Prophylactic amifostine prevents a pathologic vascular response in a murine model of expander-based breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although expander-based breast reconstruction is the most commonly used method of reconstruction worldwide, it continues to be plagued with complication rates as high as 60% when radiotherapy is implemented. We hypothesized that quantitative measures of radiotherapy-induced vascular injury can be mitigated by utilizing amifostine in a murine model of expander-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: 30 rats were divided into three groups: expander placement (Control), expander placement followed by radiotherapy (XRT), and expander placement followed by radiotherapy with amifostine (AMF/XRT). All groups underwent placement of a sub-latissimus tissue expander. After a 45 day recovery period, all groups underwent vascular perfusion and micro-CT analysis. RESULTS: Micro-CT analysis was used to calculate vessel volume fraction (VVF), vessel number (VN), and vessel separation (VSp). A significant increase in VN was seen in the XRT group as compared to the Control (p = 0.021) and the AMF/XRT (p = 0.027). There was no difference between Control and AMF/XRT (p = 0.862). VVF was significantly higher in XRT than either Control (p = 0.043) and AMF/XRT (p = 0.040), however no difference was seen between Control and AMF/XRT (p = 0.980). VSp of XRT was smaller when compared to both Control and AMF/XRT specimens (p = 0.05 and p = 0.048, respectively), and no difference was seen between Control and AMF/XRT (p = 0.339). CONCLUSIONS: Amifostine administered prior to radiotherapy preserved vascular metrics similar to those of non-radiated specimens. Elevated vascularity demonstrated within the XRT group was not seen in either the Control or AMF/XRT groups. These results indicate that amifostine protects soft tissue in our model from a radiotherapy-induced pathologic vascular response.

Validation of Histologic Bone Analysis Following Microfil Vessel Perfusion.

The ability to examine bone vascularity using Micro-Computed Tomography (µCT) following vessel perfusion with Microfil® and to subsequently perform histologic bone analysis in the same specimen would provide an efficient method by which the vascular and cellular environment of bone can be examined simultaneously. The purpose of this report is to determine if the administration of Microfil® precludes accurate histologic assessment of bone quality via osteocyte count and empty lacunae count. Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6) underwent perfusion with Microfil®. Left hemi-mandibles were harvested, decalcified and underwent vascular analysis via µCT prior to sectioning and staining with Gomori's Trichrome. Quantitative Histomorphometric evaluation was performed. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were used to determine statistical differences from an established set of controls (n=12). Histologic analyses were successfully performed on specimens that had undergone previous perfusion. Quantitative measures of bone cellularity of perfused versus control specimens revealed no statistical difference in osteocyte count per high-power field (95.33 versus 94.66; 95 percent CI,-7.64 to 6.30) or empty lacunae per high-power field (2.73 versus 1.89, 95 percent CI, -1.81 to 0.13). Here we report a statistical validation allowing for histological analysis of cell counts in specimens in which Microfil® perfusion has previously been performed.