Factors associated with poor outcomes in SLE patients with COVID-19: Data from ReumaCoV-Brazil register.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate factors associated with COVID-19 severity outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data of a prospective, multi-stage cohort study-"The ReumaCoV Brazil"-designed to monitor patients with immune-mediated rheumatologic disease (IMRD) during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. SLE adult patients with COVID-19 were compared with those without COVID-19. SLE activity was evaluated by the patient global assessment (PGA) and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). RESULTS: 604 SLE patients were included, 317 (52.4%) with COVID-19 and 287 (47.6%) in the control group. SLE COVID-19 patients reported a lower frequency of social isolation and worked more frequently as health professionals. There was no difference in the mean SLEDAI-2K score between groups in the post-COVID-19 period (5.8 [8.6] vs. 4.5 [8.0]; p = 0.190). However, infected patients reported increased SLE activity according to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) during this period (2.9 [2.9] vs. 2.3 [2.6]; p = 0.031. Arterial hypertension (OR 2.48 [CI 95% 1.04-5.91], p = 0.041), cyclophosphamide (OR 14.32 [CI 95% 2.12-96.77], p = 0.006), dyspnea (OR: 7.10 [CI 95% 3.10-16.23], p < 0.001) and discontinuation of SLE treatment medication during infection (5.38 [CI 95% 1.97-15.48], p = 0.002), were independently associated with a higher chance of hospitalization related to COVID-19. Patients who received telemedicine support presented a 67% lower chance of hospitalization (OR 0.33 [CI 95% 0.12-0.88], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Hypertension and cyclophosphamide were associated with a severe outcome, and telemedicine can be a useful tool for SLE patients with COVID-19.

Development of an instrument to predict proliferative histological class in lupus nephritis based on clinical and laboratory data.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the correlations of histological class inferences based on clinical manifestations and laboratory tests between rheumatologists and nephrologists, to determine the associations of clinical and laboratory data with histological classes and to develop an instrument that can assist histological class identification in lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Retrospective study based on medical records of 80 systemic lupus erythematosus patients (SLICC criteria classification, 2012) who underwent kidney biopsy between 2010 and 2017. Two rheumatologists and two nephrologists received clinical and laboratory data and answered questions regarding which histological class was expected on kidney biopsy. Kappa (K) coefficient was used to assess agreement between evaluators. A decision tree was constructed using the chi-square interaction detector and logistic regression was performed for the development of the proliferative histological class predictor instrument. RESULTS: The mean age and disease duration were 33 ± 10.3 years and 11.5 ± 6.7 years, respectively. The level of agreement between the evaluators and kidney biopsy was poor (global K 0.364 ± 0.029; p < .001). Analyzing clinical and laboratory variables as predictors of proliferative histological class, patients with abnormal urinary sediment and positive anti-dsDNA antibodies presented 13.96 and 4.96 times higher risks of presenting class III or IV, respectively (p < 0.001). Our instrument has a sensitivity of 87.8% and specificity of 80%, using abnormal urinary sediment, anti-dsDNA antibodies, and serum creatinine as variables. CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatologists and nephrologists with experience in treating LN generated evaluations that correlated weakly with kidney biopsy. When kidney biopsy is unavailable or is contraindicated for medical reasons, instruments based on clinical and laboratory predictors may be helpful.

Serum Myostatin and Follistatin Levels in Patients With Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.

BACKGROUND: Myostatin is a protein in the TGF-ß family that negatively regulates muscle mass, and follistatin is a myostatin antagonist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure serum levels of myostatin and follistatin in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients and correlate these levels with muscle strength, fatigue, functional capacity, damage, and serum levels of muscle enzymes. METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study including 50 patients (34 dermatomyositis and 16 polymyositis [PM]) and 52 healthy individuals (control group [CG]). The disease status was evaluated according to the International Myositis Assessment & Clinical Studies. Fatigue was rated according to the Fatigue Severity Scale, and body composition was measured using dual-energy x-ray emission densitometry. Myostatin and follistatin were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: Mean age was 50.9 ± 14.0 years, and mean disease duration was 89.2 ± 80.9 months. There were no differences in levels of myostatin (14.15 ± 9.65 vs. 10.97 ± 6.77 ng/mL; p = 0.131) or follistatin (0.53 ± 0.71 vs. 0.49 ± 0.60 ng/mL; p = 0.968) between patients and the CG. However, myostatin levels were higher in PM than CG (16.9 ± 12.1 vs. 11.0 ± 6.8 ng/mL; p = 0.036). There was no difference in serum myostatin among patients with and without low lean mass. Patients not treated with corticosteroids had higher serum levels of myostatin than the CG. There was a weak negative correlation between follistatin and Manual Muscle Testing and a Subset of Eight Muscles and a weak positive correlation between follistatin and Healthy Assessment Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of myostatin and follistatin did not differ between dermatomyositis and PM patients and control subjects. The assessment of serum levels of myostatin and follistatin in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients seems not to be helpful in clinical practice.