Genomic selection in the German Landrace population of the Bavarian herdbook.

The aim of our study was to compare different validation methods with respect to their impact on validation results and to evaluate the feasibility of genomic selection in the German Landrace population of the Bavarian herdbook. For this purpose, a sample of 337 boars and 1,676 sows was genotyped with the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip. Conventional BLUP breeding values for fertility, growth, carcass, and quality traits were deregressed and used as phenotypes in genomic BLUP. The resulting genomic breeding values were also blended with information from the full conventional breeding value estimation to include information from nongenotyped parents. Subsequent validation used forward prediction, realized reliabilities, and theoretical reliabilities. The results indicate that the validation methods showed a relatively large effect on in the displayed reliability levels in our study: forward prediction reliabilities were found to be much lower than the conventional parent-average reliabilities whereas corresponding realized and theoretical reliabilities were found substantially greater. Theoretical reliabilities appear to be the most consistent validation approach tested in our study, because they avoid the use of proxy variables. Generally, our results suggest a substantial potential for a genomic selection implementation for the Bavarian herdbook by using both sows and boars. Theoretical genomic reliabilities of direct genomic values of selection candidates were, on average, 31 to 36% greater than the conventional parent average reliabilities. However, the inclusion of residual information from conventional breeding values had only a marginal effect on reliabilities.

Genetic parameters for milkability from the first three lactations in Fleckvieh cows.

Test-day records for average flow rate (AFR) from the routine dairy recording from Bavarian Fleckvieh cows were analysed. Two data sets with observations on approximately 20 000 cows each were sampled from the total data set. For the estimation of variance parameters, a two-step approach was applied. In a first step multiple-trait restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses were carried out. For each of the first three lactations, six time periods with up to 33 days were defined. An algorithm for iterative summing of expanded part matrices was applied in order to combine the estimates. In a second step covariance functions (CF) for additive-genetic variances and non-genetic animal variances were derived using second-order Legendre polynomials plus an exponential term. Estimates of test-day heritability for AFR ranged from 0.21 to 0.40, and were largest in lactation 1. For lactations 1 and 3, heritabilities decreased considerably towards the end of lactation. Genetic correlation estimates within lactation decreased as the distance between days in milk (DIM) increased. Genetic correlations between corresponding DIM in the three lactations were generally large, ranging from 0.80 to 0.99. The largest estimates were found between DIM from lactations 2 and 3. Results from this study suggest that including AFR data from second and third lactations in genetic evaluation systems could the improve accuracy of genetic selection.

Estimation of direct, maternal, and grandmaternal genetic effects for weaning weight in several breeds of beef cattle.

Weaning weights from nine parental breeds and three composites were analyzed to estimate variance due to grandmaternal genetic effects and to compare estimates for variance due to maternal genetic effects from two different models. Number of observations ranged from 794 to 3,465 per population. Number of animals in the pedigree file ranged from 1,244 to 4,326 per population. Two single-trait animal models were used to obtain estimates of covariance components by REML using an average information method. Model 1 included random direct and maternal genetic, permanent maternal environmental, and residual environmental effects as well as fixed sex x year and age of dam effects. Model 2 in addition included random grandmaternal genetic and permanent grandmaternal environmental effects to account for maternal effects of a cow on her daughter's maternal ability. Non-zero estimates of proportion of variance due to grandmaternal effects were obtained for 7 of the 12 populations and ranged from .03 to .06. Direct heritability estimates in these populations were similar with both models. Existence of variance due to grandmaternal effects did not affect the estimates of maternal heritability (m2) or the correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects (r(am)) for Angus and Gelbvieh. For the other five populations, magnitude of estimates increased for both m2 and r(am) when estimates of variance due to grandmaternal effects were not zero. Estimates of the correlation between maternal and grandmaternal genetic effects were large and negative. These results suggest that grand-maternal effects exist in some populations, that when such effects are ignored in analyses maternal heritability may be underestimated, and that the correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects may be biased downward if grandmaternal effects are not included in the model for weaning weight of beef cattle.

Comparison of models to estimate genetic effects of weaning weight of Angus cattle.

Weaning weights from nine sets of Angus field data from three regions of the United States were analyzed. Six animal models were used to compare two approaches to account for an environmental dam-offspring covariance and to investigate the effects of sire x herd-year interaction on the genetic parameters. Model 1 included random direct and maternal genetic, maternal permanent environmental, and residual effects. Age at weaning was a covariate. Other fixed effects were age of dam and a herd-year-management-sex combination. Possible influence of a dam's phenotype on her daughter's maternal ability was modeled by including a regression on maternal phenotype (fm) (Model 3) or by fitting grandmaternal genetic and grandmaternal permanent environmental effects (Model 5). Models 2, 4, and 6 were based on Models 1, 3, and 5, respectively, and additionally included sire x herd-year (SH) interaction effects. With Model 3, estimates of fm ranged from -.003 to .014, and (co)variance estimates were similar to those from Model 1. With Model 5, grandmaternal heritability estimates ranged from .02 to .07. Estimates of maternal heritability and direct-maternal correlation (r(am)) increased compared with Model 1. With models including SH, estimates of the fraction of phenotypic variance due to SH interaction effects were from .02 to .10. Estimates of direct and maternal heritability were smaller and estimates of r(am) were greater than with models without SH interaction effects. Likelihood values showed that SH interaction effects were more important than fm and grandmaternal effects. The comparisons of models suggest that r(am) may be biased downward if SH interaction and(or) grandmaternal effects are not included in models for weaning weight.

Parameter estimates for direct, maternal, and grandmaternal genetic effects for birth weight and weaning weight in Hereford cattle.

Birth and weaning weights adjusted for age of dam from four lines of Hereford cattle were analyzed to determine the relationships among grandmaternal, maternal, and direct genetic effects. Three lines were selected for 1) weaning weight (WWL), 2) yearling weight (YWL), and 3) an index of yearling weight and muscle score (IXL). The fourth line was an unselected control line (CTL). Numbers of observations ranged from 1,699 (CTL) to 2,811 (WWL), and number of animals in the pedigree file ranged from 2,266 to 3,192. Two animal models were used to obtain estimates by REML using an average information method. Model 1 included random direct and maternal genetic, permanent maternal environmental, and residual environmental effects, and fixed sex x year effects. Model 2 additionally included random grandmaternal genetic and permanent grandmaternal environmental effects. For birth weight, Models 1 and 2 gave almost identical estimates for direct and maternal heritability, and for the fraction of variance that was due to maternal permanent environmental effects. Estimates for grandmaternal heritability could be obtained only for IXL (.03) and CTL (.01). For weaning weight, estimates for direct heritability were similar from both models. Estimates for maternal heritability from Model 1 were .18, .20, .13, and .20, and corresponding estimates from Model 2 were .34, .31, .13, and .34 for WWL, YWL, IXL, and CTL, respectively. For IXL, estimates for variances that were due to grandmaternal genetic and grandmaternal permanent environmental variances could not be obtained and were set to zero. Grandmaternal heritability estimates for WWL, YWL, and CTL were .05, .09, and .12. Estimates of correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects were -.13, -.44, -.11, and -.26 for WWL, YWL, IXL, and CTL. Estimates of correlations between direct and grandmaternal genetic effects were .21, .83, and .55, and those between maternal and grandmaternal genetic effects were -.99, -.84, and -.76 for WWL, YWL, and CTL, respectively. These results indicate that grandmaternal effects may be important for weaning weight and that maternal heritability may be underestimated if grandmaternal effects are not included in the model.