Prognostic Factors Associated with Tumor Recurrence and Overall Survival in Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities in a Colombian Reference Cancer Center.

Introduction: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are low-incidence tumors whose clinical and histopathological factors are associated with adverse oncological outcomes. This study evaluated prognostic factors (PF) associated with tumor recurrence and overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with STS of the extremities, treated at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC), Bogotá, Colombia. Materials and Methods: An analytical observational study of a historical cohort was carried out, including patients diagnosed with STS and managed surgically in the Functional Unit for Breast and Soft Tissue Tumors of the INC from January 2008 to December 2018. Results: A total of 227 patients were included; 74.5% had tumors greater than 5 cm. Most patients (29.1%) were in stage IIIB at diagnosis. Age was associated with higher mortality (HR = 1.01; CI95%: 1-1.02; p = 0.048). Tumor persistence at admission to the INC (HR = 2.34; CI95%: 1.25-4.35; p = 0.007) and histologic grade III (HR = 5.36; CI95%: 2.29-12.56; p = <0.001) showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis for recurrence of any type, as did the PFs associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (HR = 2.85; CI95%: 1.23-6.57; p = 0.014 and HR = 6.09; CI95%: 2.03-18.2; p = 0.001), respectively. Tumor size (HR = 1.03; CI95%: 1-1.06; p = 0.015) and histologic grade III (HR = 4.53; CI95%: 1.42-14.49; p = 0.011) were associated with a higher risk of distant recurrence. Conclusions: This cohort showed that in addition to histologic grade and tumor size, tumor persistence at the time of admission has an impact on disease recurrence, so STS should be managed by a multidisciplinary team with experience in this pathology in high-volume reference centers.

Seguimiento de la paciente con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama. Revisión de la evidencia y abordaje terapéutico en el Instituto Nacionalde Cancerología - Colombia / Follow-up of the patient with breast cancer history. Review of the evidence and approach at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

Los supervivientes de cáncer se definen como aquellos individuos que han completado su tratamiento inicial y no tienen evidencia de la enfermedad. Para el caso de las pacientes supervivientes de cáncer de mama, el seguimiento involucra no sólo la vigilancia de la recaída locorregional y a distancia, así como la tamización de segundos primarios mamarios, sino también la evaluación de los efectos relacionados con las terapias recibidas. Hoy en día, existe controversia sobre cuál debe ser el método, la frecuencia, la duración y tipo de personal de la salud que realice el seguimiento de estas pacientes. Las guías de las distintas sociedades científicas muestran una variabilidad importante en las recomendaciones a este respecto. Este documento pretende revisar la mejor evidencia disponible sobre los procedimientos para la detección de la recaída locorregional, de las metástasis a distancia, de un segundo cáncer de mama contralateral y de los eventos adversos relacionados con los tratamientos para el cáncer de mama. Adicionalmente, se examinan los porcentajes y sitios de recidiva tumoral con relación al estadio clínico y a la biología tumoral

Cancer survivors are defined as those individuals who have completed their initial treatment and have no evidence of disease. In the case of breast cancer survivors, follow-up involves not only surveillance of locoregional and distant relapse, as well as screening for second primary breast cancers, but also evaluation of the effects related to the therapies received. Nowadays, there is controversy about what should be the method, the frequency, the duration and the type of health personnel that carry out the follow-up of these patients. The guides of the different scientific societies show a significant variability in the recommendations in this regard. This document aims to review the best available evidence on procedures for the detection of locoregional relapse, distant metastases, contralateral second breast cancer, and adverse events related to breast cancer treatments. Additionally, the percentages and sites of tumor recurrence are examined in relation to clinical stage and tumor biology

Factors Associated with Time to Progression and Overall Survival in Patients with De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Colombian Cohort.

PURPOSE: About 10% of breast cancer (BC) is diagnosed in stage IV. This study sought to identify factors associated with time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC), from a single cancer center in Colombia, given that information on this aspect is limited. METHODOLOGY: An observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study was carried out. Time to progression and OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival functions. Cox models were developed to assess association between time to progression and time to death, using a group of fixed variables. RESULTS: Overall, 175 patients were included in the study; 33.7% of patients had luminal B HER2-negative tumors, 49.7% had bone involvement, and 83.4% had multiple metastatic sites. Tumor biology and primary tumor surgery were the variables associated with TTP and OS. Patients with luminal A tumors had the lowest progression and mortality rates (10 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 5.0-20.0) and 12.6 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 6.9-22.7), respectively), and patients with triple-negative tumors had the highest progression and mortality rates (40 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 23.2-68.8) and 44.1 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 28.1-69.1), respectively). Across the cohort, the median TTP was 2.1 years (95% CI: 1.6; the upper limit cannot be reached) and the median OS was 2.4 years (95% CI: 2-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, patients with luminal A tumors and those who underwent tumor surgery given that they presented clinical benefit (CB) after initial systemic treatment, had the lowest progression and mortality rates. Overall, OS was inferior to other series due to high tumor burden and difficulties in accessing and continuing oncological treatments.