Comparing the Effectiveness of Hands-on vs. Observational Training of Residents in Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections (ILESI) Using a High-Fidelity Spine Simulator.

Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that residents in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) residency observe or perform certain interventional procedures, one of which is an interlaminar epidural steroid injection (ILESI). While the traditional learning model relying heavily on observation is commonplace, it leaves the practice phase of learning to happen on real patients. High-fidelity simulation may be a worthwhile alternative as a training approach to increase physician comfort with the procedure and improve patient safety. Methods Current PM&R residents from two programs between their second and fourth year, inclusively, who lacked prior training experience in ILESI attended one hour of either: (1) an experimental arm of supervised hands-on training on a simulation device or (2) a control arm observing the procedures performed by an attending on the same device. Assignments were made based on resident schedule availability. Pre-training knowledge, training, and post-training knowledge were assessed at the Multidisciplinary Pain Clinic at Montefiore Medical Center. Participants were assessed on their procedural competence using an adapted version of a previously published grading checklist before the session. Participants also evaluated their confidence in performing the procedure prior to and after training. Data was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. SAS Version 9.4 was used for analysis. Results Fifteen residents initially participated, but three residents dropped out at the 15-week follow-up. There was a significant increase in test scores in both arms immediately after the intervention (p=0.008 in control, p=0.016 in the experiment), with greater improvement shown in the hands-on training group (p=0.063). At the 15-week follow-up, there was no significant change in test scores in the control arm (p=0.969) while there was a decrease in the experiment arm (p<0.001). Conclusion Hands-on learning with high-fidelity simulation demonstrated more improvement for short-term motor-skill acquisition, while observational learning with repetition showed more benefits for long-term retention. Optimal procedural training should employ both educational modalities for best short- and long-term results.

Measurement of resident fatigue using rapid number naming.

OBJECTIVE: Sleep deprivation has a negative effect on neurocognitive performance. The King-Devick test (KDT), which tests speed and accuracy of number-reading, requires integrity of saccades, visual processing, and cognition. This study investigated effects of sleep deprivation in on-call residents using KDT. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among 80 residents. KDT was performed at the beginning and end of an overnight call shift for the residents in the experimental group. A control group was tested at the beginning of 2 consecutive day shifts. Estimates of hours of sleep, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)(1 = extremely alert, 9 = extremely sleepy), and time and accuracy of KDT were recorded. RESULTS: 42 residents were tested before and after overnight call shifts and 38 served as controls. Change in test time differed between the groups, with the experimental group performing 0.54(SD = 4.0) seconds slower after their night on call and the control group performing 2.32(SD = 3.0) seconds faster on the second day, p < 0.001. This difference was larger in surgical compared to medical residents. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep deprivation was inversely correlated with neurocognitive performance as measured by KDT, with more effect on surgical than medical residents. Further research could investigate whether this test could help determine fatigue level and ability to continue working after a long shift.