Cardiac Conduction System as an OAR in Radiation Therapy: Doses to SA/AV Nodes and Their Reduction.

Purpose: Despite advancements in radiation techniques, concerns persist regarding the adverse effects of radiation therapy, particularly cardiotoxicity or radiation-induced heart disease. Recently, arrhythmogenic toxicity has come to the forefront-the impact of radiation therapy on the cardiac conduction system. Our objective was to conduct a dosimetric study and subsequently investigate the feasibility of optimizing the sinoatrial (SA) and atrioventricular (AV) nodes as organs at risk (OARs) in proton radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with N3 disease. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two non-small cell lung cancer patients with N3 disease undergoing proton radiation therapy were included. Sinoatrial and AV nodes, along with standard OARs, were delineated. Dosimetric analysis and optimization were performed using intensity-modulated proton therapy. Results: Patients surpassing a predefined SA node dose threshold underwent dose optimization. Proton radiation therapy with pencil beam scanning demonstrated a significant reduction in SA and AV node doses without compromising target volume coverage or significant shift in the dose to other monitored OARs. Conclusion: Dose reduction to the SA and AV nodes for pencil beam scanning is a relatively simple task, and the reduction can be very substantial. Larger cohort studies and diverse radiotherapeutic modalities are needed for further validation and refinement of dose constraints.

5-Years Analysis of Effectivity and Toxicity of Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and occurrence of late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy. METHODOLOGY: In the period from January 2013 to June 2018, 853 patients with prostate cancer were treated with an ultra-hypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE/five fractions). The mean PSA value was 6.7 (0.7-19.7) µg/L. There were 318 (37.3%), 314 (36.8%), and 221 (25.9%) patients at low (LR), favorable intermediate (F-IR), and unfavorable intermediate risk (U-IR), respectively. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 197 (23.1%) patients, and 7 (0.8%) patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. The whole group of patients reached median follow-up time at 62.7 months, and their mean age was 64.8 (40.0-85.7) years. The bDFS rates and late toxicity profile were evaluated. RESULTS: Median treatment time was 10 (7-38) days. Estimated 5-year bDFS rates were 96.5%, 93.7%, and 91.2% for low-, favorable intermediate-, and unfavorable intermediate-risk groups, respectively. Cumulative late toxicity (CTCAE v4.0) of G2+ was as follows: gastrointestinal (GI)-G2: 9.1%; G3: 0.5%; genitourinary (GU)-G2: 4.3%, and no G3 toxicity was observed. PSA relapse was observed in 58 (6.8%) patients: 16 local, 22 lymph node, 4 bone recurrences, and 10 combined sites of relapse were detected. Throughout the follow-up period, 40 patients (4.7%) died, though none due to prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Ultra-hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy is an effective treatment for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with long-term bDFS rates comparable to other techniques. It is promising for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and has acceptable long-term GI and favorable GU toxicity.