Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Br J Radiol ; 85(1017): e654-60, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22919015

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In radiotherapy, delineation uncertainties are important as they contribute to systematic errors and can lead to geographical miss of the target. For margin computation, standard deviations (SDs) of all uncertainties must be included as SDs. The aim of this study was to quantify the interobserver delineation variation for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung tumours using a cross-sectional study design. METHODS: 22 consecutive patients with 26 tumours were included. Positron emission tomography/CT scans were acquired for planning of SBRT. Three oncologists and three radiologists independently delineated the gross tumour volume. The interobserver variation was calculated as a mean of multiple SDs of distances to a reference contour, and calculated for the transversal plane (SD(trans)) and craniocaudal (CC) direction (SD(cc)) separately. Concordance indexes and volume deviations were also calculated. RESULTS: Median tumour volume was 13.0 cm(3), ranging from 0.3 to 60.4 cm(3). The mean SD(trans) was 0.15 cm (SD 0.08 cm) and the overall mean SD(cc) was 0.26 cm (SD 0.15 cm). Tumours with pleural contact had a significantly larger SD(trans) than tumours surrounded by lung tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver delineation variation was very small in this systematic cross-sectional analysis, although significantly larger in the CC direction than in the transversal plane, stressing that anisotropic margins should be applied. This study is the first to make a systematic cross-sectional analysis of delineation variation for peripheral lung tumours referred for SBRT, establishing the evidence that interobserver variation is very small for these tumours.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Radiocirurgia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 188(8): 671-6, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22580623

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Methods to estimate the likely origin of recurrences after radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are compared. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 25 patients meeting the following inclusion criteria were randomly selected: curatively intended intensity-modulated radiotherapy planned on a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) scan during the period 2005-2009; squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx; complete clinical response followed by locoregional recurrence; and a CT scan at recurrence before any salvage therapy. Exclusion criteria were previous cancer in the area, surgery prior to radiotherapy, or a synchronous cancer. Three methods of estimating focal points of recurrence origin and two volume overlap methods assigning the recurrences to the most central target volumes encompassing at least 50% or 95% of the recurrence volumes were tested. Treatment planning and recurrence scans were rigid and deformable co-registered in order to transfer focal points to the treatment planning scan. Double determinations of all volumes, points, and co-registrations were made. RESULTS: The volume overlap methods assigned the recurrences to significantly more peripheral target volumes than focal methods (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons of 95% overlap vs. focal methods, p < 0.028 for all comparisons of 50% overlap vs. focal methods). Repeated registrations of the same point had higher reproducibility with deformable registration than with rigid registration (median distance 0.31 vs. 0.35 cm, p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed among the focal methods. CONCLUSION: Significant differences between methods were found which may affect strategies to improve radiotherapy based on pattern of failure analyses.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Otorrinolaringológicas/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Quimiorradioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Masculino , Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Neoplasias Bucais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , Imagem Multimodal , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/patologia , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Otorrinolaringológicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Otorrinolaringológicas/patologia , Neoplasias Otorrinolaringológicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Faríngeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Faríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Faríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Faríngeas/cirurgia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Terapia de Salvação , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Carga Tumoral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA