Dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of action of mepivacaine on anesthesia of the palmar digital nerves of horses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether palmar digital nerve (PDN) blockade in horses with a combination of dexmedetomidine and mepivacaine would block the response to mechanical force applied to the digit longer than would anesthetizing these nerves with mepivacaine alone or dexmedetomidine alone. ANIMALS: 8 mares with no signs of lameness. PROCEDURES: In a randomized, crossover, blinded, experimental study, both PDNs of the same forelimb of each horse were anesthetized by perineural injection with either 30 mg mepivacaine alone, 250 µg of dexmedetomidine alone, or 30 mg mepivacaine combined with 250 µg of dexmedetomidine. Each horse received each treatment, and treatments were administered ≥ 2 weeks apart. The mechanical nociceptive threshold was measured at a region between the heel bulbs with the use of a digital force gauge before (baseline) and at 15-minute intervals after treatment. RESULTS: The mean duration of sensory blockade of the digit was 2-fold longer when a combination of mepivacaine and dexmedetomidine was administered (371 minutes), compared with when mepivacaine alone was administered (186 minutes). Treatment with dexmedetomidine alone did not change the mechanical nociceptive threshold substantially from baseline and resulted in no clinical signs of sedation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that relief from digital pain provided by perineural treatment with mepivacaine for PDN blockade can be extended by adding dexmedetomidine to the injectate.

Influence of a novel scaffold composed of polyurethane, hydroxyapatite, and decellularized bone particles on the healing of fourth metacarpal defects in mares.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a novel scaffold, designed for use in bone regeneration, on healing of splint bone segmental defects in mares. STUDY DESIGN: In vivo experimental study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Five adult mares (4-10 years old; mean weight, 437.7 kg ± 29 kg). METHODS: Bilateral 2-cm full-thickness defects were created in the fourth metacarpal bones (MCIV) of each horse. Each defect was randomly assigned to either a novel scaffold treatment (n = 5) or an untreated control (n = 5). The scaffold was composed of polyurethane, hydroxyapatite, and decellularized bone particles. Bone healing was assessed for a period of 60 days by thermography, ultrasonography, radiography, and computed tomography (CT). Biopsies of each defect were performed 60 days after surgery for histological evaluation. RESULTS: On the basis of radiographic analysis, scaffold-treated defects had greater filling (67.42% ± 26.7%) compared with untreated defects (35.88% ± 32.7%; P = .006). After 60 days, CT revealed that the density of the defects treated with the scaffolds (807.80 ± 129.6 Hounsfield units [HU]) was greater than density of the untreated defects (464.80 ± 81.3 HU; P = .004). Evaluation of histology slides provided evidence of bone formation within an average of 9.43% ± 3.7% of the cross-sectional area of scaffolds in contrast to unfilled defects in which connective tissue was predominant throughout the biopsy specimens. CONCLUSION: The novel scaffold was biocompatible and supported bone formation within the MCIV segmental defects. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This novel scaffold offers an effective option for filling bone voids in horses when support of bone healing is indicated.

Sedative effects and pharmacokinetics of detomidine when administered intravenously and intravaginally as a gel in alpacas.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sedative effects and pharmacokinetics of detomidine gel administered intravaginally to alpacas in comparison with intravenously (IV) administered detomidine. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, crossover, blinded experiment. ANIMALS: A group of six healthy adult female Huacaya alpacas (70.3 ± 7.9 kg). METHODS: Alpacas were studied on two occasions separated by ≥5 days. Treatments were IV detomidine hydrochloride (70 µg kg-1; treatment DET-IV) or detomidine gel (200 µg kg-1; treatment DET-VAG) administered intravaginally. Sedation and heart rate (HR) were evaluated at intervals for 240 minutes. Venous blood was collected at intervals for 360 minutes after treatment for analysis of detomidine, carboxydetomidine and hydroxydetomidine using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Measured variables were compared between treatments and over time using mixed model analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean, and a p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Onset of sedation was faster in treatment DET-IV (1.6 ± 0.2 minutes) than in treatment DET-VAG (13.0 ± 2.5 minutes). Time to maximum sedation was shorter in treatment DET-IV (8.3 ± 1.3 minutes) than in treatment DET-VAG (25 ± 4 minutes). Duration of sedation was not different between treatments. There was a significant linear relationship between sedation score and plasma detomidine concentration. HR was less than baseline for 60 and 125 minutes for treatments DET-IV and DET-VAG, respectively. The maximal decrease in HR occurred at 15 minutes for both treatments. The mean maximum plasma concentration of detomidine, time to maximum concentration and bioavailability for treatment DET-VAG were 39.6 ng mL-1, 19.9 minutes and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Detomidine administration at the doses studied resulted in moderate sedation when administered IV or intravaginally to alpacas.

Efficacy and duration of effect for liposomal bupivacaine when administered perineurally to the palmar digital nerves of horses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and duration of effect for liposomal bupivacaine following perineural administration to the medial and lateral palmar digital nerves of horses. ANIMALS: 9 nonlame mares. PROCEDURES: For each horse, 2 mL of liposomal bupivacaine (13.3 mg/mL; total dose, 53.2 mg or approx 0.11 mg/kg) or sterile saline (0.9% NaCl) solution was injected adjacent to the medial and lateral palmar digital nerves at the level of the distal aspect of the proximal sesamoid bones of a randomly selected forelimb. Twenty-one days later, the opposite treatment was administered in the contralateral forelimb. A digital algometer was used to measure the mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) immediately before and at predetermined times for 48 hours after injection of each treatment. The mean MNT was compared between the 2 treatments at each measurement time. RESULTS: The mean MNT for the liposomal bupivacaine-treated limbs was significantly greater (ie, the limb was less sensitive) than that for the saline-treated limbs between 30 minutes and 4 hours after treatment injection. Following liposomal bupivacaine administration, 1 horse developed mild swelling at the injection sites that resolved without treatment within 24 hours. No other adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that liposomal bupivacaine is another option for perineural anesthesia in horses. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal dose and better elucidate the duration of effect for the drug when used for palmar digital nerve blocks in horses.

Evaluation of the sedative effects and pharmacokinetics of detomidine gel administered intravaginally to horses.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the sedative effects and pharmacokinetic profile of detomidine when administered intravaginally as a gel formulation to horses. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, crossover, masked experimental design. ANIMALS: A group of six healthy adult mares (494 ± 56 kg). METHODS: Mares were studied on two occasions and were administered either detomidine hydrochloride (10 µg kg-1) intravenously (treatment IV) or detomidine gel (40 µg kg-1) intravaginally (treatment IVG), separated by 1 week. Sedation, ataxia, muzzle-floor distance and heart rate (HR) were evaluated every 15 minutes for 240 minutes. Venous blood samples were collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240, 300 and 360 minutes postadministration and were analyzed for detomidine and metabolites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Measured variables were compared over time and between treatments using mixed model analysis. Correlation between drug plasma concentrations and muzzle-floor distance, and sedation and ataxia scores was determined using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean and p value was set at <0.05. RESULTS: Sedation was shorter with IV (119 ± 16 minutes) than with IVG (188 ± 22 minutes). Ataxia scores remained greater than baseline for 90 and 135 minutes for treatments IV and IVG, respectively. HR was lower than baseline for 45 and 30 minutes for IV and IVG, respectively, but did not differ between treatments. The mean maximum plasma concentration of detomidine, time to maximum concentration and bioavailability for treatment IVG was 8.57 ng mL-1, 0.37 hour and 25%, respectively. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.68) between plasma detomidine concentrations and sedation score. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Detomidine gel administered intravaginally resulted in clinically important sedation and is a viable method for detomidine gel delivery in mares.

Effect of fentanyl on the induction dose and minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone preventing movement in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of fentanyl on the induction dose and minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus (MIRNM) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental crossover design. ANIMALS: A group of six healthy, adult, intact female mixed-breed dogs, weighing 19.7 ± 1.3 kg. METHODS: Dogs were randomly administered one of three treatments at weekly intervals: premedication with 0.9% saline (treatment A), fentanyl 5 µg kg-1 (treatment ALF) or fentanyl 10 µg kg-1 (treatment AHF), administered intravenously over 5 minutes. Anesthesia was induced 5 minutes later with incremental doses of alfaxalone to achieve intubation and was maintained for 90 minutes in A with alfaxalone (0.12 mg kg-1 minute-1), in ALF with alfaxalone (0.09 mg kg-1 minute-1) and fentanyl (0.1 µg kg-1 minute-1) and in AHF with alfaxalone (0.06 mg kg-1 minute-1) and fentanyl (0.2 µg kg-1 minute-1). The alfaxalone infusion was increased or decreased by 0.006 mg kg-1 minute-1 based on positive or negative response to antebrachium stimulation (50 V, 50 Hz, 10 ms). Data were analyzed using a mixed-model anova and presented as least squares means ± standard error. RESULTS: Alfaxalone induction doses were 3.50 ± 0.13 (A), 2.17 ± 0.10 (ALF) and 1.67 ± 0.10 mg kg-1 (AHF) and differed among treatments (p < 0.05). Alfaxalone MIRNM was 0.17 ± 0.01 (A), 0.10 ± 0.01 (ALF) and 0.07 ± 0.01 mg kg-1 minute-1 (AHF) and differed among treatments. ALF and AHF decreased the MIRNM by 44 ± 8% and 62 ± 5%, respectively (p < 0.05). Plasma alfaxalone concentrations at MIRNM were 5.82 ± 0.48 (A), 4.40 ± 0.34 (ALF) and 2.28 ± 0.09 µg mL-1 (AHF). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fentanyl, at the doses studied, significantly decreased the alfaxalone induction dose and MIRNM.

Effects of stacked wedge pads and chains applied to the forefeet of Tennessee Walking Horses for a five-day period on behavioral and biochemical indicators of pain, stress, and inflammation.

OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of stacked wedge pads and chains applied to the forefeet of Tennessee Walking Horses on behavioral and biochemical indicators of pain, stress, and inflamation. ANIMALS 20 Tennessee Walking Horses. PROCEDURES Horses were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: keg shoes (control; n = 10) or stacked wedge pads and exercise with chains (10). Ten days before treatment application, an accelerometer was attached at the left metatarsus of each horse to record daily activity. Horses were exercised for 20 minutes daily, beginning on day -7. On day 0, exercise ceased, the forefeet were trimmed, and the assigned treatment was applied. From days 1 through 5, horses were exercised as before. Blood samples for measurement of plasma cortisol, substance P, and fibrinogen concentrations were collected on days -5, 1, and 5 before and after exercise and every 30 minutes thereafter for 6 hours. RESULTS No significant differences in plasma concentrations of cortisol, substance P, and fibrinogen were detected between groups. Although lying behaviors changed after shoes were applied, these behaviors did not differ significantly between groups. Shoeing appeared to have altered behavior to a greater extent than did the type of treatment applied. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Application of stacked wedge pads and chains to the forefeet of horses for a 5-day period as performed in this study evoked no acute or subacute stress or nociceptive response as measured. Although these findings should not be extrapolated to the long-term use of such devices in Tennessee Walking Horses performing the running walk, the data should be considered when making evidence-based decisions relating to animal welfare and the use of stacked wedge pads and chains.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on the minimum infusion rate of propofol preventing movement in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on induction dose and minimum infusion rate of propofol preventing movement (MIRNM). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover, unmasked, experimental design. ANIMALS: Three male and three female healthy Beagle dogs weighing 10.2 ± 2.8 kg. METHODS: Dogs were studied on three occasions at weekly intervals. Premedications were 0.9% saline (treatment P) or dexmedetomidine (1 µg kg-1, treatment PLD; 2 µg kg-1, treatment PHD) intravenously. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg kg-1 and then 1 mg kg-1 every 15 seconds) until intubation. Anesthesia was maintained for 90 minutes in P with propofol (0.5 mg kg-1 minute-1) and saline, in PLD with propofol (0.35 mg kg-1 minute-1) and dexmedetomidine (1 µg kg-1 hour-1), and in PHD with propofol (0.3 mg kg-1 minute-1) and dexmedetomidine (2 µg kg-1 hour-1). The stimulus (50 V, 50 Hz, 10 ms) was applied to the antebrachium, and propofol infusion was increased or decreased by 0.025 mg kg-1 minute-1 based on a positive or negative response, respectively. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model anova and presented as mean ± standard error. RESULTS: Propofol induction doses were 8.68 ± 0.57 (P), 6.13 ± 0.67 (PLD) and 4.78 ± 0.39 (PHD) mg kg-1 and differed among treatments (p < 0.05). Propofol MIRNM values were 0.68 ± 0.13, 0.49 ± 0.16 and 0.26 ± 0.05 mg kg-1 minute-1 for P, PLD and PHD, respectively. Propofol MIRNM decreased 59% in PHD (p < 0.05). Plasma propofol concentrations were 14.04 ± 2.30 (P), 11.30 ± 4.30 (PLD) and 7.96 ± 0.72 (PHD) µg mL-1 and dexmedetomidine concentrations were 0.68 ± 0.12 (PLD) and 0.89 ± 0.08 (PHD) ng mL-1 at MIRNM determination. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dexmedetomidine (1 and 2 µg kg-1) decreased propofol induction dose. Dexmedetomidine (2 µg kg-1 hour-1) resulted in a significant decrease in propofol MIRNM.

Effect of fentanyl on the induction dose and minimum infusion rate of propofol preventing movement in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of fentanyl on the induction dose of propofol and minimum infusion rate required to prevent movement in response to noxious stimulation (MIRNM) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Crossover experimental design. ANIMALS: Six healthy, adult intact male Beagle dogs, mean±standard deviation 12.6±0.4 kg. METHODS: Dogs were administered 0.9% saline (treatment P), fentanyl (5 µg kg-1) (treatment PLDF) or fentanyl (10 µg kg-1) (treatment PHDF) intravenously over 5 minutes. Five minutes later, anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg kg-1, followed by 1 mg kg-1 every 15 seconds to achieve intubation) and maintained for 90 minutes by constant rate infusions (CRIs) of propofol alone or with fentanyl: P, propofol (0.5 mg kg-1 minute-1); PLDF, propofol (0.35 mg kg-1 minute-1) and fentanyl (0.1 µg kg-1 minute-1); PHDF, propofol (0.3 mg kg-1 minute-1) and fentanyl (0.2 µg kg-1 minute-1). Propofol CRI was increased or decreased based on the response to stimulation (50 V, 50 Hz, 10 mA), with 20 minutes between adjustments. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model anova and presented as mean±standard error. RESULTS: ropofol induction doses were 6.16±0.31, 3.67±0.21 and 3.33±0.42 mg kg-1 for P, PLDF and PHDF, respectively. Doses for PLDF and PHDF were significantly decreased from P (p<0.05) but not different between treatments. Propofol MIRNM was 0.60±0.04, 0.29±0.02 and 0.22±0.02 mg kg-1 minute-1 for P, PLDF and PHDF, respectively. MIRNM in PLDF and PHDF was significantly decreased from P. MIRNM in PLDF and PHDF were not different, but their respective percent decreases of 51±3 and 63±2% differed (p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fentanyl, at the doses studied, caused statistically significant and clinically important decreases in the propofol induction dose and MIRNM.

Assessment of agreement among diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia for scoring the recovery of horses from anesthesia by use of subjective grading scales and development of a system for evaluation of the recovery of horses from anesthesia by use of accelerometry.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate agreement among diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia for scores determined by use of a simple descriptive scale (SDS) or a composite grading scale (CGS) for quality of recovery of horses from anesthesia and to investigate use of 3-axis accelerometry (3AA) for objective evaluation of recovery. ANIMALS 12 healthy adult horses. PROCEDURES Horses were fitted with a 3AA device and then were anesthetized. Eight diplomates evaluated recovery by use of an SDS, and 7 other diplomates evaluated recovery by use of a CGS. Agreement was tested with κ and AC1 statistics for the SDS and an ANOVA for the CGS. A library of mathematical models was used to map 3AA data against CGS scores. RESULTS Agreement among diplomates using the SDS was slight (κ = 0.19; AC1 = 0.22). The CGS scores differed significantly among diplomates. Best fit of 3AA data against CGS scores yielded the following equation: RS = 9.998 × SG0.633 × ∑UG0.174, where RS is a horse's recovery score determined with 3AA, SG is acceleration of the successful attempt to stand, and ∑UG is the sum of accelerations of unsuccessful attempts to stand. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Subjective scoring of recovery of horses from anesthesia resulted in poor agreement among diplomates. Subjective scoring may lead to differences in conclusions about recovery quality; thus, there is a need for an objective scoring method. The 3AA system removed subjective bias in evaluations of recovery of horses and warrants further study.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam following intravenous and intramuscular administration to sheep.

OBJECTIVE To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of midazolam following IV and IM administration in sheep. ANIMALS 8 healthy adult rams. PROCEDURES Sheep were administered midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) by the IV route and then by the IM route 7 days later in a crossover study. Physiologic and behavioral variables were assessed and blood samples collected for determination of plasma midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam (primary midazolam metabolite) concentrations immediately before (baseline) and at predetermined times for 1,440 minutes after midazolam administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by compartmental and noncompartmental methods. RESULTS Following IV administration, midazolam was rapidly and extensively distributed and rapidly eliminated; mean ± SD apparent volume of distribution, elimination half-life, clearance, and area under the concentration-time curve were 838 ± 330 mL/kg, 0.79 ± 0.44 hours, 1,272 ± 310 mL/h/kg, and 423 ± 143 h·ng/mL, respectively. Following IM administration, midazolam was rapidly absorbed and bioavailability was high; mean ± SD maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, and bioavailability were 820 ± 268 ng/mL, 0.46 ± 0.26 hours, 1,396 ± 463 h·ng/mL, and 352 ± 148%, respectively. Respiratory rate was transiently decreased from baseline for 15 minutes after IV administration. Times to peak sedation and ataxia after IV administration were less than those after IM administration. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated midazolam was a suitable short-duration sedative for sheep, and IM administration may be a viable alternative when IV administration is not possible.

Effect of fentanyl and lidocaine on the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration preventing motor movement in dogs.

OBJECTIVE To determine effects of fentanyl, lidocaine, and a fentanyl-lidocaine combination on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane preventing motor movement (MACNM) in dogs. ANIMALS 6 adult Beagles. PROCEDURES Dogs were anesthetized with sevoflurane in oxygen 3 times (1-week intervals). Baseline MACNM (MACNM-B) was determined starting 45 minutes after induction of anesthesia. Dogs then received 1 of 3 treatments IV: fentanyl (loading dose, 15 µg/kg; constant rate infusion [CRI], 6 µg/kg/h), lidocaine (loading dose, 2 mg/kg; CRI, 6 mg/kg/h), and the fentanyl-lidocaine combination at the same doses. Determination of treatment MACNM (MACNM-T) was initiated 90 minutes after start of the CRI. Venous blood samples were collected at the time of each treatment MACNM measurement for determination of plasma concentrations of fentanyl and lidocaine. RESULTS Mean ± SEM overall MACNM-B for the 3 treatments was 2.70 ± 0.27 vol%. The MACNM decreased from MACNM-B to MACNM-T by 39%, 21%, and 55% for fentanyl, lidocaine, and the fentanyl-lidocaine combination, respectively. This decrease differed significantly among treatments. Plasma fentanyl concentration was 3.25 and 2.94 ng/mL for fentanyl and the fentanyl-lidocaine combination, respectively. Plasma lidocaine concentration was 2,570 and 2,417 ng/mL for lidocaine and the fentanyl-lidocaine combination, respectively. Plasma fentanyl and lidocaine concentrations did not differ significantly between fentanyl and the fentanyl-lidocaine combination or between lidocaine and the fentanyl-lidocaine combination. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE CRIs of fentanyl, lidocaine, and the fentanyl-lidocaine combination at the doses used were associated with clinically important and significant decreases in the MACNM of sevoflurane in dogs.

Effect of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride on tiletamine hydrochloride-zolazepam hydrochloride anesthesia in alpacas.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of IM administration of a tiletamine hydrochloride-zolazepam hydrochloride (TZ) combination with either dexmedetomidine hydrochloride or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (SS) on the motor response to claw clamping, selected cardiorespiratory variables, and quality of recovery from anesthesia in alpacas. ANIMALS 5 adult sexually intact male alpacas. PROCEDURES Each alpaca was given the TZ combination (2 mg/kg) with dexmedetomidine (5 [D5], 10 [D10], 15 [D15], or 20 [D20] µg/kg) or SS IM at 1-week intervals (5 experiments); motor response to claw clamping was assessed, and characteristics of anesthesia, recovery from anesthesia, and selected cardiorespiratory variables were recorded. RESULTS Mean ± SEM duration of lack of motor response to claw clamping was longest when alpacas received treatments D15 (30.9 ± 5.9 minutes) and D20 (40.8 ± 5.9 minutes). Duration of lateral recumbency was significantly longer with dexmedetomidine administration. The longest time (81.3 ± 10.4 minutes) to standing was observed when alpacas received treatment D20. Following treatment SS, 4 alpacas moved in response to claw clamping at the 5-minute time point. Heart rate decreased from pretreatment values in all alpacas when dexmedetomidine was administered. Treatments D10, D15, and D20 decreased Pao2, compared with treatment SS, during the first 15 minutes. During recovery, muscle stiffness and multiple efforts to regain a sternal position were observed in 3 SS-treated and 1 D5-treated alpacas; all other recoveries were graded as excellent. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In TZ-anesthetized alpacas, dexmedetomidine (10, 15, and 20 µg/kg) administered IM increased the duration of lack of motor response to claw clamping, compared with the effect of SS.

Field Sedation and Anesthesia of Ruminants.

Many surgical procedures on ruminants can be performed humanely and safely using local or regional anesthesia and physical restraint, but sedation and general anesthesia are necessary in order to perform some procedures. Although anesthesia-associated risks are greater in ruminants than monogastrics, ruminants can be anesthetized relatively safely in a field setting if the risks are understood, and adequate planning and precautions are in place. This article discusses the important features impacting sedation and anesthesia of cattle and small ruminants, and describes some commonly used drug protocols.

Effects of magnesium sulfate and propofol on the minimum alveolar concentration preventing motor movement in sevoflurane-anesthetized dogs.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of MgSO4, alone and in combination with propofol, on the minimum alveolar concentration preventing motor movement (MACNM) in sevoflurane-anesthetized dogs. ANIMALS 6 healthy purpose-bred adult male Beagles (least squares mean ± SEM body weight, 12.0 ± 1.1 kg). PROCEDURES Dogs were anesthetized 3 times at weekly intervals. The MACNM was measured 45 minutes after induction of anesthesia (baseline; MACNM-B) and was determined each time by use of a noxious electrical stimulus. Treatments were administered as a loading dose and constant rate infusion (CRI) as follows: treatment 1, MgSO4 loading dose of 45 mg/kg and CRI of 15 mg/kg/h; treatment 2, propofol loading dose of 4 mg/kg and CRI of 9 mg/kg/h; and treatment 3, MgSO4 and propofol combination (same doses used previously for each drug). A mixed-model ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer tests were used to determine effects of each treatment on the percentage decrease from MACNM-B. Data were reported as least squares mean ± SEM values. RESULTS Decrease from MACNM-B was 3.4 ± 3.1%, 48.3 ± 3.1%, and 50.3 ± 3.1%, for treatments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The decrease for treatments 2 and 3 was significantly different from that for treatment 1; however, no significant difference existed between results for treatments 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE MgSO4 did not affect MACNM, nor did it potentiate the effects of propofol on MACNM. Administration of MgSO4 in this study appeared to provide no clinical advantage as an anesthetic adjuvant.

Effects of ketamine and lidocaine in combination on the sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration in alpacas.

This study investigated the effects of ketamine and lidocaine in combination on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane (MACSEVO) in alpacas. Eight healthy, intact male, adult alpacas were studied on 2 separate occasions. Anesthesia was induced with SEVO, and baseline MAC (MACB) determination began 45 min after induction. After MACB determination, alpacas were randomly given either an intravenous (IV) loading dose (LD) and infusion of saline or a loading dose [ketamine = 0.5 mg/kg body weight (BW); lidocaine = 2 mg/kg BW] and an infusion of ketamine (25 µg/kg BW per minute) in combination with lidocaine (50 µg/kg BW per minute), and MACSEVO was re-determined (MACT). Quality of recovery, time-to-extubation, and time-to-standing, were also evaluated. Mean MACB was 1.88% ± 0.13% and 1.89% ± 0.14% for the saline and ketamine + lidocaine groups, respectively. Ketamine and lidocaine administration decreased (P < 0.05) MACB by 57% and mean MACT was 0.83% ± 0.10%. Saline administration did not change MACB. Time to determine MACB and MACT was not significantly different between the treatments. The quality of recovery, time-to-extubation, and time-to-standing, were not different between groups. The infusion of ketamine combined with lidocaine significantly decreased MACSEVO by 57% and did not adversely affect time-to-standing or quality of recovery.

La présente étude visait à examiner les effets d'une combinaison de kétamine et de lidocaïne sur la concentration alvéolaire minimale de sevoflurane (CAMSEVO) chez des alpagas. Huit alpagas mâles entiers et en santé ont été étudiés en deux occasions distinctes. L'anesthésie a été induite avec du SEVO, et la détermination de la CAM de base (CAMB) débutée 45 min après l'induction. Après détermination de la CAMB, les alpagas ont reçu par voie intraveineuse (IV), sur une base aléatoire, une dose de charge (DC) et une infusion de saline ou une dose de [kétamine = 0,5 mg/kg de poids corporel (PC); lidocaïne = 2 mg/kg PC] et une infusion de kétamine (25 µg/kg PC par minute) en combinaison avec de la lidocaïne (50 µg/kg PC par minute), et la CAMSEVO re-déterminée (CAMT). La qualité de la récupération, le temps pour extuber, et le temps pour se tenir debout ont également été évalués. La CAMB moyenne était de 1,88 % ± 0,13 % et de 1,89 % ± 0,14 % pour les groupes saline et kétamine + lidocaïne, respectivement. L'administration de kétamine et de lidocaïne entraîna une diminution (P < 0,05) de 57 % de CAMB et la CAMT moyenne était de 0,83 % ± 0,10 %. L'administration de saline n'a pas changé la CAMB. Le temps pour déterminer la CAMB et la CAMT n'était pas significativement différent entre les groupes de traitement. La qualité de la récupération, le temps pour extuber, et le temps pour se tenir debout n'étaient pas significativement différents entre les groupes. L'infusion de kétamine combinée à la lidocaïne a diminué significativement la CAMSEVO de 57 % et n'affecta pas négativement le temps pour se tenir debout ou la qualité de la récupération.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).

Effect of ketamine on the minimum infusion rate of propofol needed to prevent motor movement in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimum infusion rate (MIR) of propofol required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs anesthetized with propofol alone or propofol in combination with a constant rate infusion (CRI) of ketamine. ANIMALS: 6 male Beagles. PROCEDURES: Dogs were anesthetized on 3 occasions, at weekly intervals, with propofol alone (loading dose, 6 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.45 mg/kg/min), propofol (loading dose, 5 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.35 mg/kg/min) and a low dose of ketamine (loading dose, 2 mg/kg; CRI, 0.025 mg/kg/min), or propofol (loading dose, 4 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.3 mg/kg/min) and a high dose of ketamine (loading dose, 3 mg/kg; CRI, 0.05 mg/kg/min). After 60 minutes, the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious electrical stimulus was determined in duplicate. RESULTS: Least squares mean ± SEM propofol MIRs required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus were 0.76 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, 0.60 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, and 0.41 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min when dogs were anesthetized with propofol alone, propofol and low-dose ketamine, and propofol and high-dose ketamine, respectively. There were significant decreases in the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus when dogs were anesthetized with propofol and low-dose ketamine (27 ± 10%) or with propofol and high-dose ketamine (30 ± 10%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ketamine, at the doses studied, significantly decreased the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs.

The anesthetic interaction of propofol and sevoflurane on the minimum alveolar concentration preventing motor movement (MACNM) in dogs.

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of propofol on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane needed to prevent motor movement (MAC(NM)) in dogs subjected to a noxious stimulus using randomized crossover design. Six, healthy, adult beagles (9.2 ± 1.3 kg) were used. Dogs were anesthetized with sevoflurane on 3 occasions, at weekly intervals, and baseline MAC(NM) (MAC(NM-B)) was determined on each occasion. Propofol treatments were administered as loading dose (LD) and constant rate infusion (CRI) as follows: Treatment 1 (T1) was 2 mg/kg body weight (BW) and 4.5 mg/kg BW per hour; T2 was 4 mg/kg BW and 9 mg/kg BW per hour; T3 was 8 mg/kg BW and 18 mg/kg BW per hour, respectively. Treatment MAC(NM) (MAC(NM-T)) determination was initiated 60 min after the start of the CRI. Two venous blood samples were collected and combined at each MAC(NM-T) determination for measurement of blood propofol concentration using high-performance liquid chromatography method (HPLC). Data were analyzed using a mixed-model ANOVA and are presented as least square means (LSM) ± standard error of means (SEM). Propofol infusions in the range of 4.5 to 18 mg/kg BW per hour resulted in mean blood concentrations between 1.3 and 4.4 µg/mL, and decreased (P < 0.05) sevoflurane MAC(NM) in a concentration-dependent manner. The percentage decrease in MAC(NM) was 20.5%, 43.0%, and 68.3%, with corresponding blood propofol concentrations of 1.3 ± 0.3 µg/mL, 2.5 ± 0.3 µg/mL, and 4.4 ± 0.3 µg/mL, for T1, T2, and T3, respectively. Venous blood propofol concentrations were strongly correlated (r = 0.855, P < 0.0001) with the decrease in MAC(NM). In dogs, propofol decreased the sevoflurane MAC(NM) in a concentration-dependent manner.

L'objectif de la présente étude était de déterminer les effets du propofol sur la concentration alvéolaire minimale de sevoflurane requise pour empêcher les mouvements moteurs (MACNM) chez des chiens soumis à un stimulus délétère en utilisant un modèle expérimental croisé aléatoire. Six chiens Beagle adultes et en santé (9,2 ± 1,3 kg) ont été utilisés. Les chiens étaient anesthésiés avec du sevoflurane à trois occasions, à une semaine d'intervalle, et la valeur de base de MACNM (MACNM-B) déterminée à chaque occasion. Les traitements de propofol furent administrés à une dose d'attaque (LD) et un taux d'infusion constant (CRI) comme suit: Traitement 1 (T1) était de 2 mg/kg de poids corporel (BW) et 4,5 mg/kg BW par heure; T2 était de 4 mg/kg BW et 9 mg/kg BW par heure; T3 était de 8 mg/kg BW et 18 mg/kg BW par heure, respectivement. La détermination de la MACNM du traitement (MACNM-T) fut initiée 60 min après le début du CRI. Deux échantillons de sang veineux furent prélevés et combinés à chaque mesure de MACNM-T pour mesurer la concentration sanguine de propofol par une méthode de chromatographie à haute performance en phase liquide (HPLC). Les données furent analysées par un modèle mixte d'ANOVA et sont présentées sous forme du moindre carré (LSM) ± écart-type (SEM).Les infusions de propofol variant entre 4,5 à 18 mg/kg BW par heure ont résulté en des concentrations sanguines moyennes entre 1,3 et 4,4 µg/mL, et diminuèrent (P < 0,05) la MACNM de sevoflurane d'une manière dépendante de la concentration. Le pourcentage de diminution de MACNM était de 20,5 %, 43,0 % et 68,3 %, avec des concentrations sanguines de propofol correspondantes de 1,3 ± 0,3 µg/mL, 2,5 ± 0,3 µg/mL, et 4,4 ± 0,3 µg/mL, pour T1, T2 et T3, respectivement. Les concentrations veineuses en propofol étaient fortement corrélées (r = 0,855, P < 0,0001) avec la diminution de MACNM. Chez les chiens, le propofol a diminué la MACNM du sevoflurane de manière dépendante de la concentration.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).

The interaction of nitrous oxide and fentanyl on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane blocking motor movement (MACNM) in dogs.

The study objective was to determine the effects of 70% nitrous oxide (N2O) and fentanyl on the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane necessary to prevent movement (MACNM) in response to noxious stimulation in dogs. Six healthy, adult, intact male, mixed-breed dogs were used on 3 occasions in a randomized crossover design. After induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane, each of the following treatments was randomly administered: fentanyl loading dose (Ld) of 15 µg/kg and infusion of 6 µg/kg per hour [treatment 1 (T1)], 70% N2O (T2), or fentanyl (Ld of 15 µg/kg and infusion of 6 µg/kg per hour) combined with 70% N2O (T3). Each dog received each of the 3 treatments once during the 3-week period. Determination of MACNM was initiated 90 min after the start of each treatment. The values were compared using the baseline MACNM, which had been determined in a previous study on the same group of dogs. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer tests, and expressed as least squares mean ± SEM. The baseline MACNM decreased by 36.6 ± 4.0%, 15.0 ± 4.0%, and 46.0 ± 4.0% for T1, T2, and T3, respectively (P < 0.05), and differed (P < 0.05) among treatments. Mean fentanyl plasma concentrations did not differ (P ≥ 0.05) between T1 (3.70 ± 0.56 ng/mL) and T3 (3.50 ± 0.56 ng/mL). The combination of fentanyl and N2O resulted in a greater sevoflurane MACNM sparing effect than either treatment alone.

L'objectif de la présente étude était de déterminer les effets de l'oxyde nitreux (N2O) à 70 % et du fentanyl sur la concentration de sevoflurane en fin d'expiration nécessaire pour empêcher le mouvement (MACNM) en réponse à une stimulation désagréable chez des chiens. Six chiens mâles intacts adultes en santé de race croisée furent utilisés en 3 occasions dans des études croisées aléatoires. Après induction de l'anesthésie avec du sevoflurane, chacun des traitements suivants fut administré de manière aléatoire : dose d'induction de fentanyl (Ld) de 15 µg/kg et infusion de 6 µg/kg par heure [traitement 1 (T1)], 70 % N2O (T2), ou fentalyl (Ld de 15 µg/kg et infusion de 6 µg/kg par heure) combiné avec 70 % N2O (T3). Chaque chien a reçu chacun des trois traitements une fois durant la période d'essai de 3 semaines. La détermination du MACNM fut débutée 90 min après le début de chaque traitement. Les valeurs furent comparées en utilisant la valeur de base de MACNM, qui avait été déterminée dans une étude antérieure avec le même groupe de chiens. Les données furent analysées en utilisant un modèle mixte d'analyse de variance (ANOVA) et un test de Tukey-Kramer, et présentées comme la moyenne des moindres carrés ± écart-type. La valeur de base de MACNM diminua de 36,6 ± 4,0 %, 15,0 ± 4,0 %, et 46,0 ± 4,0 % respectivement pour T1, T2 et T3 (P < 0,05), et différait (P < 0,05) entre les traitements. Les concentrations plasmatiques moyennes ne différaient pas (P ≥ 0,05) entre T1 (3,70 ± 0,56 ng/mL) et T3 (3,50 ± 0,56 ng/mL). La combinaison de fentanyl et de N2O a produit un plus grand effet réducteur sur le MACNM de sevoflurane que chaque traitement individuel.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).

Antinociceptive and selected physiological effects of morphine and xylazine on tiletamine-zolazepam anesthesia in llamas.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate antinociception, anesthesia, and recovery in llamas given tiletamine-zolazepam (TZ) with either morphine, xylazine, morphine and xylazine, or saline. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover experimental study. ANIMALS: Six healthy, adult intact male llamas. METHODS: Llamas were given each of four treatments intramuscularly with a 1-week washout: TZ (2 mg kg(-1) ) combined with either morphine (0.5 mg kg(-1) ; M), xylazine (0.15 mg kg(-1) ; X), morphine (0.5 mg kg(-1) ) and xylazine (0.15mg kg(-1) ) (MX), or saline (C). Llamas breathed room air during the experiment. Characteristics of anesthesia, recovery, and selected cardiopulmonary variables were recorded. Antinociception was assessed by clamping a claw at 5-minute intervals. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model anova and Tukey-Kramer test, and are expressed as least squares mean ± SEM. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: No llama in the control group demonstrated antinociception. Antinociception was longest with treatment MX, followed by treatments X and M, respectively. Heart rates in llamas given treatments X and MX were significantly lower than with other treatments. The respiratory rate in llamas given treatment C was greater (p < 0.05) than for all other treatments, however, the respiratory rate was not significantly different among treatments X, M and MX. The PaO2 for llamas given MX remained <60 mmHg throughout the 20 minute period of blood gas analysis. Mean arterial blood pressure in llamas in treatment MX was less than for treatments M or C. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The combination of morphine (0.5 mg kg(-1) ) and xylazine (0.15 mg kg(-1) ) increased the duration of antinociception compared with xylazine alone, in TZ-anesthetized llamas. Treatments X, M and MX were associated with hypoxemia (PaO2 < 60 mmHg).