Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined With Lenvatinib With or Without PD-1 Inhibitors as Initial Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical benefit and safety of the triple combination of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with the dual combination of SBRT and lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with uHCC who received SBRT in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors or SBRT in combination with lenvatinib alone as first-line treatment from October 2018 to July 2022 were reviewed in this study. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were intrahepatic PFS, extrahepatic PFS, and objective remission rate. In addition, safety profiles were assessed by analyzing treatment-related adverse events between the two groups to assess safety profiles. RESULTS: In total, 214 patients with uHCC who received combination therapy were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 146 patients received triple combination therapy of SBRT, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors (SBRT-L-P group), and 68 patients received dual therapy of SBRT and lenvatinib (SBRT-L group). The median OS times of the 2 groups were 31.2 months and 17.4 months, respectively (P < .001). The median PFS time was significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than in the SBRT-L group (15.6 months vs 8.8 months, P < .001). Additionally, the median intrahepatic PFS (17.5 vs 9.9 months, P < .001) and extrahepatic PFS (20.9 vs 11.6 months, P < .001) were significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than in the SBRT-L group. The objective remission rate in the SBRT-L-P group was higher than in the SBRT-L group (63.0 vs 39.7%, P = .002). The incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events in the SBRT-L-P group were comparable to those in the SBRT-L group. CONCLUSION: The use of both lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors with SBRT in patients with uHCC was associated with improved overall survival compared with lenvatinib and SBRT alone with a manageable safety profile.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, single-arm, multi-center study.

Centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is difficult to be radically resected due to its special location close to major hepatic vessels. Thus, we aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be an effective and safe approach for centrally located HCC. This retrospective study included 172 patients with centrally located HCC who were treated with SBRT. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed as the primary endpoint. Rates of progression-free survival (PFS), local control, intrahepatic relapse, extrahepatic metastasis and toxicities were analyzed as secondary endpoints. The OS rates of 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 97.7%, 86.7%, and 76.3%, respectively. The PFS/local control rates of 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 94.1%/98.2%, 76.8%/94.9%, and 59.3%/92.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of intrahepatic relapse/extrahepatic metastases of 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 3.7%/2.9%, 25.0%/7.4%, and 33.3%/9.8%, respectively. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that patients received BED10 at 100 Gy or more had better OS. Radiation-related adverse events were mild to moderate according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and no toxicities over grade 3 were observed. Patients with centrally located HCC in our cohort who received SBRT had similar OS and PFS rates compared to those reported in literatures who received surgery with neoadjuvant or adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy. These results indicate that SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated method for patients with centrally located HCC, suggesting that it may serve as a reasonable alternative treatment for these kind of patients.

Efficacy and safety of subsequent radiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background: The development of immunotherapy resistance is associated with a poor prognosis in patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subsequent radiotherapy (RT) for patients with advanced-stage HCC who had lesion enlargement or new lesions (NLs) during ICI therapy. Methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled 36 patients with advanced-stage HCC who underwent subsequent RT for lesion enlargement or NLs during ICI therapy from two centers. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1- and 2-year local control (LC) rates, in-field PFS (IFPFS), out-field PFS (OFPFS), and safety. Results: The median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The median PFS was 7.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-11.7 months], and the median OS was 18.8 months (95% CI: 17.1-20.5 months). ORR and DCR were 38.9% and 72.2%, respectively. In addition, the median IFPFS was 17.8 months (95% CI: 11.5-24.2 months), median OFPFS was 7.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-12.5 months), and estimated 1- and 2-year LC rates were 67.1% and 31.9%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were diarrhea (33.3%), rash (30.6%), and malaise (27.8%); a total of 14 (38.9%) patients developed grade 3-4 AEs. Conclusions: Subsequent RT showed reliable antitumor effects and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced-stage HCC who had unsatisfactory response to ICI therapy; therefore, it could serve as an optional salvage strategy.

Lenvatinib with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) are presently lacking effective treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib with or without SBRT for HCC with PVTT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 37 patients treated with lenvatinib in combination with SBRT and 77 patients treated with lenvatinib alone from August 2018 to August 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic PFS (IHPFS) and objective remission rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups, while adverse events (AEs) was analyzed between the two groups to assess safety profiles. RESULTS: Median OS, PFS and IHPFS were significantly prolonged in the combination treatment group compared with the single treatment group (median OS, 19.3 vs. 11.2 months, p < 0.001; median PFS: 10.3 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001; median IHPFS, 10.7 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001). Moreover, a higher ORR (56.8% vs. 20.8%, P < 0.001) were observed in the lenvatinib combined with SBRT group. In subgroup analyses of Vp1-2 and Vp3-4 group, median OS, PFS and IHPFS were also significantly longer in the lenvatinib combined with SBRT group than those in the lenvatinib alone group. AEs in the combined therapy group were mostly manageable and the incidence was not statistically significant compared to the monotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib plus SBRT had a significantly better survival benefit than lenvatinib monotherapy in the treatment of HCC patients with PVTT and was well tolerated.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy with and without lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: Lack of evidence on the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our research compared the efficacy and safety of SBRT plus lenvatinib versus SBRT alone in clinical practice for the treatment of advanced HCC. METHODS: Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic PFS (IHPFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups. Additionally, safety profiles were also evaluated in the two groups. RESULTS: After PSM, 35 patients from each group were selected and the date was compared. Compared with the SBRT alone group, the median OS, PFS, and IHPFS were significantly prolonged in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (median OS 16.8 vs. 11.0 months, pOS = 0.043; median PFS 9.1 vs. 3.7 months, pPFS < 0.001; median IHPFS 9.5 vs. 4.2 months, pIHPFS = 0.004). The 6- and 12-month OS rates were 91.4% and 68.6% in the combined therapy group and 82.9% and 48.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 68.6% and 34.3% in the combined therapy group and 31.4% and 8.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. Furthermore, a higher ORR was observed in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (54.29% vs. 22.86%, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of patients with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) also had similar results. Moreover, most adverse events (AEs) were mild-to-moderate and manageable in the SBRT plus lenvatinib group. CONCLUSION: SBRT plus lenvatinib is expected to significantly improve OS, PFS, IHPFS, and ORR for patients with advanced HCC when compared to SBRT alone, with manageable adverse effects.

A multi-center retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of regorafenib vs. regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitors as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: At present, there are no definitive optimal treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following first-line treatment failure. To maximize the survival benefit of patients, we compared the combination therapy of regorafenib and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors with regorafenib monotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. Methods: Our multicenter retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors or regorafenib alone as a later-line therapy from May 2019 to January 2022. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Efficacy was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria, and safety was assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Results: A total of 133 patients were included in the study (regardless of first-line treatment), including 94 who received regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors and 39 who received regorafenib. The regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors group had a significantly higher ORR (25.53% vs. 10.26%, P=0.015), higher DCR (87.23% vs. 66.67%, P=0.006), and longer PFS (median 9.0 vs. 4.0 months, P<0.0001) than the regorafenib group. Meanwhile, the median OS (mOS) did not differ between the regorafenib plus PD-1 and regorafenib monotherapy groups {mOS, 14.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.0-16.0 months] vs. 12.0 months (95% CI, 10.0-22.0 months)}. There was no notable difference in the total incidence of treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) (71.79% vs. 78.72%, P=0.39) and the incidence of grade 3/4 serious adverse effects (5.13% vs. 18.09%, P=0.19) between the regorafenib monotherapy group and PD-1 inhibitors combination group. Conclusions: Compared with regorafenib alone, regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitors therapy increased PFS, ORR but did not improve OS, and can be used an option in second-line HCC therapy, regardless of first-line treatments. Regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitors is recommended as early as a second-line therapy to benefit patients. The combination regimen was as safe as regorafenib monotherapy for treatment of HCC in patients with compensated liver disease [Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) A/B].

New Staging Model for Radiation-based Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: A National Multicenter Study.

Background and Aims: The study aimed to create a new staging model for radiotherapy-based treatment for prognostic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) classification. Methods: The training cohort comprised 658 patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy and external validation cohort comprised 533 patients receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. We established a modified staging system as follows: stage I, solitary nodule without macrovascular invasion, or 2-3 nodules no more than 3.0 cm apart, and performance status (PS) 0-2 (Ia: ALBI-1 grade; Ib: ALBI-2 or 3 grade); stage II: 2-3 nodules with any one nodule more than 3.0-cm apart, or ≥4 nodules, and performance status 0-2 (IIa: ALBI-1 grade; IIb: ALBI-2 grade); stage III: macrovascular invasion, regional lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis, and performance status 0-2 (IIIa: ALBI-1 grade; IIIb: ALBI-2 grade); stage IV: performance status 3-4, or performance status 0-2 with ALBI-3 grade. We analyzed long-term overall survival based on different stages. Results: The staging model showed an excellent ability to discriminate patients according to four stages and seven substages with notably different curves in the training and validation cohort. The median survival decreased from stages I to IV with 63.0 months in stage I (not reached in Ia, and 53.0 months in Ib), 24.0 months in stage II (28.0 months in IIa, and 22.0 months in IIb), 11.0 months in stage III (18.0 months in IIIa, and 9.0 months in IIIb), and less than 9.0 months in stage IV in the training cohort. Conclusions: The modified staging model may provide an alternative for clinical radiation oncologists.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy as an effective local treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with inferior vena cava and right atrial tumor thrombus.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the curative effect and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with inferior vena cava (IVCTT) and right atrial tumor thrombus (RATT). METHODS: This retrospective study included fifteen advanced HCC patients with IVCTT and RATT who were treated with SBRT between 2013 and 2020. The prescribed dose delivered to the tumor was 45-50 Gy/7-10 fx. We report their treatment responses according to survival time and toxicities. RESULTS: For these patients, the median follow-up time was 15 months (2-52 months). Local tumor control rates of the treated area were 80% at the time of death or at the last follow-up. The 6-month, 12-month, 18-month and 24-month OS rates were 80.0%, 60.0%, 33.3% and 26.7%, respectively. None of these patients died from the toxicity outcomes and complications of SBRT. CONCLUSION: SBRT is an effective option for advanced HCC patients with IVCTT and RATT.

Clinical Values and Markers of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Information about radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients preexisting hepatitis B cirrhosis with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) extended to the main portal vein treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is still inadequate and the predictive markers for RILD have not been cleared in these patients. The aim of the study is to identify factors that can be used to predict RILD and to evaluate the influence of RILD in these patients. METHODS: In our study, 59 patients were analyzed and evaluated from December 2015 to June 2019, according to the entry criteria. After treatment, 59 patients were followed up within the first month and then every 3 months. Hematology test, tumor markers, three-phasic CT scan of the lungs, and CT or MRI scan of the liver were performed at each follow up. RESULTS: Median overall survival time was 10.7 months (range, 5.8 to 14.9). RILD appeared in 17 of the 59 patients (28.8%) at the 3rd month after SBRT. In the univariate analysis, not only the CP score class (A or B) but also each different pretreatment CP score (p < 0.05) was a significant predictive factor of RILD. More RILD cases were detected with the increase of CP score. The recovery rate decreased as the baseline CP score increased (p < 0.05). It was found that the overall survival time was affected by only baseline CP score and RILD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The development of RILD has a dependency on the CP score in these patients. CP scores before treatment and RILD are significantly associated with overall survival. SBRT is an effective and safe method for patients with CP ≤ B7. For patients with CP-B8, liver function should be monitored more frequently. It is not safe enough for the SBRT treatment in CP-B9 patients.

Hepatic Resection Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Plus Transhepatic Arterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are no comparative studies on the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) and CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (CK-SBRT) plus transhepatic arterial chemotherapy embolization (TACE) in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of HR and CK-SBRT+TACE in large HCC. METHODS: A total of one hundred and sixteen patients were selected from November 2011 to December 2016. Among them, 50 were allocated to the CK-SBRT+TACE group and 66 were allocated to the HR group. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Propensity score matching was performed to control for baseline differences between the groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six paired patients were selected from the CK-SBRT+TACE and HR groups. After propensity score matching, the 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 83.3%, 77.8% and 66.7% in the HR group and 80.6%, 72.2% and 52.8% in the CK-SBRT+TACE group, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates were 71.6%, 57.3% and 42.3% in the HR group and 66.1%, 45.8% and 39.3% in the CK-SBRT+TACE group, respectively (OS: p=0.143; PFS: p=0.445). Both a high platelet count and low alpha-fetoprotein value were revealed as influencing factors in improving OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: CK-SBRT+TACE brought local effects that were similar to those of HR in HCC patients with a large and single lesion. Moreover, the liver injury occurrence rate was acceptable in both groups.

The effects of stereotactic body radiotherapy on peripheral natural killer and CD3+CD56+ NKT-like cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Both natural killer (NK) and CD3+CD56+natural killer T (NKT)-like cells play critical roles in the antitumor response. This study aimed to explore the effects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on peripheral NK and NKT-like cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to identify possible surface markers on these cells that correlate with the prognosis. METHODS: Twenty-five HCC patients were prospectively enrolled in our study, and 10 healthy individuals were served as healthy controls. Flow cytometry was used to determine the counts and the percentages of peripheral NK and NKT-like cells, cells with certain receptors, and cells with intracellular interferon-γ and TNF-α secretion at different time points, including time points of prior to SBRT, at post-SBRT, and 3-month and 6-month after treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was applied for survival analysis. RESULTS: The peripheral NKT-like cells was increased at post-SBRT. Meanwhile, elevated levels of inhibitory receptors and reduced levels of activating receptors of NK cells were also observed in NK cells at post-SBRT, but the levels was not significantly different at 3-month and 6-month as compared with the baseline levels. Lower percentage of NKp30+NK cells before SBRT and higher percentage of CD158b+NK cells after SBRT were associated with poor progression-free survival. In addition, higher percentage of CD3+CD56+ NKT-like cells was associated with a higher overall survival rate in HCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT has an apparent effect on both peripheral NK and CD3+CD56+NKT-like cells. Lower percentage of NKp30+NK cells before SBRT and higher percentage of CD158b+NK cells after SBRT are correlated with poor patients' PFS. Higher percentage of CD3+CD56+ NKT-like cells is associated with higher OS in HCC patients.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 5 cm): a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (CK-SBRT) has been applied to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients for several years. The study aim was to compare the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) and CK-SBRT in naive small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) patients with hepatitis virus-related cirrhosis using a 5-year follow-up study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 317 naive sHCC patients (246 men and 71 women) with hepatitis B or C virus cirrhosis who were treated with HR (n = 195) or CK-SBRT (n = 122) from November 2011 to December 2015. Cumulative overall survival (OS) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: After the propensity score-matched analysis, 104 patients were selected from each group for further analysis. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 96.2%, 89.4%, 85.5% and 70.7% in the HR group and 93.3%, 89.4%, 83.7% and 71.0% in the CK-SBRT group, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 78.8%, 64.3%, 56.4% and 47.3% in the HR group and 84.5%, 67.8%, 58.9% and 49.0% in the CK-SBRT group, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the OS and PFS rates (OS, p = 0.673; PFS, p = 0.350). No death occurred due to the toxicity or complications of HR or CK-SBRT. CONCLUSION: CK-SBRT could be an effective alternative to HR for sHCC naive patients with hepatitis-related cirrhosis, especially if patients have higher CP scores and lower PLT counts. PLT counts should be factored into survival evaluation of HCC treatment.

CyberKnife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as an Effective Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis.

Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate the curative effect and safety of CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy in treating decompensated cirrhosis hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods: From March 2011 to December 2015, 32 HCC patients who refused or were ineligible for other treatments were treated with CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy. Among these patients, 17 were Child-Pugh score 7 (53.13%), 7 were Child-Pugh score 8 (21.87%), 4 were Child-Pugh score 9 (12.50%), and 4 were Child-Pugh score 10 (12.50%). A total dose of 45-54 Gy in 5-10 fractions was given according to the location of lesions. Results: The median follow-up period was 30 months (8-46 months). By July 2019, the tumors were recurrent or metastasized in 17 patients. The overall survival rates of 1, 2, and 3 years were 84.4, 61.8, and 46.0%, respectively. After 1, 2, and 3 years, the local control rates were 92.9%. The progression-free survival rates of the 1, 2, and 3-year treatments were 73.8, 44.6, and 33.4%, respectively. Conclusions: CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy was an effective option for HCC patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The liver injury occurrence rate was acceptable in our study.

Biologically effective dose (BED) escalation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients (≤5 cm) with CyberKnife: protocol of study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the biologically effective dose and the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, and this study was conducted to explore the relation between BED and efficacy. METHODS: This study is designed as a mono-center study. The participants are randomized into three group, and received the following recommended schedule: 49Gy/7f, 54Gy/6f and 55Gy/5f with BED10 in correspondence to 83.3Gy, 102.6Gy and 115.5Gy. The primary outcome measures are to calculate local control rates (LC), overall survival rates (OS) and progression-free survival rates (PFS). The secondary outcome measures are to observe radiation-induced liver injury (RILD) rates, Child-Pugh score and indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) value before and after CK-SBRT. Moreover, gastrointestinal toxicities are also observed. DISCUSSION: There is no uniform standard for CK-SBRT dose schedule of hepatocellular carcinoma. We propose to conduct a study determining the optimal CK-SBRT schedule of hepatocellular carcinoma patients (≤5 cm). The trial protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of 302 Hospital of PLA (People's Liberation Army). The Ethics number is 2017111D. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Clinical trails number: NCT03295500. Date of registration: November, 2017.

Repeated CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To explore the survival and side effects of repeated CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (CK-SBRT) on hepatocellular carcinoma patients. METHODS: 24 HCC patients were collected at The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from November 2011 to July 2016. They received second-course CK-SBRT with a prescribed dose of 50(48-55) Gy/5-8fx, and a single dose of 10 (7-11) Gy/fx. Cumulative overall survival rates (OS), progression-free survival rates (PFS) and local control rates (LC) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: All patients finished their radiotherapy plans. The 1-,2- and 3-year cumulative OS rate were 95.8,81.1 and 60.8%. The 1-,2- and 3-year LC rate were 95.5,90.7 and 90.7%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS were 74.8, 49.2 and 39.4%, respectively. 16 patients complained of fatigue during second-course therapy, 2 patients showed Grade 2 gastrointestinal reaction, 1 patient was diagnosed radiation-induced liver disease and none died. PFS was significantly higher in the interval time < 12 months group than in the interval time ≥ 12 months group (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: It is preliminarily believed that re-CK-SBRT is an effective and safe treatment for HCC patients, but the treatment criteria should be strictly controlled.

Biologically effective dose (BED) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was an important factor of therapeutic efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (≤5 cm).

BACKGROUND: To explore the association between biologically effective dose (BED) and survival rates in Child-Pugh A classification (CP-A) small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: This retrospective study included 108 small HCC patients who were treated with SBRT between 2011 and 2014. The prescribed dose delivered to the tumor were 48Gy/8f, 49Gy/7f, 50Gy/5f and 54Gy/6f. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) of the total prescribed dose was 100Gy (76.8-102.6Gy). Factors associated with the survival rate were examined using the Cox proportion hazards model, and the factors associated with radiation-induced liver injury (RILD) were examined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: For these patients, the median follow-up time was 42 months (6-77 months), and the 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.3, 89.8 and 80.6%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 85.2, 70.1 and 60.6%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control (LC) rates were 98.1, 96.2 and 95.1%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year distant metastasis- free survival (DMFS) rates were 86.1, 72.8 and 61.2%. The OS, PFS and DMFS were significantly higher in the BED10 ≥ 100Gy group than in the BED10 < 100Gy group (OS: p = 0.020; PFS: p = 0.017; DMFS: p = 0.012). The PLT count was a predictive factor of RILD. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is a safe and effective option for CP-A HCC patients. A BED10 value greater than 100Gy and lower CP score are associated with improved OS and PFS. Additionally, the peripheral PLT count are predictive factors of RILD.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy as an effective and safe treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma(sHCC) who were ineligible for surgery or ablation therapies. METHODS: From March 2011 to December 2012, 28 cases with sHCC which were ineligible or refused surgical resection, transplantation or local ablation were treated with CyberKnife SBRT. Median size of tumors was 2.1 cm (range:1.1-3.0 cm), a dose of 10-15Gy per faction was given over 3-6 consecutive days, resulting in a total dose of 35-60Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 36 months, with the response rate of complete response (CR) in 17 cases, partial response (PR) in 8 cases, stable disease (SD) in 2 cases and progressive disease (PD) in one case. Overall response rate was 89.28%. Overall survival rates in 1, 2 and 3 years were 92.86, 85.71 and 78.57%, respectively. Local control rates in 1, 2 and 3 years were 96.43, 92.86 and 89.28%, respectively. No grade ≥ 3 hepatic toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: CyberKnife treatment was a safe and effective option for sHCC, which had shown good local control, high overall survival rates and low toxicity. CyberKnife SBRT could be served as an alternative treatment for patients with sHCC which is unsuitable for surgical treatment or local ablation.

Prevalence of psychological symptoms among Ebola survivors and healthcare workers during the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study.

The 2014-2015 Ebola epidemic was considered to be the largest and most complex outbreak, which caused 11,310 reported deaths. The epidemic disease can cause a mental health crisis, however, there is only a small amount of scientific literature available related to this health issue so far. We evaluated the psychological symptoms of 161 participants including Ebola survivors and healthcare workers in Sierra Leone, analyzed the impact of job classification, education level on psychological status. We found that the order of total general severity index (GSI) scores from high to low was EVD survivors, SL medical staff, SL logistic staff, SL medical students, and Chinese medical staff. There were 5 dimensions (obsession-compulsion, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, and paranoid ideation) extremely high in EVD survivors. GSI were associated with university education negatively. We believed our information is necessary to develop the comprehensive emergency response plan for emerging infectious disease outbreak.

Clinical presentations and outcomes of patients with Ebola virus disease in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

BACKGROUND: Clinical and laboratory data were collected and analysed from patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD) in Jui Government Hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone, where patients with EVD were received and/or treated from October 1, 2014 to March 21, 2015 during the West Africa EVD outbreak. METHODS: The study admitted 285 patients with confirmed EVD and followed them up till the endpoint (recovery or death). EVD was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR assays detecting blood Ebola virus (EBOV). RESULTS: Among the 285 lab-confirmed EVD cases in Jui Government Hospital, 146 recovered and 139 died, with an overall survival rate of 51.23 %. Patients under the age of 6 years had a lower survival rate (37.50 %). Most non-survivors (79.86 %) died within 7 days after admission and the mean hospitalization time for non-survivors was 5.56 ± 6.11 days. More than half survivors (63.69 %) turned blood EBOV negative within 3 weeks after admission and the mean hospitalization time for survivors was 20.38 ± 7.58 days. High blood viral load (≥106 copies/ml) was found to be predictive of the non-survival outcome as indicated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The probability of patients' survival was less than 15 % when blood viral load was greater than 106 copies/ml. Multivariate analyses showed that blood viral load (P = 0.005), confusion (P = 0.010), abdominal pain (P = 0.003), conjunctivitis (P = 0.035), and vomiting (P = 0.004) were factors independently associated with the outcomes of EVD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most death occurred within 1 week after admission, and patients at the age of 6 or younger had a lower survival rate. Most surviving patients turned blood EBOV negative within 1-4 weeks after admission. Factors such as high blood viral load, confusion, abdominal pain, vomiting and conjunctivitis were associated with poor prognosis for EVD patients.

Lower number and decreased function of natural killer cells in hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) refers to acute deterioration occurring in patients with chronic hepatitis B infected liver diseases. An abnormality in NK cells mediated cellular immunity is believed to be a contributing factor. We aimed to evaluate the characteristic of NK cells in the peripheral blood of HBV related ACLF. METHODS: Flow cytometric method was used to detect the absolute numbers and subgroups of NK cells, and analyze the cytotoxicity and killing ability of NK cells in patients with HBV-ACLF. RESULTS: The results showed that peripheral numbers of NK cells were decreased in patients with HBV-ACLF, but not statistically significant. The cytotoxic CD56dimCD16bright NK cells were significantly decreased in HBV infected patients, especially ACLF patients. The CD56brightCD16- subgroup was expanded in patients with CHB and the CD56dimCD16- subgroup was expanded in patients with ACLF. The activating receptors of NKG2D, NKp30, NKp44, and NKp46 were increased in patients with ACLF. The inhibitory receptors of CD158a were increased, though the CD158b was decreased in patients of ACLF. The function of NK cells including cytotoxicity and killing activity were both downregulated in patients with ACLF and CHB. Even if after IL-12/15 stimulation, INF-γ and TNF-α produced by patients with ACLF were still less than those produced by healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HBV-ACLF had lower numbers and decreased functions of cytotoxic NK cells.