Socioeconomic Disparities in the Pursuit of Care at a High-Volume Institution for Surgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas.

OBJECTIVE: Increased institutional surgical resection case volume for vestibular schwannomas (VSs) has been associated with improved patient outcomes, including reduced risk of prolonged hospital stay and readmission. Socioeconomic disparities in the pursuit of care at these high-volume institutions remain unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort epidemiological study. SETTING: National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry of over 1,500 facilities in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult VS patients (age, >18 years) treated surgically. INTERVENTIONS: High- versus low-volume facilities, defined using a facility case volume threshold of 25 cases per year. A risk-adjusted restricted cubic spline model was previously used to identify this risk threshold beyond which the incremental benefit of increasing case volume began to plateau. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic factors, including race, ethnicity, income, insurance status, and rurality. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics, including age, sex, Charlson-Deyo score, and tumor size. RESULTS: A totoal of 10,048 patients were identified (median [interquartile range] age = 51 [41-60] years, 54% female, 87% Caucasian). Patients with Spanish/Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.96), income below median (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55-0.73]), and Medicare, Medicaid, or other government insurance versus private insurance (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53-0.74) had reduced odds of treatment at a high-volume facility. Further sensitivity analyses in which facility volume was operationalized continuously reinforced direction and significance of these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic disparities exist in the propensity for VS patients to be treated at a high-volume facility. Further work is needed to understand the nature of these associations and whether interventions can be designed to mitigate them.

The Effect of Immediate Microsurgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma on Hearing Preservation.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate for differences in postoperative hearing in patients who undergo immediate versus delayed hearing preservation microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single-institution cohort study spanning November 2017 to November 2021. SETTING: Single-institution tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Sporadic VS in patients with American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing classification A or B, with tumor size less than or equal to 2 cm and undergoing hearing preservation microsurgical resection. INTERVENTIONS: Delayed surgical intervention defined by time from first diagnostic MRI to date of surgery being greater than 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative audiometric performance. RESULTS: In total, 193 patients met inclusion criteria. Within the cohort, 70 (36%) proceeded with surgery within 3 months of diagnostic MRI with a mean observation time of 62 days, whereas 123 (63%) underwent surgery after 3 months with a mean observation time of 301 days. There was no difference in preoperative hearing between the two groups with word recognition score 99% in early intervention group and 100% in delayed intervention group ( p = 0.6). However, 64% of those who proceeded with immediate surgery had successful hearing preservation, compared to a 42% of those who had delayed intervention ( p < 0.01). In a multivariable logistic regression accounting for preoperative word recognition score, tumor size, and age at diagnosis, the odds of hearing preservation were lower in those who delayed surgery compared to immediate surgery (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent microsurgical resection within 3 months of diagnosis demonstrated a hearing preservation advantage compared to those who did not. Findings of this study highlight the counseling challenges associated with the timing of surgical treatment of VS in patients presenting with good preoperative hearing and small tumors.

Association Between Facility Surgical Volume and Excess Time in the Hospital After Surgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Importance: High surgical vestibular schwannoma case volume in a medical institution may decrease the risk of adverse outcomes among patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery. Objective: To study the association between surgical vestibular schwannoma case volume and excess time in the hospital after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study evaluated data from the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2019, on Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities in the US. The hospital-based sample comprised adult patients aged 18 years or older with a vestibular schwannoma treated with surgery. Exposures: Facility case volume, defined as the mean number of surgical vestibular schwannoma cases per year in the 2 years preceding the index case. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of prolonged hospital stay (>90th percentile) or 30-day readmission. Risk-adjusted restricted cubic splines were used to model the probability of the outcome according to facility volume. The inflection point (in cases per year) when the declining risk of excess time in the hospital began to plateau was selected as the threshold to define high- and low-volume facilities. Outcomes were compared among patients treated at high- and low-volume facilities, with mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusting for patient sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, tumor size, and clustering within facilities. Collected data were analyzed between June 24 and August 31, 2022. Results: Among 11 524 eligible patients (mean [SD] age, 50.2 [12.8] years; 53.5% female; 46.5% male) who underwent surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma at 66 reporting facilities, the median length of stay was 4 (IQR, 3-5) days, and 655 patients (5.7%) were readmitted within 30 days. The median case volume was 16 (IQR, 9-26) cases per year. An adjusted restricted cubic spline model identified a downtrending probability of excess time in the hospital with increasing volume. The declining risk of excess time in the hospital began to plateau at a facility volume of 25 cases per year. Surgery at a facility with an annual case volume at or above this threshold was independently associated with a 42% reduction in the odds of excess time in the hospital compared with surgery at a low-volume center (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that among adults undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery, a higher facility case volume was associated with a reduced risk of prolonged hospital stay or 30-day readmission. A facility case volume of 25 cases per year may represent a risk-defining threshold.

Health State Utility Values Associated with Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants in adults remains uncertain despite established clinical benefits. In cost-effectiveness studies, benefit is often measured by change in health state utility value (HSUV), a single number summary of health-related quality of life anchored at 0 (state of being dead) and 1 (perfect health). Small differences in bilateral cochlear implant HSUV change conclusions of published models, and invalid estimates can therefore mislead policy and funding decisions. As such, we aimed to review and synthesize published HSUV estimates associated with cochlear implants. DESIGN: We included observational or experimental studies reporting HSUV for adult patients (age ≥18 years) with at least moderate-profound sensorineural hearing loss in both ears who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 1, 2021. Study and participant characteristics and HSUV outcomes were extracted. Narrative synthesis is reported for all studies. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to generate pooled estimates for the mean difference in HSUV for three comparisons: (1) unilateral cochlear implant versus preimplant, (2) bilateral cochlear implants versus preimplant, (3) bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants. Our principal measure was pooled mean difference in HSUV. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies reporting unique patient cohorts were identified. Health Utilities Index, 3 (HUI-3) was the most common HSUV elicitation method. HSUV from 19 preimplant mean estimates (1402 patients), 19 unilateral cochlear implant mean estimates (1701 patients), and 5 bilateral cochlear implants mean estimates (83 patients) were pooled to estimate mean differences in HUI-3 HSUV by network meta-analysis. Compared with preimplant, a unilateral cochlear implant was associated with a mean change in HSUV of +0.17 (95% credible interval [CrI] +0.12 to +0.23) and bilateral cochlear implants were associated with a mean change of +0.25 (95% CrI +0.12 to +0.37). No significant difference in HSUV was detected for bilateral compared with unilateral cochlear implants (+0.08 [95% CrI -0.06 to +0.21]). Overall study quality was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review and network meta-analysis comprise the best-available resource for parameterization of cost-utility models of cochlear implantation in adults and highlight the need to critically evaluate the validity of available HSUV instruments for bilateral cochlear implant populations.Protocol registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018091838).

Use of a Novel Clinical Decision-Making Tool in Vestibular Schwannoma Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of a personalized tool and its effect on the decision-making process for those with vestibular schwannoma (VS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Single institution, academic tertiary care lateral skull base surgery program. PATIENTS: Patients diagnosed with VS. INTERVENTIONS: A comprehensive clinical decision support (CDS) tool was constructed from a previously published retrospective patient-reported data obtained from members of the Acoustic Neuroma Association from January to March 2017. Demographic, tumor, and treatment modality data, including associated side effects, were collected for 775 patients and integrated in an interactive and personalized web-based tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre- and posttool questionnaires assessing the process of deciding treatment for VS using a decisional conflict scale (DCS) and satisfaction with decision (SWD) scale were compared. RESULTS: A pilot study of 33 patients evaluated at a single institution tertiary care center with mean ± SD age of 63.9 ± 13.5 years and with average tumor size of 7.11 ± 4.75 mm were surveyed. CDS implementation resulted in a mean ± SD total DCS score decrease from 43.6 ± 15.5 to 37.6 ± 16.4 ( p < 0.01) and total SWD score increase from 82.8 ± 16.1 to 86.2 ± 14.4 ( p = 0.04), indicating a significant decrease in decisional conflict and increase in satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a decision-making tool after diagnosis of VS reduced decisional conflict and improved satisfaction with decision. Patients considered the tool to be an aid to their medical knowledge, further improving their comfort and understanding of their treatment options. These findings provide a basis for developing predictive tools that will assist patients in making informed medical decisions in the future.

Improving the Hearing Status Discrimination of the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3: Design of the Hearing Status Classification System.

OBJECTIVE: Redesign the health status classification system of the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3 (HUI-3) "hearing" attribute to improve its discrimination of hearing-impaired health states. STUDY DESIGN: Domain and item selection from a previously generated item set guided by a domain and item importance survey, structural independence, and cognitive interviews with patients. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a range of hearing loss severities, etiologies, and treatment experiences participated in the domain and item importance survey (n = 108) and hour-long cognitive interviews (n = 10). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Subattributes and levels for the novel Hearing attribute. Domain and item importance was scored on a seven-point Likert scale (1, not at all important; 7, extremely important). RESULTS: Mean domain importance was highest for "speech in noise" (6.21; 95% confidence interval, 5.98-6.43) and lowest for "benefits of hearing loss" (3.46; 95% confidence interval, 3.03-3.89). Domains with moderate or greater ( r ≥ 0.5) domain importance Pearson correlation or construct overlap that interfered with structural independence were combined into single subattributes. Iterative adjustments to instructions, items, and phrasing were guided by cognitive interviews to derive the final instrument with seven subattributes: speech, environmental sounds, localization, listening effort, tinnitus, music, and assistive devices. The novel hearing attribute defines 25,920 unique hearing states. CONCLUSION: The novel HUI-hearing is part of a comprehensive health utility instrument designed for individuals with hearing loss. Pending derivation of a hearing single attribute utility function and evaluation of measurement properties, our innovative approach could be used to improve health utility measurement for impairments described by any of the other HUI-3 attributes.

Large-scale phenotyping and characterization of age-related hearing loss in outbred CFW mice.

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL), or presbycusis, is one of the most prevalent conditions affecting the global population. A substantial fraction of patients with ARHL have no identifiable mutation despite over a hundred having been discovered, suggesting unidentified monogenic or polygenic causes. In this study, we investigated the hearing function of the aging outbred CFW mice through auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds. Through the characterization of 1,132 ABRs, we observed significant variation in both absolute thresholds and the effect of aging. We identify eight distinct patterns of hearing loss and were able to categorize nearly all data within these eight categories. Proportions within each category varied immensely between aging timepoints. We observe a small but consistent hearing deficit in female CFW mice. The resulting phenotypic data are a necessity for ARHL association mapping at a higher resolution than has previously been achieved and provides a new resource for studying ARHL.

Machine Learning to Predict Hearing Preservation After Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas.

OBJECTIVE: Predict hearing preservation after middle cranial fossa approach for vestibular schwannomas. STUDY DESIGN: Application of machine learning algorithms, including classification and regression trees and random forest models to observational data. SETTING: Single-tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 144) with a previously untreated sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent microsurgical resection by middle cranial fossa approach between November 2017 and November 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Middle cranial fossa approach. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Hearing preservation, defined by postoperative word recognition score of 50% or greater and pure tone average below 50 dB HL or less than 10% reduction in word recognition score. Model performance was evaluated with classification accuracy in an independent validation sample. Variable importance for the random forest model is reported according to entropy, a measure of mean decrease in model accuracy incurred by excluding each variable from the model. RESULTS: Hearing preservation was achieved in 60% of patients (86 of 144) overall. The classification and regression tree model identified preoperative pure tone average with a cut point of 30 dB HL, and more posterior tumor position to be the most important prognostic features for hearing preservation. Model accuracy was 0.68. The random forest model demonstrated perfect accuracy (1). Baseline pure tone average, word recognition score, and anteroposterior tumor position were among the most influential features for hearing preservation prediction. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms have the potential for accurate prediction of hearing preservation rates after middle fossa approach for vestibular schwannomas at a single institution. These models have the capacity for continued refinement with ongoing addition of data.

Association of Plate Contouring With Hardware Complications Following Mandibular Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Despite considerable effort being dedicated to contouring reconstruction plates, there remains limited evidence demonstrating an association between contour and reconstructive outcomes. We sought to evaluate whether optimizing mandibular reconstruction plate contouring is associated with reduced postoperative hardware complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A cohort study was performed with adult patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent mandibulectomy and osseous free flap reconstruction following oncologic ablation at the University Health Network in Toronto, Canada, between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2014. Patients with computed tomography scans performed within 1 year of reconstruction were included. Computer-based three-dimensional models were generated and used to calculate the mean plate-to-bone gap (mm). The primary outcome was plate exposure. Secondary outcome included a composite of plate exposure or intraoral dehiscence. Logistic regression models were fitted for each outcome accounting for other patient and surgical characteristics associated with the primary outcome. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 60.4 (standard deviation [SD] 14.9). The mean follow-up time was 31.4 months (range 3-94). Reconstruction was performed with fibular (57%) and scapular free flaps (43%). In the multivariable model, small mean plate-to-bone gap (<1 mm) was independently associated with 86% reduced odds of plate exposure (odds ratio [OR] 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.55). Mean plate-to-bone gap less than 1 mm was also independently associated with reduced odds of developing a composite of plate exposure or intraoral dehiscence (OR, 0.29; 95%CI, 0.11-0.75). CONCLUSION: Optimizing plate contouring during mandibular reconstruction may decrease the development of postoperative hardware complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:61-66, 2022.

Glasgow Benefit Inventory in Cochlear Implantation: A Reliable Though Ancillary Quality of Life Metric.

OBJECTIVE: The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is a health-related quality of life instrument used to detect changes in health status following otolaryngologic interventions. Despite its use in cochlear implant literature, assessment of utility, reliability, and validity of GBI in an adult cochlear implants (CI) patient population has yet to be performed. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Academic, tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Postlingually deafened, adult CI patients with at least 1 year of device use. INTERVENTIONS: Five hundred fifty-two patients were administered GBI questionnaires at least 1 year following CI activation during follow-up visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GBI total and subscale scoring were compared to either the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults or Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Moreover, a factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were performed to determine GBI validity and internal reliability, respectively. RESULTS: The average overall GBI score was 38.6 ±â€Š21.7. This was weakly correlated to the reduction in Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults/Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (τb = 0.282, p < 0.05). High factor loading with minimal cross-loading was noted on a three-factor solution, which emulated the original GBI development. Internal reliability was acceptable for the general benefit (α = 0.913) and social support subclasses (α = 0.706), whereas physical health's was low (α = 0.643). CONCLUSIONS: Although GBI possesses adequate convergent and discriminant validity with acceptable reliability, its routine use to capture CI-specific health-related changes should not supersede validated CI-specific QoL instruments.

Measurement Properties of the Hearing Environments and Reflection of Quality of Life (HEAR-QL) 28-item Questionnaire in Cholesteatoma.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the reliability and construct validity of the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life Adolescent (HEAR-QL 28) quality of life measure (QoL) in cholesteatoma. STUDY DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred seventeen patients with a diagnosis or history of cholesteatoma completed HEAR-QL 28. In addition to patients within the age range recommended for HEAR-QL 28 (13-18 yr), patients under 13 years old who were able to complete HEAR-QL 28 without parental assistance were included. INTERVENTION S: Completion of HEAR-QL 28 QoL measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE S: HEAR-QL 28 score, four tone average pure tone audiogram hearing threshold and categorical classification of hearing loss as mild, moderate, and severe. RESULTS: HEAR-QL 28 did not demonstrate discriminative ability on the basis of audiometric threshold, but did discriminate between participants hearing normally (four tone average pure tone audiogram <30 dB HL) (HEAR-QL 86/100) after cholesteatoma surgery from those with unilateral hearing loss (HEAR-QL 73/100) (p < 0.001). Those with unilateral loss could in turn be differentiated from those with bilateral loss (HEAR-QL 60/100) (p < 0.006). CONCLUSION: HEAR-QL 28 is valid measure of QoL in cholesteatoma with no evidence of redundancy and excellent internal consistency. The importance of considering QoL impact of cholesteatoma is highlighted by 17% of participants reporting the normality or abnormality of their hearing differently from their audiometric threshold. The HEAR-QL 28 provides insight into the ability to cope with their hearing environment in a specific environment.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Preoperative Screening Strategies for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Patients Undergoing Elective Inpatient Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is underdiagnosed in surgical patients. The cost-effectiveness of obstructive sleep apnea screening is unknown. This study's objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening (1) perioperatively and (2) including patients' remaining lifespans. METHODS: An individual-level Markov model was constructed to simulate the perioperative period and lifespan of patients undergoing inpatient elective surgery. Costs (2016 Canadian dollars) were calculated from the hospital perspective in a single-payer health system. Remaining model parameters were derived from a structured literature search. Candidate strategies included: (1) no screening; (2) STOP-Bang questionnaire alone; (3) STOP-Bang followed by polysomnography (STOP-Bang + polysomnography); and (4) STOP-Bang followed by portable monitor (STOP-Bang + portable monitor). Screen-positive patients (based on STOP-Bang cutoff of at least 3) received postoperative treatment modifications and expedited definitive testing. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life month in the perioperative analyses and quality-adjusted life years in the lifetime analyses. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: In perioperative and lifetime analyses, no screening was least costly and least effective. STOP-Bang + polysomnography was the most effective strategy and was more cost-effective than both STOP-Bang + portable monitor and STOP-Bang alone in both analyses. In perioperative analyses, STOP-Bang + polysomnography was not cost-effective compared to no screening at the $4,167/quality-adjusted life month threshold (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $52,888/quality-adjusted life month). No screening was favored in more than 90% of iterations in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. In contrast, in lifetime analyses, STOP-Bang + polysomnography was favored compared to no screening at the $50,000/quality-adjusted life year threshold (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $2,044/quality-adjusted life year). STOP-Bang + polysomnography was favored in most iterations at thresholds above $2,000/quality-adjusted life year in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening differs depending on time horizon. Preoperative screening with STOP-Bang followed by immediate confirmatory testing with polysomnography is cost-effective on the lifetime horizon but not the perioperative horizon. The integration of preoperative screening based on STOP-Bang and polysomnography is a cost-effective means of mitigating the long-term disease burden of obstructive sleep apnea.

Health-Related Quality of Life Changes Associated With Hearing Loss.

Importance: Utility is a single-value, preference-based measure of health-related quality of life that represents the desirability of a health state relative to being dead or in perfect health. Clinical, funding, and policy decisions rely on measured changes in utility. The benefit of hearing loss treatments may be underestimated because existing utility measures fail to capture important changes in quality of life associated with hearing loss. Objective: To develop a comprehensive profile of items that describe how quality of life is associated with hearing loss and its treatments that can be used to generate hearing-related quality of life measures, including a novel utility measure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study, performed from August 1, 2018, to August 1, 2019, in tertiary referral centers, comprised a systematic literature review, focus groups, and semistructured interviews. The systematic review evaluated studies published from 1982 to August 1, 2018. Focus groups included 8 clinical experts experienced in the measurement, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of hearing loss. Semistructured interviews included 26 adults with hearing loss recruited from an institutional data set and outpatient hearing aid and otology clinics using stratified convenience sampling to include individuals of diverse ages, urban and rural residency, causes of hearing loss, severity of hearing loss, and treatment experience. Main Outcomes and Measures: A set of items and subdomains that collectively describe the association of hearing loss with health-related quality of life. Results: The literature search yielded 2779 articles from the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. Forty-five studies including 1036 individuals (age range, 18-84 years) were included. The focus group included 4 audiologists and 4 otologists. Hour-long semistructured interviews were conducted with 26 individuals (13 women; median age, 54 years; range, 25-83 years) with a broad range of hearing loss causes, configurations, and severities. From all 3 sources, a total of 125 items were generated and organized into 29 subdomains derived from the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Conclusions and Relevance: The association of hearing loss with quality of life is multidimensional and includes subdomains that are not considered in the estimation of health utility by existing utility measures. The presented comprehensive profile of items can be used to generate or evaluate measures of hearing-related quality of life, including utility measures.

Evaluation of Residual Disease Following Transcanal Totally Endoscopic vs Postauricular Surgery Among Children With Middle Ear and Attic Cholesteatoma.

Importance: Transcanal totally endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) improves tympanic cavity visibility during cholesteatoma resection but does not readily permit 2-handed surgery, which is possible with a postauricular approach and use of an operating microscope. Improved visibility and 2-handed access may reduce rates of incomplete surgical clearance and residual cholesteatoma. Objective: To compare rates of residual cholesteatoma after TEES vs those after open surgery with a postauricular approach for initial disease limited to the middle ear and/or attic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This propensity score-matched cohort study considered a consecutive sample of 209 pediatric cases of cholesteatomas resected at a tertiary referral center between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, by either TEES or postauricular approach. The 177 cases (84.7%) in 172 patients that were eligible for inclusion in the study had undergone at least 1 of the following assessments: second-look tympanoplasty, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, or in-clinic follow-up examination at least 2 years after the operation. Ears were matched on the basis of the propensity score, a function of age, sex, comorbid diagnoses, etiology, disease extent, ossicular chain condition, presence or absence of tympanic membrane perforation, and otorrhea status at the time of surgery. Exposures: Transcanal totally endoscopic ear surgery was defined as a transcanal approach with surgeon-reported use of an endoscope for resection of cholesteatoma. Use of an operating microscope was permitted in the TEES group for graft placement during tympanoplasty. The postauricular approach was characterized by a postauricular incision and use of an operative microscope with or without adjunct use of an endoscope. Main Outcomes and Measures: Residual cholesteatoma. Results: Of 177 cases included in the study, the unmatched cohort consisted of 65 ears that had undergone TEES (mean [SD] age, 9.9 [3.6] years; 33 [50.8%] female) and 112 ears of patients who had undergone surgery with a postauricular approach (mean [SD] age, 9.9 [3.5] years; 72 [64.3%] male). Propensity score matching was accomplished for a total of 128 cases, with 64 in each group. After matching, standardized differences between TEES and postauricular approaches were less than 0.20 for all measured baseline characteristics, indicating balanced groups. The TEES group had a residual disease incidence of 4 of 64 (6.3%) compared with 7 of 64 (10.9%) in the propensity score-matched postauricular approach group (absolute risk difference, -4.7%; 95% CI, -14.8% to 5.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that there was no apparent advantage of the 2-handed postauricular microscopic approach with respect to surgical clearance of cholesteatoma limited to the middle ear and/or attic. Transcanal totally endoscopic ear surgery may be an effective alternative to a postauricular approach for removal of limited cholesteatoma in children.

Predicting Reduced Tinnitus Burden After Cochlear Implantation in Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Explore patient characteristics associated with tinnitus improvement after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral. PATIENTS: Adults with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss and tinnitus. INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral cochlear implantation. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2018, 358 patients endorsed pre-implant tinnitus and had ascertainable tinnitus status at 1-year. Clinically significant improvement in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (reduction by at least 7-points) was observed in 262 (73.2%) patients, of whom 155 (59.2%) reported complete resolution. Of the 24 characteristics explored, four were identified as independent predictors of improved tinnitus in logistic regression models. In a multivariable model including identified independent predictors, each 10-percentage point increase in baseline hearing in noise test was associated with an 14% reduction in odds of tinnitus resolution or clinically significant improvement (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence limits [CL] 0.77, 0.96) and preoperative use of a hearing aid in the contralateral ear was associated with a 72% reduction (OR 0.28; 95% CL 0.11, 0.73). Each 10-point increase in baseline Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHI) score was associated with a 28% increase in odds of tinnitus improvement (OR 1.28; 95% CL 1.07, 1.54). Higher baseline burden of tinnitus was associated with higher odds of tinnitus improvement (OR 1.21 per 10-point THI increase, 95% CL 1.04, 1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Worse residual hearing and higher baseline hearing and tinnitus handicap are associated with higher odds of tinnitus improvement. Expectations of patients seeking reduced tinnitus burden following cochlear implantation should be managed by counselling regarding odds of tinnitus improvement compared to those with similar residual hearing and tinnitus burden.

Association of Speech Processor Technology and Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

OBJECTIVE: Determine association of advancements in speech processor technology with improvements in speech recognition outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Adult unilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients. INTERVENTION: Increasing novelty of speech processor defined by year of market availability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) in quiet. RESULTS: From 1991 to 2016, 1,111 CNC scores and 1,121 HINT scores were collected from 351 patients who had complete data. Mean post-implantation CNC score was 53.8% and increased with more recent era of implantation (p < 0.001, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Median HINT score was 87.0% and did not significantly vary with implantation era (p = 0.06, ANOVA). Multivariable generalized linear models were fitted to estimate the effect of speech processor novelty on CNC and HINT scores, each accounting for clustering of scores within patients and characteristics known to influence speech recognition outcomes. Each 5-year increment in speech processor novelty was independently associated with an increase in CNC score by 2.85% (95% confidence limits [CL] 0.26, 5.44%) and was not associated with change in HINT scores (p = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Newer speech processors are associated with improved CNC scores independent of the year of device implantation and expanding candidacy criteria. The lack of association with HINT scores can be attributed to a ceiling effect, suggesting that HINT in quiet may not be an informative test of speech recognition in the modern CI recipient. The implications of these findings with respect to appropriate interval of speech processor upgrades are discussed.

The Role of Disease Label in Patient Perceptions and Treatment Decisions in the Setting of Low-Risk Malignant Neoplasms.

Importance: The cancer disease label may lead to overtreatment of low-risk malignant neoplasms owing to a patient's emotional response or misunderstanding of prognosis. Decision making should be driven by risks and benefits of treatment and prognosis rather than disease label. Objective: To determine whether disease label plays a role in patient decision making in the setting of low-risk malignant neoplasms and to determine how the magnitude of the disease-label effect compares with preferences for treatment and prognosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A discrete choice experiment conducted using an online survey of 1314 US residents in which participants indicated their preferences between a series of 2 hypothetical vignettes describing the incidental discovery of a small thyroid lesion. Vignettes varied on 3 attributes: disease label (cancer, tumor, or nodule); treatment (active surveillance or hemithyroidectomy); and risk of progression or recurrence (0%, 1%, 2%, or 5%). The independent associations of each attribute with likelihood of vignette selection was estimated with a Bayesian mixed logit model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The preference weight of the cancer disease label was compared with preference weights for other attributes. Results: In 1068 predominantly healthy respondents (605 women and 463 men) with a median age of 35 years (range, 18-78 years), the cancer disease label played a considerable role in respondent decision making independent of treatment offered and risk of progression or recurrence. Participants accepted a 4-percentage-point increase in risk of progression or recurrence (from 1% to 5%) to avoid labeling their disease as cancer in favor of nodule (marginal rate of substitution [MRS], 1.0; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.9-1.1). Preference for the nodule label instead of cancer was similar in magnitude to the preference for active surveillance over surgery (MRS, 1.0; 95% CrI, 0.9-1.1). Conclusions and Relevance: Disease label plays a role in patient preference independent of treatment risks or prognosis. Raising the threshold for biopsy or removing the word cancer from the disease label may mitigate patient preference for aggressive treatment of low-risk lesions. Health care professionals should emphasize treatment risks and benefits and natural disease history when supporting treatment decisions for potentially innocuous epithelial malignant neoplasms.

Cochlear Nerve Aplasia with Detectable Olivocochlear Efferent Function: A Distinct Presentation of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear nerve aplasia (CNA) may present with features of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD), having detectable otoacoustic emissions (OAE) but profound hearing loss. We propose that some children with CNA have a distinct form of afferent ANSD in which efferent cochlear nerve function can be detected using contralateral suppression of OAE. METHODS: Children were prospectively enrolled with MRI and auditory brainstem response evidence of unilateral CNA, a normal contralateral ear, and detectable OAE bilaterally. Distortion product OAE (DPOAE) levels were recorded in real time with default primary tone settings: frequency (f)2 = 4.5 kHz and f2/f1 = 1.22 kHz, with level (L)1 = 65 dB SPL and L2 = 55 dB SPL. Recordings were made over 2 min with simultaneous application of an intermittent contralateral broadband noise (CBBN) stimulus at 60 dB SPL. RESULTS: Three girls, aged 4.5, 7, and 8 years, participated. Suppression of DPOAE of 0.15-1.3 dB was detected in all 3 ears with CNA in response to CBBN stimulation. No response was detected in the normal ears. CONCLUSIONS: Children with unilateral ANSD can have normal efferent cochlear nerve function despite MRI evidence of ipsilateral CNA. The importance of these findings for newborn hearing screening and cochlear implantation is discussed.

Prevalence, prognosis, and treatment implications of retropharyngeal nodes in unknown primary head and neck carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: (1) To estimate the prevalence of radiographically positive Retro-Pharyngeal Lymph Nodes (RPLN) in unknown primary carcinoma of the head and neck and (2) to determine the prognostic implications of radiographically positive RPLN and other radiographic features (3) to identify patients at low risk for retropharyngeal metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all 68 eligible patients treated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between 2000 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed for demographic, clinical, pathologic, and radiologic data. Radiologic data included: RPLN, extra capsular spread (ECS), neck staging and cystic/necrotic or matted neck nodes. LRR, DR, DFS and OS were estimated using the competing risk methods and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Seven patients had concerning RPLN (10.3%). Forty-four patients were p16 positive (65%). RPLN status did not have any effect on LRR, DFS, DR and OS. Radiological ECS and p16 (neg.) status were found to be significant predictors of LRR (p = 0.023; p = 0.014). Matted nodes, radiological ECS and p16 (neg.) status were found to be significant predictors of DFS (p = 0.012; p < 0.001; p = 0.014). Matted nodes and radiological ECS were found to be significant predictors of OS (p = 0.017; p = 0.0036). Only radiological ECS was found to be a significant predictor of distant recurrence (p = 0.0066). CONCLUSIONS: 10% of CUP patients will harbor radiological positive RPLN. A large proportion of CUP patients are positive for p16. Radiologic features such as ECS and matted nodes can predict worse outcomes.