Safety and self-reported efficacy of botulinum toxin for adult spasticity in current clinical practice: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and the self-reported efficacy of botulinum toxin injections for adult spasticity in current clinical practice. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: A total of 406 adult patients with focal spasticity received of 1136 series botulinum toxin injections at Bordeaux University Hospital from January 2007 to December 2009. METHODS: Adverse events following botulinum toxin injections were reported. Their severity and the therapeutic efficacy of botulinum toxin injections were estimated with a four-point self-reporting scale (0 to 3). Latency and duration of adverse events and subjective improvement were also noted. RESULTS: The data of 640 series of injections were analyzed. Forty-six (7.2%) adverse events were reported, of which 36 (78%) were local. There were 18 (39%) cases of local muscular weakness with an average duration of 30.0 (SD 38.2) days, and an average severity score of 1.0 (SD 0.97). Among systemic adverse events, there were 8 (17%) cases of excessive fatigue without global muscular weakness and 2 (4%) cases of transitory generalized muscular weakness. The average subjective improvement score was 1.89 (SD 0.97) and was higher for upper, than for lower, limbs (P=0.007). CONCLUSION: Self-reported adverse events following botulinum toxin injections in spasticity are rare, often benign and of short duration in current clinical practice. Botulinum toxin is considered effective by patients in treating spasticity of the upper and lower limbs.

Botulinum toxin treatment in neurological practice: how much does it really cost? A prospective cost-effectiveness study.

Botulinum toxin (BTA) is a safe and effective therapeutic tool for many neurological conditions but few studies have investigated its real cost in neurological practice. We evaluated the daily cost of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) treatment through a cost effectiveness analysis alongside a prospective study of BTA injections at a French University Hospital over a 2-year follow-up period. The data of 3,108 BTA injections performed in 870 adult patients presenting with dystonia, facial hemispasm, or spasticity were entered in the database. Patients were questioned at each visit about the subjective effectiveness of the previous injection. The daily cost of BTA treatment was calculated as the ratio of each session's cost (including all additional costs) to the duration of subjective efficacy. The subjective rating of efficacy duration was 17.3 ± 7.7 weeks for facial hemispasm, 15.4 ± 7.7 for blepharospasm, 14.3 ± 6.7 for cervical dystonia, 14.5 ± 7.8 and 14.1 ± 7.4 weeks for upper and lower limb spasticity, respectively. The daily cost of BTA injections was 0.57 ± 0.20 for facial hemispasm, 0.95 ± 0.30 for blepharospasm, 2.85 ± 0.86 for cervical dystonia, 3.38 ± 1.49 and 3.62 ± 1.81 for upper and lower limb spasticity, respectively. When associated costs were considered, the daily cost of BTA injections was clearly increased (45-93%) in limb spasticity or rigidity but remained only modestly increased (15-37%) in other indications. These results obtained in a large cohort of patients show that BTA treatment has a low daily cost for a long-lasting effect, with a daily cost/benefit ratio that greatly depends on the indications.