Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and double-row (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid- to long-term clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [ P < .05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [ P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [ P < .05]). CONCLUSION: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.

Satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes can be expected in young patients under 45 years old after open wedge high tibial osteotomy in a long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcomes of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in patients younger than 45 years old. It was hypothesized that the correction of knee alignment would result in preservation of knee function in a long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients under 45 years old, who underwent MOWHTO for symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis between 2001 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed after a minimum of 10 years. The osteotomy was performed utilizing a locking plate without the use of bone graft. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the International Knee Documentation Committee Score, the Oxford Knee Score, the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the Short Form-12 Score. Standardized standing whole-limb radiographs were also obtained to assess mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA) and the grade of osteoarthritis. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (18 males, 2 females, mean age 35.4 years) with a mean follow-up of 12.3 years were included in the study. During the follow-up period, one patient required conversion to total knee replacement (95% survival rate). All clinical outcome scores (IKDC, KOOS, OKS, and SF-12) significantly improved postoperatively (p < 0.05), with no significant deterioration over time. Preoperative varus alignment with an mTFA of - 5.8 ± 2.4° was corrected to 2.5 ± 1.9° immediately after surgery (p < 0.05), and remained 2.2 ± 1.7° at the last follow-up. Furthermore, no significant radiographic progression of osteoarthritis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: MWOHTO with a locking plate is an effective joint preservation method to treat medial compartment OA in active patients less than 45 years. Clinical and radiological results are satisfactory and the survival rate is 95%, 12 years after the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV therapeutic, retrospective, cohort study.

Management of septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a standard surgical protocol.

BACKGROUND: To report the incidence of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and management of this complication using a specific treatment protocol. METHODS: All primary ACL reconstructions performed in our institution between January 2002 and January 2014 were included in this study. Time to presentation, clinical symptoms, and culture results of all infected patients were analyzed. According to our protocol, an arthroscopic debridement and irrigation of the knee joint was performed immediately after a diagnosis of infection was made. In case of recurrence, knee irrigation with hardware and graft removal and later re-implantation was performed. Patients were evaluated with the Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form, KT 1000 arthrometer and radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: Postoperative septic arthritis occurred in seven of 1242 patients (0.56%). After initial arthroscopic debridement, infection recurred in six out of seven cases (85%). Graft and hardware removal was performed in these patients. Graft re-implantation was performed in four patients at an average five months after infection. At the final follow-up (mean 6.3years) all patients had full range of motion, while in patients with graft re-implantation the mean Lysholm score was 92, and the mean IKDC score was 87. Radiographs demonstrated that three patients had normal knees and one patient had a grade one, knee arthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification. CONCLUSIONS: Management of septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction using a specific surgical protocol which includes graft removal in case of infection recurrence with later re-implantation, can provide good and excellent results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Efficacy of Local Administration of Tranexamic Acid for Blood Salvage in Patients Undergoing Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether local administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) reduced the need for a blood transfusion in elderly patients treated with an intramedullary (IM) nail for an intertrochanteric fracture. DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. SETTING: Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Two hundred patients (200 fractures) over 65 years with an intertrochanteric fracture treated by IM nail between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2014. INTERVENTION: Subfascial administration of 3 g of TXA around the fracture site at the end of the surgical procedure, versus a control group without TXA. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group differences in number of transfused packed red blood cell (PRBC) units, and hematocrit, hemoglobin, and platelet count. RESULTS: There was a 43% reduction in transfusion requirements in the TXA group (P < 0.01). Twenty-seven units of PRBC were transfused in 22/100 patients in the TXA group, whereas 48 PRBC units were transfused in 29/100 patients in control group. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of late complications and overall mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Subfascial administration of TXA around the fracture site in elderly patients undergoing IM nailing for intertrochanteric fractures is safe and cost-effective. A significant reduction in blood loss and transfused blood units, and health care cost can be achieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.