Heart Rhythm New Zealand consensus statement on the practical management of cardiac implanted electronic devices in the peri-operative environment.

Electrosurgery is commonly used during a range of operations in order to maintain effective haemostasis. This can cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) with cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs), which prevents normal device function. CIEDs include pacemakers (PPM), implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices-both pacemakers and defibrillators (CRT-P/CRT-D)-and implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Damage to the generator, inhibition of pacing, activation of asynchronous pacing and ventricular fibrillation can all be induced by electrocautery. An active management plan for CIEDs during electrosurgery is critical to minimise these adverse effects of EMI. Purpose: To facilitate the safe and effective peri-operative management of CIED patients during electrosurgery.

The Path of Least Resistance.

A 72-year-old patient presented S/P defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. We present an interesting teaching electrocardiogram that demonstrates alternating right and left bundle branch blocks, as well as an atrioventricular block that illustrates this patient's complex conduction system disease. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

The hidden costs of anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and ischemic stroke are collectively associated with annual hospital costs of tens of billions of dollars in the USA. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment with warfarin reduces the risk of stroke in patients with NVAF. Unfortunately, because of the complexity of warfarin therapy and potential for adverse events (AEs), many patients who might benefit go untreated or receive suboptimal therapy, increasing their stroke and/or bleeding risk. AREAS COVERED: This review explores current hospital costs and resource utilization for NVAF patients on warfarin therapy and the potential impact of newer OACs in this area. EXPERT OPINION: Many ischemic strokes could be prevented through wider use of OACs. Further, admissions due to anticoagulant-associated AEs could be reduced by optimizing OAC therapy. In the hospital, specialized anticoagulation services can decrease costs by improving the effectiveness of warfarin management, empowering patients through education and optimizing care transitions. With fewer interactions and no dose titration or monitoring required, the novel OACs (NOACs) have the potential to further decrease inpatient resource utilization and costs. It is important that, as data become available, inpatient costs are included in cost-benefit comparisons between warfarin and the NOACs.

Venous thromboembolism: annualised United States models for total, hospital-acquired and preventable costs utilising long-term attack rates.

Healthcare reform is upon the United States (US) healthcare system. Prioritisation of preventative efforts will guide necessary transitions within the US healthcare system. While annual deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) costs have recently been defined at the US national level, annual pulmonary embolism (PE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) costs have not yet been defined. A decision tree and cost model were developed to estimate US health care costs for total PE, total hospital-acquired PE, and total hospital-acquired "preventable" PE. The previously published DVT cost model was modified, updated and combined with the PE cost model to elucidate the same three categories of costs for VTE. Direct and indirect costs were also delineated. For VTE in the base model, annual cost ranges in 2011 US dollars for total, hospital- acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" costs and were $13.5-$27.2, $9.0-$18.2, and $4.5-$14.2 billion, respectively. The first sensitivity analysis, with higher incidence rates and costs, demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $32.1-$69.3, $23.7-$51.5, and $11.9-$39.3 billion, respectively. The second sensitivity analysis with long-term attack rates (LTAR) for recurrent events and post-thrombotic syndrome and chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $15.4-$34.4, $10.3-$25.4, and $5.1-$19.1 billion, respectively. PE costs comprised a majority of the VTE costs. Prioritisation of effective VTE preventative strategies will reduce significant costs, morbidity and mortality within the US healthcare system. The cost models may be utilised to estimate other countries' costs or VTE-specific disease states.

The efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in heart transplant recipients: results from a multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death among orthotopic heart transplant recipients is an important mechanism of death after cardiac transplantation. The role for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in this population is not well established. This study sought to determine whether ICDs are effective in preventing sudden cardiac death in high-risk heart transplant recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of all orthotopic heart transplant patients who had ICD implantation between January 1995 and December 2005 at 5 heart transplant centers. Thirty-six patients were considered high risk for sudden cardiac death. The mean age at orthotopic heart transplant was 44+/-14 years, the majority being male (n=29). The mean age at ICD implantation was 52+/-14 years, whereas the average time from orthotopic heart transplant to ICD implant was 8 years +/-6 years. The main indications for ICD implantation were severe allograft vasculopathy (n=12), unexplained syncope (n=9), history of cardiac arrest (n=8), and severe left ventricular dysfunction (n=7). Twenty-two shocks were delivered to 10 patients (28%), of whom 8 (80%) received 12 appropriate shocks for either rapid ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The shocks were effective in terminating the ventricular arrhythmias in all cases. Three (8%) patients received 10 inappropriate shocks. Underlying allograft vasculopathy was present in 100% (8 of 8) of patients who received appropriate ICD therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ICDs after heart transplantation may be appropriate in selected high-risk patients. Further studies are needed to establish an appropriate prevention strategy in this population.

Eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis.

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). With their widespread use, there is a growing body of literature describing adverse outcomes, including severe thrombocytopenia. Here we report a case of a 75-year-old man who presented with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction, underwent primary PCI and stenting, and subsequently developed profound thrombocytopenia and thrombosis after eptifibatide administration. This report adds to the literature regarding eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia and also raises the possibility of a new syndrome of eptifibatide-induced thrombosis. A case is made to examine available databases for thrombosis after administration of eptifibatide and other GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors.