Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 13(11): 7423-7431, 2023 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37969622

RESUMO

Background: In 2018, a new system was proposed for classifying and reporting post-treatment adult brain tumor on magnetic resonance imaging, named as Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS), that needs a validation by means of agreement studies. Methods: A retrospective study was designed with the aim of identifying contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of adult patients on follow-up for primary brain tumor at Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico. Four radiologists (2 radiology residents, 1 general radiologist, 1 neuroradiologist) read and scored each study using the BT-RADS scoring tool, blinded to the MRI original report. Interobserver agreement and Fleiss' k were calculated to assess the level of diagnostic agreement. It was assessed how many times the assignment of different scoring of BT-RADS would have led to a different patient management. Results: The total number of patients included in the study was 23 with 147 MRIs and a total of 588 BT-RADS scores retrospectively evaluated. The two most frequent tumor types were astrocytoma grade 4 (62%) and oligodendroglioma grade 3 (21%). The overall agreement rate for all 4 radiologists was 82% with a Fleiss' k of 0.70. The overall agreement rate between general radiologist and neuroradiologist was 91% with a Fleiss' k of 0.86. The overall agreement rate between 2 radiology residents and neuroradiologist was 80% with a Fleiss' k of 0.66. Astrocytoma grade 3 (k: 0.51) and oligodendroglioma grade 2 (k: 0.32) showed a poor agreement while higher values of agreement were found for astrocytoma grade 4 (k: 0.70), astrocytoma grade 2 (k: 0.78) and oligodendroglioma grade 3 (k: 0.78). All the radiologists agreed on BT-RADS assignment in 70% patients, three radiologists agreed in 17% and two radiologists agree in 13%. In no cases there was a complete disagreement among the readers. In 18% of cases the discrepancy in the estimated BT-RADS would have led to a different follow-up management. Conclusions: BT-RADS can be considered a valid tool for neuroradiologists and radiologists even with little experience in the interpretation of patients' images during follow-up for adult primary brain tumors supporting standardized interpretation, reporting and clinical management.

2.
Radiol Case Rep ; 18(10): 3479-3482, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37588238

RESUMO

Isolated post-traumatic rupture of renal pelvis (IPTRRP) is an extremely rare condition and only a few cases following blunt abdominal trauma have been reported in the literature. To our knowledge, no cases of IPTRRP following blunt chest trauma have been reported. We present the case of an 84-year-old woman who was admitted to our Emergency Department due to persistent left flank pain that started after she had fallen to the ground 4 days before, with blunt trauma on her chest. CT showed a rupture of the left renal pelvis with contrast extravasation, associated with multiple rib fractures. No renal and other parenchymal injuries were detected. The patient was managed conservatively with the implantation of a ureteral stent and discharged in good clinical conditions. Our case shows the first description that IPTRRP might be an uncommon but possible complication of blunt chest trauma and must be included in the differential diagnosis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA