Impulse oscillometry bronchodilator response in preschool children.

BACKGROUND: In preschoolers, performing an acceptable spirometry and measuring bronchodilator response (BDR) is challenging; in this context, impulse oscillometry (IOS) represents a valid alternative. However, more studies on the standardization of BDR for IOS in young children are required. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify optimal thresholds to define a positive BDR test with IOS in preschoolers with suspected asthma. METHODS: Children aged 3-6 years with suspected asthma and their lung function investigated with both IOS and spirometry pre- and post-BDR were retrospectively analyzed. The spirometric BDR was defined as positive when the change of FEV1 was ≥12% or ≥200 mL. The oscillometric BDR was defined as positive in case of change of at least -40% in R5, +50% in X5, and -80% in AX. RESULTS: Among 72 patients, 36 (age 5.2 ± 1 years; 64% boys) were selected for the subsequent analysis according to ATS/ERS quality criteria of measurements; specifically, 19 patients did not meet IOS and 36 did not meet spirometry criteria. The spirometric BDR was found positive in seven subjects (19.4%); conversely, a positive oscillometric BDR was identified in four patients (11.1%). No patient presented a positive BDR response with both methods. In IOS, the mean decrease in R5 and AX was 19.9% ± 10% and 44% ± 22.1%, and the mean increase in X5 was 23.3% ± 17.8%, respectively. A decrease in R5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.77, p = .03) and an increase in X5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.75, p = .04) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity to detect an increase of FEV1 ≥ 12% and/or ≥200 mL. CONCLUSION: The IOS represents a valid alternative to spirometry to measure BDR in preschool children and should be the gold standard in this age group. We are considering a decrease of 26% in R5 and an increase of 26% in X5 as diagnostic threshold for BDR.

Are Questionnaires Helpful To Predict Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction (EIB) And Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO)?

OBJECTIVE: Exercise induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) is an important differential diagnosis to exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and diagnosed via continuous laryngoscopy while exercising (CLE). However, availability of CLE is limited to specialized centres. And without CLE EILO is often misdiagnosed as EIB. Therefore it is essential to carefully preselect potential EILO candidates. Aim of this study was to investigate whether two short questionnaires -Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Dyspnea Index (DI) evaluating upper airway-related dyspnea- can differentiate between EIB and EILO. METHODS: Patients with dyspnea while exercising were analysed with an exercise challenge in the cold chamber (ECC) to diagnose EIB in visit 1 (V1), as appropriate a CLE in visit 2 (V2, 4-6 weeks after V1) and ACT and DI in V1 and V2. EIB patients were treated with asthma medication after V1. RESULTS: Complete dataset of 36 subjects were gathered. The ACT showed lower values in V2 in EILO compared to EIB patients. A lack of improvement in ACT in V2 after asthma medication of EIB patients is suspicious for additional EILO diagnosis. The DI showed higher values in V1 in EILO compared to EIB patients. A score≥30 can predict a positive CLE reaction. CONCLUSION: ACT and DI are valuable tools in preselecting CLE candidates to assure timely diagnostic despite limited diagnostic capabilities.

Proinflammatory pattern in the lower airways of non-asthmatic obese adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is known to be a pro-inflammatory condition affecting multiple organs. Obesity as a systemic pro-inflammatory state, might be associated with bronchial inflammation in non-smoking adolescents with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 without evidence of concomitant chronic diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied non-asthmatic obese patients (n = 20; median age 15.8 years; BMI 35.0 kg/m2) compared to age matched healthy control subjects (n = 20; median age 17.5 years; BMI 21.5 kg/m2). Induced sputum differential cell counts and sputum mRNA levels were assessed for all study subjects. Serum levels of CRP, IL-6, and IL-8 were measured. Further, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IP-10 protein levels were analyzed in induced sputum was. RESULTS: Serum CRP levels, sputum inflammatory cell load and sputum eosinophils differed significantly between obese and non-obese subjects, for sputum neutrophils, a correlation was shown with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Differences were also observed for sputum mRNA expression of IL6, IL8, IL13, IL17, IL23, and IFN-γ, as well as the transcription factors T-bet, GATA3, and FoxP3. CONCLUSIONS: Increased bronchial inflammation, triggered by systemic or local inflammatory effects of obesity itself, may account for the higher rates of airway disease in obese adolescents.

Methacholine and FeNO Measurement in Patients with Habit Cough.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is one of the most common symptoms in childhood. Making a definite diagnosis is a challenge for all pediatricians especially in patients when cough is without an organic cause like in habit cough. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, all electronic outpatient charts of the Division of Allergology and Pneumology, between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 were reviewed in order to study all children with potential habit cough. All children underwent the following diagnostic algorithms, skin prick test (SPT), measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), spirometry and methacholine challenge test (MCT). The value of a normal MCT and FeNO measurement for diagnosing habit cough was investigated. RESULTS: The chart review revealed 482 patients with chronic cough>4 weeks. Of these, 99 (20.5%) with suspected habit cough were collected. 13 patients had to be excluded for other diagnosis and a complete data set was available in 55 patients. 33 (60.0%) of 55 patients were SPT negative and 22 (40.0%) had sensitization to common allergens. Five patients had elevated FeNO≥20 ppb and three showed severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness<0.1 mg methacholine, challenging the diagnosis of habit cough. CONCLUSION: A normal FeNO and MCT can help confirm the clinical diagnosis of habit cough. However, in patients with positive MCT and/or elevated FeNO habit cough can be present. Especially in patients with elevated FeNO and severe BHR cough variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis have to be ruled out.

Antibiotic Use in Paediatric Patients Hospitalized with Acute Severe Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use during asthma exacerbations in paediatric patients is not routinely recommended but common practise in out-patient and in-patient settings. Objective of this study was to analyse frequency of antibiotic use during acute severe asthma exacerbations, antibiotic classes utilized and clinical decision-making. METHODS: All in-patient admissions over 10 years in a single German Children's University hospital due to acute severe asthma were included in this retrospective analysis. Age, length of stay, oxygen supplementation, treatment, laboratory parameters and chest x-rays of all patients ranging from 1 to 17 years were analysed. RESULTS: 580 hospital admissions were included in this study. Overall antibiotic use was high but decreased with age (1-5 years 69,6%, 6-11 years 57,6% and 12-17 years 39,7%, p<0.001). Analysis of antibiotic treatment without clear indication showed a consistently lower treatment rate of 28.3%, with macrolides being the most common antibiotic class. Younger age significantly decreased, whereas, increase of CrP value, use of oxygen supplementation and concomitant fever all significantly increased the odds ratio (OR 0.967; 4.366, 2.472 and 2.011 respectively) of receiving antibiotic treatment without clear indication. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic treatment without clear indication during acute severe asthma is common in this German single-centre cohort. Clinical parameters of more severe disease affect clinician's decision to administer antibiotics despite evidence of bacterial infection or improved outcome.

Evaluating Children and Adolescents with Suspected Exercise Induced Asthma: Real Life Data.

OBJECTIVE: Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) occurs frequently in children and adolescents and may be a sign of insufficient asthma control. EIB is often evaluated by respiratory symptoms, spirometry, eNO measurement and methacholine testing (MCT) instead of time consuming exercise test. Aim of this study was to analyse the amount of patients for which an exercise challenge in a cold chamber (ECC) was needed for a clear EIB diagnosis, to characterize EIB phenotypes and the incidence of exercise induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) in a large cohort of patients with EIB. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 595 children and adolescents (mean age 12.1 years) with suspected EIB from January 2014 to December 2018. Complete data sets of skin prick test, spirometry, eNO and MCT were available from 336 patients. RESULTS: An ECC to confirm the EIB diagnosis was performed in 125 (37.2%) of patients. Three EIB phenotypes were detected: group 1: EIB without allergic sensitization (n=159); group 2: EIB with other than house dust mite (HDM) sensitization (n=87) and group 3: EIB with HDM sensitization (n=90). MCT and eNO showed significant differences between the subgroups: An eNO>46 ppb and/or a MCT<0.1 mg was found in 23.9% vs. 50.6% vs. 57.8% in group 1-3, respectively. Significantly more patients suffered from EILO in group 1 compared to group 2 and 3 (n=13 vs. n=1). CONCLUSION: EIB without sensitization is as often as EIB with sensitization. In patients without sensitization, EILO has to be considered as a possible cause of symptoms during exercise.

Predictors and reproducibility of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in cold air.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is an important part of life, and hence exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) can reduce the quality of life. A standardized test is needed to diagnose EIB. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines recommend an exercise challenge in combination with dry air. We investigated the feasibility of a new, ATS guidelines conform exercise challenge in a cold chamber (ECC) to detect EIB. The aim of this study was to investigate the surrogate marker reaction to methacholine, ECC and exercise challenge in ambient temperature for the prediction of a positive reaction and to re-evaluate the reproducibility of the response to an ECC. METHODS: Seventy-eight subjects aged 6 to 40 years with suspected EIB were recruited for the study. The subjects performed one methacholine challenge, two ECCs, and one exercise challenge at an ambient temperature. To define the sensitivity and specificity of the predictor, a receiver-operating characteristic curve was plotted. The repeatability was evaluated using the method described by Bland and Altman (95% Limits of agreement). RESULTS: The following cut-off values showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity: the provocation dose causing a 20% decrease in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PD20FEV1) of methacholine: 1.36 mg (AUC 0.69, p < 0.05), the maximal decrease in FEV1 during the ECC: 8.5% (AUC 0.78, p < 0.001) and exercise challenges at ambient temperatures: FEV1 5.2% (AUC 0.64, p = 0.13). The median decline in FEV1 was 14.5% (0.0-64.2) during the first ECC and 10.7% (0.0-52.5) during the second ECC. In the comparison of both ECCs, the Spearman rank correlation of the FEV1 decrease was r = 0.58 (p < 0.001). The 95% limits of agreement (95% LOAs) for the FEV1 decrease were - 17.7 to 26.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The surrogate markers PD20FEV1 of methacholine and maximal decrease in FEV1 during ECC can predict a positive reaction in another ECC, whereas the maximal FEV1 decrease in an exercise challenge at an ambient temperature was not predictive. Compared with previous studies, we can achieve a similar reproducibility with an ECC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02026492 (retrospectively registered 03/Jan/2014).

Correlation of spirometry and body plethysmography during exercise-induced bronchial obstruction.

BACKGROUND: The exercise challenge is the gold standard for diagnosing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Airway obstructions appear up to 30 min after the challenge, with a maximum decrease in spirometry and a maximum increase in airway resistance. There is evidence that changes in body plethysmography parameters are more sensitive to the exercise challenge and precede those in spirometry. PURPOSE: To compare changes in body plethysmography and spirometry parameters after exercise challenges and to verify the cut-off values of sReff in EIB. PROCEDURES: In 82 subjects with suspected EIB, a total of 473 lung function tests were measured at baseline and at 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after exercise challenges at different stages of bronchial obstruction. FINDINGS: The maximum changes in the body plethysmography parameter sReff significantly preceded the maximum changes in the spirometry parameter FEV1 (sReff: 12.2 min ±8.8, FEV1: 15.2 min ±9.3, p < 0.005). The parameters of sReff and FEV1 had a strong negative correlation (r = -0.63, p < 0.0001) with a nonlinear, polynomial relationship. Furthermore, sReff and Reff had a strong linear correlation (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), and Reff and Rtot had a perfect linear correlation (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). Based on baseline values and on quantile regression, an increase of 0.25 kPa s in sReff was defined as significant. Using this cut-off value, FEV1 and sReff almost equally detected EIB. CONCLUSION: The changes in sReff were more sensitive and better indicated lung impairment than did the changes in FEV1, which underestimated the degree of hyperinflation.

Exhaled NO as a predictor of exercise-induced asthma in cold air.

PURPOSE: Physical activity is an important part of life, and exercise-induced asthma (EIA) can reduce the quality of life. A standardized exercise challenge is needed to diagnose EIA, but this is a time consuming, effortful and expensive method. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) as a marker of eosinophil inflammation is determined rapidly and easily. The aim of this study was to investigate eNO as surrogate marker for predicting a positive reaction in an exercise challenge in a cold chamber (ECC). METHODS: A total of 143 subjects aged 6-45 years with suspected EIA were recruited for the study. The subjects underwent an eNO measurement, an ECC and a skin prick test (SPT). To define the sensitivity and specificity of eNO as predictor, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted. The individual probability of the occurrence of a positive reaction after ECC based on an eNO value was calculated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: An eNO cut-off value of 18.5 ppb (area under the curve (AUC) 0.71, p < 0.001) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for a positive reaction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) decrease ≥ 10% after ECC) for the whole group. An eNO cut-off value of 46.0 ppb had a specificity of 100.0% to predict a significant FEV1 decrease and may save exercise testing in 22.4% of patients. A negative predictive level with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) could not be defined. In the subgroup that was house dust might (HDM) allergy positive (HDM pos; n = 68, 45.5% of all subjects), an eNO cut-off value of 35.5 ppb (AUC 0.79, p < 0.01) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for a positive reaction after the ECC with a specificity 100.0% and may save exercise testing in 45.6% of HDM pos patients. Using logistic regression, a 95% probability for a positive FEV1 decrease after ECC was estimated at 53 ppb for the whole group and at 47 ppb for the HDM pos subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Exhaled NO measurement is a screening tool for EIA, especially in HDM pos subjects. In a real-life setting, a cut-off value of 46.0 ppb detects EIA at 100% in all suspected patients, and a cut-off level of 35.5 ppb is valuable marker of EIA in patients with an HDM allergy. These levels can save time and costs in a large proportion of patients and will be helpful for clinicians.

Methacholine challenge in young children as evaluated by spirometry and impulse oscillometry.

BACKGROUND: In young children, it is difficult to obtain a reproducible flow-volume curve throughout all stages of bronchial challenge. The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is especially established in paediatrics because this method does not require forced or maximal manoeuvres and is less cooperation-dependent than conventional spirometry. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of spirometric and impulse oscillometric (IOS) indices in a short protocol for methacholine provocation. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the methacholine dose that caused a 20% decrease in FEV(1) (PD(-20)FEV(1)) compared to baseline. Changes in respiratory resistance (Rrs5) and reactance (Xrs5) acquired by IOS were compared with FEV(1). RESULTS: Forty-eight children (5.3 ± 0.9 years) were challenged. The mean maximal reduction in FEV(1) was 29.8% ± 14.7 (p < 0.0001), the mean increase in Rsr5 was 55.3% ± 31.7, and the mean decrease in Xrs5 was 0.37 kPa s L(-1) ± 0.23 (p < 0.001). An increase in Rrs5 of 45.2% and a decrease in Xrs5 of 0.69 kPa s L(-1) showed the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity to detect a 20% reduction in FEV(1) (0.72 and 0.73; 0.80 and 0.76, respectively), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.76 and 0.81, respectively (p < 0.005). In 28 patients with significant changes in FEV(1) and Rsr5, the PD(-20)FEV(1) was 0.48 mg methacholine ±0.59 and the PD(+40)Rrs5 was 0.28 mg methacholine ±0.45 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: A short protocol for methacholine challenge testing is feasible in young children. IOS detected 70-80% of patients who responded in spirometry. During the challenge, the Rrs5 response preceded the FEV(1) response.

Bronchial allergen challenge using the Medicaid dosimeter.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial allergen provocations are well established in asthma research. We evaluated the reproducibility of single-concentration, single-step allergen challenges in volunteers with grass pollen allergy. METHODS: Forty-seven subjects underwent bronchial challenges using the aerosol provocation system nebulizer (Medicaid Sidestream) with incremental doses of grass pollen to define the individual allergen dose that causes a 20% drop in FEV(1) (PD(20)FEV(1)). In 39 subjects this procedure was followed by single-step challenges. Early and late asthmatic responses were monitored, and increases in exhaled nitric oxide were measured before and 24 h after single-step challenges. RESULTS: After the first single-step challenge, the maximum drop in FEV(1) was 21.3% ± 8.0. A comparison of the drop in FEV(1) to the initial incremental challenge (29.7% ± 7.5) revealed an intraclass correlation of -0.30 (p < 0.05). In the second single-step challenge, the mean drop in FEV(1) was 20.9% ± 7.2. Compared with the first single-step challenge, the intraclass correlation was 0.37 (p < 0.05) and the 95% limits of agreement according to Bland and Altman were -17.5 to 18.1%. The increases in exhaled nitric oxide revealed substantial agreement in repeated single-step challenges (26.8 ppb ± 27.8 and 21.8 ppb ± 21.9, ICC 0.62, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of aerosol provocation system to calculate the PD(20)FEV(1) allergen is a timesaving procedure and is less prone to errors because only one dilution of the allergen is used. The repeatability in well-defined subjects is excellent to study the mechanisms of allergen-induced airway inflammation and the development of new treatments for allergic diseases.

Methacholine challenge--comparison of an ATS protocol to a new rapid single concentration technique.

Bronchial methacholine challenge is well established in asthma diagnostics and research. ATS guidelines propose a five step standard dosimeter (SDM) protocol with incremental concentrations of methacholine to calculate the concentration causing a 20% drop in FEV(1) in an individual (PC(20)FEV(1)). In contrast, the aerosol provocation system (APS) by Viasys automatically determines the administered dose of methacholine by measuring the effective nebulisation time and referring it to drug concentration and nebuliser power. Therefore, it offers a feasible and less time-consuming provocation procedure by applying incremental doses (PD(20)) of methacholine using a single concentration (16mg/mL methacholine, APS-SC). In this study we compared these two methods in 52 young adults (25+/-5.8 years). Following a screening visit, subjects were randomly assigned to undergo either SDM or APS-SC followed by the other method within 1 week. A close correlation between concentration and dosage causing a 20% fall of FEV(1) was found (r=0.69, p<0.001). Using the ATS categorisation of bronchial responsiveness we interpreted the results of the APS-SC method as follows: PD(20) methacholine<0.3mg as "moderate to severe BHR", 0.3 - 0.6mg as "mild BHR", 0.6 - 1.0mg as "borderline BHR", and>1.0mg as "normal bronchial response". We conclude that the five-step APS-SC is a suitable method, providing reliable results. In clinical practice the APS-SC is a timesaving procedure and less prone to errors since only one dilution of methacholine is necessary compared to the SDM.