS: Patients who underwent elective primary shoulder arthroplasty from 2009 through 2015 were identified using Kaiser Permanente's shoulder arthroplasty registry. Patients with a lower-extremity TJA were identified using the institution's total joint replacement registry. Revision related to the index shoulder was modeled via Cox regression stratified by procedure type and adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Of the 4751 shoulder arthroplasties identified, 1285 (27.0%) underwent a prior hip and/or knee arthroplasty and 483 (10.2%) underwent a hip and/or knee arthroplasty following the index shoulder arthroplasty. No difference was found in all-cause shoulder revision risk with lower-extremity TJA before (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.96) or after (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.06) the index shoulder arthroplasty compared with patients who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty only. CONCLUSION: In our study sample, we did not observe shoulder revision surgery risk to be different in patients who also underwent a lower-extremity TJA, regardless of the sequence of the 2 procedures. Future prospective studies should investigate whether the timing of the lower-extremity TJA in relation to the shoulder procedure impacts the latter's success.

Perioperative Clindamycin Use in Penicillin Allergic Patients Is Associated With a Higher Risk of Infection After Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study determines whether infection rates differ between prophylactic antibiotic use for patients with or without penicillin allergy before shoulder arthroplasty surgery. METHODS: Seven thousand one hundred forty primary shoulder arthroplasties operated between 2005 and 2016 were identified. We compared deep surgical site infection risk of patients who received perioperative vancomycin alone (6.2%, N = 444) or clindamycin alone (7.1%, N = 508) for penicillin allergy versus patients who received cefazolin alone without penicillin allergy (86.7%, N = 6,188). RESULTS: Seventy deep infections (1.2% 5-year cumulative incidence) were observed. The most common organism was Cutibacterium acnes (39.4%, N = 27). Compared with patients treated with cefazolin, infection risk was not different for those treated with vancomycin (hazard ratio = 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 3.30, P = 0.8), but a higher risk of infection was identified for those treated with clindamycin alone (hazard ratio = 3.45, 95% confidence interval 1.84 to 6.47, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A higher risk of postoperative infection is found after prophylactic use of intravenous clindamycin antibiotic after shoulder arthroplasty. Vancomycin is preferred over clindamycin for patients with penicillin allergy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Same-day discharge is not inferior to longer length of in-hospital stay for 90-day readmissions following shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroplasty is a common orthopedic procedure, performed historically in the inpatient setting. However, interest in same-day discharge has increased. We sought to evaluate 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department (ED) visit, 90-day deep infection, 90-day venous thromboembolism (VTE), and 1-year mortality after same-day shoulder arthroplasty compared with an inpatient stay. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from an integrated health care system's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. A total of 6503 elective primary unilateral total shoulder and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties performed between 2005 and 2016 were included; 405 (6%) had same-day discharge. The likelihood of 90-day events, including readmission, ED visit, deep infection, and VTE, and 1-year mortality after same-day discharge was compared with 1- to 4-night inpatient stay using generalized estimating equations with noninferiority testing, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, select comorbidities, osteoarthritis, anesthesia type, procedure type, and surgeon effect. RESULTS: We failed to observe a difference between same-day discharge and 1- to 4-night stay in terms of 90-day readmission, 90-day ED visit, and 1-year mortality. Same-day discharge was not inferior to 1- to 4-night stay regarding 90-day readmission, but we did not have evidence to support noninferiority for 90-day ED visits or 1-year mortality. Ninety-day deep infections and VTE were too infrequent for adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found same-day shoulder arthroplasty not to be inferior to an inpatient stay for 90-day readmission. Future investigation into the reasons for readmission and ED visit after same-day shoulder arthroplasty and interventions to mitigate these adverse events is needed.

Diabetes Disease Severity Was Not Associated with Risk of Deep Infection or Revision After Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have identified diabetes and disease severity (defined using hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]) as potential risk factors for complications after shoulder arthroplasty. Evaluations of diabetes status and risk of adverse outcomes beyond the 30-day window either are limited or have not accounted for disease severity. Further, measures of diabetes severity other than HbA1c have yet to be investigated in a shoulder arthroplasty population. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are diabetes status and glycemic control associated with adverse events, including deep infection, all-cause revision, and 90-day readmission after shoulder arthroplasty? (2) Is postoperative HbA1c associated with revision risk? (3) Is there a threshold of preoperative HbA1c that best identifies patients with diabetes who are at higher risk of 3-year deep infection, 1-year all-cause revision, or 90-day readmission? (4) Can the Adapted Diabetes Complications Severity index (aDCSI) be used as an alternative measure of diabetes severity in evaluating the risk of deep infection, all-cause revision, and 90-day readmission and identification of patients with diabetes at higher risk for these events? (5) Is there a difference between elective and traumatic shoulder arthroplasty patients? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective registry-based cohort study using Kaiser Permanente's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (2005-2015). Primary shoulder arthroplasties were classified as patients with and without diabetes. Patients with diabetes were further evaluated using two disease severity measures (1) HbA1c, with good glycemic control classified as preoperative HbA1c < 7.0% and poor control defined as HbA1c ≥ 7.0%; and (2) aDCSI, classified as mild (score of 0-2) or severe (score ≥ 3) diabetes. Cox regression was used to evaluate the risk of deep infection and revision according to diabetes status and disease severity; conditional logistic regression was used for 90-day readmission. Time-dependent 1-year postoperative HbA1c was used to evaluate revision risk in Cox regression. All models were adjusted for covariates and stratified by elective versus trauma shoulder arthroplasty. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for HbA1c and aDCSI to determine whether a threshold exists to identify patients at higher risk of deep infection, all-cause revision, or 90-day readmission. The study sample consisted of 8819 patients; 7353 underwent elective shoulder arthroplasty and 1466 underwent shoulder arthroplasty due to trauma. For elective shoulder arthroplasty, 1430 patients (19%) had diabetes, and among the patients who underwent arthroplasty due to trauma, 444 (30%) had diabetes. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes who underwent elective shoulder arthroplasty and had poor glycemic control had a higher likelihood of 90-day readmission compared with patients without diabetes (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; p = 0.032). No association was found for patients with diabetes who underwent shoulder arthroplasty due to trauma. No association was found between postoperative HbA1c and revision risk. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested preoperative HbA1c performed poorly at differentiating adverse events. When using aDCSI, patients with severe diabetes who underwent both elective and traumatic shoulder arthroplasty had a higher likelihood of 90-day readmission compared with patients without diabetes (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; p = 0.001 and OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7; p = 0.005, respectively). Similar to HbA1c, the aDCSI was a poor classifier in differentiating adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Of the longer-term outcomes evaluated, more-severe diabetes was only found to be associated with an increase in 90-day readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty; a stronger association was found when using the aDCSI in identifying diabetes severity. Arbitrary cutoffs in HbA1c may not be the best method for determining risk of postoperative outcomes. Future work investigating perioperative diabetes management should work to identify and validate measures, such as the aDCSI, that better identify patients at higher risk for postoperative outcomes and, more importantly, whether outcomes can be improved by modifying these measures with targeted interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The increasing role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder is a well established treatment for proximal humerus fractures not amenable to open reduction internal fixation. However, orthopedic surgeons have recently increased utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in the treatment of these injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of hemiarthroplasty and RTSA between 2009 and 2016 for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures within a large United States integrated healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted using our integrated healthcare system's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. Shoulder arthroplasty cases performed for an acute proximal humerus fracture between the years of 2009 and 2016 were identified. Revision rates were determined, as well as changes in age and gender distribution of the cohort during the study period. RESULTS: In 2015, RTSA utilization surpassed that of hemiarthroplasty for the first time in the healthcare system. The utilization of RTSA in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures increased from 4.5% of all arthroplasties in 2009 to 67.4% of arthroplasties in 2016. During the study period, patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty were younger and less likely to be female. Crude revision rate was 4.0% for hemiarthroplasty and 3.2% for RTSA. CONCLUSIONS: RTSA is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures and now appears to be the treatment of choice. While hemiarthroplasty appears to be falling out of favor in the treatment of fractures of the shoulder, surgeons may still be preferentially using the procedure in younger patients.

Risk Factors for Mortality and Readmission After Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty for Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists regarding mortality and readmission following proximal humerus fracture. This study examines risk factors following hemiarthroplasty for these fractures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 788 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture from January 2005 to December 2011 was conducted. One-year mortality and 30- and 90-day hospital readmission were evaluated. Patient risk factors included age, race, gender, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and body mass index. RESULTS: One-year mortality rate was 5.2%. Patients with ASA ≥3 had 2.37 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-5.32) greater mortality risk versus patients with ASA1/2. The 30-day readmission rate was 8.4% and at 90 days was 12.6%. Females had 0.53 risk of readmission versus males (95% CI: 0.29-0.96). Patients with ASA ≥3 had 1.79 (95% CI: 1.04-3.09) risk of 90-day readmission versus patients with ASA1/2; females had 0.52 (95% CI: 0.31-0.85) risk of readmission versus males. Increased age increased all odds ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission rate after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture is significant both at 30 and 90 days and is higher in males. Age and ASA ≥3 correlate with this. Diabetes and obesity were not significant risk factors for readmission or mortality.

Risk factors for postoperative opioid use after elective shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic remains a serious issue in the United States with significant impact to the medical and socioeconomic welfare of communities. We sought to determine baseline opioid use in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (SA) and identify patient characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical risk factors associated with postoperative opioid use. METHODS: A Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry identified the number of dispensed opioid medication prescriptions (Rxs) in the first postoperative year in patients who underwent elective primary SA from 2008 to 2014. We used Poisson regression to study the effect of preoperative risks factors on number of dispensed opioid Rxs in the first postoperative year, evaluated quarterly (Q1: days 0-90, Q2: days 91-180, Q3: days 181-270, Q4: days 271-360). RESULTS: Included were 4243 SAs from 3996 patients, and 75% used opioids in the 1-year preoperative period. The factors associated with increased opioid use in all postoperative quarters (Q4 incident rate ratio [IRR] shown) were age <60 years (IRR, 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.51), preoperative opioid use (1-4 Rxs: IRR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.85-2.51; ≥5 Rxs: IRR, 9.83; 95% CI , 8.53-11.32), anxiety (IRR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20), opioid dependence (IRR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05-1.43), substance abuse (IRR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.28), and general chronic pain (IRR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.28-1.50). CONCLUSION: Opioid usage in patients undergoing SA is widespread at 1 year, with three-fourths of patients having been dispensed at least one Rx. These findings emphasize the need for surgeon and patient awareness as well as education in the management of postoperative opioid usage associated with the indicated conditions. Surgeons may consider these risk factors for preoperative risk stratification and targeted deployment of preventative strategies.

Mortality After Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Large Integrated Health Care System.

CONTEXT: The number of excess deaths associated with elective total joint arthroplasty in the US is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate one-year postoperative mortality among patients with elective primary and revision arthroplasty procedures of the hip and knee. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted of hip and knee arthroplasties performed in 2010. Procedure type, procedure volume, patient age and sex, and mortality were obtained from an institutional total joint replacement registry. An integrated health care system population was the sampling frame for the study subjects and was the reference group for the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized 1-year mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 10,163 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), 4963 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 606 revision TKAs, and 496 revision THAs were evaluated. Patients undergoing primary THA (SMR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.7) and TKA (SMR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.3-0.5) had lower odds of mortality than expected. Patients with revision TKA had higher-than-expected mortality odds (SMR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1-2.5), whereas patients with revision THA (SMR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.4-1.5) did not have higher-than-expected odds of mortality. CONCLUSION: Understanding excess mortality after joint surgery allows clinicians to evaluate current practices and to determine whether certain groups are at higher-than-expected mortality risk after surgery.