Unenhanced 3D turbo spin-echo MR angiography of lower limbs in peripheral arterial disease: a comparative study with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of an unenhanced MR angiography sequence (Syngo Native Space, Siemens Healthcare) to detect and quantify lower-limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients known to have lower-limb arteriopathy were included in this prospective study. For every patient, we performed Native sequence and CE-MRA on a 1.5-T system. We evaluated examination duration, image quality, and location, number, and severity of lesions. RESULTS: Examination duration was longer for Native sequence (mean, 39.6 min, vs 10 min for CE-MRA). Image quality was significantly better for CE-MRA, with 92% of images listed as good to excellent for CE-MRA, compared to 53% for Native. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of Native were respectively 75%, 95%, 89%, and 88% for all mixed levels; 52%, 97%, 88%, and 87% for aortoiliac level; 87%, 99%, 95%, and 92% for femoropopliteal level; and 82%, 87%, 87%, and 85% for subpopliteal level. If we considered only patients with Leriche and Fontaine stage II arteriopathy, Native results were slightly better, with respective specificities and NPVs of 96% and 91% for all mixed levels; 98% and 90% for aortoiliac level; 98% and 93% for femoropopliteal level; and 91% and 90% for subpopliteal level. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced MR angiography, cheaper than CE-MRA, showed in our study a good NPV, which suggests its utility as first-line test to screen for PAD, especially in patients at risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Unenhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: 51 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to assess the feasibility and performance of an unenhanced 3D balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence, compared with contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA), which is the reference standard to detect and quantify renal artery stenoses (RAS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients were included in this prospective study. Balanced SSFP sequence (Native) and CEMRA were performed using a 1.5-T magnet. Signal quality and stenosis grade were assessed per segment for renal arteries and for ostia of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). We compared signal quality of Native and CEMRA. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were also calculated. RESULTS: Evaluation involved 114 renal arteries, 51 celiac trunks, and 51 SMAs. By use of CEMRA, 20 significant stenoses were found for renal arteries, 10 stenoses and three occlusions for celiac trunk, and three stenoses for SMA. At artery-by-artery analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and NPV of the balanced SSFP sequence in detecting stenosis were respectively 85%, 96%, 94%, and 96% for renal arteries; 100%, 97%, 98%, and 100% for celiac trunk; and 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for SMA. No significant difference of signal quality was found for the entire examination and for the different segments evaluated except for hilar and intrarenal branches, which showed better signal quality on balanced SSFP sequence. CONCLUSION: The NPV results in our study suggest that unenhanced balanced SSFP MR angiography can be the first-choice imaging method to exclude RAS in patients at high risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. However, when stenosis is found, other imaging modalities are necessary for better estimation.