Patient Education in Orthopedics: the Role of Information Design and User Experience.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This narrative review will focus on concepts and methods of Information Design and User Experience for patient education in orthopedics, with osteoarthritis as an application example. RECENT FINDINGS: Information design can make complex health information clear according to the needs of the patients. Digital health presents new opportunities to design scalable educational interventions and may be improved with User Experience Design. Human-centered design methods such as user research, co-design, and prototype testing are being applied in orthopedics to achieve patient-centered care. Current international guidelines on osteoarthritis put patient education as one of the key care strategies. Educational interventions target preoperative education and osteoarthritis self-management, but current models could be enhanced. Patient education and health literacy are fundamental to face the burden of musculoskeletal pain. The collaboration between design and health is essential to deal with the demand for education, behavioral, and social change.

Step down tests are the tasks that most differentiate the kinematics of women with patellofemoral pain compared to asymptomatic controls.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating kinematics lead to different conclusions, not all changes appear in all assessed tasks and in all subgroups of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). The inconsistencies between studies could be reduced if we knew which task separates patients best from healthy controls. RESEARCH QUESTION: Identify which functional task, between gait, forward step down (FSD), lateral step down (LSD), stair ascent and descent and propulsion and landing phase of the single leg hop test (SLHT), differentiates the three-dimensional kinematics of women with patellofemoral pain from asymptomatic women. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated thirty-five PFP and thirty-five asymptomatic women during the execution of the following tasks: gait, FSD, LSD, stair ascent and descent and the propulsion and landing phase of single leg hop test. Frontal, sagittal and transverse plane angles of the trunk, pelvis and hip, frontal and sagittal plane angles of the knee, ankle dorsiflexion, foot progression angle and hindfoot eversion were analyzed through the Movement Deviation Profile (MDP). To compare the groups, the multivariate analysis with Bonferroni post hoc test were used, with a significance level of p < 0.01. To identify which task presented the most difference between the groups, the Z-score of the mean MDP was calculated. RESULTS: For all tasks, the groups presented significant differences. According to the Z-score, the groups got farther apart considering the MDP for each task in the following order: LSD (7.97), FSD (7.62), landing phase of SLHT (3.43), gait (2.85), propulsion phase of SLHT (1.64), descending stairs (1.63) and ascending stairs (1.00). SIGNIFICANCE: We suggest that step down tests should be included in the assessment of PFP patients, since these tests most differentiate the kinematics of women with and without PFP. Identifying the tasks with the highest sensitivity to detect the kinematic differences is expected to improve clinical decision-making.

Low-Level Laser Therapy (780 nm) on VEGF Modulation at Partially Injured Achilles Tendon.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the modulatory effects of near infrared (780 nm) low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the presence of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the partially injured Achilles tendons of rats. BACKGROUND: LLLT stimulates the healing process for Achilles tendon injuries, although the extent of the modulatory effect of LLLT on the VEGF levels found in the injured tendons remains unclear. METHODS: Sixty-five male Wistar rats were distributed in the following seven groups: LASER 1, 3, and 7 (10 partially injured Achilles tendons in each group, which were treated with LLLT for 1, 3, and 7 days, respectively); Sham 1, 3, and 7 (same injury, with simulated LLLT); Control group containing the five remaining animals and in which no procedures were performed. LLLT was applied once a day for 10 sec, with a mean power of 70 mW and fluency of 17.5 J/cm(2). After euthanasia, all of the Achilles tendons were surgically removed and the VEGF levels were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The VEGF levels remained close to normal (p > 0.05) when comparing the experimental groups (LASER and Sham: 1, 3, and 7) with the Control group. CONCLUSION: LLLT did not stimulate the expression of VEGF in the treated Achilles tendons.

Low-level laser therapy in IL-1ß, COX-2, and PGE2 modulation in partially injured Achilles tendon.

This study evaluated IL-1ß, COX-2, and PGE2 modulation in partially injured Achilles tendons treated with low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Sixty-five male Wistar rats were used. Sixty were submitted to a direct injury on Achilles tendon and then distributed into six groups: LASER 1 (a single LLLT application), LASER 3 (three LLLT applications), and LASER 7 (seven LLLT applications) and Sham 1, 3, and 7 (the same injury but LLLT applications were simulated). The five remaining animals were allocated at control group (no procedure performed). LLLT (780 nm) was applied with 70 mW of mean power and 17.5 J/cm(2) of fluency for 10 s, once a day. The tendons were surgically removed and assessed immunohistochemically for IL-1ß, COX-2, and PGE2. In comparisons with control (IL-1ß: 100.5 ± 92.5 / COX-2: 180.1 ± 97.1 / PGE2: 187.8 ± 128.8) IL-1ß exhibited (mean ± SD) near-normal level (p > 0.05) at LASER 3 (142.0 ± 162.4). COX-2 and PGE2 exhibited near-normal levels (p > 0.05) at LASER 3 (COX-2: 176.9 ± 75.4 / PGE2: 297.2 ± 259.6) and LASER 7 (COX-2: 259.2 ± 190.4 / PGE2: 587.1 ± 409.7). LLLT decreased Achilles tendon's inflammatory process.