The relationship between patient-specific factors and functional progression of COVID-19 survivors admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of hospitalization for severe acute COVID-19 infection faced significant functional impairments necessitating discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for intensive rehabilitation prior to discharge home. There remains a lack of large cohort studies of the functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs with COVID-19-related impairments and the relationship to patient-specific factors. OBJECTIVE: To characterize functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs for COVID-19-related debility and to investigate associations between functional outcomes and patient-specific factors. DESIGN: Multisite retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multiple IRFs in a large urban city. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients admitted to IRFs for rehabilitation after hospitalization for acute COVID-19 infection. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included change in GG Self-Care and Mobility Activities subscales and Functional Independence Measure scores from admission to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Linear regression analysis was used to relate functional changes to demographic, medical, and hospitalization-specific factors. Secondary outcomes included discharge destination from the IRF. RESULTS: The analysis included n = 362 patients admitted to IRFs for COVID-19-related rehabilitation needs. This cohort showed significant improvements in mobility, self-care, and cognition congregate scores (216.0%, 174.3%, 117.6% respectively). Patient-specific factors associated with functional improvement, included age, body mass index, premorbid employment status, history of diabetes and cardiac disease and medications received in acute care, and muscle strength upon admission to IRF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation for COVID-19-related functional deficits made significant functional improvements in mobility, self-care, and cognition. Many significant associations were found between patient-specific factors and functional improvement, which support further investigation of these factors as possible predictors of functional improvement in an IRF for COVID-19-related deficits.

Social determinants of health and COVID-19 recovery after inpatient rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection can have long-term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long-term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment. OBJECTIVE: To determine SDOH factors related to long-term independence and QoL of COVID-19 patients after IRF stay. DESIGN: Multisite cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Two urban IRFs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post-IRF stay for severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF-36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥$70,000, p = .004), and living in the city (p = .046). Similarly, patients who were of the male gender (p = .004) and had higher income (≥$70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow-up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow-up care reported lower SF-36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long-term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID-19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.

The Relationship Between Patient-Specific Factors and Discharge Destination After COVID-19 Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the discharge destinations and associated patient-specific factors among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at a single-site tertiary acute care hospital. RESULTS: Among 2872 patients, discharge destination included home without services ( n = 2044, 71.2%), home with services ( n = 379, 13.2%), skilled nursing facility (117, 4.1%), long-term acute care hospital ( n = 39, 1.3%), inpatient rehabilitation facility ( n = 97, 3.4%), acute care facility ( n = 23, 0.8%), hospice services ( n = 20, 0.7%), or deceased during hospitalization ( n = 153, 5.3%). Adjusting by covariates, patients had higher odds of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (skilled nursing facility, long-term acute care hospital, or inpatient rehabilitation facility) than home (with or without services) when they were older (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-3.11; P < 0.001), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (3-6: OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.34-4.15; P = 0.003; ≥7: OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.56-4.86; P < 0.001), were intubated or required critical care (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.48-3.13; P < 0.001), or had a longer hospitalization (3-7 days: OR, 12.48; 95% CI, 3.77-41.32; P < 0.001; 7-14 days: OR, 28.14; 95% CI, 8.57-92.43; P < 0.001). Patients were less likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility if they received remdesivir (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization should be considered by physicians when prognosticating patient rehabilitation.

Efficacy of Etanercept in the Treatment of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

It has been suggested that the use of etanercept for treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) might provide improved mortality benefit and decreased skin healing times. This retrospective study compared the use of single-dose subcutaneous etanercept to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and supportive care alone. Thirteen patients were treated with a single dose (50 mg) of subcutaneous etanercept. Results of this study support the use of etanercept as a potentially beneficial agent in the treatment of SJS/TEN.

Ulcerative cellulitis of the arm: a case of primary cutaneous cryptococcosis.

Cutaneous cryptococcosis is usually secondary to the hematogenous dissemination of pulmonary or meningeal Cryptococcus neoformans. Primary cutaneous cryptococcosis (PCC) is a rare form of the infection, typically caused by direct inoculation from trauma to the skin [1]. Most cases of PCC present as a localized cellulitis, abscess, nodule, or ulceration. Herein, we present a case of a rapidly spreading cellulitis characterized by bullae and ulceration, caused by direct inoculation from a fall.

Skin lesions serve as clues to relapse of pediatric blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm.

A 10-year-old girl with a history of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm, a rare malignancy in children, presented with recurrent skin eruptions beginning while on maintenance chemotherapy, including mildly pruritic skin-colored plaques, tender indurated nodules, and violaceous bound-down plaques. This case highlights an unusual presentation of relapsed blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm on chemotherapy, with skin lesions providing important clues to the progression of systemic disease.

Pediatric vaccine-strain herpes zoster: a case series.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Herpes zoster (HZ) is caused by reactivation of the varicella zoster virus (VZV), and typically causes a painful, vesicular, dermatomal rash in adults over the age of fifty. However, HZ has been known to present in immunocompetent pediatric patients, which account for under 1% of total cases. Pediatric cases are typically caused by natural infection with VZV, but among vaccinated children up to half of cases can be due to vaccine-strain VZV. We present two such cases of vaccine-strain HZ in pediatric patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of two cases seen at UCLA-affiliated sites. PCR and Sanger sequencing, using previously described PCR primers, determined the presence of two vaccine-strain-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms. RESULTS: We report two cases of vaccine-strain HZ in immunocompetent pediatric patients who had previously received the varicella vaccine, affecting the right thigh in the first patient and the left leg in the second. Varicella-strain VZV positivity was confirmed by PCR. Both patients had received the varicella vaccine at 12 months of age. Both patients achieved complete resolution of symptoms after 7-day courses of acyclovir. CONCLUSIONS: While vaccination against VZV has overall reduced the incidence of both varicella and HZ in US children, given the widespread use of the VZV vaccine, awareness of the possibility of vaccine-induced HZ remains an important consideration.

Quantitative analysis of the efficacy of gradient table correction on improving the accuracy of fiber tractography.

PURPOSE: Several groups suggested that the gradient table of a DTI data set should be reoriented to compensate for head motion. Although the effects of this correction were demonstrated qualitatively, its efficacy was not demonstrated quantitatively to date. The main goal of this study was to investigate the efficacy of gradient table correction on improving the accuracy of fiber tractography. METHODS: First, the effects of gradient table correction on the estimation of fractional anisotropy (FA) maps and the primary diffusion direction were quantified and compared with the inherent uncertainty in the estimation process. Then, the effects of gradient table correction on tractography were quantified. RESULTS: The corrections in FA values were only a fraction of the typical values seen in major fasciculi and inter-subject variance. The corrections to the primary diffusion direction were also much smaller than the uncertainty inherent in the estimation of its direction. However, the directional estimates were biased due to head motion and deviated fiber tracking. CONCLUSIONS: Corrections to FA values were negligible and are not expected to affect group comparisons. However, a small but consistent bias was introduced to the estimates of primary diffusion direction, which might affect brain connectivity analyses based on fiber tracking.