Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Diabetes Complications ; 38(6): 108743, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688179

RESUMO

AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the impact of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in individuals with diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or obesity. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until October 2023 identified 13 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) meeting the inclusion criteria. Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias instrument. Statistical analysis utilized standard mean differences (SMD) in Review Manager 5.4. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. This study used the protocol registered with the Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY2023110020). RESULTS: GLP-1RA treatment significantly reduced VAT (SMD -0.55, 95 % CI [-0.90, -0.19]), SAT (SMD -0.59, 95 % CI [-0.99, -0.19]), body weight (SMD -1.07, 95 % CI [-1.67, -0.47]), and body mass index (BMI) (SMD -1.10, 95 % CI [-1.74, -0.47]) compared to controls. Heterogeneity was observed for VAT (I2 = 79 %, P < 0.01), SAT (I2 = 73 %, P < 0.01), body weight (I2 = 82 %, P < 0.01), and BMI (I2 = 82 %, P < 0.01). No publication bias was detected for VAT (P = 0.57) and SAT (P = 0.18). GLP-1RA treatment improved fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial glucose (PPG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis highlights GLP-1RAs' potential to reduce fat accumulation, body weight, and BMI and improve glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus and NAFLD or obesity. These findings supported using GLP-1RAs as promising therapeutic agents to address abnormal adipose tissue distribution and metabolic dysfunction.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Agonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Obesidade , Humanos , Adiposidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Agonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Gordura Intra-Abdominal/efeitos dos fármacos , Gordura Intra-Abdominal/metabolismo , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/metabolismo , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 15: 3459-3465, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34421297

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Choroideremia is a progressive, inherited retinal dystrophy that leads to blindness. This study of choroideremia addresses health resource utilization (HRU) and costs from a US payor perspective using insurance claims data. The retrospective analysis used data between January 2013 and December 2018 from the IBM MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental, and Multi-State Medicaid Databases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients having ≥1 claim with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Edition, diagnostic code for choroideremia (363.55/H31.21) were included; a control group was matched 3:1 to the choroideremia group. Patients were followed for ≥6 months. All-cause HRU and costs were compared between cohorts using generalized linear models adjusted for Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: There were 199 and 597 patients in the choroideremia and control groups, respectively; the choroideremia group had a higher mean baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.47 vs 0.26). The choroideremia group had a significantly greater mean number of hospital admissions (0.09 vs 0.06), outpatient visits (22.33 vs 11.22), and emergency department visits (0.41 vs 0.26) per patient per year than the control group. The choroideremia cohort had higher all-cause total annualized costs than the control cohort ($15,372 vs $9285), primarily driven by outpatient visits ($8306 vs $4702). This trend was observed across age categories, particularly among patients aged 20 to 44 years (choroideremia, $14,544 vs control, $5953). CONCLUSION: The choroideremia group had higher all-cause HRU and total costs versus the control group. These findings provide economic context around HRU associated with choroideremia and help assess the potential impact of novel treatments.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA