Association of liver dysfunction with outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Liver dysfunction is a known risk factor in the cardiovascular field. It specifically increases perioperative risk in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Since percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the much less invasive procedure for the treatment of coronary artery disease, we aimed to assess the relationship of liver dysfunction with outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: Three libraries were searched (MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library). We performed a meta-analysis of all studies in patients who underwent PCI that provided information on the presence or absence of liver dysfunction. Primary outcome was short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), bleeding and acute kidney injury. Random-effects model was applied. RESULTS: Five studies were selected and the data from 10,710,317 patients were included in the final analysis. In comparison with the absence of liver dysfunction, patients with liver dysfunction were associated with higher short-term mortality (OR 2.97, 95%CI 1.23-7.18, p = 0.02), higher MACCE (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.08-1.87, p = 0.01), and higher bleeding (OR 2.23, 95%CI 1.65-3.00, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference regarding acute kidney injury (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.50-2.87, p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis suggests that liver dysfunction in patients undergoing PCI is independently associated with higher risk of short-term mortality and increased occurrence of MACCE and bleeding. However, there appears to be no association to acute kidney injury.

Characterization of Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Atrial Fibrillation Patterns (CABG-AF): Rationale and Design of an Investigator-Initiated Observational Study.

New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery is associated with increased rates of adverse events (including mortality and stroke). Its incidence after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is considered to be approximately 30 % and it is thought to be a transient condition. However, studies investigating POAF after CABG fail to provide appropriate data on incidence and arrhythmia patterns due to the use of intermittent rhythm detection strategies. These methods have a low sensitivity as compared to continuous monitoring. Subsequently, studies utilizing these techniques most likely do not identify all patients with arrhythmia and do not adequately demonstrate the long-term incidence of arrhythmia, which in turn may affect its association with adverse events. The CABG-AF study (German Clinical Trials Register Nr.: DRKS00018887) tests the hypothesis that the incidence of AF in the first 12 months after CABG is significantly underestimated. CABG-AF is an investigator-initiated multicenter, prospective, observational study in which 196 patients with no history of arrhythmia undergoing first-time CABG, receive an insertable cardiac monitor for continuous postoperative rhythm monitoring. The primary endpoint of the study is any episode of AF within the first 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints include AF burden, AF density and the ratio of silent to symptomatic AF episodes. Endpoints will be investigated by automatic and patient-initiated data transfers from the implanted device, by telephone interview of patients and by follow-up forms sent to patients by mail. The patients will be followed for a planned follow-up of 3 years. In conclusion, the CABG-AF study will provide information on the true incidence of AF after CABG as well as on the temporal patterns of the arrhythmia.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy for resection of lung metastasis-A meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open thoracotomy (OT) in the context of pulmonary metastasectomy. Three databases were assessed. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival, ipsilateral recurrence, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Reconstruction of time-to-event data and sensitivity analyses were performed for the primary endpoint. After screening, 11 studies were included encompassing 2159 patients undergoing lung metastasectomy (VATS: 827; OT: 1332). Compared to OT, patients who underwent VATS had higher overall survival rates (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.67-0.85; p < 0.01), no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.88-1.29; p = 0.48), shorter hospital LOS (MD -1.99 days; 95% CI -2.59 to -1.39; p < 0.01), and no significant difference in ipsilateral recurrence rates (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.52-1.42; p = 0.56). For patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy, VATS strategy is associated with higher survival rates and reduced hospital LOS when compared with OT. Moreover, metastasis recurrence does not seem to be associated with long-term mortality in this population.

Aortic and Mitral Valve Endocarditis-Simply Left-Sided Endocarditis or Different Entities Requiring Individual Consideration?-Insights from the CAMPAIGN Database.

Background: Aortic valve infective endocarditis (AV-IE) and mitral valve infective endocarditis (MV-IE) are often grouped together as one entity: left-sided endocarditis. However, there are significant differences between the valves in terms of anatomy, physiology, pressure, and calcification tendency. This study aimed to compare AV-IE and MV-IE in terms of patient characteristics, pathogen profiles, postoperative outcomes, and predictors of mortality. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 3899 patients operated on for isolated AV-IE or MV-IE in six German cardiac surgery centers between 1994 and 2018. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze the risk factors for 30 day and 1 year mortality. A Log-rank test was used to test for differences in long-term mortality. Results: Patients with MV-IE were more likely to be female (41.1% vs. 20.3%.; p < 0.001). Vegetation was detected more frequently in the MV-IE group (66.6% vs. 57.1%; p < 0.001). Accordingly, the rates of cerebral embolic events (25.4% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.001) and stroke (28.2% vs. 19.3%; p < 0.001) were higher in the MV-IE group. Staphylococci had a higher prevalence in the MV-IE group (50.2% vs. 36.4%; p < 0.001). Patients with MV-IE had comparable 30 day mortality (16.7% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.095) but significantly higher 1 year mortality (35.3% vs. 29.0%; p < 0.001) than those with AV-IE. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly lower long-term survival in patients with MV-IE (log-rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: Due to the relevant differences between MV-IE and AV-IE, it might be useful to provide individualized, valve-specific guideline recommendations rather than general recommendations for left-sided IE.

Colchicine in Patients With Coronary Disease Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Recent randomized evidence has shown that low-dose colchicine lowers the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Colchicine has also been used in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), with individual studies suggesting protective effects for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). We performed a meta-analysis of studies assessing the effect of colchicine on outcomes in CABG surgery. We systematically searched 3 libraries (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library), selecting all randomized control trials including patients who underwent CABG and were randomized for perioperative administration of colchicine versus standard of care. The primary outcome was incidence of POAF. The inverse variance method (DerSimonian&Laird) and random-effects model were performed. The leave-one-out analysis was carried out as a sensitivity analysis to address possible outliers. From 205 screened studies, 5 met the inclusion criteria and were selected. The data from 839 patients were included in the final analysis. The included studies were published between 2014 and 2022. The perioperative administration of colchicine was associated with the reduction of POAF rates after CABG compared with standard of care (relative risk 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.73, p <0.01). The leave-one-out analysis confirmed the robustness of the analysis, with minimal variations of the confidence interval. This meta-analysis of randomized studies suggests that the perioperative administration of colchicine is associated with significant reduction of POAF after CABG.

Aortic regurgitation in left ventricular assist device patients - Does aortic root dilatation contribute to valve incompetence?

BACKGROUND: Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a known complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation potentially leading to recurrent heart failure. Possible pathomechanisms include valvular pathologies and aortic root dilatation. We assessed aortic root dimensions in a group of consecutive LVAD patients who received HeartMate 3. METHODS: Since 11/2015, we identified 68 patients with no or mild AR at the time of HeartMate 3 implantation who underwent serial echocardiography to assess AR and aortic root dimensions (annulus, sinus, and sinotubular junction). Median follow-up was 40 months (2-94 months). Results were correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Patients were 60 ± 10 years old, predominantly male (88%) and 35% presented in preoperative critical condition as defined by INTERMACS levels 1 and 2. During follow-up, 23 patients developed AR ≥ II (34%). Actuarial incidence was 8% at 1 year, 29% at 3 years and 41% at 5 years. Echocardiography revealed practically stable root dimensions at the latest follow-up compared to the preoperative state (annulus: 23 ± 3 mm vs. 23 ± 2 mm, sinus: 32 ± 4 mm vs. 33 ± 3 mm, sinotubular junction: 27 ± 3 mm vs. 28 ± 3 mm), irrespective of the development of AR. Serial CT angiograms were performed in 13 patients to confirm echocardiographic findings. Twenty-one patients died during LVAD support leading to a 5-year survival of 71%, showing no difference between patients with and without AR ≥ II (p = 0.573). CONCLUSIONS: At least moderate AR develops over time in a substantial fraction of patients (one-third over 3 years). The mechanism does not seem to be related to dilatation of the aortic annulus or root.

Impact of Complex Anatomy and Patient Risk Profile in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the impact of complex mitral valve disease and patient risk profile on operative outcomes in the large cohort of the Mini-Mitral International Registry. METHODS: Patients were assigned to categories of complex degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (DMR; bileaflet or anterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail) and simple DMR (posterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail). Subgroup analyses was performed in low-risk (EuroSCORE II <8%) and high-risk (EuroSCORE II >8%) cohorts. A logistic regression model was applied to investigate the impact of valve anatomy and patient risk factors on valve repair rate and operative risk. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 4524 patients with DMR (complex DMR, 1296; simple DMR, 3228). Valve repair rate was 87.3% and 91% in complex DMR and simple DMR, respectively. Predictors of valve replacement were anterior leaflet prolapse/flail, bileaflet flail, female sex, age, and reoperation, whereas Barlow disease was protective. Clinical results were comparable between complex DMR and simple DMR. On subgroup analyses, high-risk patients showed less satisfactory outcomes with respect to both the valve repair and operative mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that complex DMR can be satisfactorily addressed by minimally invasive techniques. However, whereas complex disease was associated with low operative risk, anterior leaflet lesions and bileaflet flail remain negative predictors of successful valve repair. Conversely, valve repair rate was less satisfactory in high-risk patients, regardless of DMR complexity.

Survival Correlates with Regurgitation Degree Before and After Invasive Atrioventricular Valve Treatment.

The degree of both mitral (MR) and tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) correlates with mortality. A vicious cycle has been proposed consisting of increasing regurgitation and decreasing ventricular function. Restoration of valve competence should break this vicious cycle and improve life expectancy. However, a "pop-off" mechanism keeps being entertained, presumably allowing poorly pumping ventricles to relieve volume into the low-pressure atrium through an incomplete repair, avoiding pump failure. We reasoned that if such a mechanism exists, it should offset the relationship between mortality and valve regurgitation after an invasive procedure. In this context, we meta-analytically compared valve regurgitation degree and survival before or after atrio-ventricular valve treatment. The results show significant relationships between valve regurgitation and mortality under all conditions (i.e., before and after surgery or intervention) and irrespective of the underlying pathology (i.e., functional or structural). In summary, the ubiquitously present relationship between valve regurgitation and mortality suggests that generating a tight and durable repair of the affected valve is key to long-term exploitation of a symptom-reducing and life-prologing mechanism, independent of the underlying valve pathology. This recognition may explain current controversies in the treatment effects of MR and TR.

Outcomes following heart valve surgery in patients with infective endocarditis and preoperative septic cerebral embolism: insights from the CAMPAIGN study group.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyse the impact of preoperative septic cerebral embolism on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis undergoing valve surgery. METHODS: Retrospective multicentric study based on the Clinical Multicentric Project for Analysis of Infective Endocarditis in Germany (CAMPAIGN) registry comprising patients with infective endocarditis who underwent valve surgery between 1994 and 2018 at 6 German centres. Patients were divided into 2 groups for statistical comparison according to the presence or absence of preoperative septic cerebral embolism. Propensity score matching was performed for adjusted comparisons of postoperative outcomes. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and estimated 5-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 4917 patients were included in the analysis, 3909 (79.5%) patients without and 1008 (20.5%) patients with preoperative septic cerebral embolism. Patients with preoperative septic cerebral embolism had more baseline comorbidities. Mitral valve endocarditis (44.1% vs 33.0% P < 0.001), large vegetations >10 mm (43.1% vs 30.0%, P < 0.001), and Staphylococcus species infection (42.3% vs 21.3%, P < 0.001) were more frequent in the cerebral embolism group. Among patients with preoperative cerebral embolism, 286 (28.4%) patients had no stroke signs (silent stroke). After matching (1008 matched pairs), there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality (20.1% vs 22.8%; P = 0.14) and 5-year survival (47.8% vs 49.1%; stratified log-rank P = 0.77) in patients with and without preoperative cerebral embolism, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative septic cerebral embolism in patients with infective endocarditis requiring valve surgery does not negatively affect early or late mortality; therefore, it should not play a major role in deciding if surgery is to be performed.

Surgical Outcomes in Octogenarians with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction following Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Background/Objectives: The demographic shift towards an aging population necessitates a reevaluation of surgical interventions like coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in octogenarians. This study aims to elucidate the outcomes of CABG in octogenarians with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), a group traditionally considered at high risk for such procedures. Methods: Conducted across four academic hospitals in Germany from 2017 to 2023, this retrospective multicenter study assessed 100 patients (50 octogenarians ≥80 years and 50 non-octogenarians <80 years) with HFrEF undergoing isolated CABG. Through propensity score matching, the study aimed to compare the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), as well as other clinical endpoints, between the two groups. Statistical analyses included chi-square, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test, Cox regression, and logistic regression, aiming to identify significant differences in outcomes. Results: The study revealed no significant difference in the combined incidence of MACCEs between octogenarians and non-octogenarians (OR: 0.790, 95% CI: 0.174-3.576, p = 0.759). Mortality rates were similar across groups (7% each, p = 1.000), as were occurrences of postoperative myocardial infarction (2% each, p = 1.000) and stroke (3% total). Secondary outcomes like delirium (17% total, no significant age group difference, p = 0.755), acute kidney injury (18% total, p = 0.664), and the need for dialysis (14% total, p = 1.000) also showed no differences between age groups. Interestingly, non-octogenarians required more packed red blood cells during their stay (p = 0.008), while other postoperative care metrics, such as hospital and ICU length of stay and ventilation hours, were comparable across groups. Conclusion: This multicenter study highlights that CABG is a viable and safe surgical option for octogenarians with HFrEF, challenging prior assumptions about the elevated risks associated with performing this procedure in older patients. The absence of significant differences in the incidence of MACCEs and other postoperative complications across age groups emphasizes the importance of careful patient selection and perioperative management. These findings advocate for a more inclusive approach to surgical treatment for octogenarians with HFrEF, suggesting that age alone should not be a determinant for CABG eligibility. This study contributes critical insights into optimizing care for a high-risk demographic, indicating a need for tailored guidelines that accommodate the aging population with complex cardiac conditions.

Transcatheter Repair versus Mitral-Valve Surgery for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment recommendations for patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation include transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and mitral-valve surgery. Data from randomized trials comparing these therapies are lacking in this patient population. METHODS: In this noninferiority trial conducted in Germany, patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation who continued to have symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo either transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (intervention group) or surgical mitral-valve repair or replacement (surgery group). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, hospitalization for heart failure, mitral-valve reintervention, implantation of an assist device, or stroke within 1 year after the procedure. The primary safety end point was a composite of major adverse events within 30 days after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 70.5±7.9 years, 39.9% were women, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 43.0±11.7%. Within 1 year, at least one of the components of the primary efficacy end point occurred in 16 of the 96 patients with available data (16.7%) in the intervention group and in 20 of the 89 with available data (22.5%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17 to 6; P<0.001 for noninferiority). A primary safety end-point event occurred in 15 of the 101 patients with available data (14.9%) in the intervention group and in 51 of the 93 patients with available data (54.8%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -40 percentage points; 95% CI, -51 to -27; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair was noninferior to mitral-valve surgery with respect to a composite of death, rehospitalization for heart failure, stroke, reintervention, or implantation of an assist device in the left ventricle at 1 year. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; MATTERHORN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02371512.).

Invasive Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: From Anatomical Features to Mechanistic Differences.

There is debate on the best treatment for significant stenoses of the left main (LM) coronary artery. The available evidence is based on four randomized trials, which were either performed specifically to assess patients with LM disease (EXCEL, NOBLE, PRECOMBAT) or had a significant fraction of patients with this disease pattern (SYNTAX). A meta-analysis revealed no difference in periprocedural and 5-year mortality but demonstrated a significant reduction of spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) with CABG. Furthermore, the recently published SWEDEHEART registry data have shown survival advantage and fewer MACCE with CABG for LM disease after adjustment. In general, patients with more severe coronary artery disease (CAD) appear to have a survival advantage with CABG both over PCI and medical therapy (independent of the presence or absence of LM stenosis), which is always associated with a reduction of spontaneous MI in the CABG arm. Since the nomenclature of LM disease does not automatically reflect the complexity of CAD, we review the nature of LM disease in this article. We mechanistically assess the treatment effects of PCI and CABG for patients with LM disease, which is rarely isolated, often distal, and mostly associated with varying degrees of single and multi-vessel disease. We conclude that in patients with isolated LM shaft lesions and associated diseases of low complexity, the risk of spontaneous MI is lower, and PCI may achieve similar long-term outcomes compared to CABG. Thus, heart teams are essential for selecting the best treatment option and should focus on assessing infarction risk in chronic CAD.

Sex-related differences in patients with infective endocarditis requiring cardiac surgery: insights from the CAMPAIGN Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: Sex-related differences play a role in cardiovascular disease-related outcomes. There is, however, a knowledge gap regarding sex-specific differences in patients with infective endocarditis (IE)-requiring surgical treatment. This study aims to analyse sex-related differences in the clinical presentation, treatment and clinical outcomes of patients with IE-requiring surgical treatment from the multicentric Germany-wide CAMPAIGN registry. METHODS: Patients with IE who underwent cardiac surgery between 1994 and 2018 at six German centres were retrospectively analysed. Outcomes were compared based on patients' sex. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and mid-term survival. RESULTS: A total of 4917 patients were included in the analysis (1364 female [27.7%] and 3553 male [72.3%]). Female patients presented with more comorbidities and higher surgical risk (EuroScore II 12.0% vs 10.0%, P < 0.001). The early postoperative course of female patients was characterized by longer ventilation times (20.0 h vs 16.0 h; P = 0.004), longer intensive care unit stay (4.0 days vs 3.0 days; P < 0.001), and more frequent new-onset dialysis (265 [20.3%] vs 549 [16.3%]; P = 0.001). The 30-day mortality was 13.8% and 15.5% in female and male patients, respectively (P = 0.06). The estimated mid-term survival was significantly higher amongst male patients (56.1% vs 45.4%; Log-rank P < 0.001). Female sex was an independent predictor of mid-term mortality (HR 1.2 [95% CI 1.0-1.4], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Male patients more frequently undergo cardiac surgery for IE. However, female patients have a higher surgical risk profile and subsequently an increased early postoperative morbidity, but with similar 30-day mortality compared with male patients. The estimated mid-term survival is lower amongst female patients.

Infective endocarditis and spondylodiscitis-impact of sequence of surgical therapy on survival and recurrence rate.

OBJECTIVES: To date, there are no standardized treatment algorithms or recommendations for patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and concomitant spondylodiscitis (SD). Therefore, our aim was to analyse whether the sequence of surgical treatment of IE and SD has an impact on postoperative outcome and to identify risk factors for survival and postoperative recurrence. METHODS: Patients with IE underwent surgery in 4 German university hospitals between 1994 and 2022. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify possible predictors of 30-day/1-year mortality and recurrence of IE and/or SD. RESULTS: From the total IE cohort (n = 3991), 150 patients (4.4%) had concomitant SD. Primary surgery for IE was performed in 76.6%, and primary surgery for SD in 23.3%. The median age was 70.0 (64.0-75.6) years and patients were mostly male (79.5%). The most common pathogens detected were enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus followed by streptococci, and coagulase-negative Staphylococci. If SD was operated on first, 30-day mortality was significantly higher than if IE was operated on 1st (25.7% vs 11.4%; P = 0.037) and we observed a tendency for a higher 1-year mortality. If IE was treated 1st, we observed a higher recurrence rate within 1 year (12.2% vs 0%; P = 0.023). Multivariable analysis showed that primary surgery for SD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Primary surgical treatment for SD was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. When IE was treated surgically 1st, the recurrence rate of IE and/or SD was higher.

Cardiac computed tomography-derived coronary artery volume to myocardial mass in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery lumen volume (V) to myocardial mass (M) ratio (V/M) can show the mismatch between epicardial coronary arteries and the underlying myocardium. METHODS: The V, M and V/M were obtained from the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) of patients in the FAST-TRACK CABG study, the first-in-human trial of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) guided solely by CCTA and fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFRCT) in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). The correlations between V/M ratios and baseline characteristics were determined and compared with those from the ADVANCE registry, an unselected cohort of historical controls with chronic CAD. RESULTS: The V/M ratio was obtained in 106 of the 114 pre-CABG CCTAs. Mean age was 65.6 years and 87% of them were male. The anatomical SYNTAX score from CCTA was significantly higher than the functional SYNTAX score derived using FFRCT [43.1 (15.2) vs 41.1 (16.5), p â€‹< â€‹0.001]. Mean V, M, and V/M were 2204 â€‹mm3, 137 â€‹g, and 16.5 â€‹mm3/g, respectively. There were weak negative correlations between V and anatomical and functional SYNTAX scores (Pearson's r â€‹= â€‹-0.26 and -0.34). V and V/M had a strong correlation (r â€‹= â€‹0.82). The V/M ratio in the current study was significantly lower than that in the ADVANCE registry (median 16.1 vs. 24.8 [1st quartile 20.1]). CONCLUSION: Systematically smaller V/M ratios were found in this population with severe CAD requiring CABG compared to an unselected cohort with chronic CAD. The V/M ratio could provide additional non-invasive assessment of CAD especially when combined with FFRCT.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) is challenging. Objectives: The authors evaluated the impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy on clinical endpoints in IE patients. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing IE patients with prior and/or ongoing use of ATT vs those without any ATT during IE course. Primary outcome was reported in-hospital cerebrovascular events. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), systemic thromboembolism (ST), and mortality within 6 months. Results: Twelve studies, with a total of 12,151 patients, were included. The primary endpoint was not different comparing 10,115 IE patients with or without prior anticoagulation (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.56-2.17; P = 0.77) or comparing 838 IE patients with or without prior antiplatelet (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.61-1.33; P = 0.61). In-hospital mortality was lower in IE patients with prior anticoagulation compared to those without (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.96; P = 0.03). There was no difference in reported ICH rates between patients with or without prior anticoagulation (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.27-1.09; P = 0.09) or between patients with or without prior antiplatelet (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.11-1.10; P = 0.07). The rate of ST was lower in IE patients with prior antiplatelet therapy compared to those without (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.38-0.72; P < 0.01). Conclusions: ATT in IE patients was not associated with higher frequency of cerebrovascular events or ICH. Moreover, we found that the use of anticoagulation was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and the use of antiplatelets was associated with decreased ST. Due to the limitations of this study, these results should be interpreted cautiously showing the necessity of a randomized setup.

Outcomes of complete removal versus conservative therapy in cardiac implantable electronic device infections - A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended in patients with CIED infections, including both systemic and localized pocket infection. The aim of the study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive assessment of evidence relating to the effect of complete CIED extraction in patients with a CIED infection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting short- and mid-term outcomes in patients who had a device infection or infective endocarditis (IE) and underwent complete removal of the cardiac device (generator and leads) compared to those who received conservative therapy (no removal, partial removal, local antibiotic infiltration or isolated antibiotic therapy). The primary outcome was reinfection/relapse. Secondary outcomes were short-term (30-day/in-hospital) and mid-term (mean follow-up: 43.0 months) mortality. Random effects model was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. Patients with complete CIED extraction (n = 905) exhibited a lower rate of relapse/re-infection compared to patients (n = 195) with a conservative treatment approach (n = 195, OR 0.02, 95%CI 0.01-0.06, p < 0.0001, mean-follow-up: 16.1 months). Additionally, these patients displayed a lower short- (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.23-0.69, p = 0.01) and mid-term (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.34-0.78, p = 0.002) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that patients with a CIED infection who undergo complete CIED extraction exhibit a lower rate of relapse/re-infection. Additionally, a lower short- and mid-term mortality is observed, although it is acknowledged that this outcome may be influenced by treatment allocation bias.