Effect of Exogenous Antithrombin Administration on Anti-Xa Levels in Infants Treated With Enoxaparin.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the effect of exogenous antithrombin III administration on low molecular weight heparin anti-Xa levels in the context of enoxaparin dosing in infants. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of infants receiving concomitant antithrombin III and enoxaparin. The primary objective of this study was to determine the median change in anti-Xa level with antithrombin III supplementation. Secondary objectives were to analyze the median change in antithrombin III levels after administration of exogenous antithrombin III, the dosing of antithrombin III, and the dose of enoxaparin throughout therapy. For a safety analysis, any bleeding events were recorded. RESULTS: The study included 17 patients who received a total of 33 doses of antithrombin III. The median change in anti-Xa levels in infants receiving exogenous antithrombin III was 0.2 units/mL (p < 0.001). The median dose of antithrombin III was 50 units/kg and was administered when patients were receiving a median enoxaparin dose of 1.71 mg/kg. The median increase in antithrombin III levels was 16.5% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that administration of exogenous antithrombin III to infants who were being treated with enoxaparin results in a significant increase in anti-Xa levels. At this time, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine administration of antithrombin III to infants on enoxaparin. However, antithrombin III supplementation could be considered a potential option for patients who are unable to adequately achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels with enoxaparin alone.

Use of Vasopressin in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Patients With Hypotension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vasopressin for the treatment of hypotension in patients admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS: Vasopressin use in 69 infants admitted to our NICU between 2011 and 2014 was examined. Data evaluated included demographics; serum creatinine, sodium, and lactate concentrations; urine output; and systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures (BPs). Parameters prior to vasopressin use were compared to those at maximum dose. RESULTS: Vasopressin use was associated with increased urine output (p < 0.05), and increased systolic (p < 0.0005), diastolic (p < 0.01), and mean (p < 0.001) BP. There were no differences in sodium or lactate concentrations before vs during infusion; vasopressin use was not associated with hyponatremia (sodium < 130 mEq/L) at the maximum dose. CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin for the treatment of neonatal hypotension appears safe and was efficacious in raising BP. These data suggest that vasopressin could be considered a viable option in the treatment regimen in hypotensive infants in the NICU.

Evaluating the safety of intermittent intravenous sildenafil in infants with pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of hypotension following administration of intermittent intravenous (IV) and enteral sildenafil for treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in infants. We hypothesized there may be more adverse effects associated with intermittent IV sildenafil compared with enteral sildenafil. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched-cohort study conducted in a tertiary care children's hospital. Patients were included if they were less than 1 year of age and received intermittent sildenafil for PH. Exclusion criteria consisted of concurrent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the initiation of sildenafil, the utilization of sildenafil as a one-time dose, continuation of home-dosing regimen, or inclusion in the other cohort. A total of 40 patients were matched 1:1 based on postmenstrual age and primary diagnosis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome, as 30% (6/20) of patients receiving IV sildenafil required a hypotension intervention compared with 10% (2/20) in the enteral cohort (P = 0.24). The majority of interventions occurred within 24 hr of the initiation of sildenafil with 4/6 patients (67%) in the IV group and 2/2 patients (100%) in the enteral group, respectively. Baseline mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in the IV patients that required an intervention compared with those that did not (44 ± 6.3 vs. 65 ± 13.4 mmHg, P = 0.0024). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in safety outcomes between intermittent IV and enteral sildenafil in infants with PH. Hemodynamic parameters should be monitored closely upon sildenafil initiation. Limitations include the retrospective nature and small sample size. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:232-237. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Outcomes in Postoperative Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Patients Who Received an Antiepileptic Drug.

BACKGROUND: Advances in cardiac operations over the last few decades, including corrective operations in early life, have dramatically increased the survival of children with congenital heart disease. However, postoperative care has been associated with neurologic complications, with seizures being the most common manifestation. The primary objective of this study is to describe the outcomes in pediatric patients who received an antiepileptic drug (AED) post-cardiac surgery. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed in all patients less than 18 years of age who received an AED in the cardiovascular intensive care unit at Texas Children's Hospital from June 2002 until June 2012. Cardiac surgical patients initiated on phenobarbital, phenytoin, and levetiracetam were queried. Patients were excluded if the AED was not initiated on the admission for surgery. Patients who received 1 AED were compared to patients who received 2 AED, and differences in outcomes examined between the 3 AEDs used were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients met the study criteria. Patients were initiated on an AED a median of 4 days following surgery and became seizure free a median of 1 day after initiation, with 65% remaining seizure free after the first dose. Half of all patients required 2 AEDs for seizure control, with a higher proportion of adolescents requiring 2 AEDs (p = 0.04). No differences were found when comparing the collected outcomes between phenobarbital, fosphenytoin, or levetiracetam. CONCLUSION: No adverse events were reported with the AEDs reviewed. Further work is necessary to evaluate long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in this population and whether outcomes are a result of the AED or of other clinical sequelae.

Micronutrient requirements of high-risk infants.

Micronutrient requirements are well-established for healthy full-term infants. However, few such recommendations exist for high-risk infants, including full-term infants with a variety of medical disorders or very preterm infants. Key micronutrients considered in this review are calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, and zinc. The ongoing unresolved shortages, especially of intravenous forms of these minerals, remain a major problem. Considered are some aspects of how the nutrient shortages may be managed, recognizing the complexity and changing nature of the supply.