Facial profile changes with various orthodontic premolar extraction sequences during growth.

The Visual Treatment Objective (VTO) is an extremely valuable tool in the process of working out the treatment plan for the individual. This is especially true for the inexperienced operator. Often it becomes clear that extractions are indicated, but there remains uncertainty as to which teeth should be chosen for extractions to give the best results. As it is necessary to express the expected change in profile due to growth of the nose and also of the chin, VTO construction is helpful in determining the extraction decision. Clinical experience and research projects have indicated that the use of mean values has definite limitations when constructing a VTO for an individual. The primary objective of this investigation was to provide formulae by means of which anteroposterior changes in the facial profile of growing individuals for whom four premolar extraction treatment is proposed can be predicted with a greater measure of certainty. The records of 248 growing Caucasian orthodontic patients (120 males and 128 females) were selected and divided into Group 44 (four first premolar extractions), Group 45 (upper first premolar and lower second premolar extractions) and Group 55 (four second premolar extractions). Formulae are presented for the prediction of the amount of incisor retraction, anteroposterior nose growth and for chin growth. The formulae were derived by regression of incisor retraction, anteroposterior nose growth and chin growth on various predictors, and could be used in the construction of VTO's for selected cases.

Assessment of the frequency of the 22q11 deletion in Afrikaner schizophrenic patients.

A hemizygous deletion of the q11 band on chromosome 22 occurs in 1 of every 5,950 live births (0.017%). The deletion is mediated by low copy repeats (LCRs) flanking this locus. Presence of the deletion is associated with variable phenotypic expression, which can include distinctive facial dysmorphologies, congenital heart disease and learning disabilities. An unusually high percentage of individuals with this deletion (25-30%) have been described to develop schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. In previous studies, the prevalence of the 22q11 deletion in patients with schizophrenia was found to be approximately 2% in Caucasian adults and 6% in childhood-onset cases. Both these frequencies represent a dramatic increase from the prevalence of the deletion in the general population. In this study, we investigate the occurrence of the 22q11 deletion in an independent sample of schizophrenic patients of Afrikaner origin. We first ascertained a sample of 85 patients who meet full diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia for presence of two or more of the clinical features associated with presence of the 22q11 deletion. A group of six patients (7%) met these criteria. This group was subjected to fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and presence of the 22q11 deletion was confirmed for two subjects. Our study therefore confirms the previously reported rate of 2% frequency of the 22q11 deletion in adult schizophrenic patients and provides a two-stage screening protocol to identify these patients.

Prediction of horizontal growth of the nose.

The primary objective of this investigation was to provide a means of predicting the horizontal growth of the nose in growing individuals. Mathematical formulae were statistically derived and incorporated into a software program.

Differential premolar extractions.

The primary object of this research project was to establish the amount of incisor retraction to be expected during full fixed mechanotherapy and to generate regression models that could provide more accurate prediction of each of the three most popular combinations of symmetrical premolar extractions, where extraoral anchorage would not be used. Pretreatment and posttreatment records of 73 cases that had their four first premolars extracted (group 44), 74 cases with four second premolar extractions (group 55), and 59 cases with upper first and lower second premolar extractions (group 45) were selected. All these cases were treated by one orthodontist, who used the same edgewise technique throughout. The results indicate that, on average, maxillary retraction in relation to the facial plane (N Po) differed only slightly between group 55 (mean 4.2 +/- 2.4 mm) and group 44 (mean 4.7 +/- 2.3 mm), with relatively more retraction for group 45 (mean 6.6 +/- 2.5 mm; p < 0.05). In contrast, the mandibular incisors were retracted slightly more in group 44 than in the other two groups (p < 0.05). The regression models that were developed could be useful as an additional tool to assist the practitioner in the selection of which teeth to extract for a particular case.

Anterior arch circumference adjustment--how much?

A table is presented by means of which changes in arch length and arch circumference can be more accurately predicted, thereby simplifying treatment planning for cases with special problems, e.g. a Bolton discrepancy. A fundamental condition for the use of this table is that the anterior arch from canine to canine forms a parabolic curve.