Alefacept provides sustained clinical and immunological effects in new-onset type 1 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from destruction of pancreatic ß cells by autoreactive effector T cells. We hypothesized that the immunomodulatory drug alefacept would result in targeted quantitative and qualitative changes in effector T cells and prolonged preservation of endogenous insulin secretion by the remaining ß cells in patients with newly diagnosed T1D. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we compared alefacept (two 12-week courses of 15 mg/wk i.m., separated by a 12-week pause) with placebo in patients with recent onset of T1D. Endpoints were assessed at 24 months and included meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC, insulin use, hypoglycemic events, and immunologic responses. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were enrolled. At 24 months, or 15 months after the last dose of alefacept, both the 4-hour and the 2-hour C-peptide AUCs were significantly greater in the treatment group than in the control group (P = 0.002 and 0.015, respectively). Exogenous insulin requirements were lower (P = 0.002) and rates of major hypoglycemic events were about 50% reduced (P < 0.001) in the alefacept group compared with placebo at 24 months. There was no apparent between-group difference in glycemic control or adverse events. Alefacept treatment depleted CD4+ and CD8+ central memory T cells (Tcm) and effector memory T cells (Tem) (P < 0.01), preserved Tregs, increased the ratios of Treg to Tem and Tcm (P < 0.01), and increased the percentage of PD-1+CD4+ Tem and Tcm (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed T1D, two 12-week courses of alefacept preserved C-peptide secretion, reduced insulin use and hypoglycemic events, and induced favorable immunologic profiles at 24 months, well over 1 year after cessation of therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ NCT00965458. FUNDING: NIH and Astellas.

Targeting of memory T cells with alefacept in new-onset type 1 diabetes (T1DAL study): 12 month results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes results from autoimmune targeting of the pancreatic ß cells, likely mediated by effector memory T (Tem) cells. CD2, a T cell surface protein highly expressed on Tem cells, is targeted by the fusion protein alefacept, depleting Tem cells and central memory T (Tcm) cells. We postulated that alefacept would arrest autoimmunity and preserve residual ß cells in patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The T1DAL study is a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 1 diabetes, aged 12-35 years who, within 100 days of diagnosis, were enrolled at 14 US sites. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive alefacept (two 12-week courses of 15 mg intramuscularly per week, separated by a 12-week pause) or a placebo. Randomisation was stratified by site, and was computer-generated with permuted blocks of three patients per block. All participants and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in mean 2 h C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints at 12 months were the change from baseline in the 4 h C-peptide AUC, insulin use, major hypoglycaemic events, and HbA1c concentrations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00965458. FINDINGS: Of 73 patients assessed for eligibility, 33 were randomly assigned to receive alefacept and 16 to receive placebo. The mean 2 h C-peptide AUC at 12 months increased by 0.015 nmol/L (95% CI -0.080 to 0.110) in the alefacept group and decreased by 0.115 nmol/L (-0.278 to 0.047) in the placebo group, and the difference between groups was not significant (p=0.065). However, key secondary endpoints were met: the mean 4 h C-peptide AUC was significantly higher (mean increase of 0.015 nmol/L [95% CI -0.076 to 0.106] vs decrease of -0.156 nmol/L [-0.305 to -0.006]; p=0.019), and daily insulin use (0.48 units per kg per day for placebo vs 0.36 units per kg per day for alefacept; p=0.02) and the rate of hypoglycaemic events (mean of 10.9 events per person per year for alefacept vs 17.3 events for placebo; p<0.0001) was significantly lower at 12 months in the alefacept group than in the placebo group. Mean HbA1c concentrations at week 52 were not different between treatment groups (p=0.75). So far, no serious adverse events were reported and all patients had at least one adverse event. In the alefacept group, 29 (88%) participants had an adverse event related to study drug versus 15 (94%) participants in the placebo group. In the alefacept group, 14 (42%) participants had grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared with nine (56%) participants in the placebo group; no deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Although the primary outcome was not met, at 12 months, alefacept preserved the 4 h C-peptide AUC, lowered insulin use, and reduced hypoglycaemic events, suggesting efficacy. Safety and tolerability were similar in the alefacept and placebo groups. Alefacept could be useful to preserve ß-cell function in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes.

Mechanisms for abnormal postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes.

To assess mechanisms for postprandial hyperglycemia, we used a triple-isotope technique ([\3-(3)H]glucose and [(14)C]bicarbonate and oral [6,6-dideutero]glucose iv) and indirect calorimetry to compare components of glucose release and pathways for glucose disposal in 26 subjects with type 2 diabetes and 15 age-, weight-, and sex-matched normal volunteers after a standard meal. The results were as follows: 1) diabetic subjects had greater postprandial glucose release (P<0.001) because of both increased endogenous and meal-glucose release; 2) the greater endogenous glucose release (P<0.001) was due to increased gluconeogenesis (P<0.001) and glycogenolysis (P=0.01); 3) overall tissue glucose uptake, glycolysis, and storage were comparable in both groups (P>0.3); 4) glucose clearance (P<0.001) and oxidation (P=0.004) were reduced, whereas nonoxidative glycolysis was increased (P=0.04); and 5) net splanchnic glucose storage was reduced by approximately 45% (P=0.008) because of increased glycogen cycling (P=0.03). Thus in type 2 diabetes, postprandial hyperglycemia is primarily due to increased glucose release; hyperglycemia overcomes the effects of impaired insulin secretion and sensitivity on glucose transport, but intracellular defects persist so that pathways of glucose metabolism are abnormal and glucose is shunted away from normal sites of storage (e.g., liver and muscle) into other tissues.

Abnormal renal, hepatic, and muscle glucose metabolism following glucose ingestion in type 2 diabetes.

Recent studies indicate an important role of the kidney in postprandial glucose homeostasis in normal humans. To determine its role in the abnormal postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we used a combination of the dual-isotope technique and net balance measurements across kidney and skeletal muscle in 10 subjects with T2DM and 10 age-, weight-, and sex-matched nondiabetic volunteers after ingestion of 75 g of glucose. Over the 4.5-h postprandial period, diabetic subjects had increased mean blood glucose levels (14.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.2 mM, P < 0.001) and increased systemic glucose appearance (100.0 +/- 6.3 vs. 70.0 +/- 3.3 g, P < 0.001). The latter was mainly due to approximately 23 g greater endogenous glucose release (39.8 +/- 5.9 vs. 17.0 +/- 1.8 g, P < 0.002), since systemic appearance of the ingested glucose was increased by only approximately 7 g (60.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 53.0 +/- 2.2 g, P < 0.02). Approximately 40% of the diabetic subjects' increased endogenous glucose release was due to increased renal glucose release (19.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 10.6 +/- 2.4 g, P < 0.05). Postprandial systemic tissue glucose uptake was also increased in the diabetic subjects (82.3 +/- 4.7 vs. 69.8 +/- 3.5 g, P < 0.05), and its distribution was altered; renal glucose uptake was increased (21.0 +/- 3.5 vs. 9.8 +/- 2.3 g, P < 0.03), whereas muscle glucose uptake was normal (18.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 25.9 +/- 3.3 g, P = 0.16). We conclude that, in T2DM, 1) both liver and kidney contribute to postprandial overproduction of glucose, and 2) postprandial renal glucose uptake is increased, resulting in a shift in the relative importance of muscle and kidney for glucose disposal. The latter may provide an explanation for the renal glycogen accumulation characteristic of diabetes mellitus as well as a mechanism by which hyperglycemia may lead to diabetic nephropathy.

Mechanisms for the deterioration in glucose tolerance associated with HIV protease inhibitor regimens.

The mechanisms responsible for the deterioration in glucose tolerance associated with protease inhibitor-containing regimens in HIV infection are unclear. Insulin resistance has been implicated as a major factor, but the affected tissues have not been identified. Furthermore, beta-cell function has not been evaluated in detail. The present study was therefore undertaken to assess the effects of protease inhibitor-containing regimens on hepatic, muscle, and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity as well as pancreatic beta-cell function. We evaluated beta-cell function in addition to glucose production, glucose disposal, and free fatty acid (FFA) turnover using the hyperglycemic clamp technique in combination with isotopic measurements in 13 HIV-infected patients before and after 12 weeks of treatment and in 14 normal healthy volunteers. beta-Cell function and insulin sensitivity were also assessed by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Treatment increased fasting plasma glucose concentrations in all subjects (P < 0.001). Insulin sensitivity as assessed by HOMA and clamp experiments decreased by approximately 50% (P < 0.003). Postabsorptive glucose production was appropriately suppressed for the prevailing hyperinsulinemia, whereas glucose clearance was reduced (P < 0.001). beta-Cell function decreased by approximately 50% (P = 0.002), as assessed by HOMA, and first-phase insulin release decreased by approximately 25%, as assessed by clamp data (P = 0.002). Plasma FFA turnover and clearance both increased significantly (P < 0.001). No differences at baseline or in responses after treatment were observed between drug naïve patients who were started on a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) plus a protease inhibitor and patients who had been on long-term NRTI treatment and had a protease inhibitor added. The present study indicates that protease inhibitor-containing regimens impair glucose tolerance in HIV-infected patients by two mechanisms: 1) inducement of peripheral insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue and 2) impairment of the ability of the beta-cell to compensate.

Pathways for glucose disposal after meal ingestion in humans.

To characterize postprandial glucose disposal more completely, we used the tritiated water technique, a triple-isotope approach (intravenous [3-H(3)]glucose and [(14)C]bicarbonate and oral [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose) and indirect calorimetry to assess splanchnic and peripheral glucose disposal, direct and indirect glucose storage, oxidative and nonoxidative glycolysis, and the glucose entering plasma via gluconeogenesis after ingestion of a meal in 11 normal volunteers. During a 6-h postprandial period, a total of approximately 98 g of glucose were disposed of. This was more than the glucose contained in the meal ( approximately 78 g) due to persistent endogenous glucose release ( approximately 21 g): splanchnic tissues initially took up approximately 23 g, and an additional approximately 75 g were removed from the systemic circulation. Direct glucose storage accounted for approximately 32 g and glycolysis for approximately 66 g (oxidative approximately 43 g and nonoxidative approximately 23 g). About 11 g of glucose appeared in plasma as a result of gluconeogenesis. If these carbons were wholly from glucose undergoing glycolysis, only approximately 12 g would be available for indirect pathway glycogen formation. Our results thus indicate that glycolysis is the main initial postprandial fate of glucose, accounting for approximately 66% of overall disposal; oxidation and storage each account for approximately 45%. The majority of glycogen is formed via the direct pathway ( approximately 73%).

Role of human liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle in postprandial glucose homeostasis.

Recent studies indicate a role for the kidney in postabsorptive glucose homeostasis. The present studies were undertaken to evaluate the role of the kidney in postprandial glucose homeostasis and to compare its contribution to that of liver and skeletal muscle. Accordingly, we used the double isotope technique along with forearm and renal balance measurements to assess systemic, renal, and hepatic glucose release as well as glucose uptake by kidney, skeletal muscle, and splanchnic tissues in 10 normal volunteers after ingestion of 75 g of glucose. We found that, during the 4.5-h postprandial period, 22 +/- 2 g (30 +/- 3% of the ingested glucose) were initially extracted by splanchnic tissues. Of the remaining 53 +/- 2 g that entered the systemic circulation, 19 +/- 3 g were calculated to have been taken up by skeletal muscle and 7.5 +/- 1.7 g by the kidney (26 +/- 3 and 10 +/- 2%, respectively, of the ingested glucose). Endogenous glucose release during the postprandial period (16 +/- 2 g), calculated as the difference between overall systemic glucose appearance and the appearance of ingested glucose in the systemic circulation, was suppressed 61 +/- 3%. Surprisingly, renal glucose release increased twofold (10.6 +/- 2.5 g) and accounted for ~60% of postprandial endogenous glucose release. Hepatic glucose release (6.7 +/- 2.2 g), the difference between endogenous and renal glucose release, was suppressed 82 +/- 6%. These results demonstrate a hitherto unappreciated contribution of the kidney to postprandial glucose homeostasis and indicate that postprandial suppression of hepatic glucose release is nearly twofold greater than had been calculated in previous studies (42 +/- 4%), which had assumed that there was no renal glucose release. We postulate that increases in postprandial renal glucose release may play a role in facilitating efficient liver glycogen repletion by permitting substantial suppression of hepatic glucose release.