Development of a Long-Term Cross-Sectoral Case and Care Management Manual for Patients With Severe Multiple Sclerosis and Their Caregivers.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Care and case management (CCM) aims to provide optimal care for patients and their caregivers on an individual and superordinate level of health care providers and authorities. To facilitate a clear and systematic CCM process as part of a clinical study intervention, a semistructured manual is the prerequisite. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTINGS: The ongoing COCOS-MS (Communication, Coordination and Security for People with Multiple Sclerosis) study is a randomized controlled Phase II clinical intervention study. The CCM manual is being tested on the intervention group consisting of severely affected individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS; Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] >5) and their caregivers receiving CCM for 12 months in addition to standard care. The intervention comprises monthly personal visits and weekly telephone calls during which the CCM manual is applied. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: The CCM manual has been developed on the basis of previous literature and well-established questionnaires following theoretical aspects and prior scientific work covering individual domains of life of people with MS. Within the COCOS-MS study, its feasibility is being tested meticulously. It allows for a standardized assessment while being tailored to the individual. At the end of the intervention period, it will be analyzed statistically and qualitatively. Consequently, conclusions can be drawn as to whether the CCM manual is feasible or has to be adapted for use in standard care after analyzation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: The CCM manual serves as a tool for the continuous, long-term, cross-sectoral care for patients suffering from severe MS and their caregivers. The manual provides guidance in adequately addressing patients' complex symptoms, problems, and needs, as well as assessing existing resources both at the individual patient level and at a superordinate level.

How do trained palliative care providers experience open desire to die-conversations? An explorative thematic analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the potential benefits of open communication about possible desires to die for patients receiving palliative care, health professionals tend to avoid such conversations and often interpret desires to die as requests for medical aid in dying. After implementing trainings to foster an open, proactive approach toward desire to die, we requested trained health professionals to lead and document desire to die-conversations with their patients. In this article, we explore how trained health professionals experience an open (proactive) approach to desire to die-conversations with their patients. METHODS: Between April 2018 and March 2020, health professionals recorded their conversation-experiences on documentation sheets by answering seven open questions. A subsample was invited to offer deeper insights through semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interviews and documentation sheets were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically, then findings from both sources were compared and synthesized. RESULTS: Overall, N = 29 trained health professionals documented N = 81 open desire to die-conversations. A subsample of n = 13 health professionals participated in qualitative interviews. Desire to die-conversations after the training were reported as a complex but overall enriching experience, illustrated in seven themes: (1) beneficial (e.g., establishing good rapport) and (2) hindering aspects (e.g., patients' emotional barriers) of desire to die-conversations, (3) follow-up measures, (4) ways of addressing desire to die, as well as (5) patient reactions to it. The interviews offered space for health professionals to talk about (6) content of desire to die-conversation and (7) (self-)reflection (e.g., on patients' biographies or own performance). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: As part of an open (proactive) approach, desire to die-conversations hold potential for health professionals' (self-)reflection and a deeper understanding of patient background and needs. They may lead to a strengthened health professional-patient relationship and potentially prevent suicide.

Desire to Die: How Does the Patients' Chorus Sound?

Patients receiving palliative care often express a desire to die. Forms and backgrounds of these expressions can be diverse. To contribute to a better understanding of this phenomenon, we analyzed patients' desire to die expressions reported by palliative care providers participating in 11 communication trainings on desire to die. The 102 participants were asked to reproduce related patients' statements from their everyday practice. The 165 reported statements could be assigned to the four topics: "Putting an end to life by …," "Social death," "Death images," as well as "Specific and unspecific references to life, death and dying." Across these topics, phrasing differs particularly regarding sentence type (interrogative, declarative, propositional, exclamatory), explicitness and (the way of) referencing others (e.g. attribution of power). The compilation of statements reflects a chorus of expressions, which the palliative care providers might hear throughout their professional career as well as during a patient's process(ing) of disease.

[Dealing with Desire to Die in Palliative Care]. / Umgang mit Todeswünschen in der Palliativversorgung.

Dealing with Desire to Die in Palliative Care Abstract. In the course of new legal regulations, the question of how to deal with desire to die is the focus of current professional debates. From the perspective of palliative care, a desire to die should not be thought of only as the wish for assisted suicide, but should be recognised in all its possible forms and facets. An open, respectful, and interested approach towards patient perspectives is therefore essential. Goals for dealing with desire to die are formulated within the S3 guideline "Palliative care for patients with incurable cancer". Support for the implementation of such goals is provided by trainings on the topic and a clinical guideline for the discussion of a potential desire to die. Open communication about the topic primarily helps to shift the focus from taking immediate action towards a widening of perspectives, a slowing of the process and the opening of an emotional space. Decisions regarding next steps can then be made based on a richer understanding of possible underlying concerns and expectations related to desire to die. These steps can include pain management and the treatment of depression to reduce suffering associated with a desire to die. Measures may also consist of foregoing or terminating life-prolonging measures. If patients have a serious and persistent wish for assisted suicide, the existence of such a wish should be recognized and addressed appropriately.

Communication, Coordination, and Security for People with Multiple Sclerosis (COCOS-MS): a randomised phase II clinical trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have complex needs that range from organising one's everyday life to measures of disease-specific therapy monitoring to palliative care. Patients with MS are likely to depend on multiple healthcare providers and various authorities, which are often difficult to coordinate. Thus, they will probably benefit from comprehensive cross-sectoral coordination of services provided by care and case management (CCM). Though studies have shown that case management improves quality of life (QoL), functional status and reduces service use, such benefits have not yet been investigated in severely affected patients with MS. In this explorative phase ll clinical trial, we evaluated a CCM with long-term, cross-sectoral and outreaching services and, in addition, considered the unit of care (patients and caregivers). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eighty patients with MS and their caregivers will be randomly assigned to either the control (standard care) or the intervention group (standard care plus CCM (for 12 months)). Regular data assessments will be done at baseline and then at 3-month intervals. As primary outcome, we will evaluate patients' QoL. Secondary outcomes are patients' treatment-related risk perception, palliative care needs, anxiety/depression, use of healthcare services, caregivers' burden and QoL, meeting patients' and caregivers' needs, and evaluating the CCM intervention. We will also evaluate CCM through individual interviews and focus groups. The sample size calculation is based on a standardised effect of 0.5, and one baseline and four follow-up assessments (with correlation 0.5). Linear mixed models for repeated measures will be applied to analyse changes in quantitative outcomes over time. Multiple imputation approaches are taken to assess the robustness of the results. The explorative approach (phase ll clinical trial) with embedded qualitative research will allow for the development of a final design for a confirmative phase lll trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial will be conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Ethics Commission of Cologne University's Faculty of Medicine. Trial results will be published in an open-access scientific journal and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) (DRKS00022771).

Is trained communication about desire to die harmful for patients receiving palliative care? A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Palliative patients frequently express a desire to die. Health professionals report uncertainty regarding potential risks of addressing it. AIM: We aim to evaluate effects of desire to die-conversations on palliative patients. DESIGN: Within a prospective mixed-methods cohort study, we trained health professionals in dealing with desire to die. Afterwards, they held conversations about it with patients. Effects on depressiveness, hopelessness, wish to hasten death, death anxiety, patient-health professional-relationship, and will to live were evaluated at baseline (t0), 1 (t1), and 6 weeks afterwards (t2). Results were analyzed descriptively. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: From April 2018 to March 2020, 43 health professionals asked 173 patients from all stationary and ambulatory palliative care settings (within 80 km radius) for participation. Complete assessments were obtained from n = 85 (t0), n = 64 (t1), and n = 46 (t2). RESULTS: At t1, patients scored significantly lower on depressiveness (med = 8, M = 8.1, SD = 5.4) than at t0 (med = 9.5, M = 10.5, SD = 5.8) with Z = -3.220, p = 0.001 and Cohen's d = 0.42. This was due to medium-severely depressed patients: At t1, their depressiveness scores decreased significantly (med = 9, M = 9.8; SD = 5.1) compared to t0 (med = 14, M = 15.2; SD = 3.9) with Z = -3.730, p ⩽ 0.000 and Cohen's d = 1.2, but others' did not. All other outcomes showed positive descriptive trends. CONCLUSIONS: Desire to die-conversations through trained health professionals do not harm palliative patients. Results cautiously suggest temporary improvement.

"Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care.

In order to investigate controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon in palliative care by analyzing expert opinions on the topic, we carried out a secondary qualitative data analysis of free text comments collected during a Delphi survey that was designed to develop a conversation aid for dealing with desire to die in everyday clinical practice. Between 01/2018 and 03/2018, a two-round Delphi survey was carried out with national (German) and international palliative care experts. Free text comments were reinvestigated to identify controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon. An additional in-depth analysis focused on statements expressing attitudes towards proactively addressing (potential) desires to die. Within the Delphi survey, 103 of 149 multi-professional participants (almost all of them with practical and only six with exclusively theoretical expertise in palliative care) generated 444 free text comments. Thereof, we identified three main categories related to dealing with desire to die: "outer framework", "extended care system" and "health-professional-patient-relationship". Ambivalences, taboos and uncertainties surrounding desire to die in palliative care became apparent. Experts are divided concerning the practice of proactively addressing desire to die. Even if these conversations-especially the proactive approach-are also viewed critically, we conclude that open-ended and respectful communication about desire to die between health professionals and patients can be understood as an eligible intervention in palliative care. Proactively addressing the topic is a possible way to open up such conversations.

The desire to die in palliative care: a sequential mixed methods study to develop a semi-structured clinical approach.

BACKGROUND: Although desire to die of varying intensity and permanence is frequent in patients receiving palliative care, uncertainty exists concerning appropriate therapeutic responses to it. To support health professionals in dealing with patients´ potential desire to die, a training program and a semi-structured clinical approach was developed. This study aimed for a revision of and consensus building on the clinical approach to support proactively addressing desire to die and routine exploration of death and dying distress. METHODS: Within a sequential mixed methods design, we invited 16 palliative patients to participate in semi-structured interviews and 377 (inter-)national experts to attend a two-round Delphi process. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and an agreement consensus for the Delphi was determined according to predefined criteria. RESULTS: 11 (69%) patients from different settings participated in face-to-face interviews. As key issues for conversations on desire to die they pointed out the relationship between professionals and patients, the setting and support from external experts, if required. A set of 149 (40%) experts (132/89% from Germany, 17/11% from 9 other countries) evaluated ten domains of the semi-structured clinical approach. There was immediate consensus on nine domains concerning conversation design, suggestions for (self-)reflection, and further recommended action. The one domain in which consensus was not achieved until the second round was "proactively addressing desire to die". CONCLUSIONS: We have provided the first semi-structured clinical approach to identify and address desire to die and to respond therapeutically - based on evidence, patients' views and consensus among professional experts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012988; registration date: 27.9.2017) and in the Health Services Research Database (VfD_DEDIPOM_17_003889; registration date: 14.9.2017).