Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Apr 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674277

RESUMO

Introduction: Symptomatic acute metastatic spinal epidural cord compression (MSCC) is an emergency that requires multimodal attention. However, there is no clear consensus on the appropriate timing for surgery. Therefore, to address this issue, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the outcomes of different surgery timings. Methods: We searched multiple databases for studies involving adult patients suffering from symptomatic MSCC who underwent decompression with or without fixation. We analyzed the data by stratifying them based on timing as emergent (≤24 h vs. >24 h) and urgent (≤48 h vs. >48 h). The analysis also considered adverse postoperative medical and surgical events. The rates of improved outcomes and adverse events were pooled through a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: We analyzed seven studies involving 538 patients and discovered that 83.0% (95% CI 59.0-98.2%) of those who underwent urgent decompression showed an improvement of ≥1 point in strength scores. Adverse events were reported in 21% (95% CI 1.8-51.4%) of cases. Patients who underwent emergent surgery had a 41.3% (95% CI 20.4-63.3%) improvement rate but a complication rate of 25.5% (95% CI 15.9-36.3%). Patients who underwent surgery after 48 h showed 36.8% (95% CI 12.2-65.4%) and 28.6% (95% CI 19.5-38.8%) complication rates, respectively. Conclusion: Our study highlights that a 48 h window may be the safest and most beneficial for patients presenting with acute MSCC and a life expectancy of over three months.


Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica , Compressão da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Compressão da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Spine Surg ; 17(5): 627-637, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37802654

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The relationship between paraspinal muscle degeneration and low back pain (LBP), disability, and structural changes has been investigated in the literature, but it is still a matter of debate. We differentiated paraspinal muscle magnetic resonance imaging by quality and quantity, focusing on fatty infiltration (FI) and paraspinal muscles cross-sectional area (CSA) from T12 to S1 in patients with and without chronic LBP. We aimed to determine whether paraspinal muscle quantity (CSA) and quality (FI) are positively associated with LBP or degenerative/spinopelvic changes in the spine. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2021, we prospectively enrolled 205 patients aged between 18 to 65 years, of whom 153 patients had chronic back pain (back pain group) and 52 patients did not have chronic back pain (no back pain group), and collected clinicodemographic, structural, and spinopelvic data. We correlated these data with paraspinal muscle FI and CSA from T12 to S1. Multivariate models were run to highlight associations between pain, disability, or degenerative and spinopelvic parameters. RESULTS: Age was not associated with increased FI but consistently with decreased CSA values. After adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index, FI was associated with an increased risk of back pain (OR, 8.80; 95% CI, 1.9-39.79; P = 0.006) and high disability scores (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.12-10.30; P = 0.030). Decreased CSA was associated with reduced disc height (P < 0.001), while FI and CSA did not associate with abnormal spinopelvic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: FI on paraspinal muscle highly correlates with back pain and disability but was not found in structural and degenerative changes in the lower back. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings from this study are clinically relevant for patient counseling and rehabilitation strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

3.
Front Pharmacol ; 14: 1258108, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235113

RESUMO

Background and purpose: Lung cancer is the leading cause of death in both men and women, constituting a major public health problem worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer accounts for 85%-90% of all lung cancers. We propose a compound that successfully fights tumor growth in vivo by targeting the enzyme GARS1. Experimental approach: We present an in-depth investigation of the mechanism through which Fraisinib [meso-(p-acetamidophenyl)-calix(4)pyrrole] affects the human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cell line. In a xenografted model of non-small-cell lung cancer, Fraisinib was found to reduce tumor mass volume without affecting the vital parameters or body weight of mice. Through a computational approach, we uncovered that glycyl-tRNA synthetase is its molecular target. Differential proteomics analysis further confirmed that pathways regulated by Fraisinib are consistent with glycyl-tRNA synthetase inhibition. Key results: Fraisinib displays a strong anti-tumoral potential coupled with limited toxicity in mice. Glycyl-tRNA synthetase has been identified and validated as a protein target of this compound. By inhibiting GARS1, Fraisinib modulates different key biological processes involved in tumoral growth, aggressiveness, and invasiveness. Conclusion and implications: The overall results indicate that Fraisinib is a powerful inhibitor of non-small-cell lung cancer growth by exerting its action on the enzyme GARS1 while displaying marginal toxicity in animal models. Together with the proven ability of this compound to cross the blood-brain barrier, we can assess that Fraisinib can kill two birds with one stone: targeting the primary tumor and its metastases "in one shot." Taken together, we suggest that inhibiting GARS1 expression and/or GARS1 enzymatic activity may be innovative molecular targets for cancer treatment.

4.
Medicines (Basel) ; 10(1)2022 Dec 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36662490

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The management of osteoporotic fractures is sometimes rather challenging for spinal surgeons, and considering the longer life expectancy induced by improved living conditions, their prevalence is expected to increase. At present, the approaches to osteoporotic fractures differ depending on their severity, location, and the patient's age. State-of-the-art treatments range from vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty to hardware-based spinal stabilization in which screw augmentation with cement is the gold standard. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a 74-year-old man with an L5 osteoporotic fracture. The patient underwent a vertebroplasty (VP) procedure, which was complicated by a symptomatic cement leakage in the right L4-L5 neuroforamen. We urgently decompressed the affected pedicle via hemilaminectomy. At that point, the column required stability. The extravasation of cement had ruled out the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws but leaving the pedicular screws alone was not considered sufficient to achieve stability. We decided to cover the screws with a polyethylene terephthalate sleeve (OGmend®) to avoid additional cement leakage and to reinforce the screw strength required by the poor bone quality. CONCLUSION: In the evolving technologies used for spinal surgery, screws sleeve implants such as OGmend® are a useful addition to the surgeon's armamentarium when an increased pull-out strength is required and other options are not available.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA