The effects of vilaprisan on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive-A randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: The primary objective was to explore whether the suppression of ovarian activity induced by a combined oral contraceptive (COC) is influenced by the simultaneous intake of the selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) vilaprisan (VPR). METHODS: In this exploratory randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, 71 healthy premenopausal women were randomized (1:1) to receive either 2 mg/d VPR or placebo for 3 months. Concomitantly, a COC (0.15 mg levonorgestrel, 0.03 mg ethinyloestradiol) was administered in a cyclic regimen. Ovarian activity (Hoogland score based on follicle size and hormone concentrations), cervical function (Insler score), bleeding pattern and endometrial thickness/histology were assessed before treatment, in treatment cycle 3 and during follow-up. RESULTS: The known COC-driven suppression of ovarian activity was mildly affected by VPR. COC+VPR group: 22, 0 and 6% of the subjects had Hoogland scores of 4 (active follicle-like structures), 5 or 6 (ovulation). COC+placebo group: 14% of the subjects had a score of 4 and none a score of 5 or 6 (Bayesian analysis for Hoogland score = 4, median difference in response rate: 7.5%; 90% credible interval [-8.5; 23.5%]). COC effects on cervical function were moderately affected (mucus more sperm permeable under COC+VPR). COC withdrawal bleeding, in contrast, was absent in 81% of the subjects receiving COC+VPR vs 0% receiving COC+placebo. CONCLUSION: The SPRM VPR interfered with the pharmacodynamic effects of the COC. Therefore, full contraceptive effectiveness cannot be assumed without final judgement by a Pearl index study. Women on SPRMs should be advised to use nonhormonal contraception methods.

Ovulation inhibition with a new vaginal ring containing trimegestone.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the lowest trimegestone (TMG) dose, administered via a vaginal ring, that effectively inhibited ovulation. STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, open-label, single-dose, parallel-group clinical trial with adaptive design. Eighty healthy female volunteers with proven ovulatory cycles were allocated to treatment with a vaginal ring during 28 days, with an average daily release rate of either 46 µg, 94 µg, 147 µg, or 184 µg TMG (20 women/group). Ultrasound measurements of follicular growth and endometrial thickness, and blood sampling for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol and progesterone determinations were performed every 3rd (±1) day from treatment day 4 (±1) until day 28 (±1), and in a follow-up phase after ring removal, until study day 39 (±1). Trimegestone concentrations were measured at each visit in the treatment phase. RESULTS: Mean age and body mass index were 28.8 years and 23.15 kg/m2. One subject in the lowest dose group (46 µg/day) ovulated, no ovulations were seen in the higher dose groups. The degree of ovarian suppression increased with the dose. Median estradiol levels were 119, 36.5, 33.2 and 27.2 pg/mL in the 46, 94, 147 and 184 µg/day groups, respectively. Ovarian activity was resumed in the follow-up phase. Plasma TMG levels gradually declined over the treatment period and showed dose proportionality. The study treatment was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The release rate of 94 µg TMG per day was the lowest effective dose for ovulation inhibition. The study results justify further development of the TMG-ring as progestogen-only contraceptive. IMPLICATIONS: The vaginal ring releasing TMG seems to be an effective new progestogen-only contraceptive preparation, having the advantage of once-a-month vaginal insertion.

Effect of the Novel Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator Vilaprisan on Ovarian Activity in Healthy Women.

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in healthy young women investigated the effect of treatment with vilaprisan (0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg/day for 12 weeks) on ovarian function by assessing the Hoogland score, which is based on the size of follicle-like structures as determined by transvaginal ultrasound and on estradiol and progesterone serum concentrations. Ovulation inhibition (ie, Hoogland score <6 in treatment weeks 1-4 and 8-12) was observed in >80% of the subjects receiving vilaprisan ≥1 mg/day. The effect was dose dependent. With a Bayesian approach, the percentage of subjects with ovulation inhibition was estimated to increase from 37% in subjects receiving 0.5 mg/day vilaprisan to 76%, 86%, and 88% in subjects receiving 1, 2, and 4 mg/day, respectively. Follicle growth was not suppressed during treatment. The majority of subjects receiving ≥1 mg/day had a Hoogland score of 4 (active follicle-like structures, ie, follicle diameter >13 mm, estradiol >27.2 pg/mL, no progesterone increase) both at beginning and end of treatment. Mean average estradiol as well as mean maximum progesterone concentrations were noticeably decreased during treatment with vilaprisan ≥1 mg/day compared to pretreatment, but estradiol concentrations remained >80 pg/mL. Both hormones returned to pretreatment levels after the end of treatment, indicating a rapid resumption of normal ovarian activity. Amenorrhea occurred in the majority of subjects during treatment at dosages ≥1 mg/day. The adverse events observed in this study confirm the known safety profile of vilaprisan. All in all, the results of this study support the development of vilaprisan for the long-term treatment of uterine fibroids.