Design of a community-based, Hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation asthma intervention study: The Rhode Island Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) program.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric asthma is among the most common health conditions and disproportionately impacts Black and Latino children. Gaps in asthma care exist and may contribute to racial and ethnic inequities. The Rhode Island Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) program was developed to address current limitations in care. The aims of the RI-AIR Hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation trial were to: a) simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of RI-AIR on individual-level and community-level outcomes; b) evaluate implementation strategies used to increase uptake of RI-AIR. In this manuscript, we outline the design and methods used to implement RI-AIR. METHODS: School-based areas (polygons) with the highest asthma-related urgent healthcare utilization in Greater Providence, R.I., were identified using geospatial mapping. Families with eligible children (2-12 years) living in one of the polygons received evidence-based school- and/or home-based asthma management interventions, based on asthma control level. School-based interventions included child and caregiver education programs and school staff trainings. Home-based interventions included individualized asthma education, home-environmental assessments, and strategies and supplies for trigger remediation. Implementation strategies included engaging school nurse teachers as champions, tailoring interventions to school preferences, and engaging families for input. RESULTS: A total of 6420 children were screened throughout the study period, 811 were identified as eligible, and 433 children were enrolled between November 2018 and December 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Effective implementation of pediatric asthma interventions is essential to decrease health inequities and improve asthma management. The RI-AIR study serves as an example of a multi-level intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in pediatric chronic disease. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03583814.

Interdisciplinary Protocol for Surgery in Older Persons: Development and Implementation.

As the population ages, more older adults will undergo surgical procedures, and common physiologic changes can raise the risk for surgical complications while increasing morbidity and mortality. In conjunction with the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we piloted a comprehensive and interdisciplinary assessment and intervention protocol for perioperative care for patients aged ≥75 years undergoing elective general, gynecology-oncologic, and orthopedic surgery. The intervention included screening tools for cognitive, functional, and nutritional deficits, a Geriatric Nurse Champion on each inpatient surgical unit, and an interdisciplinary Geriatric Surgery Quality Committee. Our intervention group was compared to surgical patients during the same time period 1 year prior to the intervention, and the groups were well matched in demographics and comorbidities. The intervention group had significantly higher rates of advance care plan documentation in analysis of all patients (P < .001) and in subgroup analysis of those 85 and older (P = .006). The preintervention group had less postoperative delirium compared to the postintervention group but it was not significant and there was no difference in length of stay between groups. Various explanations for the minimal impact of the protocol exist: small sample size, presence of other hospital initiatives to reduce pressure ulcer and delirium, and clinician's awareness of project planning that led to incorporating ideas prior to official implementation. Future research implementing this protocol in naïve and/or underperforming institutions may demonstrate a greater effect. Larger sample size as well as implementation in other surgical fields may reveal a significant impact. However, if additional study does not reveal a meaningful impact of a comprehensive geriatric assessment for surgical patients, then consideration must be made regarding unrecognized factors in surgical care for older adults or perhaps that factors cannot be mitigated in older adults because they are intrinsically a higher surgical risk.